Solving Rational Equations - Math 3
- Solve . How many solutions does this equation have? Answer: One solution, because one potential solution is extraneous When solving rational equations, you must always check for extraneous solutions—apparent solutions that don't actually satisfy the original equation due to restrictions in the domain. Let's solve this step by step. First, subtract from both sides: Combine the fractions on the left: Multiply both sides by , noting that : Subtract from both sides: Now check this solution in the original equation. When : the left side gives , and the right side gives . Since both sides equal , is valid. The algebraic manipulation yielded only one potential solution, and it's not extraneous. Therefore, the equation has exactly one solution. Choice B is wrong because we found one valid solution, not zero. Choice C is incorrect because we only found one potential solution, not two. Choice D is wrong because the equation doesn't simplify to an identity—it has a specific solution. Always verify solutions in rational equations by substituting back into the original equation, and remember that the domain excludes values that make denominators zero.
- The equation is solved by first factoring . After clearing denominators and simplifying, what type of equation results? Answer: A linear equation in with one potential solution to check for validity First, factor . The equation becomes . The domain excludes and . Multiplying through by : . Simplifying the left side: . The right side: . So we have , which gives , so . This is a linear equation with one solution. Since doesn't equal 2 or -2, it doesn't violate domain restrictions. Checking: substitute into the original equation to verify it's valid.
- To solve , a student multiplies both sides by and gets . What is the next step, and what should the student be careful about? Answer: Expand to get , then conclude no solution exists Expanding : , which simplifies to . This gives , which is impossible. Therefore, the equation has no solution. The student should conclude that despite the algebraic manipulation being valid, the resulting contradiction indicates that no value of satisfies the original equation. This is different from having an extraneous solution (where a solution exists algebraically but violates domain restrictions) - here, no solution exists at all.
- Consider the equation . A student claims this equation has no solution. Is the student correct? Answer: No, because the equation is satisfied by infinitely many values of Note that . Multiplying both sides by : , which simplifies to . This is an identity that's true for all values of except those that make the original denominators zero (). Therefore, the solution set is all real numbers except and . The student is incorrect; the equation has infinitely many solutions.
- A student solving makes an error and concludes that is a solution. What type of error did the student most likely make? Answer: Failed to check that makes a denominator zero in the original equation In the original equation , when , the terms and have denominators that equal zero (since ). This makes these expressions undefined. Even if satisfies the algebraic equation obtained after clearing denominators, it cannot be a solution to the original rational equation because it violates the domain restrictions. The student's most likely error was failing to check whether the algebraically obtained solution makes any denominator zero in the original equation.
- A student attempts to solve and finds as a potential solution. What should the student conclude? Answer: is an extraneous solution because it makes denominators zero When solving rational equations, you must always check whether your solutions make any denominator equal to zero, as this would make the equation undefined. Let's examine what happens when . Looking at the original equation , we need to check each denominator. When : - The first term has denominator - The middle term has denominator - The third term has denominator (this is fine) Since two denominators become zero when , this value makes the original equation undefined. Therefore, is an extraneous solution that must be rejected. Answer choice A is wrong because cannot be correct when it makes denominators zero. Answer choice B is incorrect because while would also create undefined denominators (making and ), the main issue is that itself is invalid. Answer choice D goes too far—while must be rejected, we'd need to solve the equation properly to determine if other valid solutions exist. The key lesson: whenever you solve rational equations, always substitute your solutions back into the original equation to verify they don't make any denominator zero. Any solution that does this is extraneous and must be discarded, regardless of whether it satisfies the algebraic manipulations.