Next Generation Bar Exam Quiz
8 questions · no time limit
0:00
FOUNDATIONAL SKILLS
Question 1 of 8
No time limit
Current
Answered
Flagged
Not seen
PASSAGE
In Rivera v. Central Railroad, a railroad employee negligently knocked a small package from a boarding passenger's arms. The package exploded, toppling a heavy scale at the other end of the platform and injuring a woman standing about 25 feet away. The court held the railroad owed no duty to the woman: she was outside the zone of danger created by the employee's act, and her injury was an unforeseeable consequence.
In Delgado v. Arena Authority, a security guard used a taser to subdue a disorderly fan in a packed arena concourse; the taser dart missed the fan and struck a child standing 15 feet away. The court held the arena owed a duty to the child: the crowded concourse made injury to bystanders a foreseeable risk of using a taser there.
A casino security guard shoved a loud patron while ejecting him at the casino's outdoor valet entrance. The patron stumbled backward into a luggage cart, and a heavy suitcase fell to the ground, striking a guest who was standing about 30 feet away, outside the valet canopy, waiting for his car. The guest sues the casino.
Which fact in the guest's matter is most analogous to the dispositive fact in Rivera, making the casino more likely to prevail on the duty issue?
YOUR PROGRESS
8
QUESTIONS
Ready when you are
Answer in any order. Your progress shows here as you go.
QUESTIONS
KEYBOARD
Pick an answer ABCD
Next question ↵→
Previous ←
Flag for review F
Answers save as you go · flagged questions come back at the end