Supporting Evidence - SSAT Upper Level Reading

Identify the best evidence for: "The company is struggling financially." A) profits dropped $15\%$ B) it launched a new logo.

A) Profits dropped $15\%$ . Declining profits provide measurable financial evidence, unlike cosmetic changes such as a new logo which are unrelated.
What type of evidence most strongly supports a conclusion about an author's attitude or tone?

Loaded or evaluative word choice that signals approval, disapproval, or irony. Word choices convey the author's subjective stance, providing direct insight into tone beyond neutral facts.
What type of evidence most strongly supports a conclusion about a character's motivation?

The character's stated reasons, choices, and consequences shown in the text. Explicit depictions of reasons and outcomes reveal underlying drives, offering concrete textual backing for motivational inferences.
What should you do first to find supporting evidence for a conclusion question?

Locate the conclusion in the question and restate it precisely. Precisely restating the conclusion ensures focused searching for matching textual details that directly validate it.
What is the best definition of evidence that supports a conclusion in a reading passage?

A specific detail that directly justifies the stated inference or claim. This definition emphasizes the need for precise textual support that logically validates the inferred conclusion without extraneous interpretation.
What is the best evidence to support a conclusion about cause and effect in a passage?

A stated causal link or sequence showing one event leads to another. Explicit connections or sequences in the text establish causality, providing stronger support than mere correlations.
What is the best way to eliminate wrong evidence choices in a supporting-evidence question?

Cross out choices that are irrelevant, too broad, or contradict the conclusion. Systematic elimination focuses on options that align closely with the conclusion, ensuring accurate evidence selection.
Identify the best evidence for the conclusion: "The mayor is unpopular." Detail: A) polls show $30\%$ approval B) mayor gave a speech.

A) Polls show $30\%$ approval. Low approval ratings quantitatively demonstrate unpopularity, unlike neutral actions such as giving a speech.
Identify the best evidence for: "The policy reduced accidents." A) accidents fell from $50$ to $20$ B) drivers felt safer.

A) Accidents fell from $50$ to $20$ . Numerical decline in accidents directly links the policy to reduced incidents, unlike subjective feelings which are indirect.
Which option best supports the conclusion: the one that adds new claims or the one that repeats the passage?

The one that matches a passage detail without adding new claims. Options that mirror passage content offer reliable support, whereas those introducing new ideas risk distortion or irrelevance.
Which option is best evidence for an inference: a detail that must be interpreted or a detail that directly points to it?

A detail that directly points to the inference with minimal extra assumptions. Direct pointers minimize interpretive leaps, ensuring the evidence logically and efficiently supports the inference.
Which detail best supports: "The author admires the scientist." A) calls her "brilliant" B) notes her birth year?

A) The author calls her "brilliant". Positive descriptors like 'brilliant' reveal admiration, unlike factual details such as birth year which remain neutral.
What is the difference between a conclusion and evidence in a passage?

Conclusion is an inference; evidence is the text detail that proves it. Conclusions are derived interpretations, while evidence consists of explicit textual elements that substantiate those interpretations.
Which option is better evidence for a character being generous: A) "He donated his savings" B) "He was nice"?

A) "He donated his savings". Specific actions like donating savings directly illustrate generosity, whereas vague descriptions lack concrete proof.
Which detail best supports: "The relationship is tense." A) dialogue has insults B) they share a meal quietly.

A) The dialogue includes insults. Insulting dialogue reveals conflict, contrasting with neutral interactions like sharing a meal that suggest harmony.
What is the main reason extreme language in an answer choice is often weak evidence?

It overclaims beyond what the passage actually states. Extreme language often exaggerates or misrepresents the passage's content, weakening its validity as evidence.
Which option is best evidence: A) a quote showing the claim B) a quote that is true but unrelated to the claim?

A) A quote that directly shows the claim. Direct quotes substantiate claims precisely, whereas unrelated truths fail to connect to or support the specific conclusion.
Identify the best evidence for: "The author is skeptical of the proposal." A) calls it "unproven" B) lists its steps neutrally.

A) The author calls it "unproven". Dismissive terms like 'unproven' indicate doubt, unlike neutral listings that lack evaluative judgment.
Which detail best supports: "The passage is primarily informative." A) defines key terms B) uses many metaphors?

A) It defines key terms. Defining terms indicates an explanatory purpose, contrasting with literary devices like metaphors that suggest figurative intent.
Which detail best supports: "The narrator is unreliable." A) contradicts earlier facts B) describes the weather?

A) The narrator contradicts earlier facts. Factual contradictions undermine credibility, serving as key evidence of unreliability unlike irrelevant descriptions.
Which option is strongest support: a specific quoted detail or a broad restatement of the conclusion?

A specific quoted detail from the passage. Quoted details provide direct, verifiable support from the text, making them stronger than paraphrased or generalized statements.
Which detail best supports: "The setting is dangerous." A) "sirens wailed nightly" B) "the sky was blue"?

A) "Sirens wailed nightly". Auditory details like wailing sirens evoke danger, contrasting with neutral descriptions like sky color that do not imply threat.
Which option is stronger evidence: a single precise fact or a vague generalization with no text anchor?

A single precise fact anchored in the text. Precise facts tied to the text provide targeted support, unlike vague generalizations that lack specificity and direct linkage.
What is the best evidence to support a conclusion about the passage's main idea?

Details repeated or emphasized across the passage, especially in topic and concluding lines. Repeated and positioned details highlight central themes, forming the foundation for main idea conclusions.
Identify the best evidence for: "The experiment was carefully controlled." A) one variable changed B) results were surprising.

A) Only one variable changed. Changing only one variable ensures controlled conditions, isolating effects, unlike unexpected results which do not confirm control.

Study these flashcards