Modification of contracts - Next Generation Bar Exam
- An excavator hits a buried rock ledge neither party anticipated, and the owner agrees to pay more to finish. On what basis is the promise enforceable?
- It is a fair and equitable modification prompted by unanticipated circumstances. The Restatement (Second) exception enforces such modifications without new consideration.
- Under the Restatement (Second), when else is a modification enforceable without consideration?
- To the extent justice requires because of a material change of position in reliance on the modification. Reliance can make a promise to modify binding even if the unanticipated-circumstances exception does not apply.
- Under the traditional common-law rule, what must support a modification?
- New consideration. Under the preexisting duty rule, a promise of more for the same performance is unenforceable.
- Under the Restatement (Second), how is performance of a duty owed to a third person treated when another promises to pay for it?
- As consideration for the new promise. Because the promisor gains a performance it had no right to demand, the preexisting duty rule does not apply.
- When must a common-law modification be in writing?
- When the contract as modified falls within the statute of frauds. The writing requirement applies to the contract as it stands after the change.
- What effect does a no-oral-modification clause generally have at common law?
- Little; the parties may orally modify the contract, including the clause itself. The UCC treats such clauses differently for sales of goods.
- Under the Restatement (Second), when is a modification enforceable without new consideration?
- When it is fair and equitable in view of circumstances not anticipated when the contract was made, before full performance. This exception, in section 89, applies to unexecuted contracts.
- A contractor halfway through a job refuses to finish unless paid $10,000 more, and the owner agrees. On what ground is the owner's promise unenforceable at common law?
- The contractor gave no new consideration, since it was already bound to finish. The promise of additional pay for the same work fails under the preexisting duty rule.
- What makes a modification enforceable under the preexisting duty rule?
- Any new or different performance by the party benefiting from the modification. Even a slight added duty, if bargained for, supplies consideration.
- How do some courts avoid the preexisting duty rule when parties agree to change their contract?
- By treating the parties as having rescinded the old contract and formed a new one. Mutual rescission is supported by each party's release, so the new contract needs no additional consideration.