Conversational Japanese Quiz: Discussing Availability
10 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Discussing AvailabilityQuestion 1 of 10

Natsuki leaves a voicemail: 「もしもし、田中さん。来週の火曜日か水曜日に少しお時間をいただけますか？火曜日は午後なら大丈夫です。水曜日は午前中のほうがありがたいです。ご都合のよいほうをお知らせください。よろしくお願いします。」Tanaka-san can only meet in the morning on both Tuesday and Wednesday next week.

Given Tanaka-san's constraint, which day and time should Tanaka-san propose, and why is the other option unavailable?

Tanaka-san should propose Wednesday afternoon, because Natsuki preferred Wednesday mornings and Tanaka-san must accommodate Natsuki's schedule as the one who initiated the request.
Tanaka-san should propose Tuesday morning, because morning is Tanaka-san's only availability and Tuesday comes before Wednesday, making it the more efficient choice.
Tanaka-san should propose either day in the morning, because Natsuki expressed flexibility by offering two days and Tanaka-san's morning preference overrides Natsuki's stated time preferences.
Tanaka-san should propose Wednesday morning, because Natsuki preferred the morning on Wednesday, and Tuesday morning is unavailable since Natsuki only offered Tuesday afternoon.
← Back to quizzes

Conversational Japanese Quiz

Conversational Japanese Quiz: Discussing Availability

Practice Discussing Availability in Conversational Japanese with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Discussing Availability, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Conversational Japanese.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

Natsuki leaves a voicemail: 「もしもし、田中さん。来週の火曜日か水曜日に少しお時間をいただけますか？火曜日は午後なら大丈夫です。水曜日は午前中のほうがありがたいです。ご都合のよいほうをお知らせください。よろしくお願いします。」Tanaka-san can only meet in the morning on both Tuesday and Wednesday next week.

Given Tanaka-san's constraint, which day and time should Tanaka-san propose, and why is the other option unavailable?

  1. Tanaka-san should propose Wednesday afternoon, because Natsuki preferred Wednesday mornings and Tanaka-san must accommodate Natsuki's schedule as the one who initiated the request.
  2. Tanaka-san should propose Tuesday morning, because morning is Tanaka-san's only availability and Tuesday comes before Wednesday, making it the more efficient choice.
  3. Tanaka-san should propose either day in the morning, because Natsuki expressed flexibility by offering two days and Tanaka-san's morning preference overrides Natsuki's stated time preferences.
  4. Tanaka-san should propose Wednesday morning, because Natsuki preferred the morning on Wednesday, and Tuesday morning is unavailable since Natsuki only offered Tuesday afternoon. (correct answer)
Explanation: When reading scheduling passages in Japanese, your job is to match each person's availability carefully — not just one side. Natsuki's voicemail offers two options with specific time conditions: Tuesday is only available in the afternoon (「火曜日は午後なら大丈夫です」), and Wednesday is preferred in the morning (「水曜日は午前中のほうがありがたいです」). Tanaka-san, meanwhile, can only meet in the morning on both days. This means the correct answer is D. The only overlap between Natsuki's conditions and Tanaka-san's constraint is Wednesday morning — Natsuki explicitly preferred mornings on Wednesday, and that's when Tanaka-san is free. Tuesday is unavailable because Natsuki only offered Tuesday afternoon, which falls outside Tanaka-san's morning-only availability. A is wrong because it invents a rule that the requester's schedule automatically takes priority — no such rule exists here. More importantly, Wednesday afternoon was never offered by Natsuki at all, making it an entirely invalid option. B is tempting because Tuesday comes first and morning fits Tanaka-san, but it ignores the key constraint: Natsuki didn't offer Tuesday morning. Efficiency is irrelevant when the time slot was never on the table. C incorrectly assumes Tanaka-san's preference "overrides" Natsuki's stated times. In reality, both parties' conditions must be satisfied simultaneously — you can't ignore one side. As a study tip: in scheduling questions, always map out who said what about which day and time, then find the single slot where both people's conditions align. Overlooking one person's restrictions is the most common trap.

Question 2

Mia asks her Japanese tutor: 「来週、授業はできますか？」The tutor replies: 「月曜日と火曜日は午前中だけ空いています。水曜日は一日空いています。木曜日と金曜日はちょっと…。」Mia says: 「じゃあ、火曜日の午後2時はどうですか？」

What is the most likely outcome of Mia's proposal, and why?

  1. The tutor will likely decline, because the tutor said Monday and Tuesday are only free in the morning, and 2:00 PM falls in the afternoon. (correct answer)
  2. The tutor will likely accept, because Tuesday is one of the days the tutor mentioned as available, and 2:00 PM is a reasonable afternoon time.
  3. The tutor will likely suggest Wednesday instead, because the tutor already signaled full availability that day, making it the preferred option over a partial day.
  4. The tutor will likely decline and propose Monday morning, because Monday was mentioned before Tuesday and the tutor prefers to schedule earlier in the week.
Explanation: When reading Japanese conversations, pay close attention to time qualifiers — words like だけ ("only") and 午前中 ("morning/AM hours") are critical clues that restrict availability, not just signal it. Here, the tutor says 「月曜日と火曜日は午前中だけ空いています」— meaning Monday and Tuesday are free only in the morning. Then Mia proposes 火曜日の午後2時 — Tuesday at 2:00 PM, which is afternoon. Since 午後 (afternoon) falls outside the tutor's stated window of 午前中 (morning), the tutor will most likely decline. That makes A the correct answer — the conflict between 午前中だけ and 午後2時 is the key. B is the most tempting trap: Tuesday was mentioned as available, but you must catch that だけ restricts it to mornings only. Ignoring that qualifier leads directly to this mistake. C is plausible reasoning — Wednesday truly is fully open — but the question asks about the outcome of Mia's specific proposal, not what the tutor might suggest afterward. There's no evidence the tutor would proactively redirect to Wednesday rather than simply declining the Tuesday afternoon slot. D invents logic entirely; nothing in the tutor's words implies a preference for scheduling "earlier in the week," and Monday was not proposed by Mia at all. As a study strategy, always flag scope-limiting words like だけ, しか, and time nouns like 午前中 vs. 午後 when reading Japanese scheduling conversations. These small words carry the entire meaning of availability.

Question 3

Tanaka-san calls his friend and says: 「今週末は空いてる？土曜日か日曜日に会いたいんだけど。」His friend replies: 「土曜日の午前中は空いてるけど、午後からバイトがあって。日曜日は朝から晩まで家族と出かけるんだ。」Tanaka-san says: 「じゃあ、土曜日の10時はどう？」His friend says: 「いいよ！」

Which of the following best describes the friend's availability and why Saturday morning at 10:00 was the only viable option this weekend?

  1. The friend is free Saturday morning but works Saturday afternoon, and is occupied all day Sunday with family, making Saturday morning the only available window across both days. (correct answer)
  2. The friend is free all day Saturday but has a family event Sunday morning, so Saturday at 10:00 was chosen simply because it is earlier in the weekend and more convenient.
  3. The friend is free Sunday morning but busy Sunday afternoon, so Saturday at 10:00 was suggested as an alternative since Sunday afternoon did not work for Tanaka-san.
  4. The friend is free both Saturday and Sunday mornings but prefers Saturday, so 10:00 on Saturday was selected based on personal preference rather than schedule constraints.
Explanation: When reading Japanese dialogue questions like this, your job is to carefully track who is free when — the conversation contains overlapping schedule details that are easy to mix up under pressure. The friend's schedule breaks down clearly from the dialogue. On Saturday (土曜日), the friend says 「午前中は空いてる」— free in the morning — but then 「午後からバイトがあって」— has a part-time job starting in the afternoon. On Sunday (日曜日), the friend says 「朝から晩まで家族と出かけるんだ」— out with family from morning until night, meaning completely unavailable. This leaves exactly one open window across the entire weekend: Saturday morning. Tanaka-san's suggestion of 10:00 on Saturday fits perfectly within that window, which is why the friend immediately agrees with 「いいよ！」. This confirms A is correct. B is wrong because the friend is not free all day Saturday — the afternoon is blocked by work (バイト). Saying Saturday was chosen for "convenience" ignores the real schedule constraint. C is wrong because it reverses the days. The friend is not free Sunday morning — the dialogue explicitly says Sunday is busy 「朝から晩まで」, from morning to night. D is wrong because the friend is not free Sunday at all, so this was never a choice between two available mornings. Saturday morning wasn't a preference — it was the only option. As a study habit, when you see schedule-based comprehension questions in Japanese, underline the time expressions (午前中、午後から、朝から晩まで) — they carry the critical information and are common sources of traps.

Question 4

A manager sends this message to her team: 「今週は月曜日と水曜日にミーティングがあります。来週は木曜日だけです。再来週はまだ未定です。」A new employee, Kenji, needs to find a day with NO scheduled meetings to work quietly. He is only available on weekdays.

If Kenji wants to find a meeting-free day as soon as possible within the next two weeks (this week and next week), which day should he choose?

  1. This week on Tuesday, Thursday, or Friday — any of these days this week have no scheduled meetings and come before next week's free days. (correct answer)
  2. Next week on Thursday, because that is the only day next week with a confirmed meeting, so Kenji should schedule around it and use it as a planning anchor.
  3. This week on Wednesday, because the manager mentioned Wednesday as one of two meeting days, meaning the other days that week must be free.
  4. Next week on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, or Friday — these days next week are meeting-free, but they come later than the available days this week.
Explanation: When reading Japanese scheduling messages, your job is to track which days have meetings and which week they fall in — then apply any additional conditions from the question, like "as soon as possible." The manager's message breaks down clearly: 今週 (this week) has meetings on 月曜日 (Monday) and 水曜日 (Wednesday). 来週 (next week) has a meeting only on 木曜日 (Thursday). That means this week's free weekdays are 火曜日 (Tuesday), 木曜日 (Thursday), and 金曜日 (Friday). Next week's free weekdays are Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, and Friday. Since Kenji wants a meeting-free day as soon as possible, he should look at this week first. Tuesday, Thursday, and Friday this week are all confirmed free — and they all come before any day next week. That makes A the correct answer. It correctly identifies all three available days this week and notes they come sooner than next week's options. B is a trap: it misreads 来週は木曜日だけ as meaning Thursday is free, but だけ here means "only Thursday has a meeting." Thursday next week is actually the one busy day. C misapplies the logic from this week — yes, Wednesday is mentioned as a meeting day, but the conclusion "other days must be free" accidentally ignores Monday, which also has a meeting. The sentence lists two meeting days. D correctly identifies next week's free days but fails the "as soon as possible" condition, since this week's free days come first. Watch out for だけ — it means "only," and in a scheduling context, it limits what has meetings, not what is free.

Question 5

Riku wants to politely decline an invitation for this Saturday while leaving the door open for a future meeting. Which response best accomplishes BOTH goals simultaneously?

  1. 「今週の土曜日はちょっと都合が悪くて…。来週の土曜日も難しいかもしれません。」
  2. 「今週の土曜日はちょっと都合が悪くて…。また今度お願いします。」
  3. 「今週の土曜日はちょっと都合が悪くて…。来週以降でしたら、ぜひ！」 (correct answer)
  4. 「今週の土曜日はちょっと都合が悪くて…。今週の日曜日はいかがでしょうか？」
Explanation: When declining an invitation politely in Japanese, you need to accomplish two things at once: soften the refusal and signal genuine openness to meeting another time. This question tests whether you can identify phrasing that truly does both simultaneously, not just one or the other. The first half of every option — 「今週の土曜日はちょっと都合が悪くて…」("This Saturday is a little inconvenient for me...") — handles the soft decline nicely. The 「ちょっと」softens the refusal, and the trailing 「…」leaves it open-ended rather than blunt. The real difference is in the second clause. Option C, 「来週以降でしたら、ぜひ！」("If it's from next week onward, absolutely!"), achieves both goals perfectly. It proposes a concrete timeframe for a future meeting and expresses enthusiasm with 「ぜひ」, making the invitation feel warm and sincere rather than like a polite brush-off. Option A fails because its second sentence — 「来週の土曜日も難しいかもしれません」("Next week might also be difficult") — actually closes the door further instead of opening it, signaling unavailability rather than future interest. Option B uses 「また今度お願いします」("Let's do it another time"), which sounds vague and formulaic. In Japanese social contexts, this phrase is often understood as a soft permanent decline, not a genuine proposal — so it doesn't truly leave the door open. Option D sidesteps the future-meeting goal entirely by only suggesting this Sunday, which doesn't address the spirit of planning ahead. When you see refusal + future-openness questions, look for the answer that includes both a softened "no" and a specific, enthusiastic alternative. Vague phrases like 「また今度」are often Japanese social "soft nos" — a crucial cultural nuance to remember.

Question 6

Conversation between two coworkers: A: 「今日の夕方、少し時間ありますか？」 B: 「今日はちょっと…。明日はどうですか？」 A: 「明日の午前中はいいんですが、午後は会議があって。」 B: 「じゃあ、明日の午前10時はどうでしょう？」 A: 「すみません、明日の10時から11時まで別の予定が入っていて。」 B: 「11時半はどうですか？」 A: 「大丈夫です！」

At what time did the two coworkers agree to meet, and which constraints made all earlier proposed times impossible?

  1. They agreed on 11:30 AM tomorrow. Today's evening was unavailable for A, tomorrow morning was unavailable for A, and 10:00 AM was rejected because B had a conflict at that time.
  2. They agreed on 11:30 AM tomorrow. Today's evening was unavailable for B, tomorrow afternoon has a meeting for A, and tomorrow at 10:00 AM conflicts with A's existing appointment until 11:00 AM. (correct answer)
  3. They agreed on 10:00 AM tomorrow. B suggested this time and A initially hesitated but ultimately agreed after B confirmed the meeting room was available.
  4. They agreed on 11:30 AM tomorrow. Today's evening was unavailable for B, tomorrow at 10:00 AM was unavailable for B, and A's afternoon meeting prevented a later time.
Explanation: When reading a dialogue-based comprehension question in Japanese, your job is to track who said what, and why each proposed time was rejected. Map each speaker's constraints carefully before choosing an answer. Walking through the conversation: B is unavailable today evening ("今日はちょっと…"), which eliminates that slot. Tomorrow afternoon is blocked for A because of a meeting ("午後は会議があって"). B then proposes 10:00 AM tomorrow, but A already has an existing appointment from 10:00 to 11:00 ("10時から11時まで別の予定が入っていて"). Finally, B offers 11:30 AM ("11時半"), and A agrees ("大丈夫です！"). This makes B the correct answer — it accurately identifies all three constraints and the final agreed time. A is wrong because it misattributes the evening conflict: it was B who was unavailable tonight, not A. It also incorrectly claims B had a conflict at 10:00 AM — the text clearly shows it was A with that scheduling problem. C is entirely wrong on the agreed time. They did not settle on 10:00 AM, and the detail about a "meeting room confirmation" is completely fabricated — nothing in the passage mentions it. D is wrong because it claims A's afternoon meeting prevented choosing a later time, implying 11:30 AM is somehow "afternoon." In Japanese scheduling context, 11時半 is still late morning, and A's "午後" meeting doesn't conflict with it. The constraint logic is muddled. As a study strategy, always read Japanese dialogues with a simple table in mind: list each proposed time and note whose conflict rejected it. This prevents the classic trap of swapping A and B's roles.

Question 7

Keiko is trying to schedule a phone call with her overseas contact, who wrote: 「I'm available Monday through Wednesday next week, but only after 3 PM my time. Thursday and Friday I'm in meetings all day.」Keiko lives 14 hours ahead of her contact. She prefers to make the call during her own working hours (9 AM–6 PM).

Considering the time difference, on which days and during what local time can Keiko call her contact while both are available during their respective preferred hours?

  1. Monday through Wednesday (Keiko's time), calling between 5:00 AM and 8:00 AM her time — but this falls outside Keiko's 9 AM–6 PM working hours, so there is no overlap on those days.
  2. Monday through Wednesday, calling at 5:00 PM Keiko's time — this corresponds to 3:00 AM her contact's time, which is before the contact's available window and does not satisfy the after-3 PM requirement.
  3. There is no suitable overlap: the contact's 3 PM availability corresponds to 5:00 AM Keiko's time (outside her working hours), and Keiko's 9 AM corresponds to 7:00 PM the previous day for the contact (before the contact's window opens). (correct answer)
  4. Thursday or Friday (Keiko's time), calling at 9:00 AM her time — this corresponds to 7:00 PM the previous day for the contact, satisfying the after-3 PM condition.
Explanation: When tackling time-difference scheduling problems, your goal is to find a window where both people are simultaneously available — which means converting one person's availability into the other's local time and checking for overlap. Here's the key conversion: Keiko is 14 hours ahead, so to find what Keiko's time corresponds to for her contact, subtract 14 hours. Conversely, the contact's 3 PM availability becomes 3 PM + 14 hours = 5 AM Keiko's time (next day). Since Keiko's working hours are 9 AM–6 PM, 5 AM falls well outside her window. Now check the other direction: Keiko's earliest availability, 9 AM, corresponds to 9 AM − 14 hours = 7 PM the previous day for her contact — before the contact's 3 PM window even opens the next day. No matter how you slice it, the available windows never overlap. That makes C correct. A is actually on the right track with the 5 AM calculation, but then incorrectly implies there's still some partial solution to explore on those days — there isn't, because no overlap exists at all. B makes a critical directional error: adding 14 hours instead of subtracting, producing a nonsensical 3 AM contact-time result. D confuses the contact's Thursday/Friday blackout (meetings all day) with Keiko's Thursday/Friday — the contact is unavailable those days regardless of time-zone math. A useful strategy: always draw a two-row timeline — one row per person — and mark each person's available blocks before attempting any conversion. Overlap (or the lack of it) becomes immediately visible and prevents directional errors like the one in B.

Question 8

Yuki and her colleague Hiro are trying to schedule a meeting. Yuki says: 「今日の午後はちょっと…。明日の午前中はどうですか？」Hiro replies: 「明日の午前中は予定があります。来週の月曜日はどうでしょう？」Yuki responds: 「月曜日は一日中ダメです。火曜日の午後2時はいかがですか？」Hiro says: 「それで大丈夫です。」

Based on the conversation, when did Yuki and Hiro finally agree to meet?

  1. Tomorrow morning, because Hiro was the one who suggested it and Yuki did not explicitly refuse it in her final response.
  2. Next week on Tuesday afternoon at 2:00, because both parties worked through all unavailable times and agreed on this slot. (correct answer)
  3. Next week on Monday, because Hiro suggested Monday and Yuki's mention of Tuesday came before confirming any time.
  4. Today in the afternoon, because Yuki's initial hesitation was resolved once Hiro confirmed his schedule for the week.
Explanation: When reading a scheduling conversation in Japanese, your job is to track each proposed time slot and note whether it was accepted or rejected before moving on. Follow the negotiation step by step rather than assuming the first or last suggestion automatically wins. In this conversation, Yuki opens by hesitating about today's afternoon (「ちょっと…」signals polite refusal), then proposes tomorrow morning. Hiro rejects that with 「予定があります」(I have plans) and counter-proposes next Monday. Yuki then says Monday is completely unavailable (「一日中ダメです」), and offers Tuesday afternoon at 2:00 (「火曜日の午後2時はいかがですか？」). Hiro responds with 「それで大丈夫です」— "That works for me." This confirms Tuesday afternoon at 2:00 as the agreed meeting time, making B correct. A is wrong because tomorrow morning was explicitly rejected by Hiro with 「予定があります」— it never moved forward in the negotiation. C misreads the sequence: Hiro suggested Monday, but Yuki clearly rejected it with 「ダメです」before proposing Tuesday. Monday was never confirmed. D is completely unsupported — today's afternoon was Yuki's first hesitation, and the entire conversation moves away from it; Hiro never confirmed anything about today. A useful strategy: in Japanese scheduling dialogues, watch for rejection markers like 「ちょっと」, 「ダメです」, and 「予定があります」, and look for acceptance phrases like 「大丈夫です」or 「それでいいです」to identify the final agreed slot — not just the most recently mentioned one.

Question 9

A student studying Japanese reads the phrase 「来週のいつかで大丈夫です」in a scheduling conversation. Which interpretation of this phrase is most accurate in context?

  1. The speaker is expressing uncertainty about whether next week will work at all, using 「いつか」to signal that the schedule is still being decided.
  2. The speaker is available only on weekdays next week, since 「いつか」in scheduling contexts typically excludes weekends by convention.
  3. The speaker is suggesting a specific but unnamed day next week, and the listener is expected to guess which day the speaker prefers.
  4. The speaker is flexible and open to any day next week, indicating broad availability without specifying a particular day or time. (correct answer)
Explanation: When reading Japanese scheduling phrases, the key is understanding how 「いつか」functions grammatically and contextually. This word is a compound of 「いつ」(when) and the indefinite suffix 「か」, which creates an open-ended, unspecified meaning — "sometime" or "some day." Recognizing this pattern unlocks many similar expressions in Japanese. In 「来週のいつかで大丈夫です」, the speaker is saying "Sometime next week is fine." The phrase uses 「大丈夫です」(it's okay/fine) to express acceptance and flexibility, and 「いつか」to leave the specific day open. This makes D correct — the speaker is broadly available any day next week without committing to a particular one. A misreads 「いつか」as expressing doubt or hesitation about whether next week works at all. That meaning would require different phrasing, such as 「来週は難しいかもしれません」or similar hedging language. B introduces a false convention about weekday exclusivity — no such grammatical or cultural rule applies here. 「いつか」carries no implication about weekends versus weekdays. C suggests the speaker has a hidden preference the listener must guess, which contradicts both the grammar and the tone of 「大丈夫です」, a phrase used to signal ease and openness, not ambiguity with an unstated preference. A useful study tip: watch for the 「か」suffix in Japanese question words — 「だれか」(someone), 「どこか」(somewhere), 「なにか」(something), 「いつか」(sometime). These all signal indefiniteness, not uncertainty or secrecy. Memorizing this pattern will help you decode many natural conversation phrases quickly.

Question 10

A student wants to express that she is NOT available next Wednesday but IS available the Wednesday after that. Which sentence most accurately conveys both pieces of information in natural Japanese?

  1. 「来週の水曜日はちょっと都合が悪いんですが、再来週の水曜日でしたらよろしいです。」 (correct answer)
  2. 「来週の水曜日はちょっと都合が悪いんですが、来週の木曜日でしたらよろしいです。」
  3. 「今週の水曜日はちょっと都合が悪いんですが、来週の水曜日でしたらよろしいです。」
  4. 「来週の水曜日はちょっと都合が悪いんですが、来週の水曜日の午後でしたらよろしいです。」
Explanation: When scheduling in Japanese, two key vocabulary words are essential: 来週 (らいしゅう, "next week") and 再来週 (さらいしゅう, "the week after next"). Confusing these — or mixing up days — is exactly what this question tests. The student's situation is clear: next Wednesday is bad, but the Wednesday after that is fine. That "Wednesday after next Wednesday" is 再来週の水曜日 — two Wednesdays from now. The phrase structure 「〜はちょっと都合が悪いんですが、〜でしたらよろしいです」is a natural, polite way to decline one time while offering an alternative. Answer A uses this structure perfectly: 来週の水曜日 (unavailable) → 再来週の水曜日 (available). This is the correct answer. Answer B goes wrong by suggesting 来週の木曜日 (next Thursday) as the alternative — that's a different day entirely, not the Wednesday two weeks out. Answer C swaps the timeline entirely, saying this week's Wednesday is bad and next week's Wednesday works — but the question specifies next Wednesday as the problem, not this week's. Answer D keeps both dates as 来週の水曜日, only adding 「午後」(afternoon) as a qualifier — this doesn't actually propose a different Wednesday, just a different time on the same unavailable day, which doesn't solve the conflict. A useful memory trick: 再 in 再来週 means "again" or "re-," so think of it as "the next next week." Whenever you see scheduling questions in Japanese, always check whether the days and week references (今週・来週・再来週) are internally consistent with what's being described.