Solving with Logarithms - Math 3
- The equation has potential solutions that must be verified. After solving and checking domain restrictions, how many valid solutions exist? Answer: Exactly one valid solution exists Since the logarithms are equal: . Rearranging: . Using the quadratic formula: . For domain restrictions, we need and (so ). Note that , which is positive when or . Since we also need , we need . Check solutions: (valid), but (invalid). Therefore exactly one valid solution exists. Choice A incorrectly concludes no solutions. Choice C doesn't account for domain restrictions. Choice D suggests too many solutions.
- A radioactive substance decays according to , where is in years and years is the half-life. If a sample starts with 1000 grams and must be reduced to less than 50 grams before disposal, what is the minimum number of complete years that must pass? Answer: 26 years Set up the inequality: . Dividing by 1000: . Taking natural log: . Since , when we divide by the negative coefficient, the inequality flips: years. Since we need complete years and the amount must be less than 50 grams, we need at least 25 complete years. Checking: after 25 years, grams (still too much), but after 26 years, grams (acceptable). Choice A gives the approximate solution without considering it must be complete years. Choice B gives 25 years but this doesn't quite reach the threshold. Choice D is one year too many.
- A certain medication's concentration in the bloodstream decreases according to , where is concentration in mg/L and is time in hours. A second dose should be given when the concentration drops to 5 mg/L. After how many hours should the second dose be administered? Answer: Approximately 9.2 hours Set up the equation: . Divide both sides by 20: . Take the natural logarithm: . Therefore: hours. Choice A uses an incorrect decay constant. Choice C makes an error in the logarithm calculation. Choice D uses the wrong initial concentration in the setup.
- To solve for , logarithms must be used. Which equation correctly represents the first step after taking the natural logarithm of both sides? Answer: When you encounter an exponential equation where the bases are different (like 5 and 3), taking logarithms of both sides is the key to solving it. This transforms the equation from exponential form into linear form by bringing the exponents down as coefficients. Starting with , when you take the natural logarithm of both sides, you get . The crucial step is applying the logarithm power rule: . This rule allows you to bring the exponents down as multipliers in front of the logarithms. Applying this rule: and . Therefore, the equation becomes , which is answer C. Let's examine why the other options are incorrect. Option A, , incorrectly distributes the logarithm over subtraction and addition within the exponents. Option B, , confuses the logarithm of a product rule with the power rule—it treats the exponents as if they're being logged separately. Option D, , uses addition instead of multiplication, which isn't how the power rule works. Remember: when applying , the exponent becomes a coefficient that multiplies the entire logarithm—don't break apart the exponent's components.
- A learning curve model shows that typing speed follows words per minute, where is weeks of practice. To reach 95% of the maximum speed, which equation must be solved? Answer: When you encounter exponential growth or decay models, you're often asked to find when the function reaches a certain percentage of its maximum value. The key insight is identifying what "maximum" means and translating the percentage correctly. In this typing speed model , the maximum speed occurs as . Since as increases, the maximum speed is words per minute. To reach 95% of this maximum, you need words per minute. Setting up the equation: . Dividing both sides by 85 gives . Rearranging: . This matches answer choice D. Answer A stops at but doesn't complete the isolation of the exponential term. Answer B gives the correct setup but hasn't simplified to isolate the exponential expression. Answer C jumps ahead to taking the natural logarithm () but the question asks which equation "must be solved," not the final logarithmic form. Remember: when working with exponential models, carefully identify the maximum value, calculate the target percentage, then systematically isolate the exponential term. The question often asks for an intermediate step in your solution process, not necessarily the final form.
- The equation has a solution that can be found using logarithms. When this equation is solved correctly, what is the value of ? Answer: 26 Rewrite , so . Since the bases are equal: . Solving: , so . Therefore . Choice B results from the error . Choice C results from the error . Choice D results from the error .
- A sound intensity level in decibels is given by , where is the intensity and is a reference intensity. If one sound measures 60 dB and another measures 80 dB, what is the ratio of their intensities ? Answer: For the first sound: , so , giving . For the second sound: , so , giving . Therefore: . Choice A incorrectly assumes a linear relationship. Choice B uses the difference . Choice D uses the simple ratio of decibel values.
- A medication concentration in the bloodstream follows mg/L, where is hours after administration. For therapeutic effectiveness, the concentration must remain above 3 mg/L. After how many hours will the medication drop below the therapeutic level? Answer: hours Set up the equation: . Dividing by 12: . Taking natural log: . Since : , so . Choice A incorrectly uses instead of . Choice C uses from the initial concentration rather than the ratio. Choice D has the correct but wrong coefficient.
- A population model is given by , where is time in months. To find when the population reaches 2500, which equation must be solved? Answer: Set . Cross-multiply: . Dividing by 2500: . Subtracting 1: . Dividing by 9: . Taking natural log: . Multiplying by -1: , or equivalently . Choice A results from incorrectly getting . Choice B has the correct logarithm but wrong sign for . Choice D uses unnecessary notation .
- A carbon-14 dating formula is , where is the ratio of current carbon-14 to original carbon-14, and is years since death. If an artifact shows 15% of its original carbon-14, approximately how old is it? Answer: 15,700 years Given , substitute into the formula: . Calculate , so years. Choice A incorrectly uses . Choice C incorrectly uses . Choice D incorrectly uses .
- A radioactive substance decays according to , where is in years. If 75% of the original amount has decayed, how many years have passed? Answer: Approximately 60 years When you encounter exponential decay problems, you're working with situations where a quantity decreases at a rate proportional to its current amount. The key insight here is understanding what "75% has decayed" means for your calculation. If 75% of the substance has decayed, then 25% (or 0.25) of the original amount remains. This means . Substituting into the decay equation: Dividing both sides by : Taking the natural logarithm of both sides: This confirms answer D is correct. Answer A (52 years) would correspond to about 70% decay, not 75%. Answer B (45 years) represents roughly 65% decay. Answer C (30 years) would only result in about 50% decay—a common trap if you confused "75% decayed" with the half-life. The most common error on these problems is misinterpreting the percentage. Remember: if X% has decayed, then (100-X)% remains. Always set up your equation using the remaining percentage, not the decayed percentage. Also, when solving exponential equations, natural logarithms are your tool for "undoing" the exponential function.
- An investment grows according to , where is the amount in dollars and is time in years. At what time will the investment first exceed $2500? Answer: Between 15 and 16 years Set up the inequality: . Divide by 1000: . Take logarithm of both sides: . Therefore: years. Since we want when it first exceeds $2500, this occurs between 15 and 16 years. Choice B uses instead of natural log. Choice C misinterprets 'first exceeds' as 'reaches exactly'. Choice D makes a calculation error in the division.
- An exponential equation needs to be solved. After expressing both sides with base 4, what equation results? Answer: Since , we can rewrite as . Therefore, the equation becomes . Setting the exponents equal: , which gives , so . Choice A doesn't simplify the exponent completely. Choice C incorrectly multiplies the exponent by 4 instead of 2. Choice D makes an error in the constant term of the exponent.
- A bacterial culture grows according to the model , where is time in hours. If the culture needs to reach 8000 bacteria before a certain treatment can be applied, and the treatment must be administered within a 2-hour window, what is the latest time (in hours) the treatment window can begin? Answer: 6.75 hours First, solve for when the population reaches 8000: . Dividing by 250: . Taking natural log: , so hours. Since the treatment must be administered within a 2-hour window, the latest the window can begin is hours. Choice B incorrectly adds 0.5 hours. Choice C gives the time when 8000 is reached, not when the window begins. Choice D adds 2 hours instead of subtracting.
- An investment account follows the compound interest formula , where is the final amount, is the principal, and is time in years. If an investor wants to triple their initial investment, which logarithmic equation correctly represents the time needed using natural logarithms? Answer: To triple the investment: , which simplifies to . Taking natural log of both sides: , so . Choice B inverts the fraction. Choice C incorrectly multiplies the logarithms. Choice D incorrectly adds the logarithms.