Congressional Enforcement Powers - Next Generation Bar Exam
- Under City of Boerne v. Flores, what test governs legislation enacted under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment?
- Congruence and proportionality between the injury to be prevented and the means adopted. Congress must identify a pattern of unconstitutional state conduct that the remedy addresses.
- On what power, other than Section 5, did the Court uphold the ban on race discrimination in public accommodations?
- The Commerce Clause. Heart of Atlanta Motel upheld Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as a regulation of commerce.
- Against whom does the Thirteenth Amendment's prohibition of slavery operate?
- Both government and private persons. Unlike the Fourteenth Amendment, the Thirteenth contains no state-action requirement.
- What did City of Boerne hold about the Religious Freedom Restoration Act as applied to the states?
- It exceeded Congress's Section 5 power. RFRA was out of proportion to any pattern of unconstitutional state conduct.
- What kind of Section 5 legislation may prohibit conduct that is not itself unconstitutional?
- Prophylactic legislation congruent and proportional to a documented pattern of state violations. Congress may sweep somewhat beyond the conduct the courts would find unconstitutional, if the fit is close.
- What did Shelby County v. Holder hold about the Voting Rights Act's coverage formula?
- It was unconstitutional because it relied on decades-old data that no longer justified treating covered states differently. The decision left in place the preclearance provision but without a valid formula to apply it.
- Invoking Section 5, Congress lets victims of gender-motivated violence sue their private attackers. On what ground is the provision invalid?
- Section 5 does not authorize Congress to regulate purely private conduct. United States v. Morrison held that the Fourteenth Amendment restricts only state action.
- Under Tennessee v. Lane, which application of Title II of the ADA was valid Section 5 legislation?
- Requiring access to the courts for persons with disabilities. The right of access to the courts is a fundamental right with a history of state violations.
- What may Congress not do under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment?
- Change the substance of Fourteenth Amendment rights as the courts define them. Section 5 is remedial; it enforces rights but does not redefine them.
- What does Section 2 of the Thirteenth Amendment permit Congress to do?
- Rationally determine and eliminate the badges and incidents of slavery, including by regulating private conduct. Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. upheld a ban on private racial discrimination in property sales on this basis.