01 / 20

LSAT Inference
Questions

Master the art of identifying what must be true based on the information provided: the core skill behind LSAT inference questions.

LSAT Logical Reasoning

What Is an Inference?

In everyday language, "inference" means a guess or a conclusion you draw. But on the LSAT, the word has a much stricter meaning. An inference is a statement that must be true based on the information given in the stimulus.

Recognizing Inference Stems

Inference questions use specific language in the question stem. Learning to spot these phrases is your first step toward consistent accuracy.

Must Be True
"Which one of the following must be true?"
Properly Inferred
"Which one of the following can be properly inferred?"
Most Supported
"The statements above, if true, most strongly support which of the following?"

The Logic Behind Inference

Inference questions test your ability to combine premises and derive what logically follows. You are not adding outside knowledge: you are working strictly within the text.

Premise A Premise B + Valid Inference

The Core Rule of Inference

1
Every word in the stimulus is true. Accept all premises at face value, even if they seem questionable.
2
The correct answer follows necessarily. There is no scenario where the premises are true and the answer is false.
3
Wrong answers go beyond the text. They introduce new concepts, overstate claims, or reverse relationships.

Must Be True vs. Most Strongly Supported

These two question types are closely related, but they differ in how strict the logical standard is. Understanding this distinction prevents costly errors.

Must Be True Most Strongly Supported
Standard 100% guaranteed Very well supported
Allows Slight Leap? No A very small one
Wrong Answers Could be false Weakly or not supported
Frequency Very common Common

Key Inference Triggers

Certain logical structures in the stimulus frequently generate inferences. Learning to spot these patterns speeds up your analysis.

Conditional Chains
If \(A \rightarrow B\), and if \(B \rightarrow C\), lets you infer: \(A \rightarrow C\).
Quantifier Overlap
"All X are Y" and "Some X are Z" lets you infer: some Z are Y.
Contrapositive
"If \(A \rightarrow B\)" guarantees "If \(\neg B \rightarrow \neg A\)."

Step-by-Step Approach

1
Read the question stem first. Confirm it is an inference question by looking for "must be true," "properly inferred," or "most strongly supported."
2
Read the stimulus carefully. Identify all premises. Note conditional statements, quantifiers ("all," "most," "some," "none"), and comparisons.
3
Look for connections. Can two premises be linked? Does a conditional chain form? Is there a contrapositive available?
4
Evaluate each answer choice. Ask: "Could this be false while the stimulus remains true?" If yes, eliminate it.
5
Pick the safest answer. The correct choice is often modest and narrow, not sweeping or dramatic.

Worked Example: Conditional Chain

General Rule: Professional Athlete Trains Daily Above-Avg Endurance Specific Case: Maria is a...

Worked Example: Quantifier Overlap

Passed Certification Exam Engineers Graduate Degrees (most engineers)

Worked Example: Contrapositive

1
Identify the conditional: Violation \( \rightarrow \) Must close until reinspected.
2
Form the contrapositive: Did not close \( \rightarrow \) No violation.
3
Apply to Cafe Lux: Cafe Lux has not closed. Therefore, Cafe Lux has not received a health code violation this year.

Eliminating Wrong Answers

Wrong answers on inference questions fall into predictable categories. Recognizing these traps makes elimination faster and more confident.

Too Extreme
Uses "all," "never," or "always" when the stimulus only supports "some" or "most."
Outside Scope
Introduces a concept or comparison not mentioned anywhere in the stimulus.
Reversed Logic
Confuses "if \(A \rightarrow B\)" with "if \(B \rightarrow A\)": the converse, not the contrapositive.

Common Mistakes

✕ Picking "Could Be True"
Something could be true without being guaranteed. The correct answer must be true.
✕ Bringing Outside Knowledge
Choosing an answer because you know it is true in the real world, even though the stimulus does not support it.
✕ Confusing the Converse
Treating "If \(A \rightarrow B\)" as equivalent to "If \(B \rightarrow A\)." Only the contrapositive is valid, not the converse.

Quantifier Strength Scale

The LSAT cares deeply about the strength of quantifiers. A valid inference can never be stronger than its weakest premise. Memorize this scale.

None
\( 0\% \)
Some
\( 1\%+ \)
Most
\( > 50\% \)
All
\( 100\% \)
Inference strength \( \le \) weakest premise
Example: "Most A are B" + "All B are C" Valid: "Most A are C" (limited by "most") Invalid: "All A are C" (too strong)

Inference Cheat Sheet

Pattern Structure Inference
Conditional Chain \( A \rightarrow B, B \rightarrow C \) \( A \rightarrow C \)
Contrapositive \( A \rightarrow B \) \( \neg B \rightarrow \neg A \)
Quantifier Overlap All \(X\) are \(Y\), Some \(X\) are \(Z\) Some \(Z\) are \(Y\)
Combined Quantifiers Most \(A\) are \(B\), All \(B\) are \(C\) Most \(A\) are \(C\)
Converse (Invalid) \( A \rightarrow B \) \( B \rightarrow A \) (wrong)

Question 1 of 5

If the statements above are true, which of the following must be true?

Question 2 of 5

Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the statements above?

Question 3 of 5

If all of the statements above are true, which one of the following must also be true?

Question 4 of 5

The critic and director disagree about whether:

Question 5 of 5

The statements above, if true, most strongly support which of the following?