Supporting Evidence - ISEE Upper Level Reading Comprehension

1. What is the best evidence to support a conclusion about comparison: a random fact or a stated similarity or difference?

   A stated similarity or difference. Stated comparisons explicitly highlight parallels or contrasts, providing targeted support unlike random facts.

2. What is the best evidence to support a conclusion about cause and effect: a time marker or an explicit causal statement?

   An explicit causal statement (cause leads to effect). Explicit statements clearly link cause to effect, offering direct evidence beyond mere temporal indicators.

3. What is the strongest textual evidence to cite: a direct quote, a personal belief, or outside knowledge?

   A direct quote from the passage. Direct quotes offer unambiguous textual proof, surpassing personal beliefs or external knowledge in evidential strength.

4. Which detail best supports the conclusion "The speaker is uncertain" if the text includes "perhaps," "I suppose," and "definitely"?

   "Perhaps". This word indicates hesitation and doubt, directly evidencing the speaker's lack of certainty in the statement.

5. What is the best evidence to support a conclusion about setting: a character's opinion or concrete sensory description?

   Concrete sensory description of the environment. Sensory descriptions vividly establish the setting through tangible details, unlike subjective character opinions.

6. What is the best definition of evidence that supports a conclusion in a reading passage?

   Specific passage details that directly justify the stated conclusion. Evidence in reading comprehension must consist of precise textual elements that logically validate the inferred conclusion.

7. Which detail best supports the conclusion "The experiment failed" if the passage states "no reaction occurred despite heating"?

   "No reaction occurred despite heating". The absence of the expected outcome despite proper conditions confirms the experiment's lack of success.

8. What is the best evidence to support a conclusion about a conflict: a background detail or the central problem stated?

   The central problem stated or shown. The central problem directly illustrates the conflict, offering core evidence beyond peripheral background details.

9. Which detail best supports the conclusion "The character is generous" if the text says she "shared her lunch with strangers"?

   "Shared her lunch with strangers". The act of sharing illustrates selflessness, providing behavioral evidence of the character's generous nature.

10. Which sentence best supports the conclusion "The narrator admires the scientist" if one line calls her "brilliant and tireless"?

    "Brilliant and tireless". Positive descriptors express the narrator's high regard, revealing admiration through complimentary language.

11. What is the best evidence choice when two details seem relevant: the more general one or the more specific one?

    The more specific detail. Specific details offer precise, targeted support that strengthens the conclusion more effectively than general ones.

12. What is the best evidence to support a conclusion about a passage's main idea: a minor detail or a repeated central point?

    A repeated central point. Repeated points highlight the core message, providing robust support unlike isolated minor details.

13. What is the best evidence to support a conclusion about the meaning of a word: a dictionary definition or surrounding context clues?

    Surrounding context clues in the passage. Context clues within the passage offer immediate, text-specific insights into word meaning, superior to external definitions.

14. What is the best evidence to support a conclusion about a character trait: a single label or an action described in the text?

    An action described in the text. Actions provide behavioral evidence that demonstrates the trait through showing rather than merely labeling it.

15. Which type of detail most strongly supports a conclusion: a specific fact, a vague opinion, or an unrelated example?

    A specific fact. Specific facts provide concrete, verifiable support, unlike vague opinions or unrelated examples that lack direct relevance.

16. Which detail best supports the conclusion "The solution is effective" if the passage reports "errors dropped from 20 to 3"?

    "Errors dropped from 20 to 3". The significant reduction in errors provides measurable proof of the solution's success in improving outcomes.

17. Which option is the best evidence for the conclusion "The town feared the storm" if the text says it "boarded windows and stocked food"?

    "Boarded windows and stocked food". These preparatory actions demonstrate the town's fear through proactive behaviors in response to the impending storm.

18. Which sentence best supports the conclusion "The author opposes the plan" if the passage calls it "shortsighted and risky"?

    "Shortsighted and risky". Negative descriptors convey disapproval, indicating the author's critical stance against the proposed plan.

19. What is the key test for whether a detail supports a conclusion: relevance, length, or emotional impact?

    Relevance to the conclusion. Relevance ensures the detail directly connects to and substantiates the conclusion, unlike length or emotional appeal.

20. Which detail best supports the conclusion "Demand increased" if the passage states "orders doubled within two months"?

    "Orders doubled within two months". The rapid increase in orders quantifies rising interest, directly supporting the conclusion of heightened demand.

21. Which detail best supports the conclusion "The policy reduced costs" if the text reports "spending fell by 15% after adoption"?

    "Spending fell by 15% after adoption". The quantifiable decrease post-policy implementation directly demonstrates its cost-reducing impact.

22. What is the best evidence to support a conclusion about an author's attitude: a plot event or charged word choice?

    Charged word choice that reveals tone. Charged words convey the author's emotional stance and tone, offering stronger insight than neutral plot events.

23. Which detail best supports the conclusion "The two approaches differ" if the text says one is "preventive" and the other "reactive"?

    "One is preventive; the other is reactive". Highlighting contrasting natures explicitly shows how the approaches vary in their fundamental strategies.

24. What is the best evidence to support a conclusion about a claim's credibility: an insult or cited data and sources?

    Cited data and sources. Cited data and sources lend objective credibility, far outweighing subjective insults in validating claims.

25. What is the best evidence to support a conclusion about theme: a one-time event or a pattern across the passage?

    A pattern across the passage. Patterns reveal recurring ideas that embody the theme, providing comprehensive support unlike singular events.

Study these flashcards