All questions
Question 1
Text message chain:
Supervisor (Mon, 9:02 AM): Team — the Thursday all-staff meeting is cancelled this week because the conference room is being painted.
Supervisor (Mon, 2:47 PM): Update: The painting is done early. Thursday meeting is back on, same time, but moved to the break room on the second floor.
Supervisor (Wed, 8:15 AM): Reminder — HR just informed me that the break room will be used for new employee orientation Thursday morning. Our meeting is moved to Friday, same time, conference room as usual.
Employee (Wed, 9:00 AM): Got it — see everyone Friday in the break room!
Supervisor (Wed, 9:05 AM): Not the break room — back to the conference room. See you there.
Based on the complete text message chain, where and when should employees attend the staff meeting?
- Thursday in the conference room, because the supervisor's second message restored the original day and the conference room was only temporarily unavailable due to painting.
- Thursday in the break room on the second floor, because the supervisor confirmed the meeting was back on and the break room was the most recently confirmed location before Friday.
- Friday in the break room on the second floor, because the employee confirmed this location and the supervisor did not send a correction about the day of the week.
- Friday in the conference room, because the supervisor's final message corrected the employee's location error and the Wednesday morning message had already moved the meeting to Friday. (correct answer)
Explanation: When reading a chain of messages, your job is to track every update in order and make sure you're working from the most recent, accurate information — not just the most recent message you happen to remember.
Let's walk through the chain. The supervisor first cancels Thursday's meeting, then restores it but moves the location to the break room. Then, on Wednesday morning, the supervisor moves the meeting again — this time to Friday in the conference room. That Wednesday message is the key one: it changes both the day and the location back to the conference room. The employee then misreads this, writing that they'll see everyone "Friday in the break room" — mixing the new day with the old location. The supervisor immediately corrects this: not the break room, but the conference room. So the final, confirmed answer is Friday in the conference room, which is choice D.
Choice A fails because the conference room's temporary unavailability due to painting was already resolved — and then the meeting was moved to Friday anyway. Choice B is a trap because the break room was the meeting location at one point, but it was later overridden by two more messages. Choice C is particularly tricky — it treats the employee's message as reliable confirmation, but employees don't set meeting locations; only the supervisor does. That supervisor correction immediately followed.
When you see a chain of messages, always read to the very end and identify who has authority to make decisions. An employee's misunderstanding is not a confirmation — look for the official voice's last word.
Question 2
Library Newsletter — Policy Update Notice
Effective the first of next month, the library is changing its overdue fine policy. Under the current policy, members are charged $0.25 per day for overdue items, with a maximum fine of $10.00 per item. Under the new policy, there will be no daily fines. Instead, any item kept more than 21 days past its due date will be billed at full replacement cost. Members who return items between 14 and 21 days late will receive a courtesy warning letter but no financial penalty. Items returned within 13 days of the due date will have all existing fines forgiven as a one-time transition benefit — but only for fines accumulated before the new policy takes effect.
A library member currently owes $3.75 in overdue fines for a book that is 12 days late. After the new policy takes effect, what will most likely happen if the member returns the book on the 13th day after the due date?
- The member will owe $3.75, because the fine was accumulated under the old policy and the new policy only eliminates future daily charges, not previously owed balances from before the change.
- The member will owe nothing, because returning the item within 13 days of the due date qualifies for the one-time fine forgiveness that applies to fines accumulated before the policy change. (correct answer)
- The member will owe nothing for future charges but must still pay the $3.75, because the fine forgiveness only applies to items returned within 12 days — not on the 13th day itself — making this return one day too late for the transition benefit.
- The member will be charged the full replacement cost of the book, because keeping an item past the original due date triggers the new billing policy once any prior fines have been accumulated under the old system.
Explanation: When a passage describes a policy change with specific conditions, slow down and treat each condition like a checklist. Ask yourself: does this person meet every requirement for the benefit described?
Here, the new policy offers one-time fine forgiveness for fines accumulated before the policy takes effect — but only if the member returns the item within 13 days of the due date. The member's book is currently 12 days late, meaning returning it on day 13 still falls within that 13-day window. The $3.75 in fines was accumulated under the old policy, which is exactly what the transition benefit covers. Both conditions are satisfied, so the member owes nothing. That makes B the correct answer.
A misreads the policy by assuming old fines are automatically excluded from forgiveness. The passage explicitly says fines accumulated before the new policy takes effect are eligible — that's the whole point of the transition benefit.
C introduces a false boundary by claiming the forgiveness applies only to items returned within 12 days, not on day 13 itself. The passage says "within 13 days," which includes day 13. Watch out for answer choices that shift a number by one to create a trap.
D confuses two separate parts of the policy. The full replacement cost only applies when an item is kept more than 21 days past the due date — not simply because prior fines exist.
Study tip: When a passage has multiple conditions (time limits, eligibility rules, exceptions), underline or mentally note each one. Wrong answers often distort just one detail to mislead you.
Question 3
Community Bulletin — Bus Route 44 Service Changes
Effective Monday, Route 44 will be temporarily modified due to road construction on Elm Street. The following changes will be in place for approximately six weeks:
• The stop at Elm & 3rd will be eliminated. Riders should use the stop at Oak & 3rd instead, which is two blocks east.
• Northbound buses will run every 25 minutes instead of the usual 15 minutes.
• Southbound service is not affected.
• The last northbound bus will depart at 9:00 PM instead of 10:30 PM.
Riders who depend on the 10:00 PM or 10:30 PM northbound departures should make alternative arrangements. The transit authority apologizes for the inconvenience and thanks riders for their patience.
A commuter normally takes the northbound Route 44 bus at 9:15 PM from the Elm & 3rd stop. Based on the service changes, what does this commuter need to do?
- Go to the Oak & 3rd stop and take the 9:00 PM bus, since the stop location has changed but the 9:00 PM departure is still available for riders who arrive a few minutes early.
- Go to the Elm & 3rd stop and take the 9:00 PM bus, since only the departure times have changed and the original stop location remains open to riders after 9:00 PM.
- Go to the Oak & 3rd stop but make alternative arrangements for transportation, because the last northbound bus departs at 9:00 PM — before the commuter's usual 9:15 PM travel time. (correct answer)
- Take the southbound Route 44 bus at the usual stop and time, since southbound service is not affected by the construction and the commuter can connect to northbound service from another stop.
Explanation: When reading a public notice like this one, your job is to track multiple changes at once and apply all of them to a specific situation. This question gives you a commuter with two key details: a usual stop (Elm & 3rd) and a usual departure time (9:15 PM). You need to check both against the new rules.
The bulletin makes two changes that affect this commuter directly. First, the Elm & 3rd stop is eliminated — riders must go to Oak & 3rd instead. Second, the last northbound bus now departs at 9:00 PM, which is before the commuter's usual 9:15 PM travel time. That means even if the commuter goes to the correct new stop, no northbound bus will be running. Answer C captures both problems correctly: wrong stop and no available bus.
Answer A correctly identifies the new stop location (Oak & 3rd), but it makes a false assumption — it treats the 9:00 PM bus as "still available" for someone arriving at 9:15 PM. A bus that has already departed is not a valid option. Answer B fails on both counts: it keeps the commuter at the closed Elm & 3rd stop and assumes the 9:00 PM bus is catchable after 9:15 PM. Answer D misreads the bulletin entirely — southbound service being unaffected has nothing to do with a commuter who needs to travel northbound. Switching directions is not a logical workaround the passage supports.
When reading notices with bullet-point changes, always check every bullet for details that apply to your specific scenario — missing even one can lead you to a wrong conclusion.
Question 4
Email from: Downtown Dental Clinic
To: Patient List
Subject: Appointment and Billing Policy Changes — Please Read Carefully
We are writing to inform you of two changes beginning March 1st.
First, our cancellation policy is changing. Previously, patients could cancel up to 24 hours before their appointment without a fee. Starting March 1st, cancellations must be made at least 48 hours in advance. Cancellations made between 24 and 48 hours before the appointment will result in a $25 fee. Cancellations made less than 24 hours before the appointment will result in a $50 fee.
Second, our office hours are changing. We will no longer be open on Saturdays. Monday through Friday hours remain 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM.
If you have a Saturday appointment currently scheduled after March 1st, our office will contact you to reschedule. You do not need to call us — we will reach out to you.
It is March 5th. A patient calls to cancel a March 7th appointment scheduled for 10:00 AM. The patient calls at 11:00 AM. Which fee, if any, will the patient be charged?
- No fee, because the patient is cancelling more than 24 hours before the appointment, which met the standard under the old policy that many patients still follow.
- A $25 fee, because the cancellation is made between 24 and 48 hours before the appointment under the new policy that took effect March 1st. (correct answer)
- A $50 fee, because the patient is cancelling with less than 48 hours' notice, and the new policy charges $50 for all cancellations that do not meet the 48-hour requirement.
- No fee, because the clinic's office is no longer open on Saturdays, so any appointment on a weekday is automatically protected from cancellation fees during the transition period.
Explanation: When a passage gives you a policy with specific rules and numbers, your job is to apply those rules carefully to the exact scenario described — not to rely on old rules or make assumptions beyond what the text says.
Here, the new cancellation policy took effect March 1st. The patient calls on March 5th at 11:00 AM to cancel a March 7th appointment at 10:00 AM. Count the time between the call and the appointment: from 11:00 AM on March 5th to 10:00 AM on March 7th is 47 hours. That falls between 24 and 48 hours before the appointment — exactly the range the new policy describes as a $25 fee. That makes B the correct answer.
A is a trap that sounds reasonable but misreads the situation. The patient is cancelling more than 24 hours ahead, which would have been fine under the old policy — but the old policy no longer applies after March 1st. The passage clearly states the new policy began March 1st, and this call happens on March 5th.
C misreads the fee structure. The new policy does not charge $50 for all cancellations under 48 hours. It only charges $50 for cancellations made less than 24 hours before the appointment. Since the patient is cancelling 47 hours ahead, the $25 tier applies, not the $50 tier.
D invents a rule that doesn't exist. The passage says nothing about a "transition period" or weekday fee protections. The Saturday closure is a separate policy change entirely.
Study tip: When a passage has multiple policy changes, keep them separate in your mind. Answer only what the text actually says — don't combine rules or invent exceptions.
Question 5
Text messages between a student and a school administrator:
Administrator (Tuesday, 10:14 AM): Hi — just a heads up that your Thursday appointment with the financial aid counselor has been moved. She's now available Thursday at 3:00 PM instead of 10:00 AM. Please confirm you can make the new time.
Student (Tuesday, 11:02 AM): I have class until 3:30 on Thursdays. Can we do Friday instead?
Administrator (Tuesday, 2:45 PM): Friday doesn't work for her. She can do Thursday at 4:30 PM or the following Tuesday at 10:00 AM. Let me know by end of day Wednesday.
Student (Wednesday, 8:50 AM): 4:30 Thursday works. I'll be there.
Administrator (Wednesday, 3:10 PM): Sorry — one more change. The counselor just told me she has a department meeting at 4:00 PM Thursday that she forgot about. The 4:30 option is no longer available. It will have to be Tuesday at 10:00 AM unless you want to reschedule for a different week entirely.
Student (Wednesday, 4:58 PM): Ok, Tuesday at 10 works.
Based on the complete text message exchange, when is the student's financial aid appointment?
- Thursday at 3:00 PM, because that was the first rescheduled time offered by the administrator and the student never formally rejected it in writing.
- Thursday at 4:30 PM, because the student confirmed this time on Wednesday morning, creating a binding agreement before any further changes were communicated.
- The following Tuesday at 10:00 AM, because after the 4:30 PM Thursday option was cancelled, the student agreed to the only remaining confirmed option. (correct answer)
- A different week entirely, because the final message from the administrator gave the student the option to reschedule and the student's reply was too brief to constitute a clear confirmation.
Explanation: When reading a conversation with multiple changes, your job is to track the most recent confirmed agreement — not the first offer or any agreement that was later cancelled.
Here's how this exchange unfolds: The counselor cancelled the original 10:00 AM Thursday slot, then offered 3:00 PM Thursday. The student couldn't do that time. The administrator then offered two alternatives: Thursday at 4:30 PM or the following Tuesday at 10:00 AM. The student confirmed Thursday at 4:30. However — and this is the key moment — the administrator sent another message cancelling the 4:30 option due to a scheduling conflict. That confirmation became void because one party cancelled it before the appointment occurred. The administrator then restated that only Tuesday at 10:00 AM was available (or a different week). The student replied agreeing to Tuesday at 10:00 AM. That is the final, active agreement, making C correct.
Choice A is wrong because the student explicitly said they couldn't make 3:00 PM Thursday — that offer was rejected and replaced. Choice B is the most tempting trap: the student did confirm 4:30 Thursday, but that confirmation was cancelled by the administrator before the appointment took place. An agreement becomes void when one party cancels it and both parties acknowledge the change. Choice D misreads the student's final reply — "Ok, Tuesday at 10 works" is a clear, direct confirmation of the Tuesday option, not an ambiguous non-answer.
When tracking multi-step conversations, always follow the chain to the last mutual agreement — everything before a cancellation is overwritten.
Question 6
From: Riverside Community Center
To: All Fitness Class Members
Subject: IMPORTANT — Yoga Class Update
Dear Members,
Please be advised that starting next Monday, the Tuesday/Thursday Yoga class will move from Room 12 to the Main Gymnasium due to ongoing ceiling repairs. Additionally, the 6:00 PM session has been rescheduled to 7:30 PM for the next three weeks only. After that, the class will return to its original time but will remain in the gymnasium permanently.
If you cannot attend the 7:30 PM sessions, please contact the front desk to freeze your membership at no charge. Members who do not contact us will be assumed to be continuing and will be charged the regular monthly fee.
According to the notice, which of the following correctly describes the situation after the three-week temporary period ends?
- The yoga class will return to Room 12 at 6:00 PM, since all temporary changes will be reversed and the class goes back to its original schedule and location.
- The yoga class will be held in the Main Gymnasium at 6:00 PM, because the room change is permanent but the time change is only temporary. (correct answer)
- The yoga class will continue in the Main Gymnasium at 7:30 PM, since both the room and the time were changed as part of the same long-term renovation plan.
- The yoga class will return to Room 12 at 7:30 PM, because the gymnasium is only available temporarily and the new time becomes the permanent schedule.
Explanation: When a notice contains multiple changes, your job is to track each change separately — some may be temporary, and others may be permanent. Don't assume all changes follow the same rule.
In this notice, two things changed: the room and the time. Read carefully and you'll notice they follow different rules. The notice says the class moves to the Main Gymnasium "due to ongoing ceiling repairs" — no end date is given for that change. In fact, the notice explicitly states the class "will remain in the gymnasium permanently." The time change, however, is labeled "for the next three weeks only," after which the class returns to "its original time" — which was 6:00 PM. So after three weeks: gymnasium (permanent) + 6:00 PM (restored) = answer B.
Answer A is wrong because it assumes both changes are reversed. The room change is not reversed — the gymnasium becomes the permanent location. Answer C is wrong because it assumes both changes are long-term. The 7:30 PM time was clearly labeled temporary. Answer D is wrong on two counts: it incorrectly treats the gymnasium as temporary and the new time as permanent — the exact opposite of what the notice says.
A useful strategy here: when a passage announces multiple changes, make a quick mental checklist — is each change temporary or permanent? Look for signal words like "only," "permanently," "after that," and "return to." These words are your clues. On reading comprehension questions, details in the fine print almost always contain the correct answer.
Question 7
Employee Announcement — Updated Remote Work Policy
To all staff:
Following last quarter's review, our remote work policy has been revised. The previous policy allowed employees to work remotely up to three days per week with supervisor approval. The updated policy, effective immediately, changes this in two ways:
First, remote work is now limited to two days per week for employees who have been with the company for less than one year. Employees with one year or more of service may continue working remotely up to three days per week.
Second, all remote work days must now be pre-approved on a weekly basis through the online scheduling system by end of day Friday for the following week. Previously, approvals were given on a monthly basis.
Employees who do not submit requests by Friday will be expected to work on-site the following week. Exceptions require written approval from a department director — not a supervisor.
An employee who joined the company eight months ago submits a remote work request every Friday for three remote days the following week. Under the new policy, what will most likely happen?
- The request will be approved for two days because the employee has less than one year of service, which limits remote work to two days regardless of how many days were requested. (correct answer)
- The request will be approved for three days because the employee is following the correct weekly submission process, which is the most important requirement of the new policy.
- The request will be denied entirely because employees with less than one year of service are no longer permitted to work remotely under the updated policy, and must work on-site every day.
- The request will be approved for three days only if the employee's supervisor provides written approval, since the new approval process requires supervisor sign-off for any remote work above two days.
Explanation: When reading workplace policy questions, focus on identifying which rules apply to which people. This question asks you to match the employee's specific situation to the correct policy conditions.
The employee joined eight months ago, meaning they have less than one year of service. The updated policy clearly states that employees with less than one year of service may work remotely up to two days per week — not three. The employee submits correctly (every Friday for the following week), so the timing requirement is satisfied. However, the number of days requested exceeds what their experience level allows. The most likely outcome is that the request gets partially approved for the two allowed days. That makes A the correct answer.
B is a tempting trap because the employee is following the correct submission process — but following the right process doesn't override the day limit tied to their tenure. Both conditions matter, not just one.
C is too extreme. The policy does not eliminate remote work for newer employees — it reduces it from three days to two. Employees under one year still have remote work access.
D introduces a detail that doesn't exist in the passage. The policy mentions that exceptions require a department director's approval (not a supervisor's), but D invents a requirement for "supervisor sign-off for any remote work above two days," which the passage never says.
When a question asks "what will most likely happen," focus on the standard rule — not exceptions. Policies describe typical outcomes, and exam questions usually test whether you read all conditions carefully, not just the ones you remember first.
Question 8
Memo To: All Apartment Residents
From: Building Management
Re: Parking Garage Policy Update
Beginning the first of next month, the following parking changes will go into effect:
-
Guest parking in the garage will be limited to a maximum of 2 hours between 6:00 PM and 10:00 PM on weekdays. On weekends, guest parking remains unlimited.
-
Residents who wish to have guests park for more than 2 hours on weekday evenings must register the guest's vehicle at the front desk before 5:00 PM on the day of the visit.
-
Vehicles not registered and parked beyond the 2-hour limit will be towed at the owner's expense.
-
This policy does not apply to residents' own registered vehicles.
Residents with questions should contact the front desk, not the parking company directly.
A resident's family member arrives unexpectedly at 6:30 PM on a Tuesday and needs to park in the garage until 9:30 PM. The resident did not register the vehicle before 5:00 PM. What is most likely to happen?
- The vehicle will be towed at the owner's expense because it will exceed the 2-hour guest limit on a weekday evening and was not registered before the 5:00 PM deadline. (correct answer)
- The vehicle will not be towed because the family member is visiting a registered resident, which provides automatic guest parking protection during the 6:00 PM to 10:00 PM window.
- The resident can still register the guest vehicle at the front desk after 6:00 PM to avoid the towing policy, since the registration requirement applies to the day of the visit and there is no strict cutoff time listed.
- The vehicle will not be towed because the visit ends before 10:00 PM, and the towing policy only applies to guests who remain in the garage after the 10:00 PM closing time for the restricted period.
Explanation: When reading workplace or building policy memos, your job is to match a real situation to the specific rules written in the memo — every condition matters, and you cannot assume exceptions exist if they aren't stated.
In this scenario, the guest vehicle arrives at 6:30 PM on a Tuesday (a weekday) and stays until 9:30 PM — that's exactly 3 hours. The memo states that weekday evening guest parking is limited to 2 hours between 6:00 PM and 10:00 PM, and that guests parking longer must be registered at the front desk before 5:00 PM. The resident missed that deadline because the visit was unexpected. The memo also states clearly that unregistered vehicles exceeding the 2-hour limit will be towed at the owner's expense. That makes A the correct answer — all three conditions for towing are met: weekday evening, over 2 hours, and no prior registration.
Choice B invents a rule that doesn't exist. The memo gives no "automatic protection" to family members or any guest simply because they're visiting a registered resident. Choice C is wishful thinking — the memo sets a firm 5:00 PM registration deadline, and you cannot create flexibility where none is written. Choice D misreads the policy entirely. The 10:00 PM time is when the restricted window ends, not a cutoff after which towing begins. Towing applies to any unregistered vehicle exceeding 2 hours within that window.
Study tip: On policy-reading questions, treat every written condition as a hard rule. If the text says "before 5:00 PM," there is no after-hours workaround unless the memo says so.
Question 9
Recorded Phone Message from Greenfield Adult School:
'Attention students: Due to a water main break, the school building will be closed this Wednesday and Thursday. All Wednesday classes are cancelled. Thursday classes for the morning session — 8 AM to 12 PM — are also cancelled. However, the Thursday afternoon and evening sessions, from 1 PM onward, will be held as scheduled because repairs are expected to be completed by noon Thursday. Students in cancelled sessions do not need to contact their instructors — makeup sessions will be automatically scheduled and you will receive an email with the details. If you have a scheduled placement test on Wednesday or Thursday morning, please call the testing center directly to reschedule, as those appointments are handled separately from regular classes.'
A student has a regular ESL class on Thursday at 2:00 PM and also has a placement test scheduled for Thursday at 9:00 AM. What should this student do?
- Attend the 2:00 PM class as scheduled and wait for an email about rescheduling the placement test, since both situations are handled automatically by the school.
- Call the testing center to reschedule the placement test and wait for an email about the 2:00 PM class makeup, since the afternoon session is also cancelled along with the morning session.
- Wait for an email about both the placement test and the 2:00 PM class, since the closure affects all Thursday activities and all rescheduling is handled automatically through email notification.
- Call the testing center to reschedule the 9:00 AM placement test and attend the 2:00 PM class as scheduled, since the afternoon session is not cancelled but placement tests require a direct call. (correct answer)
Explanation: When a passage gives you different rules for different groups of people or situations, your job is to carefully match each situation to its specific rule — not apply one rule to everything.
In this passage, two separate policies exist for Thursday: the afternoon session (1 PM onward) runs as normal, but placement tests on Wednesday or Thursday morning require you to call the testing center directly. These are explicitly treated as separate systems. So for this student, you need to apply two different rules to two different situations.
The 2:00 PM class falls in the afternoon session, which the message says will be "held as scheduled." No action needed there — just show up. The 9:00 AM placement test, however, is a Thursday morning appointment, and the message specifically says students with placement tests on Wednesday or Thursday morning must "call the testing center directly to reschedule." That makes D the correct answer: call about the test, attend the afternoon class.
Choice A gets the class right but wrongly assumes the placement test is handled automatically by email — the passage says the opposite. Choice B incorrectly states the afternoon session is cancelled; the passage clearly says afternoon and evening sessions will proceed. Choice C applies the "wait for an email" rule to everything, ignoring that placement tests require a direct phone call and that the afternoon class isn't cancelled at all.
A useful strategy: when a passage lists exceptions or special cases, underline or note them as you read. Exam questions are often built around those exceptions — they test whether you noticed the detail that didn't follow the general rule.
Question 10
Voicemail Transcript:
'Hi, this message is for all students enrolled in the ESL Level 2 morning class. This is a reminder that due to the school's new attendance policy, effective this semester, missing more than three classes will result in automatic withdrawal from the course — not a grade of F as it was under the old policy. However, students who are withdrawn may re-enroll in the next available session without paying the re-enrollment fee, as long as they bring a written explanation to the registrar within 10 business days of withdrawal. Students who miss more than three classes but do not get withdrawn — which can happen if the instructor grants an exception — will still need to complete all missed assignments to avoid receiving an incomplete. Please call the main office if you have questions.'
A student has missed four classes but the instructor has granted an exception. Based on the new policy, what will most likely happen to this student?
- The student will be automatically withdrawn from the course and must pay a re-enrollment fee to join the next available session of the class.
- The student will remain in the course but must complete all missed assignments to avoid receiving an incomplete grade on their record. (correct answer)
- The student will receive a failing grade of F because missing more than three classes triggers the old policy when an exception is granted by the instructor.
- The student will be automatically withdrawn but can re-enroll in the next session for free by bringing written documentation to the registrar within 10 days.
Explanation: When a passage contains multiple rules with specific conditions, your job is to identify which rule applies to this specific situation — not just find any rule that mentions the topic. Here, the key condition is that the instructor has granted an exception, which changes everything.
Because the instructor granted an exception, the student is not automatically withdrawn — that exception bypasses the withdrawal outcome. The passage directly states: "Students who miss more than three classes but do not get withdrawn — which can happen if the instructor grants an exception — will still need to complete all missed assignments to avoid receiving an incomplete." That matches answer B exactly, making it the correct choice.
Answer A is wrong because it ignores the exception entirely and applies the automatic withdrawal rule as if no exception were granted. The exception specifically prevents withdrawal, so this scenario doesn't apply here.
Answer C is a trap that invents information. The passage never says an instructor's exception triggers the old policy (a grade of F). The old policy — giving an F — has been replaced entirely by the new one. Nothing brings it back.
Answer D describes what happens when a student is withdrawn and wants to re-enroll for free. That's a real part of the new policy, but it doesn't apply here because the exception means this student was never withdrawn in the first place.
A useful strategy: when a passage describes a general rule and exceptions, always ask yourself, "Which version of events matches the scenario in the question?" Highlight or underline conditions like "if," "unless," and "as long as" — they signal when a different rule kicks in.