SECTION 1
Historical Context & Motivation
The analysis of trusses stands as one of the foundational problems in structural engineering, driven by centuries of demand for lightweight yet rigid frameworks capable of spanning rivers, supporting roofs, and carrying heavy loads. Early bridge builders relied on empirical intuition and craft traditions, but as iron and steel replaced timber in the 18th and 19th centuries, engineers needed rigorous analytical methods to predict the internal forces in each member of a truss. The method of joints — analyzing equilibrium at each pin connection — was the first systematic technique, but it becomes tedious for large trusses when only a few specific member forces are needed. The method of sections emerged as an elegant shortcut: by making an imaginary cut through the entire truss, engineers could isolate a portion and apply equilibrium to determine member forces directly, bypassing dozens of intermediate calculations.
1826 • Navier's Structural Theory
1862 • Ritter's Method of Sections
1864 • Maxwell's Reciprocal Diagrams
1873 • Cremona's Force Polygon Method
1950s–present • Finite Element Methods
The central question that the method of sections answers is deceptively simple: given a truss under known loads, how can we determine the force in a specific member without analyzing every joint in the structure? This efficiency makes the method indispensable in both academic problem-solving and professional practice, where rapid estimation of critical member forces guides material selection and cross-sectional sizing during the early stages of design.
SECTION 2
Core Principles & Definitions
Before applying the method of sections, it is essential to revisit the idealizations that define a simple truss. Every member is assumed to be a straight, two-force member connected at frictionless pin joints, loaded only at its endpoints. This means each member carries either pure tension (T) or pure compression (C), with the force directed along the member's longitudinal axis. External loads and support reactions act only at the joints. These assumptions are remarkably accurate for well-designed trusses and form the basis of both the method of joints and the method of sections.
Imaginary Cut
Exposed Internal Forces
Three Equations of Equilibrium
Strategic Moment Points
Sign Convention
KEY TAKEAWAY
SECTION 3
Visual Explanation — Cutting a Pratt Truss
In the diagram above, the section cut a–a has been drawn so that it intersects exactly three members: the top chord GH, the diagonal BG, and the bottom chord BC. Because only three unknowns are exposed and three equilibrium equations are available for a planar rigid body, the system is solvable. The choice of which side to analyze (left or right of the cut) is a matter of convenience — select the side with fewer external forces and reactions to simplify arithmetic. Notice how the exposed forces are drawn along the axes of their respective members, reflecting the two-force member assumption that is fundamental to all truss idealizations.
WHY ONLY THREE MEMBERS?
SECTION 4
Mathematical Framework
The mathematical machinery behind the method of sections is the same set of equilibrium equations used throughout statics, applied to a well-chosen free-body diagram. The power of the method lies not in new equations but in strategic selection of moment centers and force-summation directions that isolate individual unknowns. The procedure begins by determining the external support reactions for the entire truss (treated as a rigid body) and then applying equilibrium to the portion of the truss on one side of the section cut.
EQUILIBRIUM — FORCE SUMMATION (HORIZONTAL)
The sum of all horizontal force components acting on the free body equals zero. This includes horizontal components of support reactions, applied loads, and the resolved components of exposed member forces.
EQUILIBRIUM — FORCE SUMMATION (VERTICAL)
The sum of all vertical force components acting on the free body equals zero. For trusses with predominantly vertical loads, this equation is often the most useful for determining diagonal member forces.
EQUILIBRIUM — MOMENT SUMMATION
The sum of moments about any point O equals zero. By choosing O at the intersection of the lines of action of two of the three unknown member forces, only the third unknown appears in this equation, yielding a direct solution. The moment of a force F about O is M = F × d, where d is the perpendicular distance from O to the line of action.
The strategic selection of the moment center is the defining skill of the method of sections. Consider a cut that exposes three unknowns: F₁, F₂, and F₃. If the lines of action of F₁ and F₂ intersect at point O, then taking moments about O eliminates both F₁ and F₂ from the equation, leaving F₃ as the sole unknown. Similarly, a different moment point can isolate each of the other two forces. In many problems, one or two forces can also be found using force summation equations (ΣFₓ or ΣFᵧ) when the member orientations are favorable — for instance, when one unknown acts horizontally and another acts at an angle.
FORCE RESOLUTION FOR INCLINED MEMBERS
For any member inclined at angle θ to the horizontal, the force F in the member resolves into horizontal and vertical components. The angle θ is determined from the geometry of the truss (i.e., from the coordinates of the joints at each end of the member).
PROCEDURAL CHECKLIST
SECTION 5
Geometric Considerations & Cut Strategy
The effectiveness of the method of sections depends critically on the geometry of the cut and the spatial relationships between exposed member forces. A well-chosen cut reduces a complex truss to a straightforward system of equations, while a poorly chosen cut can lead to coupled equations or indeterminate situations. This section examines the geometric factors that govern cut selection and moment-point strategy for several common truss configurations.
The Warren truss in the diagram above illustrates a common situation: the top and bottom chords are parallel, and the diagonals alternate in direction. When the cut s–s is made, three member forces are exposed: Ftop (top chord), Fdiag (diagonal), and Fbot (bottom chord). Since the two chord forces are horizontal and parallel, they do not intersect at a finite point. However, because Fbot passes through the bottom joint (O₁ in the diagram), taking moments about O₁ eliminates Fbot from the equation. The perpendicular distance from O₁ to the top chord is the truss height h, so the moment arm for Ftop is simply h. The diagonal force Fdiag can then be isolated using the vertical force equilibrium equation ΣFᵧ = 0, since it is the only exposed force with a vertical component (the chord forces being horizontal).
- Parallel chord trusses (Pratt, Howe, Warren): The chord forces are horizontal, so ΣFᵧ = 0 directly yields the vertical component of the diagonal, and moments about a chord joint yield the opposite chord force.
- Non-parallel chord trusses (e.g., scissors or cambered trusses): Chord forces have both horizontal and vertical components, making moment-point selection even more critical. The intersection of the lines of action of two inclined members can sometimes lie far from the truss, requiring careful geometry.
- K-trusses and complex configurations: When a single section cut inevitably severs more than three unknown-force members, combine the method of sections with the method of joints at adjacent nodes, or use multiple section cuts.
SECTION 6
Worked Example — Pratt Truss Under Concentrated Loads
Consider a symmetric Pratt truss spanning 16 m with four equal panels of 4 m each, a height of 3 m, pin-supported at joint A (left) and roller-supported at joint E (right). Vertical loads of 20 kN act downward at each of the two interior upper-chord joints (G and H). We wish to determine the forces in members GH (top chord), BC (bottom chord), and BG (diagonal) using the method of sections.
Method of Sections — Pratt Truss
- 1
Step 1 — Determine Support Reactions
Treat the entire truss as a rigid body. By symmetry (symmetric geometry and symmetric loading), each vertical reaction equals half the total load. The total downward load is 2 × 20 kN = 40 kN. Therefore Ay = Ey = 20 kN (upward). Joint A is a pin, but the horizontal loads are zero, so Ax = 0.Ay = 20 kN ↑, Ey = 20 kN ↑, Ax = 0 - 2
Step 2 — Make the Section Cut
Pass a vertical section cut between joints B and C (bottom chord) and between joints G and H (top chord). This cut severs three members: top chord GH, diagonal BG (running from joint B on the bottom chord up to joint G on the top chord), and bottom chord BC. Analyze the left portion of the truss, which includes joints A, B, F, and G, the reaction Ay = 20 kN, and the load P = 20 kN at G.Three unknowns exposed: FGH, FBG, FBC - 3
Step 3 — Find F_GH (Moment about B)
Take moments about joint B (at the bottom chord, x = 4 m, y = 0). Forces FBC and FBG both pass through B, so their moments about B are zero. The remaining forces are: Ay = 20 kN at x = 0 (moment arm = 4 m, CCW), the load 20 kN ↓ at G (x = 4 m, directly above B, moment arm = 0 for the horizontal distance, but G is at height 3 m above B — the 20 kN is vertical and passes through x = 4, same x as B, so moment arm = 0). FGH acts horizontally at height 3 m, so its moment arm about B is 3 m. Setting ΣMB = 0 (taking CCW as positive): +20(4) + FGH(3) = 0. Note that FGH is assumed in tension (pointing to the right, away from the cut on the left portion), and its moment about B is clockwise (negative if CCW is positive). Correcting: +20(4) − FGH(3) = 0 → FGH = 80/3 ≈ 26.67 kN.FGH = +26.67 kN → positive → Tension - 4
Step 4 — Find F_BC (Moment about G)
Take moments about joint G (at x = 4 m, y = 3 m). Forces FGH passes through G (moment arm = 0), and FBG also passes through G (moment arm = 0). So only Ay, the 20 kN load at G, and FBC contribute. The 20 kN load at G acts through G, so its moment about G is zero. Ay = 20 kN ↑ at x = 0, moment arm = 4 m (horizontal distance from G), produces a CW moment. FBC is horizontal at y = 0, moment arm = 3 m (vertical distance from G). ΣMG = 0 (CCW positive): −20(4) + FBC(3) = 0 → FBC = 80/3 ≈ 26.67 kN.FBC = +26.67 kN → positive → Tension - 5
Step 5 — Find F_BG (Vertical Force Equilibrium)
Apply ΣFᵧ = 0 to the left free body. Vertical forces: Ay = +20 kN (up), load at G = −20 kN (down), and the vertical component of FBG. The chord forces FGH and FBC are horizontal, contributing zero to ΣFᵧ. Member BG connects B (4, 0) to G (4, 3), making it a vertical member. Therefore FBG is entirely vertical. Assuming tension (pointing from the cut upward toward G on the left FBD is away from joint B, i.e., upward): +20 − 20 + FBG = 0 → FBG = 0 kN.FBG = 0 kN → Zero-force member - 6
Step 6 — Verify and Interpret
Check ΣFₓ = 0 on the left FBD: FGH acts to the right (assumed tension, pointing right away from the left portion) and FBC also acts to the right. Wait — if both are tension, they both point to the right on the left FBD, giving ΣFₓ = FGH + FBC ≠ 0. Re-examining: on the left free body, FGH (top chord, assumed tension) points to the right (away from the left portion toward the right), but re-checking Step 3: Ay creates a CCW moment about B, and FGH (pointing right at height 3 m above B) creates a CW moment. This is consistent. For ΣFₓ: FGH → right (+), FBC → right (+). Since no horizontal external forces exist on the left FBD, ΣFₓ = 0 requires FGH + FBC = 0. This means one must be negative. Reconsidering: FGH in compression means it pushes on the left portion (pointing left), so FGH = −26.67 kN (compression) and FBC = +26.67 kN (tension). ΣFₓ: −26.67 + 26.67 = 0 ✓. The top chord is in compression and the bottom chord is in tension — as expected for a simply supported truss under downward loads.FGH = 26.67 kN (C), FBC = 26.67 kN (T), FBG = 0 kN ✓
SECTION 7
Method of Sections vs. Method of Joints
The method of sections and the method of joints are complementary tools for truss analysis. Neither is universally superior — the choice depends on the nature of the problem and what information is sought. Understanding the strengths and limitations of each method ensures that you select the most efficient approach, or combine both when needed.
| Criterion | Method of Joints | Method of Sections |
|---|---|---|
| Number of unknowns per step | 2 (ΣFₓ = 0, ΣFᵧ = 0 at each pin) | Up to 3 (ΣFₓ, ΣFᵧ, ΣM = 0 on a rigid section) |
| Best suited for | Finding all member forces in a truss, or starting from a joint with only two unknowns | Finding forces in specific members without solving the entire truss |
| Efficiency for large trusses | Becomes tedious — must work sequentially through many joints | Highly efficient — jumps directly to the members of interest |
| Moment equation use | Not used (concurrent forces at a point) | Essential — strategic moment centers isolate unknowns |
| Limitation | Must begin at a joint with ≤ 2 unknown member forces | Section cut must not pass through more than 3 unknown-force members |
| Error propagation | Errors at early joints propagate through subsequent calculations | Each cut is independent — errors do not propagate |
Comparison of the two primary analytical methods for simple trusses
WHEN TO USE WHICH METHOD
SECTION 8
Connection to Advanced Structural Analysis
The method of sections, while complete for statically determinate trusses, represents the starting point of a broader continuum of structural analysis methods. As structures become more complex — featuring redundant members, rigid connections, or distributed loads — the assumptions of the simple truss model break down, and more sophisticated techniques are required. Understanding how the method of sections connects to these advanced methods provides valuable context for courses in structural analysis, matrix methods, and finite element analysis.
| Feature | Method of Sections (Simple Trusses) | Advanced Methods |
|---|---|---|
| Determinacy | Statically determinate (m + r = 2j) | Handles indeterminate structures (m + r > 2j) via compatibility and force/displacement methods |
| Connections | Frictionless pins only — two-force members | Rigid (moment-resisting) joints, semi-rigid connections → members carry bending and shear |
| Loading | Concentrated loads at joints only | Distributed loads, thermal effects, settlement, dynamic loads |
| Solution approach | Hand calculation via equilibrium equations | Stiffness matrix assembly [K]{d} = {F}, solved computationally |
| Output | Axial forces only (T or C) | Axial force, shear, bending moment, deflections at every point |
Simple truss analysis vs. advanced structural methods
Despite the power of computational tools, the method of sections retains its relevance for several important reasons. First, it builds the physical intuition needed to interpret and validate computer output — if a finite element model predicts tension in a top chord of a simply supported truss under gravity load, an engineer trained in the method of sections immediately recognizes this as an error. Second, preliminary design often involves sizing members for worst-case load combinations, and the method of sections provides rapid estimates without the overhead of building a full computational model. Third, many professional engineering exams (the FE and PE exams in the United States, for instance) prominently feature method-of-sections problems, making mastery of this technique essential for licensure.
SECTION 9
Practice Problems
Question 1: CONCEPTUAL
Show answer
Question 2: BASIC CALCULATION
Show answer
Question 3: INTERMEDIATE
Show answer
Question 4: APPLIED
Show answer
Question 5: CRITICAL THINKING
Show answer
SUMMARY
Lesson Summary
Summary
The method of sections is a powerful technique for determining internal member forces in a statically determinate truss without analyzing every joint. The method proceeds by making an imaginary section cut through the truss — severing no more than three unknown-force members — and applying the three equilibrium equations (ΣFₓ = 0, ΣFᵧ = 0, ΣM = 0) to the resulting free body. The hallmark skill is strategic moment-point selection: choosing a point through which two of the three unknown forces pass, thereby isolating the third unknown in a single equation.
Compared to the method of joints, the method of sections excels when only specific member forces are needed, offering a direct path to the answer without sequential joint-by-joint analysis. Both methods rest on the same two-force member assumption and the requirement that the truss be statically determinate (satisfying m + r = 2j). Mastery of the method of sections builds the physical intuition needed to interpret results from advanced computational tools and remains a cornerstone of every structural engineering curriculum.