All questions
Question 1
Rosa has been working at the same company for ten years. Last month, her manager asked her to take on extra responsibilities without more pay. Rosa was upset, but she didn't say anything. Her coworker Mia noticed and said, 'You shouldn't just put up with that. You need to speak up for yourself.'
In this context, what does Mia mean when she says Rosa should not 'put up with' the situation?
- Rosa should not tolerate the unfair treatment and should express her concerns instead of staying silent. (correct answer)
- Rosa should not post any complaints about her job on public websites or social media platforms.
- Rosa should not try to organize or arrange her workspace to make it more comfortable for herself.
- Rosa should not agree to work longer hours or take on any additional projects in the future.
Explanation: When you see a question asking about the meaning of a phrase "in this context," you're being tested on phrasal verbs and idiomatic expressions — common word combinations whose meanings can't be guessed from the individual words alone. Your job is to use the surrounding story as your guide.
In the passage, Rosa is being asked to do extra work without extra pay. She feels upset but stays silent. Mia steps in and tells her to "speak up for yourself" — to say something, to defend her own interests. This context is your biggest clue. "Put up with" is a phrasal verb meaning to tolerate or accept something unpleasant without complaining. So when Mia says Rosa shouldn't "put up with" the situation, she means Rosa should stop silently accepting unfair treatment and start expressing her concerns. That makes A the correct answer — it captures both the meaning of the phrase and the situation perfectly.
B is wrong because "put up with" has nothing to do with posting online or social media. Don't confuse "put up" (to post or display something) with the phrasal verb "put up with," which has a completely different meaning.
C is wrong because organizing or arranging a workspace relates to a literal reading of "put up" — as in, physically setting things up. This is a classic trap: ignoring the full three-word phrase.
D is wrong because while it relates to the workplace situation, Mia's advice is specifically about speaking up, not about refusing future tasks.
When you encounter phrasal verbs on this exam, always look at the full phrase together — "put up with" means something entirely different from "put up" alone.
Question 2
Daniel is trying to decide whether to take a second job. His friend says, 'Before you decide, you should weigh up all the pros and cons. Don't just go along with what your family thinks — figure out what works best for you.'
Which sentence uses BOTH 'weigh up' and 'go along with' correctly in a new context?
- She decided to weigh up her options before the meeting, but in the end she went along with the group's decision even though she had doubts. (correct answer)
- He weighed up the heavy boxes at the gym, and his teammates went along the hallway to find the coach after practice.
- They weighed up their luggage at the airport counter, and the whole family went along with matching suitcases for the long trip.
- She weighed up the cake ingredients carefully, and her sister went along with her to the grocery store to buy more flour.
Explanation: When a question asks you to identify correct usage of phrasal verbs, you need to check two things for each phrase: the meaning and the grammatical structure. "Weigh up" means to carefully consider options or make a judgment — it's about thinking, not physical weight. "Go along with" means to agree with or accept someone else's decision or idea — it's not about moving alongside someone physically.
Answer A is correct because both phrases are used idiomatically. The subject "weighs up her options" (considers them carefully) and then "goes along with the group's decision" (accepts it, even reluctantly). Notice the detail "even though she had doubts" — that's exactly the nuance "go along with" carries: accepting something you're not fully convinced by.
Answer B misuses both phrases. "Weighed up the heavy boxes" treats "weigh up" as literal weighing on a scale, and "went along the hallway" uses "along" as a simple preposition describing physical movement — not the phrasal verb "go along with" at all.
Answer C makes the same mistake. "Weighed up their luggage" refers to checking luggage weight, not evaluating a decision. "Went along with matching suitcases" describes traveling together with bags — again, not the idiom.
Answer D also confuses both phrases. Weighing cake ingredients is literal measuring, not decision-making. "Went along with her to the store" describes accompanying someone physically, not agreeing with their idea.
A useful tip: whenever you see a phrasal verb question, mentally substitute a definition. Replace "weigh up" with "carefully consider" and "go along with" with "agree with" — if the sentence still makes sense, the idiom is used correctly.
Question 3
Carlos received this email from his supervisor: 'Please look into the complaint we received from a client last Tuesday. Once you have the facts, we can figure out how to move forward.'
Carlos wants to reply professionally. Which response uses the phrasal verbs from the email correctly?
- I will look into the complaint right away and report back to you once I have figured out what happened on that day. (correct answer)
- I will look into the window of the office to check if the client came in, and I will figure the report out by sorting the pages.
- I will look into buying new office supplies this week and will figure out a way to move the furniture to a better location.
- I looked forward to the complaint being resolved, and I will figure the client out by calling their office number directly.
Explanation: When you see a question about phrasal verbs, ask yourself: what does this expression actually mean in context? Phrasal verbs like "look into" and "figure out" have meanings that are completely different from their individual words. "Look into" means to investigate or research something, and "figure out" means to find an answer or solution through thinking. The question tests whether you understand these meanings AND can use them correctly in a professional reply.
Answer A is correct because it uses both phrasal verbs accurately. "Look into the complaint" means Carlos will investigate it — matching the supervisor's original request. "Figured out what happened" means he will determine the facts — exactly what the supervisor asked for. The tone is also appropriately professional, making it a strong workplace reply.
Answer B misuses both verbs. "Look into the window" treats "look into" as a literal physical action (peering through glass), not an idiom. "Figure the report out by sorting pages" misunderstands "figure out" as a physical organizing task rather than a mental process of understanding.
Answer C uses the correct phrasal verbs grammatically, but applies them to completely unrelated topics — office supplies and furniture — that have nothing to do with the client complaint. The words are used correctly, but the context is entirely wrong for the situation.
Answer D confuses "look into" with "look forward to," which means to anticipate something with excitement — a completely different phrasal verb. It also misuses "figure the client out," implying the client is a puzzle to solve personally, which sounds strange and unprofessional.
Study tip: When studying phrasal verbs, always learn the full meaning as one unit — not word by word. A little flashcard with the phrase and a sample sentence goes a long way.
Question 4
Which sentence shows a speaker correctly using 'take after' AND 'grow up' in a single, natural, and meaningful statement?
- He takes after his lunch break every day at noon, and he grew up all the leftover food before leaving the office kitchen.
- She takes after her mother in many ways — both are patient and creative — and she grew up in a small coastal town near the border. (correct answer)
- They take after the project deadline by one week, and the interns grew up their presentations for the final board meeting.
- She takes after her workload carefully each morning, and her confidence grew up quickly once she joined the new department.
Explanation: When you see a question testing phrasal verbs, your first job is to check whether each verb is being used with its correct meaning — not just whether the sentence sounds grammatically possible. Two phrasal verbs are tested here: "take after" (to resemble a family member in personality or appearance) and "grow up" (to spend one's childhood somewhere, or to mature over time).
Answer B is correct because both phrasal verbs carry their proper meanings. "She takes after her mother" tells us she resembles her mother in specific ways — patience and creativity. "She grew up in a small coastal town" tells us where she spent her childhood. Both phrases work together naturally in a single, believable sentence about one person's background.
Answer A misuses both verbs entirely. "Takes after his lunch break" uses "take after" as if it means to take something — a completely different verb. "Grew up all the leftover food" treats "grow up" as if it means to finish or consume, which is not a meaning it has.
Answer C also misuses both verbs. "Take after the project deadline" treats the phrase as if it means to extend or postpone a deadline. "Grew up their presentations" uses "grow up" as if it means to develop or build something — again, not a standard meaning.
Answer D makes a similar mistake. "Takes after her workload" implies she resembles her workload, which makes no sense. "Grew up quickly" is close, but without a place or time context, it feels misapplied here.
Study tip: Phrasal verbs almost always require a specific type of object or context. When in doubt, ask yourself: "Does this phrase describe a person resembling a relative, or a person maturing?" If not, "take after" and "grow up" are being misused.
Question 5
A job posting reads: 'Applicants must be able to work independently, keep up with fast-changing technology, and follow through on all assigned tasks without close supervision.'
An applicant wants to address these three requirements in a cover letter. Which paragraph BEST demonstrates all three phrasal verbs used correctly and appropriately?
- In my previous role, I kept up with my manager by scheduling weekly check-ins to discuss updates, followed through the office hallways to attend all required team meetings, and worked independently on organizing the break room for staff celebrations.
- In my previous role, I regularly worked on my own without guidance, kept up with software updates by taking monthly training courses, and always followed through on every project until completion, even when priorities shifted. (correct answer)
- In my previous role, I followed through several online training programs to build new skills, kept up a positive attitude during challenging periods at work, and worked independently from home during winter months when commuting was difficult.
- In my previous role, I kept up with staying late on Fridays to show dedication, followed through with my daily lunch choices by planning meals in advance, and worked independently by choosing to ask my supervisor fewer questions than my colleagues typically did.
Explanation: When a question asks you to match phrasal verbs to specific job requirements, focus on two things: whether the phrasal verb is used correctly grammatically, and whether it's used in a context that matches the original meaning from the job posting. The three target phrasal verbs here are work independently (without supervision), keep up with (stay current with technology), and follow through on (complete assigned tasks fully).
Answer B earns full credit because each phrasal verb maps cleanly onto one of the job requirements. "Worked on my own without guidance" demonstrates independence. "Kept up with software updates by taking monthly training courses" directly addresses staying current with fast-changing technology. "Followed through on every project until completion" mirrors the job posting's language almost exactly — and the added detail about shifting priorities makes it even stronger.
Choice A misuses all three. "Kept up with my manager" misapplies the phrase — you keep up with trends or changes, not people you meet regularly. "Followed through the office hallways" is not a real phrasal verb use at all; it's a prepositional phrase describing physical movement. "Worked independently on organizing the break room" trivializes the requirement.
Choice C confuses "followed through" with "enrolled in" or "completed," and "kept up a positive attitude" uses "kept up" as a different phrasal verb meaning entirely — one unrelated to technology.
Choice D is the most problematic. Each example sounds vaguely related but fundamentally misses the point — asking fewer questions is not the same as working independently, and planning lunch has nothing to do with professional follow-through.
Your strategy: when you see phrasal verbs tested, always ask — does the meaning fit, not just the words?
Question 6
Yuki is talking to her friend about her new neighborhood: 'I didn't know anyone at first, but I've been settling in really well. My neighbors have been helpful, and I'm slowly getting used to all the new routines.'
Yuki's friend responds: 'That's great! It always takes time to a new place.' Which fixed expression BEST completes the friend's response and matches the meaning of Yuki's statement?
- get off on the right foot in
- put your foot down in
- find your feet in (correct answer)
- drag your feet about
Explanation: When a question asks you to match a fixed expression (also called an idiom) to a specific meaning, focus on what the passage is actually describing — then find the phrase whose meaning fits that situation precisely.
Yuki describes a process of gradually adjusting: she didn't know anyone at first, but over time she's settling in, building relationships, and learning new routines. This is the experience of slowly becoming comfortable and capable in an unfamiliar environment. The expression that captures this perfectly is C) find your feet, which means to gradually gain confidence and familiarity in a new situation. "It always takes time to find your feet in a new place" mirrors Yuki's journey exactly — it acknowledges that adjustment is a process, not an instant event.
Looking at the distractors: A) get off on the right foot means to start something in a positive, successful way — it's about a good beginning, not the gradual process of adapting. It also sounds awkward with "in a new place." B) put your foot down means to firmly assert authority or refuse to accept something — for example, "She put her foot down about the noise." This has nothing to do with adjusting to a new environment. D) drag your feet means to delay doing something intentionally or reluctantly — the opposite of Yuki's experience, since she's actively settling in well, not avoiding the process.
A useful study tip: many idioms using body parts (especially foot/feet) appear on intermediate ESL exams. Build a list of these — "find your feet," "put your foot in your mouth," "stand on your own two feet" — and learn their meanings through example sentences rather than literal translations.
Question 7
Read the four sentences. Which one uses a phrasal verb INCORRECTLY for an intermediate English context?
- She called the meeting off because not enough people could attend on such short notice.
- He turned down the job offer even though the salary was much higher than his current position.
- They brought up an interesting point during the discussion that no one had considered before.
- We looked forward the summer vacation with great excitement after a very long and difficult school year. (correct answer)
Explanation: Phrasal verbs are two- or three-word combinations where a verb pairs with a preposition or adverb (called a particle) to create a specific meaning. The key rule many students overlook is that certain phrasal verbs require a specific particle — you cannot swap it out or omit it without breaking the phrase entirely.
Answer D is the incorrect usage. "Look forward to" is a fixed phrasal verb — the word to is absolutely required. The sentence reads "looked forward the summer vacation," dropping to completely. This makes the sentence grammatically wrong and unnatural to any English speaker. The correct version must be: "We looked forward to the summer vacation..." This is an especially common error because learners sometimes confuse the structure with simpler verbs that don't need a preposition.
The other three sentences all use their phrasal verbs correctly. In A, "called off" means to cancel something — the particle off is properly placed after the verb, and the sentence makes perfect logical sense. In B, "turned down" means to reject an offer — again, the particle is correct and the meaning is clear. In C, "brought up" means to introduce a topic into a conversation, and it's used naturally and accurately.
A helpful study tip: when you learn a new phrasal verb, always memorize it with its particle as one complete unit. Write it as "look forward to," not just "look forward." Many phrasal verbs have particles that are non-negotiable — removing or changing them creates errors exactly like the one in D.
Question 8
At a community meeting, the organizer says: 'We need everyone to chip in if we want this event to succeed. No one can back out at the last minute — we're counting on each other.'
A volunteer did not attend and sent this message: 'Sorry, something came up.' Which statement BEST explains whether this volunteer's message fits the situation described by the organizer?
- The message is unrelated to the situation because 'something came up' is not a recognized fixed expression in English and therefore cannot be meaningfully connected to either chipping in or backing out of a commitment.
- The message completely matches the organizer's request because 'something came up' means the volunteer found an unexpected way to contribute to the event, which is exactly the kind of chipping in the organizer was asking for.
- The message partially conflicts with the organizer's expectation because 'something came up' suggests an unexpected problem caused the absence, but the organizer specifically warned against backing out, making the excuse understandable but still a form of the behavior the organizer cautioned against. (correct answer)
- The message fully satisfies the organizer's concerns because sending an apology is the same as chipping in, and any volunteer who communicates with the group in writing is considered to have fulfilled their commitment to the event.
Explanation: When a question asks you to connect a real-life message to idiomatic language used in a passage, your job is to analyze what each expression actually means and then decide how well they match. Here, you need to understand two phrasal verbs: chip in (to contribute effort or resources to a shared goal) and back out (to withdraw from a commitment, especially at the last moment).
The organizer explicitly warned volunteers not to back out. The absent volunteer said "something came up," which is a common English idiom meaning an unexpected situation or problem suddenly required their attention — it does not imply they contributed. So the volunteer's message is essentially an excuse for not attending, which is exactly the behavior the organizer cautioned against. However, because the problem was unplanned rather than deliberate, the excuse is understandable — it just doesn't erase the fact that the volunteer backed out. That layered reality makes C correct: the message partially conflicts with the organizer's expectation.
A is wrong because "something came up" is absolutely a recognized, widely-used English expression — claiming otherwise is factually incorrect. B misreads the idiom entirely; "something came up" signals a problem that caused absence, not a new way to contribute. This is a classic trap of reversing a word's meaning. D is wrong because sending an apology message is not the same as physically chipping in — the organizer needed participation, not just communication.
As a study tip, when you see phrasal verbs in a passage and answer choices, slow down and define each one precisely before comparing them. Small meaning differences often determine the right answer.
Question 9
A student says: 'I used to give up on math problems when they were hard, but now I always until I find the answer.' Which phrasal verb BEST completes this sentence while maintaining a contrast with 'give up'?
- take it up
- get along with it
- come up with an answer
- stick with it (correct answer)
Explanation: When a sentence sets up a contrast using "but now," you need a phrasal verb that means the opposite of the first action. Here, "give up" means to stop trying when something gets difficult. So the blank needs a phrase meaning to keep trying or persist — that's your guiding question: which option expresses persistence?
D) "stick with it" is the best fit. "Stick with something" means to continue doing it despite challenges, which directly contrasts "give up." The sentence now reads: I used to quit, but now I always persist — a clean, logical contrast that flows naturally.
The other choices don't create that contrast. A) "take it up" means to start a new hobby or activity (e.g., "I took up painting"). It describes beginning something, not continuing through difficulty — the opposite of what's needed. B) "get along with it" describes having a good relationship with a person or situation (e.g., "She gets along with her coworkers"). It doesn't express persistence at all. C) "come up with an answer" means to think of or produce an idea, which is actually close in meaning to finding an answer — but it describes the result, not the effort. It doesn't contrast with "give up" because it doesn't describe the act of persisting through difficulty.
A useful tip: when a sentence uses contrast words like "but," "however," or "although," look for the answer that is the opposite in meaning to the other action in the sentence. Phrasal verb questions often test whether you understand the full meaning — not just single words, but the whole phrase in context.
Question 10
Which sentence uses the phrasal verb 'run out of' with the correct meaning AND grammatically correct structure for an intermediate English learner?
- We ran out of milk this morning, so I need to stop at the store on my way home from work today. (correct answer)
- The children ran out of the building quickly when they heard the fire alarm ringing in the hallway.
- My grandmother always runs out of her house to greet us warmly whenever our family visits her.
- The athletes ran out of the stadium tunnel and onto the field as the crowd cheered at the start of the game.
Explanation: When you see a question about phrasal verbs, always ask yourself two things: What does this phrasal verb actually mean? and Is it being used correctly here? This question tests whether you know the difference between the phrasal verb "run out of" (meaning to exhaust your supply of something) and the literal verb phrase "run out of" (meaning to physically exit a place by running).
Choice A is correct because "ran out of milk" uses the phrasal verb with its true idiomatic meaning — the milk supply was completely used up. The structure is also grammatically perfect: subject + "ran out of" + noun object. The rest of the sentence adds natural, realistic context that an intermediate learner would encounter in everyday life.
Choices B, C, and D are all traps because they use "ran out of" or "runs out of" to describe physical movement — people literally running out of a building, a house, or a stadium tunnel. These sentences are grammatically fine as descriptions of movement, but they are NOT using the phrasal verb. They are using the base verb "run" combined with the preposition "out of" to show direction, which is a completely different structure with a completely different meaning.
The key mistake many learners make is assuming any sentence with "run out of" counts — but the words must function as a single idiomatic unit meaning to exhaust a supply, not describe physical motion.
Study tip: When you study phrasal verbs, always memorize them with an example sentence that shows the idiomatic meaning, so you can quickly spot when the words are being used literally instead.