Next Generation Bar Exam Quiz
12 questions · no time limit
0:00
EVIDENCE
Question 1 of 12
No time limit
Current
Answered
Flagged
Not seen
PASSAGE
In a products liability action for a tire blowout, the plaintiff calls a mechanic who has repaired and inspected tires for 30 years but has no engineering degree and has never conducted laboratory testing. The mechanic proposes to testify that, based on his experience, a tire showing this particular pattern of tread separation was manufactured with a defect, and that the blowout was not caused by underinflation. The defendant challenges the witness's qualifications.
Which of the following is the most accurate statement about the admissibility of the mechanic's testimony?
YOUR PROGRESS
12
QUESTIONS
Ready when you are
Answer in any order. Your progress shows here as you go.
QUESTIONS
KEYBOARD
Pick an answer ABCD
Next question ↵→
Previous ←
Flag for review F
Answers save as you go · flagged questions come back at the end