Limited admissibility - Next Generation Bar Exam
- Prior acts evidence is admitted under FRE 404(b) to show intent. What should the court give on request?
- An instruction that the evidence may not be used to infer character and action in conformity. Limiting instructions protect against the forbidden propensity inference.
- In a joint civil trial, a document is admissible against one defendant only. What should the court do on request of the other defendant?
- Instruct the jury to consider the document only against the first defendant. FRE 105 applies to evidence admissible against one party but not another.
- Under FRE 105, what must the court do when evidence is admissible against one party or for one purpose but not another?
- On timely request, restrict the evidence to its proper scope and instruct the jury. The duty is triggered by a party's request.
- A prior inconsistent statement not made under oath is admitted. What is the opposing party entitled to request?
- A limiting instruction that the statement may be considered only for credibility. The statement is not substantive evidence.
- Under the 2023 amendment to FRE 106, what objection may not bar a completing statement?
- A hearsay objection. The completing statement may be admitted to correct a misleading impression.
- What is the effect on appeal of failing to request a limiting instruction?
- Error is generally forfeited, subject to plain-error review. Courts are not required to give limiting instructions sua sponte under FRE 105.
- What may the court do if a limiting instruction cannot cure the risk of misuse of evidence?
- Exclude the evidence under FRE 403. Rule 403 considers the probable effectiveness of a limiting instruction.
- What is the purpose of the rule of completeness in FRE 106?
- To allow an adverse party to require introduction of another part of a statement that in fairness ought to be considered at the same time. Since 2023, the rule applies to written, recorded, and oral statements, over a hearsay objection.
- The prosecution reads an excerpt of the defendant's recorded statement that is misleading out of context. What may the defendant require under FRE 106?
- Introduction of the remaining portion needed to correct the misleading impression. The completing portion is introduced at the same time.