Task Demand Analysis — Deconstruct task demands and required performance skills across settings - Nbcot Registered Occupational Therapists Otr

SECTION 1

Historical Context & Motivation

The practice of occupational therapy has always rested on a fundamental question: What does a person need to do, and what stands between them and doing it? Early practitioners approached this question intuitively, observing patients in rehabilitation hospitals after World War I and II and prescribing crafts and activities believed to restore function. However, the profession lacked a systematic vocabulary for dissecting activity demands—the specific requirements that any given task places on the human performer. Without that vocabulary, clinical reasoning remained implicit, inconsistent, and difficult to teach or replicate across settings.

The need for a formalized approach to task demand analysis grew alongside the profession's expanding scope of practice. As occupational therapists moved beyond physical rehabilitation into mental health, pediatrics, community settings, and ergonomics, they encountered radically different tasks performed in radically different environments. A single framework capable of deconstructing any human occupation—regardless of context—became essential for evidence-based evaluation and for communicating clinical findings to interdisciplinary teams.

1917–1940s • Founding Era & Craft-Based Analysis

Early occupational therapists such as Eleanor Clarke Slagle used habit training and craft prescription; task demands were assessed informally based on the therapist's clinical intuition and observation of physical and psychological responses to graded activities.

1960s–1970s • Activity Analysis Emerges

OT curricula began teaching formal activity analysis as a core competency. Theorists like Mary Reilly emphasized the therapeutic power of occupation, spurring development of structured methods to identify the motor, cognitive, and psychosocial components embedded in everyday tasks.

2002 • OTPF First Edition

The American Occupational Therapy Association (AOTA) published the first Occupational Therapy Practice Framework (OTPF), formalizing 'activity demands' as a distinct analytical category alongside client factors, performance skills, performance patterns, and contexts.

2014–2020 • OTPF 3rd & 4th Editions

Revised frameworks refined the taxonomy of activity demands, emphasizing the transactional relationship between task, person, and environment. The concept of performance skills (motor, process, and social interaction skills) became central to understanding how demands translate into observable behaviors.

2020s • Cross-Setting & Telehealth Applications

Task demand analysis expanded to address telehealth environments, community reintegration, and technology-assisted occupations. The NBCOT exam now requires candidates to apply analysis skills across diverse practice settings including acute care, schools, home health, and work rehabilitation.

The central question that task demand analysis seeks to answer is deceptively simple: What exactly does this task require of the person performing it, and how do those requirements change when the setting, tools, or social context shift? Answering this question with precision is the foundation of every occupational therapy evaluation and the gateway to effective, client-centered intervention.

SECTION 2

Core Principles & Definitions

Task demand analysis rests on a clear conceptual distinction between activity demands and performance skills. Activity demands are the objective, inherent requirements of the task itself—the objects used, the space required, the sequence of steps, the social norms governing performance. Performance skills, on the other hand, are the observable, goal-directed actions the client must execute to meet those demands. A complete task demand analysis maps one onto the other, identifying the gap between what the task requires and what the individual can produce.

Activity Demands

The specific features of a task that influence the type and amount of effort needed to perform it. Categories include objects and properties, space demands, social demands, sequencing and timing, required actions and performance skills, and required body functions and structures.

Performance Skills

Observable elements of action that have implicit functional purposes. The OTPF-4 organizes them into three categories: motor skills (e.g., reaching, gripping, stabilizing), process skills (e.g., sequencing, organizing, adapting), and social interaction skills (e.g., turn-taking, gesturing, expressing).

Context & Environment

Task demands are never static; they shift with the physical, social, cultural, temporal, and virtual contexts in which the occupation occurs. A meal preparation task, for example, demands different skills in a fully equipped kitchen versus a hospital bedside table.

Person–Task–Environment Transaction

Drawing from ecological and Person-Environment-Occupation (PEO) models, task demand analysis views occupational performance as emerging from the dynamic transaction among the person's capacities, the task's requirements, and the environmental conditions—not from any single factor in isolation.

Clinical Utility

The ultimate purpose of task demand analysis is to generate actionable clinical data that informs goal setting, intervention selection, environmental modification, and discharge planning across all practice settings.

✦

KEY TAKEAWAY

Think of task demand analysis like a mechanical engineer reverse-engineering a machine: instead of looking at the finished product, you disassemble it into its individual components—gears, shafts, circuits—and examine each one. Similarly, an OT takes an occupation (e.g., getting dressed, cooking a meal, participating in a classroom activity) and systematically identifies every sensory, motor, cognitive, and social "component" the task demands. Only by understanding all the parts can you determine which one is the bottleneck preventing successful performance.

SECTION 3

Visual Explanation — The Task Demand Framework

The following diagram illustrates how a single occupation is systematically deconstructed into its constituent activity demands and then mapped to the performance skills required of the client. The outer ring represents the contextual environments that modulate every demand category, while the inner layers show the six OTPF activity demand categories converging on the three performance skill domains. This layered model captures the essential clinical reasoning process: identify the demand, determine the relevant skill domain, and then assess whether the client's capacity meets the requirement.

Figure 1. The Task Demand Analysis Framework. An occupation (top) is deconstructed into six activity demand categories, each of which maps to one or more of the three performance skill domains. The surrounding dashed border represents the contextual environments that modulate every demand. Note how the dashed arrows show that multiple demand categories may converge on a single skill domain, reflecting the interdependent nature of occupational performance.

As the diagram illustrates, the analysis proceeds in a top-down fashion. The therapist begins with the target occupation that is meaningful to the client—perhaps independent dressing, meal preparation, or return to work. The occupation is then broken apart into its constituent activity demands: What objects are involved (buttons, utensils, tools)? What kind of space is needed? What sequence must be followed? What social rules govern performance? Each of these demand categories is then linked to the performance skills the client must demonstrate, allowing the therapist to pinpoint precisely where performance breaks down and to design targeted interventions.

SECTION 4

How Task Demand Analysis Works — The Analytical Process

Task demand analysis follows a structured clinical reasoning process that can be applied to any occupation in any setting. While the OTPF provides the categorical framework, the actual analytical process requires the therapist to move through a series of systematic steps that connect observation, knowledge of activity demands, and assessment of the client's performance skills. Understanding this process is essential for NBCOT exam success because questions frequently present clinical scenarios requiring the candidate to identify mismatches between task demands and client capacities.

Step-by-Step Analytical Process

Step 1 — Identify the target occupation. Determine the meaningful activity the client needs, wants, or is expected to perform. This must be occupation-based, not component-based (e.g., "preparing breakfast" rather than "improving grip strength").
Step 2 — Describe the typical performance context. Document the physical environment, social expectations, cultural norms, temporal factors, and any virtual or personal contextual variables that shape how the task is normally performed.
Step 3 — Deconstruct activity demands. Systematically catalog the objects/properties, space demands, social demands, sequencing/timing requirements, required actions, and necessary body functions and structures.
Step 4 — Map demands to performance skills. For each demand category, identify which motor, process, and/or social interaction skills are required. A single demand often engages multiple skill domains simultaneously.
Step 5 — Assess the person–task fit. Compare the identified skill requirements against the client's current performance capacity, noting areas of match and mismatch. This gap analysis drives intervention planning.
Step 6 — Consider cross-setting variability. Re-analyze the task demands under different contextual conditions (e.g., hospital vs. home vs. community) to anticipate how performance may change across settings during transitions of care.

OTPF Activity Demand Categories — Deep Dive

Demand Category	Definition	Example (Brushing Teeth)
Objects & Properties	Tools, materials, and equipment used, including their physical properties (size, weight, texture, shape)	Toothbrush (lightweight, narrow handle), toothpaste tube (requires squeeze force), water cup
Space Demands	Physical environment requirements including lighting, surface height, floor type, room size	Bathroom with sink at standard height (~34 inches), adequate lighting, stable standing surface
Social Demands	Social expectations, rules, and interactions inherent in the task	Generally performed independently and privately; social norms expect twice-daily completion
Sequencing & Timing	Process order, number of steps, timing requirements, and the need to complete steps in a specific sequence	Multi-step sequence: pick up brush → apply paste → brush systematically → rinse → replace items; typically 2 minutes
Required Actions & Performance Skills	The motor, process, and social interaction skills embedded in the task	Motor: bilateral coordination, grip, fine motor manipulation. Process: sequencing, initiating, terminating.
Required Body Functions & Structures	Underlying physiological and anatomical prerequisites (per ICF classification)	Intact UE ROM, hand strength (grip/pinch), standing balance, oral sensation, attention span

OTPF Activity Demand Categories Applied to Tooth Brushing

💡

NBCOT Exam Tip

NBCOT questions often ask you to identify which activity demand is the primary barrier to performance. When answering, systematically eliminate demand categories that are already met and focus on the mismatch between the specific task requirement and the client's observed performance deficit. Avoid jumping to intervention before fully analyzing the demand.

SECTION 5

Cross-Setting Task Demand Variability

One of the most clinically important—and most frequently tested—aspects of task demand analysis is recognizing how the same occupation generates different demand profiles across practice settings. A client preparing a simple meal in an acute-care hospital kitchen faces fundamentally different demands than the same client performing the same task in their home kitchen or in a community-based transitional living program. The physical environment, available tools, social expectations, time constraints, and safety considerations all shift, and with them, the performance skills required for successful completion.

Figure 2. Cross-Setting Demand Comparison for Meal Preparation. The three columns represent acute care (lowest demands), home health (moderate to high demands), and community/work settings (highest demands). Notice how every demand category—objects, space, social expectations, sequencing, and required skills—intensifies as the setting moves from institutional to community-based contexts. This comparison is critical for discharge planning and transition-of-care reasoning on the NBCOT exam.

The clinical implication of cross-setting variability is profound. A client who successfully opens a pre-packaged snack at bedside in acute care may be entirely unable to prepare a family meal at home, not because their underlying capacities have changed, but because the task demands have escalated dramatically. The therapist must anticipate these shifts during evaluation and explicitly document how performance is expected to change as the client transitions across settings. This anticipatory analysis is what distinguishes competent occupational therapy reasoning from a purely component-focused approach.

ℹ

Settings to Know for the NBCOT

Be prepared to analyze task demands across the following settings: acute care hospitals, inpatient rehabilitation, skilled nursing facilities, home health, outpatient clinics, school-based settings, community programs, and vocational/work rehabilitation. Each presents unique contextual factors that alter the demand profile of any given occupation.

SECTION 6

Worked Example — Task Demand Analysis for Dressing

The following worked example walks through a complete task demand analysis for upper-body dressing in a client recovering from a left cerebrovascular accident (CVA) with resulting right hemiparesis. The client is currently in inpatient rehabilitation and will be transitioning to home health services. This example demonstrates how to systematically apply the framework introduced in previous sections.

Task Demand Analysis: Donning a Button-Down Shirt (Post-CVA, Right Hemiparesis)

1
Step 1 — Identify the Target Occupation

The client is a 62-year-old retired teacher who identifies independent dressing as a priority occupational goal. Specifically, the client wants to don a button-down shirt independently each morning—a task that holds cultural and personal significance as part of his daily routine prior to the stroke. This is the occupation we will deconstruct.

Target occupation: Donning a button-down shirt independently.
2
Step 2 — Describe the Performance Context

In inpatient rehabilitation, the client dresses in a hospital room with a standard closet and a bed-height chair. Shirts are hung on accessible hooks. Lighting is fluorescent and consistent. In the home health context, the client will dress in a bedroom with a high closet rod, dim natural lighting, a soft bed (no firm chair), and shirts stored in drawers requiring bilateral retrieval. The physical context change increases space and object demands significantly.

Context shift identified: Inpatient rehab (controlled) → Home (variable, higher demands).
3
Step 3 — Deconstruct Activity Demands

Objects & Properties: Button-down shirt with small buttons (~1 cm diameter), fabric that drapes and shifts, buttons requiring bilateral fine motor manipulation. Space Demands: Seated or standing workspace; access to closet/drawer. Social Demands: Privacy expected; cultural norm for neat appearance. Sequencing & Timing: Multi-step sequence (~12 steps): retrieve shirt → orient → don affected arm first → pull across back → don unaffected arm → align front → button from bottom up → adjust collar. Requires consistent step order for compensatory technique. Required Body Functions: Bilateral UE ROM (at least passive on affected side), trunk control for weight shifting, fine motor dexterity (unaffected hand), standing or seated balance, visual attention to midline.

Six demand categories cataloged. Highest demand areas: objects (button manipulation) and sequencing (12-step process).
4
Step 4 — Map Demands to Performance Skills

Motor Skills: Stabilize (trunk), reach (unaffected arm across midline), grip (pinch buttons), coordinate (bilateral arm movements), position (orient shirt). Process Skills: Sequence (follow 12-step order), initiate (begin task without prompting), attend (sustain attention for ~10 minutes), organize (retrieve and arrange clothing), adapt (modify approach when difficulty encountered). Social Interaction Skills: Minimal for independent dressing; relevant if therapist or caregiver is providing verbal cues (then: acknowledge, respond to cues).

Primary skill domains engaged: Motor (5 skills) and Process (5 skills). Social interaction minimal.
5
Step 5 — Assess Person–Task Fit (Gap Analysis)

Observation reveals the client can stabilize trunk when seated but not standing. He can reach across midline with the unaffected left hand but lacks active grasp on the right (affected) side, making bilateral tasks like buttoning impossible without compensatory technique. Process skills are intact—he can sequence, attend, and initiate appropriately. The primary performance gap is in motor skills: bilateral coordination for buttoning and dynamic standing balance for retrieving clothing from the closet. Intervention should target compensatory dressing techniques (one-handed buttoning), adaptive equipment (button hook), and environmental modification (lower closet rod at home).

Gap identified: Motor skills (bilateral coordination, standing balance) are insufficient for current task demands. Intervention plan: compensatory technique training, adaptive equipment, environmental modification.
6
Step 6 — Cross-Setting Re-Analysis

Upon discharge to home health, the therapist must re-analyze demands in the home environment. The soft bed removes the stable seated surface; the high closet rod adds a reaching demand; dim lighting may impair visual guidance of one-handed buttoning. Recommendations include a dressing chair with armrests, a reacher for high clothing, improved task lighting at the dresser, and a button hook with a built-up handle. The therapist documents these anticipated demand shifts in the discharge summary to ensure continuity of care.

Home environment re-analysis complete. Four environmental modifications recommended to maintain person–task fit across settings.

SECTION 7

Strengths, Limitations, and Common Pitfalls

Task demand analysis is one of the most powerful tools in the occupational therapy evaluation toolkit, but like any clinical reasoning framework, it has both strengths and limitations. Understanding these is essential for applying the framework effectively in practice and for navigating NBCOT questions that test your ability to recognize when and how to use it appropriately.

Strengths	Limitations
Provides a systematic, replicable framework applicable to any occupation in any setting, reducing reliance on clinical intuition alone.	Can be time-intensive, especially for complex multi-step occupations; may not be feasible in full depth for every evaluation in fast-paced acute care.
Aligns with the OTPF, providing a shared professional vocabulary for documentation and interprofessional communication.	Categorical frameworks may oversimplify the dynamic, fluid nature of real-world task performance, where demands interact nonlinearly.
Supports client-centered practice by grounding analysis in the client's actual occupational goals rather than isolated body functions.	Requires skilled observation and clinical reasoning; novice therapists may produce superficial analyses that miss subtle demand features.
Facilitates cross-setting anticipatory planning, which is critical for transitions of care (acute → rehab → home → community).	Cultural and personal meaning of tasks may not be fully captured by demand categories alone; must be supplemented with client interview data.
Directly links evaluation findings to intervention planning by identifying specific demand–capacity mismatches.	The analysis is setting-specific and time-bound; demands can shift unexpectedly (e.g., illness progression, environmental changes), requiring re-analysis.

Strengths and Limitations of Task Demand Analysis

⚠️

COMMON PITFALL

A frequent mistake among entry-level therapists—and a common trap in NBCOT questions—is performing what might be called a "component-level analysis" instead of a true task demand analysis. In a component-level analysis, the therapist assesses isolated body functions (grip strength, ROM, cognition) without linking them to specific task demands. This produces a list of impairments but fails to explain why the client cannot perform the target occupation. Always begin with the occupation and work downward to the demands it imposes, rather than starting with impairments and working upward.

SECTION 8

Connection to Advanced Evaluation Frameworks

Task demand analysis does not exist in isolation—it is one component of a broader evaluation ecosystem that includes standardized assessments, theoretical models, and advanced clinical reasoning approaches. Understanding how task demand analysis integrates with these advanced frameworks strengthens your clinical reasoning and prepares you for complex NBCOT scenarios that require synthesis across evaluation domains.

Feature	Task Demand Analysis (OTPF-Based)	Standardized Assessment (e.g., AMPS, COPM)
Purpose	Deconstruct what the task requires; identify demand–capacity mismatches	Quantify functional performance level; measure change over time
Data Type	Qualitative, descriptive; therapist-generated reasoning	Quantitative scores (ordinal or interval); norm-referenced or criterion-referenced
Flexibility	Highly flexible—can be applied to any occupation; no standardized protocol	Structured administration protocol; specific tasks prescribed by the tool
Setting Sensitivity	Explicitly designed to be re-applied across settings	May require specific environmental conditions for valid administration
Relationship	Informs which assessments to select by identifying relevant skill domains	Provides measurable data to validate or refine the demand analysis findings

Task Demand Analysis vs. Standardized Assessment

In clinical practice, task demand analysis and standardized assessment function as complementary tools. The Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS), for example, uses a standardized observational protocol to rate 16 motor and 20 process skills during performance of chosen IADL or personal ADL tasks. The AMPS essentially operationalizes what a task demand analysis outlines qualitatively: it provides Rasch-calibrated scores for each performance skill, enabling the therapist to quantify the severity of demand–capacity mismatches. Similarly, the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) provides client-reported ratings of performance and satisfaction in self-identified occupations, grounding the demand analysis in the client's subjective priorities.

Models such as the Person-Environment-Occupation (PEO) model, the Ecology of Human Performance (EHP) framework, and the Model of Human Occupation (MOHO) all provide theoretical lenses through which task demand analysis can be interpreted. The PEO model, for instance, directs the therapist to consider how person, environment, and occupation overlap—and task demand analysis provides the operational method for dissecting the occupation component of that triad. As you advance in practice, you will learn to select and integrate these frameworks fluidly, using task demand analysis as the foundational analytical step that informs all subsequent clinical decisions.

SECTION 9

Practice Problems

Question 1: CONCEPTUAL

An occupational therapist is evaluating a client's ability to perform morning hygiene tasks. The therapist carefully documents the weight and shape of the soap, the height of the sink, the number of steps in the sequence, and the social expectations around grooming. According to the OTPF, which evaluation construct is the therapist primarily analyzing, and how does it differ from assessing client factors?

Show answer

The therapist is primarily analyzing activity demands—the specific requirements inherent in the task itself. Activity demands include objects and their properties, space demands, social demands, sequencing and timing, required actions/performance skills, and required body functions and structures. This differs from client factors, which are the person's internal capacities (body functions like ROM, strength, cognition, and body structures like intact joints). Activity demands describe what the task requires; client factors describe what the person can provide. The therapist must analyze both to identify demand–capacity mismatches that impede occupational performance.

Question 2: BASIC APPLICATION

A client with a traumatic brain injury is working on meal preparation in an inpatient rehabilitation kitchen. The therapist observes that the client can physically perform all motor actions (reaching, gripping, stirring) but consistently performs steps out of order—for example, attempting to pour boiling water before placing the tea bag in the cup, and leaving the stove burner on after cooking is complete. Which performance skill domain is primarily impaired, and which activity demand category does this skill relate to?

Show answer

The client's primary impairment is in process skills, specifically the skill of sequencing (performing steps in a logical and effective order) and terminating (completing or ending a step at the appropriate point). This relates to the sequencing and timing activity demand category, which specifies that meal preparation requires steps to be completed in a particular order with appropriate timing. The motor skill demands are being met, but the process skill demands are not, resulting in unsafe and ineffective task performance.

Question 3: INTERMEDIATE

A school-based OT is evaluating a 9-year-old student with developmental coordination disorder (DCD) who struggles with handwriting. The teacher reports the student can write legibly at an isolated desk with a pencil grip but cannot keep up during classroom note-taking. Perform a brief cross-setting demand analysis: identify at least three activity demands that differ between isolated practice and classroom note-taking, and explain how each difference increases the demand on the student's performance skills.

Show answer

Three key demand differences between isolated practice and classroom note-taking: (1) Sequencing and timing demands increase—in the classroom, the student must simultaneously listen, process auditory information, and write, requiring divided attention and rapid motor execution under time pressure, whereas isolated practice allows self-paced performance. (2) Social demands increase—the student must attend to a teacher's verbal instructions, manage peer distractions, and conform to classroom behavioral expectations while writing, all of which compete for attentional resources. (3) Space demands change—the classroom desk may differ from the isolated practice setup in height, surface area, and position relative to the visual target (whiteboard), requiring postural adjustments and visual tracking that add motor and process skill demands. These combined demand increases explain why the student performs adequately in isolation but breaks down in context.

Question 4: APPLIED

You are an OT conducting a pre-discharge home evaluation for a 74-year-old client with COPD and moderate bilateral hip osteoarthritis. The client's goal is to independently shower at home. The home bathroom has a standard tub-shower combination with no grab bars, a glass shower door that swings outward, shampoo bottles stored on a high shelf, and a bath mat on tile. Perform a full task demand analysis for showering in this specific environment, identifying at least one demand from each of the six OTPF activity demand categories. Then recommend two specific interventions based on the demand–capacity mismatches you identify.

Show answer

Objects & Properties: Shampoo bottles stored on a high shelf require overhead reaching; the client's limited hip flexion and COPD-related activity intolerance make bending and reaching demanding. Space Demands: The tub-shower combination requires stepping over a raised edge (~15 inches), which is a fall risk given bilateral hip OA. Social Demands: Showering is a private activity; the client may resist caregiver assistance, making independent accessibility critical. Sequencing & Timing: Showering requires sustained standing for 10–15 minutes with multiple weight shifts; COPD limits activity endurance. Required Actions: Motor skills (standing balance, bilateral arm reach, grip for washcloth) and process skills (energy conservation pacing). Body Functions: Cardiovascular endurance, bilateral hip ROM, standing balance. Two interventions: (1) Install a tub transfer bench and hand-held shower head to eliminate tub step-over and allow seated showering, reducing balance and endurance demands. (2) Relocate shampoo to a suction-cup caddy at chest height and install grab bars to reduce reaching demands and provide stabilization during transfers.

Question 5: CRITICAL THINKING

Two clients—Client A (age 30, C6 spinal cord injury, inpatient rehab) and Client B (age 30, moderate intellectual disability, community group home)—both have the goal of independent meal preparation. Compare and contrast how a task demand analysis for the same occupation (making a sandwich) would differ for these two clients. In your analysis, discuss which activity demand categories present the greatest challenge for each client, which performance skill domains are most affected, and how the therapist's intervention approach would differ despite the shared occupation.

Show answer

While both clients share the same target occupation, the demand–capacity mismatch profiles are fundamentally different. For Client A (C6 SCI), the greatest challenge lies in the objects and properties demand category (manipulating jars, knives, and containers without active finger flexion) and space demands (wheelchair-accessible counter height, reaching into refrigerator). The primary performance skill domain affected is motor skills (grip, reach, coordinate), while process skills are likely intact. Intervention focuses on adaptive equipment (rocker knife, jar opener, dycem, reacher) and environmental modification (lowered counters, front-loading appliances). For Client B (intellectual disability), the greatest challenge lies in sequencing and timing (remembering and executing multi-step sequences) and potentially social demands (group home norms, kitchen sharing with housemates). The primary affected domain is process skills (sequence, organize, attend, adapt), while motor skills may be adequate. Intervention focuses on visual step-by-step checklists, task simplification, structured practice with backward chaining, and social skills coaching for shared kitchen use. This comparison illustrates that task demand analysis is client-specific even when the occupation is identical—the framework directs each therapist to entirely different intervention pathways.

SUMMARY

Summary — Task Demand Analysis

Summary

Task demand analysis is a systematic clinical reasoning process in which an occupational therapist deconstructs an occupation into its constituent activity demands—including objects and properties, space demands, social demands, sequencing and timing, required actions, and necessary body functions and structures—and then maps those demands to the three performance skill domains (motor, process, and social interaction skills) to identify specific demand–capacity mismatches that impede occupational performance.

Critically, the analysis must account for cross-setting variability: the same occupation generates different demand profiles across acute care, inpatient rehabilitation, home health, and community/work settings. Always begin with the client's target occupation, work downward through demand categories, map to performance skills, and then compare the resulting skill profile against the client's current capacities. This top-down, occupation-based reasoning—grounded in the OTPF framework and complemented by standardized assessments like the AMPS and COPM—is the foundation of effective evaluation and intervention planning across all OT practice settings.