Summary judgment motion - Next Generation Bar Exam
- Under Celotex v. Catrett, how may a movant that does not bear the burden of proof at trial carry its initial burden?
- By pointing out the absence of evidence supporting the nonmovant's case. The movant need not produce evidence negating the nonmovant's claim.
- Under Rule 56(a), when must a court grant summary judgment?
- When there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The court must state on the record its reasons for granting or denying the motion.
- Under Rule 56(d), what may a court do when the nonmovant shows it cannot yet present facts essential to its opposition?
- Defer or deny the motion, allow time for discovery, or issue another appropriate order. The nonmovant must make the showing by affidavit or declaration with specified reasons.
- Under Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, how does a heightened burden of proof at trial affect summary judgment?
- The court asks whether a reasonable jury could find for the nonmovant under that heightened standard. For example, a public-figure defamation plaintiff must show evidence that could satisfy clear and convincing proof of actual malice.
- What makes a fact material for purposes of summary judgment?
- It might affect the outcome of the suit under the governing law. Disputes over irrelevant or unnecessary facts do not defeat summary judgment.
- How must the court view the record on a summary judgment motion?
- In the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, without weighing evidence or judging credibility. All reasonable inferences are drawn in the nonmovant's favor.
- What makes a dispute genuine for purposes of summary judgment?
- The evidence would allow a reasonable jury to return a verdict for the nonmoving party. A mere scintilla of evidence is not enough.
- Once the movant carries its burden, what must the nonmoving party do?
- Cite particular materials in the record showing a genuine dispute for trial. The nonmovant may not rest on the allegations or denials in its pleadings.
- After discovery, a defendant shows there is no evidence of causation. The plaintiff responds only by citing the complaint's allegations. How should the court rule?
- Grant summary judgment for the defendant. The nonmovant must cite record evidence; pleadings alone cannot create a genuine dispute.
- Absent a local rule or court order, until when may a party move for summary judgment?
- Until 30 days after the close of all discovery. A motion may be filed at any time before that deadline.
- What requirement applies to materials cited in support of or opposition to summary judgment?
- They must be capable of being presented in a form that would be admissible in evidence. A party may object that cited material cannot be presented in admissible form.
- Under Scott v. Harris, how should a court treat a nonmovant's account that is blatantly contradicted by an unchallenged video in the record?
- It need not adopt that account in ruling on the motion. No reasonable jury could believe a version of events that the video clearly refutes.
- On what portion of a case may a court grant summary judgment?
- Any claim or defense, or part of a claim or defense. Partial summary judgment narrows the issues remaining for trial.