Reading Comprehension Quiz
15 questions · no time limit
0:00
GLOBAL UNDERSTANDING
Question 1 of 15
No time limit
Current
Answered
Flagged
Not seen
PASSAGE
Courts have increasingly turned to algorithmic risk assessments to guide pretrial release decisions, often on the promise that they can neutralize human bias by grounding bail in data. That promise is appealing but oversold. Risk scores are not delivered from a neutral realm; they are constructed from past arrests, charges, and failures to appear, all of which reflect policing priorities and court practices that are unevenly applied across communities. Feeding that history into a model can launder inequities under a veneer of objectivity.
Two practical constraints compound the problem. First, many tools are proprietary, leaving defendants, judges, and researchers unable to inspect the variables, weights, or error rates. Without transparency, defendants cannot meaningfully contest a score that might tip the balance against release, and courts cannot weigh whether a model's false positives fall disproportionately on certain groups. Second, the factors that drive pretrial risk are dynamic: policy changes alter policing, economic shifts alter stability, and court administration tweaks scheduling—yet tools are often validated once and then left in place. An outdated model can be worse than no model at all, because it addscertainty to stale assumptions.
This does not mean that judges should discard risk information altogether. Pure intuition is no panacea; studies show that unstructured human judgment is inconsistent and can be infected by the same biases the tools reflect. The question is not tool or no tool, but how to constrain their use so that they supplement rather than supplant judicial reasoning and adversarial testing.
A defensible approach would include public documentation of variables, regular third-party validation with subgroup error analysis, and clear avenues for defendants to challenge inputs and scores. Courts should bar the use of risk assessments as a dispositive basis for detention and require judges to articulate reasons when diverging from or relying on a score. Periodic policy review—triggered by shifts in policing or court practices—should be built in. Used this way, risk tools can serve as one source of structured information, framed by transparency and accountability, rather than as an opaque arbiter that dictates liberty.
Which one of the following most accurately expresses the primary purpose of the passage?
YOUR PROGRESS
15
QUESTIONS
Ready when you are
Answer in any order. Your progress shows here as you go.
QUESTIONS
KEYBOARD
Pick an answer ABCDE
Next question ↵→
Previous ←
Flag for review F
Answers save as you go · flagged questions come back at the end