01 / 20

Detail
Identification

Master the art of locating specific information in dense LSAT reading passages and selecting the answer choice that the passage directly supports.

LSAT Reading Comprehension

What Is Detail Identification?

Detail identification questions ask you to find a specific piece of information that is explicitly stated in the passage. Unlike inference questions, the correct answer will be a close paraphrase of something the author actually wrote: you do not need to read between the lines.

Recognizing the Question Stem

Detail questions use characteristic language. Learning to spot these phrases instantly tells you what kind of thinking the question demands.

Direct Phrasing
"According to the passage..." or "The passage states that..."
Mention Phrasing
"The author mentions which of the following..." or "Which of the following is cited..."
Identification Phrasing
"The passage identifies... as..." or "Which of the following does the author describe as..."

Why This Skill Matters

~30% Other RC question types Detail Questions of all RC questions Fastest to solve Answer is in the text High accuracy No guesswork needed Builds confidence Bank time for harder Q's

The Core Rule

THE CORRECT ANSWER is a paraphrase of something explicitly stated in the passage. It rewrites, not repeats Same meaning, different words It never adds new ideas No outside knowledge needed

Paraphrase vs. Exact Copy

The LSAT almost never repeats the passage word-for-word in the correct answer. Instead, it paraphrases: the same idea expressed with different vocabulary or sentence structure. Watch out for answer choices that copy striking phrases from the passage but change the meaning.

True Paraphrase
Passage: "lacks sufficient empirical support" → Answer: "has not been adequately demonstrated by evidence"
Deceptive Copy
Passage: "lacks sufficient empirical support" → Answer: "empirical support has made it sufficient" (same words, opposite meaning)

Detail vs. Inference

Detail Question Inference Question
Stem language "According to the passage..." "It can be inferred..."
Answer source Explicit in text Implied by text
Reasoning Match and verify Read between the lines
Risk Misreading a paraphrase Over-inferring beyond scope
Speed Faster Slower

The 5-Step Method

1
Read the stem. Confirm it is a detail question by identifying "according to," "states," or "mentions."
2
Identify the keyword. Locate the specific topic, name, concept, or phrase the stem asks about.
3
Return to the passage. Use your keyword to find the relevant sentence or sentences. Read the surrounding context.
4
Pre-phrase an answer. Before looking at the choices, summarize what the passage says in your own words.
5
Match and eliminate. Find the choice that best matches your pre-phrase. Eliminate choices that distort, add to, or go beyond the text.

Decision Flowchart

Read the question stem Detail Q? Yes No Use other strategy Find keyword in passage Pre-phrase your answer Match best choice Eliminate distortions and additions

Worked Example: Basic

✕ Trap choice
"corrupt and biased" : too extreme; the passage says inefficient, not corrupt.
✓ Correct
"inefficient and outdated" : a direct paraphrase (here, nearly verbatim) of the passage language.

Worked Example: Intermediate

A
"markets should be entirely controlled by the government" : Too extreme. Keynes said intervention could be necessary, not total control.
B
"government action might be needed during extended recessions to boost demand" : ✓ Correct paraphrase. "Prolonged economic downturn" = "extended recessions"; "stimulate demand" = "boost demand."
C
"classical economics was entirely wrong" : Distortion. The passage says Keynes differed, not that he rejected everything.

Worked Example: Advanced

Eliminating Wrong Answers

Wrong answer choices on detail questions follow predictable patterns. Learn to recognize and dismiss them quickly.

Too Extreme
Turns a moderate claim ("can be useful") into an absolute ("is always essential").
Wrong Speaker
Attributes a detail to the wrong person or group mentioned in the passage.
Outside Scope
Introduces a concept or claim that never appears in the passage at all.
Reversed Logic
Uses the passage's own words but flips the relationship (cause and effect swapped).

Common Mistakes

✕ Answering from Memory
Relying on a vague impression of the passage instead of going back to verify. Always re-read the specific sentence.
✕ Choosing Familiar Words
Picking a choice because it uses the same vocabulary as the passage, even though the meaning has been altered.
✕ Over-Inferring
Adding your own reasoning or outside knowledge. Detail questions reward only what is explicitly stated.

Strategy Summary

Step Action Watch Out For
1. Classify Confirm it is a detail question Inference stems in disguise
2. Keyword Find the topic the stem targets Vague or broad stems
3. Locate Return to passage, read in context Reading only one sentence
4. Pre-phrase Summarize in your own words Skipping this step
5. Match Find closest paraphrase, eliminate rest Familiar-word traps

Question 1 of 5

According to the passage, Thompson characterizes judicial precedent as:

Question 2 of 5

The passage states that critics of green corridors are concerned that such corridors may:

Question 3 of 5

According to the passage, Osei supports her position by citing:

Question 4 of 5

According to the passage, Speaker B recommends which of the following to address the impact of the new regulations?

Question 5 of 5

The passage mentions which of the following as an explanation for higher microplastic concentrations in deep-ocean sediments?