Reading Comprehension Quiz
18 questions · no time limit
0:00
GLOBAL UNDERSTANDING
Question 1 of 18
No time limit
Current
Answered
Flagged
Not seen
PASSAGE
Urban planners often treat city greenery as a pleasant amenity rather than an ecological system, a perspective that tends to concentrate resources in a few large parks while leaving the rest of the urban fabric paved and inhospitable to nonhuman life. The result is familiar: fragmented habitats, overheated streets, and declining urban biodiversity. The standard remedy—adding more acres of lawn or planting a few street trees—makes for pleasing renderings but rarely changes the underlying pattern of ecological scarcity. If cities are to support more species and buffer residents against heat and flooding, the question is not simply how many acres are green, but how those acres are configured and managed. A growing cohort of designers and ecologists argues for a shift from ornamental greening to what might be called microhabitat urbanism. Instead of concentrating vegetation in showcase parks, they propose scattering a mosaic of small, functionally diverse patches—pocket prairies in traffic medians, green roofs seeded with native forbs, rain gardens on residential blocks, and deadwood features tucked into schoolyards to host beetles and fungi. The point is not to mimic a lost wilderness but to create enough connectivity and resource variety for pollinators, birds, and beneficial insects to persist across the city. Early trials suggest that modest interventions can yield outsized returns. In Singapore, a program of native roadside plantings increased observed butterfly species without expanding park acreage. In Philadelphia, retrofitted rain gardens along a bus corridor cooled adjacent microclimates and supported a surprising richness of ground-nesting bees. Even in Phoenix, where heat and aridity are extreme, shallow basins planted with desert shrubs moderated peak temperatures and provided nectar at critical times. Critics counter that such distributed systems are expensive to maintain and prone to neglect once the ribbon-cutting ends. The case for microhabitats, however, rests on long-term function, not short-term spectacle: species selection can reduce irrigation needs; community-led stewardship can spread labor; and, over time, avoided stormwater costs and reduced heat stress can offset maintenance budgets. The question is not whether cities can afford ecological complexity, but whether they can afford the fragility of a landscape designed for appearance rather than resilience.
Which one of the following best describes the organization of the passage?
YOUR PROGRESS
18
QUESTIONS
Ready when you are
Answer in any order. Your progress shows here as you go.
QUESTIONS
KEYBOARD
Pick an answer ABCDE
Next question ↵→
Previous ←
Flag for review F
Answers save as you go · flagged questions come back at the end