Conversational French Quiz: Confirming Plan Details
20 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Confirming Plan DetailsQuestion 1 of 20

Julien invite Sarah à un concert. Il lui donne les informations par message vocal, mais certains détails ne sont pas clairs.

Julien dit : « Sarah, j'ai eu des billets pour le concert de vendredi ! C'est à la salle Pleyel, le spectacle commence à 20h30. On peut se voir avant pour boire un verre, vers 18h30-19h ? » Sarah veut s'assurer de bien comprendre. Quelle est sa meilleure réponse ?

« Super ! Alors on se retrouve à 18h30 devant la salle Pleyel pour l'apéritif, c'est ça ? »
« Génial ! Tu proposes qu'on se voie vers 18h30-19h, mais où exactement et à quelle heure précise ? »
« Parfait ! On se retrouve à 19h pour boire un verre et ensuite on va au concert ensemble ? »
« Excellente idée ! Vers 18h30 alors, et tu as pensé à quel endroit pour l'apéritif ? »
← Back to quizzes

Conversational French Quiz

Conversational French Quiz: Confirming Plan Details

Practice Confirming Plan Details in Conversational French with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Confirming Plan Details, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Conversational French.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

Julien invite Sarah à un concert. Il lui donne les informations par message vocal, mais certains détails ne sont pas clairs.

Julien dit : « Sarah, j'ai eu des billets pour le concert de vendredi ! C'est à la salle Pleyel, le spectacle commence à 20h30. On peut se voir avant pour boire un verre, vers 18h30-19h ? » Sarah veut s'assurer de bien comprendre. Quelle est sa meilleure réponse ?

  1. « Super ! Alors on se retrouve à 18h30 devant la salle Pleyel pour l'apéritif, c'est ça ? »
  2. « Génial ! Tu proposes qu'on se voie vers 18h30-19h, mais où exactement et à quelle heure précise ? » (correct answer)
  3. « Parfait ! On se retrouve à 19h pour boire un verre et ensuite on va au concert ensemble ? »
  4. « Excellente idée ! Vers 18h30 alors, et tu as pensé à quel endroit pour l'apéritif ? »
Explanation: La réponse B est correcte car Sarah demande une clarification sur les deux points flous : le lieu du rendez-vous pour l'apéritif et l'heure exacte. A suppose un lieu, C fixe une heure arbitrairement, D ne clarifie que le lieu sans préciser l'heure.

Question 2

Lucie receives a text message from her study group saying 'RDV demain 14h bibliothèque universitaire salle de groupe.' However, she realizes there might be confusion about which day 'demain' refers to since the message was sent late at night.

What is the most effective way for Lucie to confirm the meeting day while addressing the potential confusion?

  1. Salut! Juste pour être sûre - quand vous dites 'demain', c'est bien mercredi le 15, c'est ça? (correct answer)
  2. Bonjour, je voulais confirmer notre rendez-vous de demain à 14h à la bibliothèque universitaire.
  3. Excusez-moi, mais votre message n'est pas clair. Quel jour exactement voulez-vous qu'on se rencontre?
  4. D'accord pour demain 14h. Est-ce qu'il faut apporter quelque chose de spécial pour la réunion?
Explanation: Option A specifically addresses the ambiguity of 'demain' by providing the actual date, ensuring everyone is on the same page. Option B repeats the vague term without clarifying. Option C is unnecessarily critical of the original message. Option D accepts the unclear timing and moves on to other details without resolving the main issue.

Question 3

During a phone call, Julien's friend Emma says they should meet 'vers 16h' at the 'nouveau café.' Julien wants to make sure he arrives at the right time and place.

Which question best addresses both timing and location concerns while showing cultural understanding of French time flexibility?

  1. Emma, 'vers 16h' ça veut dire exactement à quelle heure? Et le nouveau café, c'est lequel?
  2. Emma, je comprends 'vers 16h' - entre 15h45 et 16h15, ça va? Et pour le café, c'est 'Le Moderne' rue Saint-Jacques? (correct answer)
  3. Emma, il faut absolument être là à 16h précises? Et vous êtes sûre que le café sera ouvert?
  4. Emma, moi je préfère 16h30 si ça ne vous dérange pas. Et on peut changer de café aussi?
Explanation: Option B shows understanding that 'vers' allows flexibility (giving a time range) and provides specific details to confirm the location. Option A treats 'vers' as if it should be exact, missing cultural nuance. Option C focuses on punctuality concerns rather than clarifying the flexible timing. Option D suggests changes rather than confirming the proposed details.

Question 4

Marc receives a voicemail from his dentist's office saying his appointment has been moved to 'jeudi prochain à 10h30' but he's unsure if they mean this week or next week since he's calling on a Wednesday.

What is the most precise way for Marc to confirm the appointment date when he calls back?

  1. Bonjour, je confirme mon rendez-vous pour jeudi prochain à 10h30 comme indiqué dans votre message.
  2. Bonjour, vous avez dit 'jeudi prochain' - est-ce que c'est demain le 8 ou jeudi le 15? (correct answer)
  3. Bonjour, j'ai eu votre message pour jeudi. Est-ce que vous pourriez me répéter la date exacte?
  4. Bonjour, votre message parlait de jeudi prochain mais je ne sais pas de quel jeudi il s'agit.
Explanation: Option B eliminates all ambiguity by providing both possible dates, making it impossible to have a misunderstanding. Option A repeats the vague language without clarifying. Option C asks for repetition but doesn't specify the source of confusion. Option D explains the problem but doesn't provide the specific dates to choose between.

Question 5

During a business call, Madame Dubois tells her colleague she'll send the documents 'avant la fin de semaine' and they should meet 'la semaine prochaine.' Her colleague needs to plan his schedule accordingly.

Which response best confirms both deadlines while maintaining professional courtesy?

  1. Parfait Madame Dubois. Donc je recevrai les documents avant vendredi soir, et notre réunion aura lieu entre lundi et vendredi prochains? (correct answer)
  2. Très bien Madame Dubois. J'attends les documents cette semaine et je vous recontacte la semaine prochaine pour fixer notre rendez-vous.
  3. Madame Dubois, pouvez-vous être plus précise sur les délais? J'ai besoin de dates exactes pour mon planning.
  4. Entendu Madame Dubois. Je suppose que vous m'enverrez tout avant dimanche et qu'on se verra lundi ou mardi?
Explanation: Option A confirms understanding of both timeframes while clarifying the boundaries professionally. Option B accepts vague timing without seeking confirmation. Option C is too direct in demanding precision from a superior. Option D makes assumptions about specific days rather than confirming the intended timeframes.

Question 6

Sandra is coordinating a group study session via email. One person suggests 'mercredi après-midi à la BU' but Sandra knows the library has different sections and closing times vary.

Which email response best addresses the logistical concerns while keeping the group organized?

  1. Salut tout le monde! Pour mercredi après-midi - quelle heure et quel étage de la BU? Je vérifie les horaires selon la section. (correct answer)
  2. Hello! Mercredi après-midi à la BU, ça marche. Je suppose qu'on se débrouillera pour se trouver une fois sur place.
  3. Coucou! Mercredi c'est parfait. Est-ce que quelqu'un peut réserver une salle d'étude à l'avance pour notre groupe?
  4. Salut! Pour la BU mercredi, on pourrait plutôt se retrouver à 14h au rez-de-chaussée près de l'accueil?
Explanation: Option A addresses both the timing and location ambiguity while showing practical awareness of library logistics. Option B accepts vague plans without seeking clarification. Option C shifts to room reservation without confirming basic details first. Option D proposes specific alternatives rather than confirming the original suggestion.

Question 7

During a conference call, Jean-Luc's international colleague says they should 'touch base milieu de semaine prochaine' mixing English and French. Jean-Luc needs to schedule this in his calendar.

What response best confirms the meeting while addressing the mixed language diplomatically?

  1. D'accord pour se parler la semaine prochaine. Vous préférez qu'on communique en français ou en anglais?
  2. Très bien! Je note qu'on fait un point milieu de semaine prochaine. Je vous recontacte pour fixer l'heure.
  3. Parfait! Donc on se recontacte mercredi ou jeudi de la semaine prochaine, c'est bien l'idée? (correct answer)
  4. Entendu! 'Touch base' ça veut dire se faire un point rapide par téléphone, je suppose? Quel jour vous arrange?
Explanation: When dealing with code-switching (mixing languages) in professional French conversations, your response should acknowledge what was said naturally while maintaining conversational flow, rather than drawing explicit attention to the language mixing. Answer C perfectly handles this diplomatic situation by seamlessly incorporating the colleague's meaning ("milieu de semaine" = mid-week) into a natural French confirmation. By suggesting "mercredi ou jeudi" (Wednesday or Thursday), Jean-Luc shows he understood "mid-week" and moves the conversation forward productively while using proper French throughout. Answer A is too direct about the language issue. Asking "Vous préférez qu'on communique en français ou en anglais?" makes the code-switching awkward and could embarrass the colleague who was simply trying to communicate naturally in a multilingual workplace. Answer B repeats the mixed language ("faire un point") unnecessarily. While "faire un point" is acceptable French, it mimics the colleague's mixing pattern rather than modeling clear French communication. Answer D is the most problematic because it explicitly calls out the English phrase with "'Touch base' ça veut dire..." This draws uncomfortable attention to the language mixing and could make the colleague feel self-conscious about their French abilities. For conversational French exams, remember that diplomatic communication often means acknowledging the speaker's intent while naturally modeling proper usage, rather than correcting explicitly. The most elegant response demonstrates understanding through clear, natural French while keeping the focus on the business at hand.

Question 8

Valérie is planning a dinner party and tells her guests to arrive 'entre 19h30 et 20h pour l'apéritif.' One guest texts asking if this means dinner will be served immediately after or later.

How should Valérie clarify the evening's timeline while maintaining the relaxed atmosphere?

  1. Hello! Arrive quand tu peux entre 19h30 et 20h, on s'adaptera pour le dîner selon l'ambiance du moment.
  2. Coucou! Ne t'inquiète pas pour l'horaire, on est entre amis. On mangera quand tout le monde sera là!
  3. Salut! L'apéritif vers 19h30-20h, puis on passe à table vers 21h. Ça te va comme timing? (correct answer)
  4. Salut! L'apéritif dure généralement une heure, donc prévois de rester jusqu'à 22h30-23h minimum pour le repas complet.
Explanation: This question tests your ability to communicate clear timing expectations while maintaining appropriate French social etiquette for informal gatherings. When hosting in French culture, you need to balance being informative with staying relaxed and welcoming. Option C provides the perfect response because it directly answers the guest's question about timing while keeping a friendly, casual tone. "L'apéritif vers 19h30-20h, puis on passe à table vers 21h" gives clear expectations—aperitif from 7:30-8:00 PM, then dinner around 9:00 PM. The phrase "Ça te va comme timing?" shows consideration for the guest's schedule while maintaining the informal atmosphere with "Salut!" This response demonstrates proper French dinner party etiquette where aperitif and dinner are distinct phases. Option A is too vague ("on s'adaptera...selon l'ambiance") and doesn't actually answer the timing question, leaving the guest still uncertain. Option B, while friendly, avoids giving any specific timeline and could frustrate someone trying to plan their evening. Option D provides excessive detail about duration and end times, making the casual dinner party sound overly formal and structured, which contradicts the relaxed tone established in the original invitation. For conversational French questions about social situations, look for responses that directly address the specific concern raised while matching the appropriate register and cultural context. French dinner parties have expected rhythms—acknowledge them clearly but casually.

Question 9

Nicolas gets a group message about a hiking trip saying 'Départ parking du lac 8h dimanche, retour en fin d'après-midi.' He needs to plan transportation and wants to know the expected return time.

Which response best seeks clarification about return timing while showing consideration for group planning?

  1. Salut! Ok pour 8h dimanche. La randonnée dure combien d'heures généralement? J'essaie d'estimer l'heure de retour.
  2. Coucou! Super pour dimanche 8h au lac. Vous pensez qu'on sera rentrés avant 18h pour les transports en commun?
  3. Hello! Parfait pour le départ 8h dimanche. Quelqu'un peut-il me ramener en ville après la randonnée?
  4. Salut tous! Pour dimanche, 'fin d'après-midi' ça correspond à quelle heure environ? Histoire de prévoir le transport retour. (correct answer)
Explanation: This question tests your ability to communicate politely and clearly in group settings while using appropriate French expressions for seeking clarification. Option D is the strongest choice because it directly addresses the vague timing ("fin d'après-midi ça correspond à quelle heure environ?") while showing practical consideration for everyone's planning needs. The phrase "Histoire de prévoir le transport retour" demonstrates thoughtful group communication - you're explaining why you need the information without seeming demanding. "Salut tous!" also appropriately addresses the entire group. Option A focuses on hiking duration rather than the specific return time mentioned in the message. While polite, it doesn't directly clarify what "fin d'après-midi" means and requires additional calculation to determine actual return time. Option B assumes a specific return time (18h) rather than asking for clarification of the stated "fin d'après-midi." This shows you're making assumptions instead of seeking the needed information, and it focuses on your personal transport constraints. Option C asks for a ride rather than clarifying timing, which changes the subject entirely. Using "Hello!" in a French conversation also sounds awkward and less natural than French greetings. When participating in French group conversations, always address unclear information directly while explaining why you need clarification. Phrases like "ça correspond à quelle heure environ?" and "histoire de..." are excellent for polite, practical communication that shows you're thinking about group logistics, not just personal convenience.

Question 10

Stéphanie's dance instructor sends a message saying 'Cours exceptionnel samedi 10h salle B au lieu de salle A habituelle.' Stéphanie isn't sure if this replaces her regular class or is additional.

How should Stéphanie seek clarification about whether this affects her regular class schedule?

  1. Bonjour! D'accord pour samedi 10h salle B. Faut-il s'inscrire spécialement ou c'est automatique pour les élèves réguliers?
  2. Salut! J'ai vu pour samedi 10h salle B. Est-ce que notre cours de mardi est maintenu normalement cette semaine?
  3. Hello! Merci pour l'info sur samedi. Pourquoi est-ce qu'on change de salle pour ce cours exceptionnel?
  4. Bonjour! Le cours de samedi 10h en salle B, c'est en remplacement de notre cours habituel ou en plus? (correct answer)
Explanation: When you encounter ambiguous messages in French, the key is asking questions that directly address your specific confusion rather than making assumptions or asking tangential questions. The instructor's message mentions a "cours exceptionnel" (exceptional/special class) but doesn't clarify whether this replaces Stéphanie's regular class or is an additional offering. Answer D directly addresses this ambiguity by asking "c'est en remplacement de notre cours habituel ou en plus?" (is it replacing our usual class or in addition to it?). This question uses the key phrase "en remplacement... ou en plus" which perfectly captures the either/or nature of her confusion. Answer A focuses on registration procedures rather than addressing whether the class is additional or replacement. While practical, it doesn't resolve Stéphanie's main concern about her schedule. Answer B asks about maintaining Tuesday's class, but this assumes the special Saturday class might affect a different day entirely. The message doesn't mention Tuesday, so this question doesn't logically follow from the given information. Answer C asks why the room changed, which is irrelevant to Stéphanie's scheduling concern. The room change is already explained (it's for the exceptional class), and this doesn't help clarify the replacement versus additional question. Study tip: When asking for clarification in French, use direct either/or constructions like "ou" and phrases like "en remplacement de" (replacing) versus "en plus de" (in addition to). This shows you understand the situation while efficiently requesting the specific information you need.

Question 11

Élise is coordinating a potluck dinner and receives responses like 'j'apporte quelque chose de sucré' and 'je m'occupe de l'entrée.' She wants to avoid duplicates and ensure variety.

How should Élise follow up to better coordinate the meal while maintaining the collaborative spirit?

  1. Salut! Génial pour l'organisation. Ne vous inquiétez pas pour les détails, on aura sûrement assez de tout!
  2. Coucou! Merci pour vos propositions. Je vais assigner un plat spécifique à chacun pour bien organiser le repas.
  3. Hello! Super vos idées! Pierre et Marie, vous pouvez préciser vos plats? Et il nous faut encore plat principal et légumes.
  4. Salut tout le monde! Pour éviter les doublons, qui apporte quoi exactement? On fait une liste ensemble? (correct answer)
Explanation: When coordinating group activities in French, you need to balance practical organization with maintaining a friendly, collaborative tone. This question tests your ability to handle logistical coordination while preserving the social dynamic of a shared event. Option D succeeds because it directly addresses the coordination challenge ("pour éviter les doublons") while using inclusive language ("on fait une liste ensemble?"). The phrase "qui apporte quoi exactement?" seeks the specific information Élise needs without being controlling. The collaborative "together" approach maintains the potluck's communal spirit. Option A fails because "ne vous inquiétez pas pour les détails" completely ignores the stated problem of avoiding duplicates and ensuring variety. While friendly, it abandons any organizational responsibility. Option B uses overly directive language with "je vais assigner," which transforms the collaborative potluck into a top-down assignment system. This kills the participatory spirit that makes potlucks enjoyable. Option C switches to "Hello" instead of maintaining consistent French greetings, and the phrase "il nous faut encore" creates pressure by emphasizing what's missing rather than organizing what people want to bring. For conversational French exams, remember that successful communication often requires balancing multiple social needs simultaneously. Look for responses that solve practical problems while preserving relationship dynamics. Phrases like "on fait... ensemble" and "qui apporte quoi" demonstrate collaborative problem-solving rather than authoritative management.

Question 12

Claire is coordinating a weekend trip with friends. During a group chat, someone suggests meeting 'samedi matin à la gare' but Claire notices this could be interpreted in multiple ways.

How should Claire seek clarification to avoid confusion while keeping the group conversation flowing smoothly?

  1. Les amis, 'samedi matin' et 'la gare' - on peut préciser l'heure et laquelle? Il y en a trois en ville 😊 (correct answer)
  2. Excusez-moi tout le monde, mais ce message est beaucoup trop vague pour organiser notre voyage correctement.
  3. D'accord pour samedi matin à la gare. J'espère qu'on se trouvera facilement sur place le jour J!
  4. Samedi matin ça marche! Je propose 9h à la gare centrale, ça vous convient à tous les autres?
Explanation: Option A directly addresses both ambiguities (time and which station) in a friendly, group-appropriate way with an emoji to maintain the casual tone. Option B is too critical for a group chat setting. Option C accepts vague information without seeking clarification. Option D makes assumptions and proposes new details rather than confirming the original suggestion.

Question 13

Céline receives a voice message from her yoga instructor saying the class has been 'reporté à la semaine suivante, même heure, même jour.' However, the original class was on Thursday and Céline isn't sure if this means next Thursday or the Thursday after.

How should Céline confirm the rescheduled class date most effectively?

  1. Bonjour! Pour le cours reporté - c'est jeudi 12 ou jeudi 19? Je veux m'assurer de noter la bonne date. (correct answer)
  2. Salut! J'ai bien reçu votre message. Le cours de jeudi est donc reporté à jeudi prochain, c'est bien ça?
  3. Bonjour! Quand vous dites 'semaine suivante', ça veut dire la semaine qui vient ou celle d'après?
  4. Hello! Merci pour l'info. Est-ce que vous pourriez me renvoyer un message avec la date exacte du cours reporté?
Explanation: Option A eliminates ambiguity by providing both possible specific dates for confirmation. Option B repeats the ambiguous language without clarifying which Thursday. Option C asks about the phrase meaning rather than confirming specific dates. Option D asks for repetition without addressing the specific source of confusion.

Question 14

Mathieu receives a wedding invitation stating 'Cérémonie à 15h, vin d'honneur à suivre, dîner à 20h.' He wants to know if he needs to stay for the entire duration between ceremony and dinner.

What is the most tactful way for Mathieu to ask about the schedule expectations?

  1. Toutes mes félicitations! Y a-t-il une pause entre le vin d'honneur et le dîner? Je voudrais organiser ma journée.
  2. Bravo pour votre mariage! Je peux venir à la cérémonie et au vin d'honneur, mais pas rester pour le dîner.
  3. Félicitations! Pour le planning, est-ce qu'il y a des activités entre 16h et 20h ou peut-on partir après le vin d'honneur? (correct answer)
  4. Super nouvelle! Le vin d'honneur dure combien de temps généralement? Et faut-il confirmer pour le dîner séparément?
Explanation: When navigating French social etiquette, especially for formal events like weddings, you need to balance politeness with practical information-gathering. The key is asking questions that show respect for the hosts while addressing your scheduling needs indirectly. Option C is correct because it demonstrates excellent French social tact. It starts with appropriate congratulations ("Félicitations!"), then frames the question around general planning rather than personal limitations. By asking "est-ce qu'il y a des activités entre 16h et 20h ou peut-on partir après le vin d'honneur?" you're seeking information about the event structure without immediately declaring your intention to leave early. This gives you the information you need while leaving room to gracefully excuse yourself if necessary. Option A fails because while polite, asking about "une pause" suggests you expect a break rather than understanding that guests may naturally flow in and out during this time. Option B is too direct and presumptuous—you're essentially announcing your departure plans before even knowing if it's appropriate or necessary. Option D focuses too much on logistics ("combien de temps") and confirmation requirements, which could seem overly concerned with technicalities rather than celebrating the couple. Remember that in French social situations, indirect communication often shows more sophistication than direct questions. Frame your needs as requests for information about the event structure rather than statements about your personal constraints. This approach maintains relationships while getting the practical details you need.

Question 15

Antoine gets a text saying 'On se retrouve au métro Châtelet sortie 4 à 20h15' but he knows Châtelet is a complex station with multiple sortie 4s on different levels.

What is the most efficient way for Antoine to confirm the exact meeting point?

  1. Ok pour 20h15! Sortie 4 côté rue de Rivoli ou côté Les Halles? Il y en a une à chaque niveau. (correct answer)
  2. Parfait pour 20h15 au métro Châtelet sortie 4! J'espère qu'on va se croiser facilement dans cette grande station.
  3. D'accord pour Châtelet! Vous pouvez m'expliquer comment trouver la sortie 4? Cette station est un vrai labyrinthe.
  4. 20h15 ça marche! Je serai à Châtelet sortie 4. Si on ne se trouve pas, on s'appelle sur portable?
Explanation: Option A demonstrates knowledge of the station's complexity and offers specific alternatives to choose from. Option B accepts potentially confusing directions without clarifying. Option C asks for directions rather than clarifying which specific exit. Option D proposes a backup plan rather than preventing the confusion in the first place.

Question 16

Thomas is organizing a group meeting and needs to confirm the location with his colleague Sophie. She mentions meeting 'près de la fontaine' but there are several fountains in the area.

Which response best demonstrates Thomas asking for clarification while showing he has been paying attention to previous conversations?

  1. Sophie, il y a plusieurs fontaines dans ce quartier. Vous parlez de laquelle exactement, s'il vous plaît?
  2. D'accord Sophie, près de la fontaine. C'est parfait, je connais bien cet endroit-là maintenant.
  3. Sophie, vous aviez mentionné la fontaine près du café hier. C'est bien celle-là qu'on vise? (correct answer)
  4. Excusez-moi Sophie, mais je ne connais aucune fontaine dans ce secteur. Où exactement?
Explanation: Option C shows Thomas has been listening to previous conversations by referencing specific details ('près du café hier') while still seeking confirmation. Option A asks for clarification but doesn't show attention to previous discussions. Option B accepts vague information without clarifying. Option D suggests he wasn't paying attention to earlier conversations.

Question 17

Amélie is planning to meet her friend at 'l'entrée principale du musée' but realizes when she arrives that there are multiple entrances that could be considered 'principal.'

What should Amélie text to quickly resolve the location confusion?

  1. Salut! Je suis devant le musée mais il y a plusieurs entrées principales. Tu es où exactement?
  2. Coucou! Je suis à l'entrée côté rue Victor Hugo. C'est bien là qu'on avait dit, non? (correct answer)
  3. Salut! Il y a un problème - ce musée a trop d'entrées! Où est-ce qu'on se retrouve finalement?
  4. Hey! Je ne te vois pas à l'entrée principale. Est-ce que tu es en retard ou quoi?
Explanation: Option B provides her specific location and asks for confirmation, making it easy for her friend to either confirm or redirect. Option A asks a question without providing helpful information about where she is. Option C is unnecessarily dramatic about the situation. Option D assumes her friend is late rather than addressing the location confusion.

Question 18

Isabelle is meeting a client who emails 'RDV mardi 14h bureau principal.' She knows the company has recently moved offices and wants to confirm she has the right address.

How should Isabelle confirm the meeting location professionally while addressing the office move?

  1. Bonjour, très bien pour mardi 14h. Je viendrai à votre ancien bureau sauf si vous me précisez autrement.
  2. Bonjour, parfait pour mardi 14h au bureau principal. Pourriez-vous me confirmer l'adresse actuelle de vos bureaux?
  3. Bonjour, j'ai noté mardi 14h. J'espère que vous me ferez parvenir l'adresse exacte avant notre rendez-vous.
  4. Bonjour, je confirme notre rendez-vous de mardi 14h. Sagit-il de vos nouveaux bureaux avenue Montaigne ou des anciens rue Lecourbe? (correct answer)
Explanation: When confirming business meetings in French, especially when circumstances have changed, you need to balance politeness with specificity while demonstrating your awareness of the situation. Option D is correct because it perfectly combines professional courtesy with practical problem-solving. "Je confirme notre rendez-vous de mardi 14h" acknowledges the meeting details, while "S'agit-il de vos nouveaux bureaux avenue Montaigne ou des anciens rue Lecourbe?" shows you're aware of the office move and provides specific options. This demonstrates preparedness and saves the client time by offering clear alternatives. Option A assumes the old location unless told otherwise, which puts the burden on the client and shows poor awareness of the situation. Option B is polite but vague—asking for "l'adresse actuelle" doesn't show you know about the move and requires more back-and-forth communication. Option C uses "j'espère que vous me ferez parvenir" which sounds passive and slightly demanding, expecting the client to provide information rather than actively solving the problem. The key difference is that D shows initiative and business awareness by acknowledging the specific change (office move) while offering concrete options. This approach demonstrates professionalism and efficiency. For conversational French exams, remember that the most professional responses often show you're informed about the context and proactively address potential issues. When circumstances change in business settings, acknowledge the change explicitly while providing practical solutions rather than just asking for clarification.

Question 19

Laurent receives a text from his neighbor saying 'Peux-tu récupérer mon colis demain entre midi et 18h?' but Laurent has a meeting that could run late and wants to give a realistic timeframe.

What response best confirms availability while being honest about potential timing constraints?

  1. Salut! Pas de souci pour ton colis. Je serai là entre midi et 18h comme tu demandes, aucun problème.
  2. Hello! Avec plaisir pour ton colis. Je peux être dispo à partir de 15h normalement - ça marche pour la livraison? (correct answer)
  3. Coucou! Ok pour le colis demain. Tu as une idée de l'heure de livraison ou c'est vraiment entre midi et 18h?
  4. Salut! Désolé mais demain c'est compliqué pour moi. Tu peux demander à quelqu'un d'autre peut-être?
Explanation: Option B confirms willingness to help while being honest about availability constraints and checking if that works. Option A promises full availability without acknowledging the meeting constraint. Option C asks about delivery timing but doesn't address his own availability limitations. Option D declines entirely rather than offering partial availability.

Question 20

Marie calls her friend Paul to confirm their dinner plans. Paul mentions they should meet at 'chez Laurent' at 8 PM, but Marie remembers discussing a different time earlier.

What would be the most appropriate way for Marie to clarify the time discrepancy while maintaining a friendly tone?

  1. Excusez-moi Paul, mais je croyais qu'on avait dit 19h30. Est-ce qu'on peut vérifier l'heure ensemble? (correct answer)
  2. Non Paul, vous vous trompez complètement. C'était définitivement à 19h30 qu'on avait rendez-vous.
  3. Paul, je ne comprends pas pourquoi vous changez l'heure maintenant. C'est très compliqué pour moi.
  4. Ah bon, d'accord Paul. Alors on se retrouve à 20h chez Laurent comme vous voulez.
Explanation: Option A appropriately uses polite language ('Excusez-moi') and collaborative language ('Est-ce qu'on peut vérifier ensemble') to address the discrepancy without being confrontational. Option B is too direct and accusatory. Option C is passive-aggressive and doesn't actually clarify anything. Option D avoids the issue entirely instead of confirming the details.