CARS Quiz
20 questions · no time limit
0:00
FOUNDATIONS OF COMPREHENSION
Question 1 of 20
No time limit
Current
Answered
Flagged
Not seen
Read the passage and answer the question.
The resurgence of interest in classical liberal education—often summarized as "teaching the great books"—is frequently defended as a remedy for specialization. Students, it is argued, should encounter enduring questions about justice, beauty, and truth before being trained for a profession. The impulse has a certain dignity, especially in institutions that have reduced learning to credentialing.
Yet the defense sometimes relies on an implausible uniformity: as if a list of texts could stand outside history and politics. The "greatness" of books is not merely discovered; it is also conferred through translation, institutional repetition, and the exclusion of rival traditions. A curriculum that treats the canon as self-evident risks mistaking inheritance for inevitability.
Advocates respond that the canon is revisable and that the point is not to worship authors but to practice rigorous reading. This is a stronger argument. Close reading can indeed cultivate intellectual discipline, and shared texts can provide a common reference for debate. Still, the selection of shared texts is never a purely pedagogical decision; it signals what a community chooses to regard as exemplary.
The most defensible version of liberal education would therefore be explicit about its criteria and open to contestation. Otherwise, the appeal to "timelessness" becomes an alibi for avoiding the difficult work of justification.
Question: The author's attitude toward "great books" liberal education is best described as:
YOUR PROGRESS
20
QUESTIONS
Ready when you are
Answer in any order. Your progress shows here as you go.
QUESTIONS
KEYBOARD
Pick an answer ABCD
Next question ↵→
Previous ←
Flag for review F
Answers save as you go · flagged questions come back at the end