Psychological Drivers of Choice — Explain motivation, perception, learning, and attitudes as drivers of choice at a conceptual level. - Marketing

SECTION 1

Historical Context & Motivation

For most of its early history, marketing operated under the assumption that consumers were rational agents who weighed price against utility and selected the optimal product. This view, rooted in classical economics, treated the consumer as a calculating machine — a perspective that left marketers with little to work with beyond price cuts and product features. The emergence of consumer psychology as a field fundamentally challenged this assumption, revealing that human choice is driven by a rich interior landscape of needs, perceptions, learned associations, and deeply held attitudes. These psychological drivers of choice have since become central to how firms design products, craft messages, and build brands.

1943 • Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs

Abraham Maslow published his theory of human motivation, proposing that needs are arranged in a hierarchy from physiological survival to self-actualization. Marketers later adopted this framework to classify which level of need a product addresses.

1957 • Motivation Research & Vance Packard

Vance Packard's "The Hidden Persuaders" brought public attention to Freudian-influenced motivation research used by advertisers, sparking debate about subconscious drivers of consumer choice and the ethics of psychological persuasion.

1968 • Howard–Sheth Model of Buyer Behavior

John Howard and Jagdish Sheth formalized a comprehensive model integrating perception, learning, and attitudes into a single decision framework, establishing the modern multivariable approach to consumer behavior research.

1979 • Prospect Theory — Kahneman & Tversky

Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky demonstrated that consumers evaluate gains and losses asymmetrically, proving that perception of outcomes — not objective value — drives decisions, and laying the groundwork for behavioral economics in marketing.

2000s • Neuromarketing & Implicit Attitude Research

Advances in fMRI and implicit association testing enabled marketers to measure subconscious attitudes and neural responses to brands, confirming that much consumer choice operates below the threshold of deliberate awareness.

The central question that this lesson addresses is deceptively simple: Why does a consumer choose one product over another when the objective features are similar? The answer lies in four interconnected psychological constructs — motivation, perception, learning, and attitudes — each of which filters, shapes, and ultimately determines the choices consumers make in the marketplace. Understanding these drivers equips marketers to move beyond guesswork and design strategies that resonate with the internal states of their target audience.

SECTION 2

Core Principles & Definitions

The four psychological drivers of consumer choice operate as an interconnected system rather than as isolated variables. A consumer's motivation creates the initial energy that propels behavior, while perception determines which stimuli from the environment are noticed, interpreted, and retained. Learning encodes these experiences into memory and shapes future expectations, while attitudes crystallize into relatively stable evaluative frameworks that predispose the consumer toward or against specific brands, products, or categories. Together, these four constructs form the cognitive and affective infrastructure through which every purchase decision is processed.

Motivation

An internal state of tension arising from an unmet need — whether physiological, psychological, or social — that drives the consumer to act. Motivation determines whether a consumer enters the market and what category of solution they seek. Frameworks like Maslow's hierarchy and Herzberg's motivation–hygiene theory classify the type and intensity of the underlying need.

Perception

The process by which a consumer selects, organizes, and interprets sensory stimuli to create a meaningful picture of the world. Perception is subjective — two consumers can encounter the same advertisement and derive entirely different meanings. Key sub-processes include selective attention, selective distortion, and selective retention.

Learning

A relatively permanent change in behavior or knowledge resulting from experience. In marketing, learning encompasses classical conditioning (brand–emotion associations), operant conditioning (reinforcement via rewards or loyalty programs), and cognitive learning (information processing and schema formation through deliberate evaluation).

Attitudes

Learned predispositions to respond favorably or unfavorably toward a given object — a brand, product, company, or idea. Attitudes are composed of three components: cognitive (beliefs), affective (feelings), and conative (behavioral intentions). They are resistant to change but can be shifted through persuasion, experience, or social influence.

✦

KEY TAKEAWAY

Think of consumer decision-making as a radio receiver. Motivation is the power switch — without it, nothing happens. Perception is the tuning dial that selects which signal to focus on from thousands of competing frequencies. Learning is the memory bank that stores previously heard stations and their quality. Attitudes are your preset favorites — stable preferences that guide where you tune first. Marketers succeed when they understand every stage of this receiving process.

SECTION 3

Visual Explanation — The Psychological Choice Funnel

The following diagram illustrates how the four psychological drivers interact sequentially — yet recursively — to produce a consumer's final choice. A need triggers motivation, which activates perceptual filters; perceived stimuli are processed through learned associations; and the resulting evaluation is shaped by pre-existing attitudes, ultimately leading to a purchase decision or its deferral.

The flow progresses left to right: motivation activates the process, perception filters stimuli, learning encodes experience, and attitudes produce the evaluative stance that leads to choice. External modulators (culture, reference groups, social class, situational factors) influence every stage, and a feedback loop from post-purchase evaluation recursively reshapes motivation for future decisions.

Notice the red dashed feedback loop from "Choice" back to "Motivation." This reflects the reality that consumer behavior is cyclical, not linear. A satisfying purchase reduces tension (negative feedback), while a disappointing one creates new tension (cognitive dissonance) that restarts the search process. This feedback mechanism is why post-purchase marketing — such as follow-up emails, satisfaction surveys, and loyalty programs — is not merely an afterthought but a critical intervention point in the consumer's psychological journey.

SECTION 4

How the Four Drivers Work — Mechanisms in Depth

Motivation: From Need to Drive

Motivation begins with a need — a gap between the consumer's actual state and desired state. When this gap becomes large enough to cross a threshold of awareness, it generates a drive, which is the internal energy that pushes the consumer toward action. The direction of this action is shaped by wants — culturally and individually shaped forms that the need takes. A hungry consumer (biological need) might seek sushi, fast food, or a meal-kit delivery service depending on their cultural conditioning and personal preferences. Maslow's hierarchy suggests that lower-order needs (physiological, safety) must be substantially satisfied before higher-order needs (belonging, esteem, self-actualization) become motivationally active, though marketing scholars note that consumers frequently satisfy multiple levels simultaneously — purchasing a luxury vehicle, for instance, satisfies safety, esteem, and self-actualization needs concurrently.

Perception: Filtering the Marketing Environment

Consumers are exposed to an estimated 4,000 to 10,000 marketing messages per day, yet they consciously process only a tiny fraction. Perception operates through three gatekeeping mechanisms. Selective attention determines which stimuli are noticed — consumers are more likely to attend to messages related to their current needs, messages that offer significant contrast from their surroundings, or messages that deviate from expectations. Selective distortion causes consumers to interpret information in ways consistent with their pre-existing beliefs — a loyal Apple customer, for example, may interpret a critical product review as biased rather than informative. Selective retention means consumers remember information that supports their attitudes and forget information that contradicts them. These three filters collectively mean that the marketer's intended message and the consumer's received message can differ dramatically.

Learning: Building Behavioral and Cognitive Associations

Consumer learning takes three principal forms. Classical conditioning pairs a neutral stimulus (e.g., a jingle or logo) with an unconditioned stimulus that naturally elicits an emotional response (e.g., happiness, nostalgia), until the brand alone triggers the desired feeling. Coca-Cola's pairing of its brand with holiday warmth exemplifies decades of classical conditioning. Operant conditioning uses reinforcement — positive rewards such as loyalty points, discounts, or social praise — to increase the probability that a behavior (purchase, repeat purchase) will recur. Cognitive learning involves deliberate information processing: reading reviews, comparing specifications, and constructing mental models of product performance. This form dominates high-involvement purchases such as automobiles or insurance policies, where consumers invest significant mental effort before committing.

Attitudes: The Evaluative Summary

Attitudes integrate the outputs of motivation, perception, and learning into a relatively stable predisposition toward a marketing object. The tricomponent attitude model (also called the ABC model) decomposes attitudes into three dimensions. The cognitive component encompasses the consumer's beliefs and knowledge about the object ("This brand uses sustainable materials"). The affective component captures the emotional response ("I feel good when I buy from this brand"). The conative component reflects behavioral intention ("I intend to purchase this brand next time"). Fishbein's multi-attribute attitude model formalizes the cognitive dimension by proposing that a consumer's overall attitude toward an object equals the sum of their beliefs about the object's attributes weighted by the importance they assign to each attribute.

FISHBEIN MULTI-ATTRIBUTE ATTITUDE MODEL

A₀ = Σᵢ (bᵢ × eᵢ)

Where A₀ = overall attitude toward the object, bᵢ = strength of belief that the object possesses attribute i, eᵢ = evaluation (importance) of attribute i, and the summation runs over all n salient attributes.

SECTION 5

Classifying the Drivers — Types and Sub-Processes

Each of the four psychological drivers contains internal sub-categories that marketers must distinguish in order to craft effective strategies. The diagram below maps each driver to its principal sub-processes and illustrates representative marketing applications. Understanding these distinctions allows marketers to diagnose precisely where a campaign is succeeding or failing in the consumer's internal decision architecture.

Each of the four drivers is broken into its principal sub-processes, with representative marketing applications shown in italics. The involvement spectrum at the bottom illustrates how the relative dominance of each driver shifts depending on whether the consumer faces a low-, moderate-, or high-involvement purchase decision.

Driver	Low-Involvement Purchase	High-Involvement Purchase
Motivation	Minimal arousal; routine replenishment (e.g., toothpaste)	Intense drive; significant gap between actual and desired state (e.g., buying a home)
Perception	Peripheral processing; attention to packaging, shelf placement, colors	Central processing; attention to detailed product information, specifications
Learning	Classical conditioning dominant; brand recognition through repetition	Cognitive learning dominant; deliberate information search and comparison
Attitudes	Weak, malleable; formed post-purchase ("I bought it, so I must like it")	Strong, multi-attribute evaluation; formed pre-purchase after deliberation

How each psychological driver manifests differently across involvement levels

SECTION 6

Worked Example — Applying the Four Drivers to a Smartphone Purchase

Consider a college student, Maya, whose two-year-old smartphone has a cracked screen and declining battery life. She is deciding between three options: the latest iPhone, a Samsung Galaxy, and a mid-range OnePlus device. Let us trace Maya's decision through each of the four psychological drivers to see how they shape her final choice.

Smartphone Purchase Decision — Maya's Psychological Journey

1
Step 1 — Identify the Motivation

Maya's cracked screen and dying battery create a functional (utilitarian) need — her phone no longer reliably performs its core function. This gap between her actual state (unreliable phone) and desired state (a phone that works seamlessly) generates a strong drive. However, Maya also has psychogenic needs at play: she wants a device that signals technological savvy to her peers (esteem need) and enables seamless social connectivity (belonging need). The motivation is therefore both biogenic (functional performance) and psychogenic (social identity), placing this firmly in high-involvement territory.

Motivation level: High — dual utilitarian and hedonic drives activated
2
Step 2 — Trace the Perceptual Filters

Now actively searching, Maya's selective attention is heightened for smartphone-related information. She notices social media ads for Samsung that she previously scrolled past, reads a tech review of the OnePlus, and pays close attention when a friend mentions the iPhone camera. However, selective distortion is also operating: Maya has been an iPhone user for five years, so she unconsciously interprets the Samsung review through a skeptical lens ("their software isn't as smooth") while giving more favorable interpretation to the iPhone review. Selective retention ensures she remembers the iPhone's strong camera performance data while forgetting that the OnePlus review praised its superior battery life at half the price.

Perception outcome: Information filtered toward confirming existing brand preference
3
Step 3 — Assess the Role of Learning

Maya's past experiences create powerful learned associations. Five years of using iPhones have produced operant conditioning effects: each positive experience (smooth OS updates, seamless AirDrop with friends) has reinforced her repeat-purchase tendency. Classical conditioning has also linked the Apple brand with feelings of premium quality and aesthetic pleasure through years of exposure to Apple advertising and retail environments. Cognitively, Maya actively processes new information by reading comparison articles, but her learned schemas for evaluating phones are already structured by past Apple experience — she weights ecosystem integration highly because that is what her experience has taught her to value.

Learning outcome: Strong conditioned associations and cognitive schemas favor the incumbent brand
4
Step 4 — Evaluate Attitudes Using the Multi-Attribute Model

Maya's attitude toward each phone can be modeled using Fishbein's formula: A₀ = Σ(bᵢ × eᵢ). Suppose she evaluates three salient attributes on a 1–7 scale: Camera Quality (importance eᵢ = 7), Ecosystem Integration (eᵢ = 6), and Price Value (eᵢ = 4). Her belief ratings (bᵢ) are: iPhone (6, 7, 3), Samsung (6, 4, 5), OnePlus (4, 3, 7). iPhone attitude score = (6×7) + (7×6) + (3×4) = 42 + 42 + 12 = 96. Samsung = (6×7) + (4×6) + (5×4) = 42 + 24 + 20 = 86. OnePlus = (4×7) + (3×6) + (7×4) = 28 + 18 + 28 = 74. The iPhone generates the highest attitude score, primarily because Maya weights ecosystem integration heavily and believes Apple excels on that dimension.

Attitude scores: iPhone = 96, Samsung = 86, OnePlus = 74 → Maya chooses the iPhone
5
Step 5 — Post-Purchase Feedback Loop

After purchasing the iPhone, Maya experiences positive reinforcement (the new camera exceeds expectations, friends compliment it), which strengthens both her learned associations and her existing attitude toward Apple. This post-purchase satisfaction reduces her need tension to zero for this product category and further entrenches her brand loyalty, making future repeat purchases even more likely. Had Maya experienced buyer's remorse — for example, discovering that the OnePlus offered better value — cognitive dissonance would have created new motivational tension, potentially triggering information search to justify her decision or, in extreme cases, product return.

Feedback: Positive post-purchase experience reinforces all four drivers for future decisions

SECTION 7

Strengths, Limitations, and Practical Considerations

The four-driver framework provides marketers with a powerful diagnostic toolkit, but like any model of human behavior, it has both strengths and limitations that practitioners must understand in order to apply it responsibly and effectively. The following comparison highlights these trade-offs and offers guidance on when the framework is most — and least — useful.

Dimension	Strengths	Limitations
Comprehensiveness	Covers the full arc of internal decision-making from need arousal through evaluation; provides a shared vocabulary for cross-functional marketing teams	Can oversimplify by treating drivers as sequential stages when in practice they operate simultaneously and interact nonlinearly
Measurability	Attitudes can be quantified via Fishbein's model and Likert scales; learning effects can be tracked through purchase frequency and brand recall metrics	Motivation and perception are inherently subjective and difficult to observe directly; self-reported data is subject to social desirability bias
Actionability	Each driver suggests specific marketing levers: need-based segmentation (motivation), sensory branding (perception), loyalty programs (learning), repositioning (attitudes)	Translating psychological insights into executable campaigns requires additional research (e.g., ethnography, A/B testing) beyond the conceptual model alone
Cross-Cultural Validity	The four constructs are recognized across diverse consumer behavior traditions (North American, European, Asian marketing scholarship)	The relative importance of each driver varies by culture; Maslow's hierarchy, for instance, has been criticized for Western individualist bias
Ethical Implications	Understanding drivers enables marketers to serve genuine consumer needs more effectively, improving customer satisfaction and product-market fit	Knowledge of psychological vulnerabilities can be exploited through dark patterns, manipulative framing, or artificial scarcity that preys on motivated consumers

Strengths and limitations of the four-driver framework for marketing practice

⚖️

KEY TAKEAWAY

The psychological drivers framework is like a medical diagnostic model: it provides a structured way to identify what is happening inside the consumer, but the diagnosis is only as good as the data feeding it. A physician who relies on a checklist without actually listening to the patient will miss crucial nuances — and the same is true for a marketer who applies these constructs mechanically without grounding them in qualitative consumer research. The framework's greatest value is as an organizing lens that ensures no aspect of the consumer's internal world is overlooked, not as a predictive algorithm.

SECTION 8

Connection to Advanced Consumer Behavior Theory

The four psychological drivers covered in this lesson form the foundation of individual-level consumer behavior analysis. At more advanced levels of study, these constructs are embedded in comprehensive models that incorporate group-level influences (reference groups, family, culture), situational variables (time pressure, mood, physical environment), and decision-process theories that specify the cognitive architecture of choice. The table below maps each driver to the advanced theoretical tradition it feeds into, providing a roadmap for deeper exploration.

Foundational Driver	Advanced Theory / Model	Key Extension
Motivation	Self-Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan); Regulatory Focus Theory (Higgins)	Distinguishes intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivation; promotion focus (gains) vs. prevention focus (losses) shapes message framing
Perception	Elaboration Likelihood Model (Petty & Cacioppo); Prospect Theory (Kahneman & Tversky)	Specifies central vs. peripheral processing routes; demonstrates loss aversion and reference-point dependence in how outcomes are perceived
Learning	Associative Network Memory Model; Brand Schema Theory	Models brand knowledge as an interconnected network of nodes and links in memory; explains how brand extensions succeed or fail based on schema fit
Attitudes	Theory of Planned Behavior (Ajzen); Implicit Association Test research	Adds subjective norms and perceived behavioral control to the attitude–behavior link; reveals that explicit and implicit attitudes can diverge, especially for socially sensitive products

Mapping foundational drivers to advanced consumer behavior theories

As you progress in your marketing studies, you will encounter these advanced frameworks in courses on consumer behavior, brand management, and marketing research. The key insight to carry forward is that motivation, perception, learning, and attitudes are not self-contained modules but rather interacting layers in a dynamic system. Advanced models attempt to specify the precise nature of these interactions — how, for example, a consumer's regulatory focus (a motivational variable) determines whether they process information via the central or peripheral route (a perceptual variable), which in turn affects the strength and durability of the attitude formed. Understanding this layered architecture is essential for designing marketing strategies that are not merely attention-grabbing but genuinely persuasive.

SECTION 9

Practice Problems

Question 1: CONCEPTUAL

A consumer walks past a coffee shop every morning without stopping, but one day — after skipping breakfast — she notices the aroma and enters. Which two psychological drivers best explain the change in behavior, and how do they interact in this scenario?

Show answer

The two drivers are motivation and perception. Skipping breakfast activated a biogenic need (hunger), which heightened the consumer's drive to satisfy that need. This increased motivation lowered her perceptual threshold for food-related stimuli, making her selectively attend to the coffee aroma that she had previously filtered out through selective attention. The interaction is critical: without the motivational state, the perceptual stimulus was always present but not noticed. This illustrates a core principle — motivation acts as a gate that determines which environmental stimuli reach conscious awareness through perceptual filtering.

Question 2: BASIC CALCULATION

Using Fishbein's multi-attribute attitude model (A₀ = Σ bᵢ × eᵢ), calculate the overall attitude score for Brand X given the following data. Attributes: Durability (importance e = 6, belief b = 5), Style (e = 7, b = 4), Price (e = 5, b = 6). Then calculate Brand Y: Durability (e = 6, b = 4), Style (e = 7, b = 6), Price (e = 5, b = 3). Which brand does the consumer prefer, and which attribute most differentiates the two?

Show answer

Brand X: A₀ = (5 × 6) + (4 × 7) + (6 × 5) = 30 + 28 + 30 = 88. Brand Y: A₀ = (4 × 6) + (6 × 7) + (3 × 5) = 24 + 42 + 15 = 81. The consumer prefers Brand X with a score of 88 versus 81 for Brand Y. The attribute that most differentiates the two brands is Price, where Brand X's advantage (6 − 3 = 3 belief-point difference, weighted by importance 5) contributes a 15-point swing, followed by Durability (1-point belief difference × 6 importance = 6 points favoring X). Interestingly, Brand Y outscores X on Style (42 vs. 28), but this advantage is insufficient to overcome X's strengths on the other two attributes.

Question 3: INTERMEDIATE

A luxury watch brand discovers through survey research that consumers hold strong positive cognitive beliefs about the brand's craftsmanship (cognitive component) and intend to recommend it to friends (conative component), yet few consumers report warm emotional feelings toward the brand (affective component). Using the tricomponent attitude model, explain which component is deficient, propose one specific marketing strategy to address the gap, and identify which type of learning (classical conditioning, operant conditioning, or cognitive learning) the strategy would primarily leverage.

Show answer

The deficient component is the affective dimension — consumers respect the brand intellectually but do not feel emotionally connected to it. This is a common challenge for heritage brands that emphasize functional superiority over emotional resonance. One effective strategy would be to create a brand narrative campaign that pairs the watches with emotionally charged life moments — such as a father passing a watch to a graduating child — using cinematic advertising and experiential retail events. This strategy primarily leverages classical conditioning: by repeatedly pairing the watch brand (neutral stimulus) with powerful emotional scenes (unconditioned stimulus that naturally elicits warmth, nostalgia, and pride), the brand alone will eventually evoke those feelings. Over time, the affective deficit closes, and the three attitude components become aligned, which research shows strengthens purchase intention and reduces vulnerability to competitive switching.

Question 4: APPLIED

You are the marketing manager for a new plant-based protein bar entering a market dominated by established brands. Using the four psychological drivers as a diagnostic framework, identify one barrier your new product faces within each driver (motivation, perception, learning, attitudes) and propose a specific tactic to overcome each barrier. Justify why each tactic addresses the identified driver.

Show answer

Motivation barrier: Consumers may not perceive a need gap — they already have satisfactory protein bars. Tactic: Activate a latent psychogenic need by positioning the bar around environmental sustainability and personal health identity ("You care about the planet — your protein bar should too"), creating tension between consumers' values and their current product choice. Perception barrier: As a new entrant, the brand is invisible amid thousands of SKUs — selective attention works against you. Tactic: Use disruptive, unconventional packaging (e.g., matte black with neon green typography) that creates visual contrast on shelves, leveraging the perceptual principle that stimuli with high figure-ground contrast break through attentional filters. Learning barrier: Consumers have no prior experience with the brand, so no positive associations exist. Tactic: Implement a mass sampling program at gyms and college campuses paired with a money-back guarantee, using operant conditioning (trial → positive taste experience → reinforcement → repeat purchase) to build learned associations rapidly. Attitude barrier: Consumers may hold negative beliefs about plant-based protein (e.g., "it tastes bad" or "it has less protein"). Tactic: Deploy cognitive learning strategies through transparent nutritional comparisons on social media, influencer partnerships with athletes who credibly demonstrate performance, and third-party certifications, directly addressing the cognitive component of the attitude to shift beliefs about product attributes.

Question 5: CRITICAL THINKING

A consumer research study finds that consumers who hold strongly positive explicit attitudes toward a fast-food brand (measured by surveys) often exhibit negative implicit attitudes (measured by an Implicit Association Test). How might the four-driver framework — particularly the interaction between learning and attitudes — explain this discrepancy? What implications does this have for the validity of Fishbein's multi-attribute model, and how might a marketer respond strategically?

Show answer

This discrepancy likely arises because explicit and implicit attitudes are formed through different learning processes. Explicit attitudes — the kind Fishbein's model captures — are products of cognitive learning: consumers deliberately evaluate the brand on salient attributes (taste, convenience, price) and arrive at a positive summary judgment. Implicit attitudes, however, are shaped by classical conditioning and accumulated cultural associations (health concerns, guilt, social stigma around fast food) that operate below conscious awareness. The consumer has learned two contradictory evaluative responses through different mechanisms, and the survey captures only the explicit, rationalized layer. This has significant implications for Fishbein's model: because it relies on self-reported belief and importance ratings, it systematically captures only the cognitive learning pathway and may overpredict purchase intention when implicit attitudes work in the opposing direction. The model remains useful as a diagnostic of the deliberate evaluation process, but it should be supplemented with implicit measurement tools for a complete picture. Strategically, a marketer could address the implicit negativity by redesigning the in-store environment (e.g., open kitchens, natural materials, visible fresh ingredients) to create new sensory associations that gradually recondition the implicit evaluative response, while simultaneously maintaining the rational value proposition that supports explicit attitudes.

SUMMARY

Lesson Summary — Psychological Drivers of Choice

Summary

Consumer choice is not a single event but a psychological process shaped by four interconnected drivers. Motivation provides the energy — an unmet need creates a drive that propels the consumer into the marketplace, with Maslow's hierarchy classifying needs from physiological to self-actualization. Perception acts as a filter, using selective attention, distortion, and retention to determine which of thousands of daily marketing stimuli reach conscious processing. Learning — through classical conditioning, operant conditioning, and cognitive processing — encodes past experiences into memory structures that shape future expectations and brand associations.

Finally, attitudes crystallize these inputs into stable evaluative predispositions composed of cognitive, affective, and conative components, quantifiable through Fishbein's multi-attribute model (A₀ = Σ bᵢ × eᵢ). The four drivers do not operate in isolation — they form a recursive feedback loop in which post-purchase experience reshapes motivation, perception, learning, and attitudes for future decisions. The dominance of each driver shifts with involvement level: low-involvement purchases are governed primarily by conditioning and perceptual cues, while high-involvement purchases activate deliberate cognitive learning and complex attitude formation. Effective marketing strategy requires diagnosing which driver represents the greatest opportunity or obstacle for a given product, consumer segment, and decision context.