Assess Sufficiency of Provided Sources - Next Generation Bar Exam
- Which law generally governs whether conduct was lawful when a statute was amended after the events at issue?
- The version in effect when the conduct occurred, unless the amendment applies retroactively. Presumptions against retroactivity require checking effective dates and transition provisions.
- A memo on a negligence claim cites only a treatise describing the majority rule. What makes the sources insufficient?
- They lack primary authority from the controlling jurisdiction. The jurisdiction may follow a minority rule, and a treatise is secondary authority.
- Why are regulations implementing a statute often necessary for sufficient research?
- Because they may define statutory terms or impose additional binding requirements. Valid regulations have the force of law.
- What does a question of first impression in the jurisdiction require of the researcher?
- Searching for persuasive authority, such as decisions of other jurisdictions and secondary sources. In the absence of mandatory authority, persuasive sources guide prediction.
- When is a collection of sources sufficient to answer a research question?
- When it addresses each element or issue under current controlling law in the relevant jurisdiction. Gaps in any element, jurisdiction, or currency make the collection insufficient.
- A research assignment asks whether a client's contract claim is timely, and the file contains only cases on breach elements. What is missing?
- The applicable statute of limitations and authority on when the claim accrued. Timeliness turns on limitations and accrual rules, not the elements of breach.
- What does a provided statute that cross-references a definitions section require for sufficiency?
- The definitions section itself. Statutory terms may carry defined meanings that change the analysis.
- What is the significance of sources from the wrong jurisdiction for a question of state law?
- They are only persuasive, so the research is insufficient if mandatory authority exists. A lawyer must locate the controlling jurisdiction's law where it exists.
- What must a lawyer confirm before relying on a statute as current law?
- That the version is the one in effect at the relevant time and has not been amended or repealed. Annotated codes and legislative histories show amendments and effective dates.
- What must a lawyer confirm before relying on a judicial opinion as current law?
- That it has not been reversed, overruled, or otherwise negatively treated, using a citator. Updating ensures the authority remains good law.
- A file contains a 2015 state supreme court decision directly on point but no citator report. What is required before relying on it?
- Updating the decision with a citator to confirm it remains good law. A later decision or statute may have altered the rule.