Evaluate the Argument - Logical Reasoning

What is a causal argument?

An argument that asserts one event causes another. Claims one event directly produces or influences another.
Identify the type of reasoning where the conclusion is reached by eliminating alternatives.

Eliminative reasoning. Rules out possibilities until only one viable option remains.
What does it mean to evaluate an argument's validity?

To assess if the conclusion logically follows the premises. Determines whether premises logically support the conclusion.
What is an ad populum fallacy?

Appealing to popular opinion as evidence. Equivalent to bandwagon fallacy; relies on popular support as evidence.
What is an assumption in an argument?

An unstated premise that must be true for the argument to hold. Hidden premise that bridges the gap between evidence and conclusion.
Identify the term for reasoning from general principles to specific cases.

Deductive reasoning. Applies general rules to reach specific conclusions.
What is a red herring in an argument?

An irrelevant topic introduced to divert attention. Distracts from the main issue with irrelevant information.
What is circular reasoning?

An argument that restates its conclusion as a premise. Uses the conclusion as evidence for itself in circular fashion.
What is the fallacy of equivocation?

Using a word with multiple meanings inconsistently. Exploits ambiguity by shifting word meanings mid-argument.
What is a sufficient condition in an argument?

A condition that, if true, guarantees the conclusion. Alone guarantees the conclusion will follow when present.
What is meant by the term 'burden of proof'?

The obligation to provide evidence supporting a claim. Whoever makes a claim must provide supporting evidence.
What is a counterargument?

An argument opposing the main argument. Presents an alternative perspective that challenges the main claim.
What is the term for reasoning from an effect back to a cause?

Abductive reasoning. Infers the most likely explanation for observed phenomena.
Identify the term for reasoning from specific cases to a general statement.

Inductive reasoning. Moves from particular observations to broader generalizations.
What is the purpose of a rebuttal in an argument?

To refute or counter an opposing argument. Challenges or disproves the opposing side's arguments.
What is the primary function of an argument's conclusion?

To summarize the main claim or point. The conclusion is the main point the argument aims to establish.
What is the difference between a valid and a sound argument?

A sound argument is valid and has true premises. Validity concerns logical structure; soundness requires both validity and true premises.
What is the term for reasoning based on similarities between two cases?

Analogical reasoning. Draws conclusions based on parallels between different situations.
What role does a warrant play in an argument?

It justifies the link between premises and conclusion. Connects evidence to conclusion through underlying reasoning principles.
Identify the term for a conclusion that doesn't logically follow its premises.

Non sequitur. The conclusion lacks logical connection to its premises.
What is a slippery slope argument?

An argument that suggests a small step leads to a chain of events. Claims one action will inevitably lead to extreme consequences.
Which logical fallacy involves assuming a false cause-and-effect relationship?

Post hoc ergo propter hoc. Confuses correlation with causation based on temporal sequence.
What is the purpose of an argument's premise?

To provide evidence supporting the conclusion. Premises offer the factual foundation for the conclusion.
Which logical fallacy involves assuming that something is true because many believe it?

Bandwagon fallacy. Assumes popularity indicates truth or correctness.
Which fallacy involves drawing a conclusion from insufficient evidence?

Hasty generalization. Reaches broad conclusions from too few examples or cases.
Identify the term for reasoning that moves from specific observations to broad generalizations.

Inductive reasoning. Builds general conclusions from specific observed instances.
What is the purpose of an argument's introduction?

To present the topic and main thesis. Establishes context and states the central claim to be defended.
What is meant by the term 'logical consistency'?

The absence of contradictions in a set of statements. All statements work together without internal conflicts or contradictions.
Identify the logical fallacy of presenting only two options when more exist.

False dilemma. Artificially limits options when more alternatives exist.
What is a false cause fallacy?

Assuming a false causal relationship between events. Incorrectly attributes causation without proper evidence.
What is a necessary condition in an argument?

A condition that must be true for the conclusion to hold. Required for the conclusion; without it, the conclusion cannot be true.
Identify the term for an argument that assumes what it is trying to prove.

Begging the question. Creates circular reasoning by using the conclusion as evidence.
What is the term for a conclusion that follows necessarily from the premises?

Logical conclusion. Follows necessarily and inevitably from the given premises.
What is a false analogy?

An analogy where the compared cases are not sufficiently similar. Compares fundamentally different things as if they were equivalent.
What is the fallacy of composition?

Assuming what is true of a part is true of the whole. Incorrectly applies part characteristics to the entire whole.
What is the role of a qualifier in an argument?

To limit or modify the scope of a claim. Adds conditions or exceptions to narrow the claim's application.
What is an appeal to emotion?

Using emotional responses as evidence for an argument. Manipulates feelings rather than providing logical evidence.
Which fallacy involves concluding that something is true because it is traditional?

Appeal to tradition. Justifies claims based solely on historical practice.
Identify the term for evidence supporting a conclusion.

Premise. Premises provide the foundational evidence for the argument.
Which logical fallacy involves appealing to pity to support an argument?

Appeal to pity. Uses sympathy to gain support rather than logical reasoning.
Which logical fallacy involves attacking the person instead of the argument?

Ad hominem. Targets the person making the argument rather than the argument itself.
Which logical fallacy involves making a broad claim based on limited evidence?

Hasty generalization. Draws overly broad conclusions from insufficient sample size.
What is an appeal to authority?

Using an authority figure as evidence for an argument. Relies on expert opinion as evidence for the claim.
Which fallacy involves misrepresenting an argument to make it easier to attack?

Straw man fallacy. Distorts opponent's position to make it easier to refute.
Identify the fallacy of arguing that a claim is true because it has not been proven false.

Argument from ignorance. Claims truth based on lack of evidence against it.
What is a loaded question?

A question that contains a controversial assumption. Embeds disputed assumptions within the question itself.
What is meant by an argument's scope?

The range of cases the argument applies to. Defines the boundaries and limitations of the argument's claims.
Which type of argument relies on analogies to support its conclusion?

Analogical argument. Uses similarities between cases to draw conclusions about one.
Identify the part of an argument that explains how evidence supports the conclusion.

Justification. Provides the reasoning that connects evidence to the conclusion.

Study these flashcards