Freedom of association - Next Generation Bar Exam
- Under Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, when does forced inclusion of an unwanted member violate expressive association?
- When it would significantly burden the group's ability to express its views. Courts defer to a group's assertion of what its message is.
- Under Janus v. AFSCME, what is the status of requiring public employees to pay agency fees to a union they have not joined?
- It violates the First Amendment without the employee's affirmative consent. Compelled subsidies of a union's speech infringe free speech and association.
- Under Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta, what standard governs compelled disclosure of an organization's members or donors?
- Exacting scrutiny: a substantial relation to a sufficiently important interest, narrowly tailored. NAACP v. Alabama first recognized that compelled disclosure can chill association.
- A state requires a large, unselective civic organization to admit women. The group's message does not concern sex. What is the status of the requirement?
- It is valid, because eliminating sex discrimination is a compelling interest and admission does not burden the group's message. In Roberts v. Jaycees, admitting women did not impair the organization's ability to express its views.
- Under Rumsfeld v. FAIR, what is the status of requiring law schools to give military recruiters equal access as a condition of funding?
- It does not violate the schools' freedom of association. Allowing recruiters on campus did not force the schools to accept them as members or endorse their views.
- Under California Democratic Party v. Jones, what is the status of a blanket primary that lets voters of any party choose a party's nominee?
- It violates the party's right of association. A party has a right to choose its nominee without the participation of nonmembers.
- Under Elrod v. Burns and Branti v. Finkel, which public employees may not be dismissed for their political party affiliation?
- Those whose positions do not require party affiliation for effective performance. Policymaking or confidential positions may be filled on a partisan basis.
- What standard governs government infringement of the right of expressive association?
- A compelling interest unrelated to suppressing ideas that cannot be achieved by significantly less restrictive means. Roberts v. United States Jaycees stated this standard.
- When may the government penalize a person for membership in an organization with illegal aims?
- Only if the person knows of the illegal aims and specifically intends to further them. Mere membership, without specific intent, is protected.
- What relationships does the right of intimate association protect?
- Close personal relationships, such as family relationships. Large, unselective organizations do not qualify for intimate-association protection.