Piercing the veil - Next Generation Bar Exam
- What is the general standard for piercing the corporate veil?
- Domination so complete that the corporation had no separate existence, plus fraud or injustice if the form were respected. Both elements, domination and resulting injustice, are ordinarily required.
- Why are courts more reluctant to pierce the veil for contract creditors than for tort victims?
- Contract creditors chose to deal with the corporation and could have investigated or demanded guarantees. Tort victims are involuntary creditors who had no chance to protect themselves.
- What is enterprise liability?
- Treating affiliated corporations under common control as a single enterprise liable for each other's obligations. Courts apply it when sister corporations are operated as one business without regard to their separate identities.
- Which factor do courts treat as especially significant in deciding whether to pierce the veil for a tort claim?
- Inadequate capitalization. Courts rarely pierce on undercapitalization alone, but it weighs heavily when tort victims cannot recover.
- In which kind of corporation do courts almost exclusively pierce the veil?
- Closely held corporations. Shareholders of publicly traded corporations are virtually never held liable on a veil-piercing theory.
- What is reverse veil piercing?
- Disregarding the entity to reach its assets for a controlling owner's personal obligations. Jurisdictions are divided on whether to permit it, particularly when an outside creditor seeks it.
- When will a court hold a parent corporation liable for its subsidiary's obligations?
- When the parent so dominates the subsidiary that it is a mere instrumentality, and injustice would otherwise result. Ownership and overlapping directors alone are not enough.
- A sole shareholder runs a minimally insured taxi corporation, pays personal bills from its account, and holds no meetings. An injured passenger sues him. What result is likely?
- The court pierces the veil and holds the shareholder personally liable. Undercapitalization, commingling, and disregard of the corporate form combine with an involuntary tort creditor.
- Which shareholder conduct concerning funds is a common factor supporting veil piercing?
- Commingling personal and corporate funds. Treating corporate assets as personal property shows that the corporation lacks a separate existence.
- A well-capitalized corporation that observes all formalities breaches a supply contract on its sole shareholder's decision. On what ground will the court refuse to pierce the veil?
- Control by a sole shareholder, without misuse of the corporate form, is not enough to pierce. Every closely held corporation is controlled by its owners; piercing requires abuse causing injustice.
- When the veil is pierced, which shareholders are held personally liable?
- Those who dominated or actively participated in the corporation's misuse. Passive shareholders are generally not held liable.