Attorney-client and work product - Next Generation Bar Exam
- Under FRE 502(a), when does a disclosure waive the privilege as to undisclosed communications on the same subject?
- Only when the waiver is intentional and the disclosed and undisclosed communications ought in fairness to be considered together. This limits subject-matter waiver to situations where a party uses privileged material selectively.
- What is the status of the underlying facts that a client communicates to a lawyer?
- The facts are not privileged and may be obtained from other sources or by questioning the client. Only the communication itself is protected.
- What are the elements of the attorney-client privilege?
- A confidential communication between client and lawyer made for the purpose of obtaining or providing legal advice. The privilege protects communications, not the underlying facts.
- What is the effect of the presence of the lawyer's agents, such as a paralegal or interpreter, on confidentiality?
- It does not destroy confidentiality when they are needed to facilitate the legal advice. The presence of unnecessary third parties, by contrast, may defeat the privilege.
- Who holds the attorney-client privilege?
- The client. The lawyer may assert the privilege on the client's behalf, but only the client may waive it.
- What protection does opinion work product receive?
- Near-absolute protection for an attorney's mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, and legal theories. Ordinary factual work product may be obtained on a showing of substantial need and undue hardship.
- Under Swidler & Berlin v. United States, what is the effect of the client's death on the attorney-client privilege?
- The privilege survives the client's death. The Court refused to create an exception for criminal investigations after death.
- Under FRE 502(b), when does an inadvertent disclosure of privileged material not waive the privilege in a federal proceeding?
- When the holder took reasonable steps to prevent disclosure and promptly took reasonable steps to rectify it. Parties may also obtain a court order under Rule 502(d) protecting against waiver.
- What is the joint-client exception to the attorney-client privilege?
- Communications by jointly represented clients are not privileged in a later dispute between those clients. The privilege still applies against outsiders.
- What does the crime-fraud exception remove from the attorney-client privilege?
- Communications made to obtain help in committing or planning a future crime or fraud. Communications about past crimes, made to obtain a defense, remain privileged.
- Under Upjohn Co. v. United States, which corporate employees' communications with counsel may be privileged?
- Communications by employees at any level, made at the direction of superiors to secure legal advice for the corporation. Upjohn rejected the narrower control-group test in federal court.
- A client tells her lawyer she intends to shred documents before a subpoena is served and asks how to avoid detection. What is the status of the communication?
- It is not privileged, because it seeks help with a future crime. The crime-fraud exception applies to communications in furtherance of planned wrongdoing.