Proving Fault & Res Ipsa Loquitur - Next Generation Bar Exam
- What are the elements of res ipsa loquitur?
- The accident ordinarily does not occur without negligence, and the negligence is attributable to the defendant. Traditionally, exclusive control by the defendant was required to show attribution.
- A statute requires livestock trucks to separate animals to prevent disease. Unseparated animals are swept overboard in a storm. What is the status of a negligence per se claim?
- It fails, because the harm is not the type the statute was designed to prevent. The statute addressed disease, not loss overboard.
- Under Ybarra v. Spangard, what is the effect of res ipsa loquitur when an unconscious patient is injured during surgery by an unknown member of the medical team?
- Each defendant with control over the patient must explain its conduct. The doctrine applies to multiple defendants when the plaintiff could not know who was at fault.
- What is the role of custom in medical malpractice?
- Customary practice generally establishes the standard of care. Expert testimony on the professional standard is usually required.
- What is the effect of compliance with a statute on negligence?
- It is evidence of due care but not conclusive. A statute sets a minimum standard, and reasonable care may require more.
- Under Byrne v. Boadle, what inference may be drawn from a barrel falling from a warehouse window?
- That the warehouse owner was negligent. Barrels do not ordinarily fall without negligence by those in control.
- A statute requires railings on stairs to prevent falls. A guest falls through a gap where a railing was missing. What doctrine establishes breach?
- Negligence per se. The guest is in the protected class and suffered the type of harm the statute addresses.
- What is the role of custom in proving negligence?
- Evidence of custom is relevant to the standard of care but not conclusive. Under The T.J. Hooper, an entire industry may lag behind reasonable precautions.
- A falling counterweight strikes a pedestrian in a building maintained solely by the defendant, with no proof of the specific negligent act. What doctrine permits an inference?
- Res ipsa loquitur. The accident ordinarily does not occur without negligence by the party in control.
- What is the procedural effect of res ipsa loquitur in most jurisdictions?
- It permits, but does not require, the jury to infer negligence. It allows the plaintiff to survive a motion for directed verdict.
- What excuses a violation of a statute in a negligence per se claim?
- Circumstances such as incapacity, emergency, or compliance being more dangerous than violation. An excused violation is not negligence.
- What is negligence per se?
- Violation of a safety statute by a defendant, harming a plaintiff in the protected class with the type of harm addressed. In most jurisdictions, the violation conclusively establishes breach.