High School Writing: Grades 9-10 • Research to Build and Present Knowledge

Apply Grades 9–10 Reading Standards to Literary Nonfiction

Learn to analyze literary nonfiction with the same rigor you bring to fiction—examining rhetoric, structure, and evidence. Develop the reading and research writing skills the CCSS RI and W standards require.

High School English emblem with an open text, writing notebook, and spelling check
Inside this lesson 10 sections 5 questions 4 figures

SECTION 1

Historical Context & Motivation

For centuries, readers treated essays, memoirs, speeches, and journalism as simple repositories of facts—containers for information rather than artfully constructed texts. But as the study of rhetoric evolved, scholars began to recognize that literary nonfiction demands the same careful reading we give to novels and poems. Authors of nonfiction make deliberate choices about tone, structure, word choice, and evidence—choices that shape how readers think and feel about real-world subjects.

The Common Core State Standards (CCSS), adopted in the early 2010s, formalized this idea by requiring students to apply the same analytical reading skills to nonfiction that they had traditionally reserved for fiction. The standard we focus on today asks you to bring grades 9–10 reading standards to literary nonfiction texts—essays, speeches, memoirs, biographies, and more—analyzing them for craft, structure, purpose, and meaning. Critically, the CCSS places literary nonfiction under the Reading Informational Text (RI) strand, not the Reading Literature (RL) strand. This means the correct standards citations are RI.9-10.1 through RI.9-10.6, not RL codes.

1936 • George Orwell's "Shooting an Elephant"

Orwell blends personal narrative with political commentary, demonstrating how literary nonfiction can use storytelling techniques to make powerful arguments about imperialism.

1963 • Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Letter from Birmingham Jail"

King's letter showcases masterful use of rhetorical appeals—ethos, pathos, and logos—to argue for civil rights, becoming a touchstone text for studying persuasive nonfiction.

1973 • Rise of New Journalism

Writers like Joan Didion and Tom Wolfe blur the line between reporting and literature, using narrative techniques—scene-setting, dialogue, point of view—in factual writing.

2010 • Common Core State Standards Adopted

The CCSS require that students apply reading standards for informational text (RI strand) to literary nonfiction, emphasizing close reading, evidence-based analysis, and understanding of craft across genres. These same skills anchor the W.9-10.7–9 research writing standards.

The central question this standard addresses is: How do we read nonfiction not just for what it says, but for how it says it? By answering this question, you gain the ability to evaluate the effectiveness of real-world texts—from editorials to presidential speeches—and to use those analytical skills in your own research and writing.

SECTION 2

Core Principles & Definitions

Applying reading standards to literary nonfiction means using the same analytical toolkit you would use for a short story or poem. You look at how the author builds meaning through language, structure, and rhetorical strategy. The following core principles guide this analysis. Because literary nonfiction—essays, speeches, memoirs, journalism—is informational text, the applicable CCSS strand is RI (Reading Informational Text), not RL (Reading Literature).

1

Central Idea & Theme

Identify the author's central idea (the main claim or insight) and trace how it develops over the course of the text through supporting details, examples, and reasoning. (RI.9-10.2)
2

Sequence & Connections

Analyze how the author unfolds a series of ideas or events—identifying the order in which points are introduced, how each idea is developed, and the connections the author draws between them. (RI.9-10.3)
3

Craft & Structure

Analyze the author's word choice (diction), sentence patterns, and figurative language for their cumulative effect on tone, and examine how specific paragraphs or sections develop and refine the author's central claims—through structures such as chronological order, cause-and-effect, or compare-contrast. (RI.9-10.4, RI.9-10.5)
4

Point of View & Purpose

Determine the author's point of view and purpose—to inform, persuade, reflect, or entertain—and evaluate how the perspective influences the content and style of the work. (RI.9-10.6)
5

Evidence & Reasoning

Assess the quality and relevance of the evidence the author uses—facts, anecdotes, statistics, expert testimony—and how logical reasoning connects evidence to claims. (RI.9-10.1)
6

Rhetorical Appeals

Identify the author's use of ethos (credibility), pathos (emotion), and logos (logic) to persuade or engage the reader. (RI.9-10.6)
✦

KEY TAKEAWAY

Think of reading literary nonfiction like watching a basketball game with a coach's eye. A casual fan just sees whether the ball goes in the basket (the content). But a coach notices the pick-and-roll play design, the defensive rotation, and the timeout strategy (the craft). Applying reading standards to literary nonfiction means watching for the plays behind the content—the deliberate choices the author makes to achieve a specific effect on the reader.

SECTION 3

Visual Explanation: The Analytical Reading Framework

The diagram below illustrates how the five core reading standards work together when you analyze a piece of literary nonfiction. Notice that your analysis moves from the surface level (what the text literally says) through deeper layers of craft and structure, ultimately arriving at an evaluation of the author's effectiveness.

Layers of Analysis for Literary NonfictionLAYER 1: Central Idea & Theme (RI.9-10.2)What is the author's main insight or argument?LAYER 2: Craft & Structure (RI.9-10.4, RI.9-10.5)How does diction, syntax, figurative language, and organization shape meaning?LAYER 3: Point of View & Purpose (RI.9-10.6)Why did the author write this, and from whose perspective?LAYER 4: Evidence (RI.9-10.1)Facts, anecdotes, dataLAYER 5: Rhetoric (RI.9-10.6)Ethos, Pathos, LogosEVAL
The diagram shows five analytical layers for reading literary nonfiction. You start by identifying the central idea, then examine craft and structure, consider point of view and purpose, and finally assess both evidence and rhetorical appeals, which converge in your overall evaluation of the text's effectiveness.

As the diagram shows, your analysis is not a single step but a layered process. When you read an essay by Frederick Douglass or a memoir excerpt by Maya Angelou, you first determine the central idea, then dig into how the author's craft reinforces that idea. By the time you reach the bottom of the diagram, you are synthesizing evidence quality and rhetorical strategy into an informed evaluation. This is exactly what the grades 9–10 RI standards expect you to do.

SECTION 4

How It Works: Reading Standards in Action

The grades 9–10 reading standards for informational text are not a single skill but a cluster of interrelated competencies. When applied to literary nonfiction, each standard asks you to perform a specific type of analysis. Let's break down the key RI standards and see what each one looks like when you apply it to a nonfiction text.

Standard RI.9-10.1 — Textual Evidence

This standard requires you to cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support your analysis of what the text says explicitly and what it implies. In literary nonfiction, this means quoting or paraphrasing specific passages from an essay or memoir and explaining how those passages support your interpretation. You must go beyond surface-level reading to identify implications—what the author suggests without directly stating.

Standard RI.9-10.2 — Central Idea & Development

You must determine a central idea of the text and analyze in detail how it emerges and is shaped and refined by specific details. For a speech like Sojourner Truth's "Ain't I a Woman?", the central idea is the equal humanity of women, and it develops through a series of rhetorical questions and personal examples that accumulate persuasive force.

Standard RI.9-10.3 — Sequence of Ideas and Events

This standard asks you to analyze how an author unfolds a series of ideas or events, including the order in which points are introduced, how each idea is developed, and the connections drawn between them. In a memoir, this might mean tracing how the author moves from a specific childhood memory to a broader reflection on identity. In an essay, it might mean noticing how the writer introduces a claim, complicates it with a counterexample, and then resolves the tension in a later paragraph. This standard emphasizes the logical or chronological relationships that connect ideas across an entire text, complementing RI.9-10.5's focus on how individual sentences and paragraphs refine specific claims.

Standard RI.9-10.4 — Word Choice & Tone

This standard asks you to determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text, including figurative and connotative meanings. You also analyze the cumulative impact of specific word choices on meaning and tone. When Martin Luther King Jr. writes "the fierce urgency of now" in his "I Have a Dream" speech, the word "fierce" is not describing something literally wild or dangerous—it conveys intensity and moral weight.

Standard RI.9-10.5 — Text Structure

You analyze in detail how an author's ideas or claims are developed and refined by particular sentences, paragraphs, or larger portions of a text. In nonfiction, this could mean examining how a single paragraph introduces a claim that later sections complicate or support, or how an essayist uses a sequence of examples across several paragraphs to sharpen an initial, more general assertion.

Standard RI.9-10.6 — Point of View & Purpose

You determine an author's point of view or purpose in a text and analyze how the author uses rhetoric—word choice, structure, and appeals to ethos, pathos, and logos—to advance that point of view or purpose. In literary nonfiction, this standard is especially powerful because the author is a real person making deliberate persuasive choices to move a real audience toward a specific stance.

💡

Why This Matters for Research Writing (W.9-10.7–W.9-10.9)

The RI.9-10 reading skills you develop here connect directly to the CCSS Writing standards for research (W.9-10.7–W.9-10.9). W.9-10.7 requires you to conduct short and sustained research projects; W.9-10.8 asks you to gather, assess, and integrate information from authoritative sources; and W.9-10.9b specifically requires you to apply grades 9–10 Reading standards to literary nonfiction when drawing evidence for your research writing. In other words, being able to evaluate an author's evidence quality (RI.9-10.1), central idea (RI.9-10.2), and point of view (RI.9-10.6) is not just a reading task—it is a prerequisite for selecting and integrating credible sources into your own research papers and arguments.

SECTION 5

Types of Literary Nonfiction & How to Analyze Them

Literary nonfiction is not a single genre—it's a family of genres that share a commitment to factual content while employing literary techniques. Each type of literary nonfiction lends itself to slightly different analytical approaches. Understanding these genres helps you choose the right analytical lens for any text you encounter.

Literary Nonfiction Genre MapEach genre emphasizes different RI.9-10 reading standardsMEMOIRPersonal experience as lensKey focus: Point of View,Narrative Structure, Tonee.g., Night by Elie WieselRI.9-10.5, RI.9-10.6ESSAYArgument or explorationKey focus: Central Idea,Evidence, Word Choicee.g., Orwell's essaysRI.9-10.2, RI.9-10.4SPEECHPersuasion for an audienceKey focus: Rhetoric,Structure, Purposee.g., MLK's speechesRI.9-10.5, RI.9-10.6BIOGRAPHYAnother person's life storyKey focus: Evidence,Author POV vs. Subjecte.g., biographies of leadersRI.9-10.1, RI.9-10.6JOURNALISMReporting with narrative flairKey focus: Evidence quality,Objectivity vs. Perspectivee.g., New JournalismRI.9-10.1, RI.9-10.4
This genre map shows five major types of literary nonfiction—memoir, essay, speech, biography, and journalism—along with the RI.9-10 reading standards most relevant to each.

While every reading standard can be applied to every genre, certain genres naturally foreground certain skills. A memoir, for instance, invites deep analysis of point of view and narrative structure because the author is recounting personal experience. A speech, by contrast, demands close attention to rhetorical appeals and structural choices because it was designed to persuade a live audience. Recognizing these genre-specific tendencies helps you focus your analysis where it will be most productive.

SECTION 6

Worked Example: Analyzing an Excerpt

Let's walk through a complete analysis of a short passage from literary nonfiction, applying the grades 9–10 RI reading standards step by step. We'll use a well-known passage from Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Letter from Birmingham Jail" (1963): "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny."

Applying RI Reading Standards to King's "Letter from Birmingham Jail"

  1. 1

    Step 1 — Identify the Central Idea (RI.9-10.2)

    Read the passage and determine its central idea. King argues that injustice is not a local problem but a universal one—what happens in one community affects all communities. This is his central claim in this passage.
    Central idea: Injustice is interconnected; it cannot be isolated to one place.
  2. 2

    Step 2 — Analyze Word Choice and Figurative Language (RI.9-10.4)

    Examine key words and phrases. The metaphor "inescapable network of mutuality" compares human society to a net—pulling one thread affects the whole fabric. The phrase "single garment of destiny" extends this metaphor, suggesting that all people are woven together. The word "inescapable" adds urgency: there is no opting out of this interconnectedness. These figurative choices make an abstract argument feel vivid and tangible.
    Key literary device: Extended metaphor comparing society to fabric/garment.
  3. 3

    Step 3 — Examine Structure and Its Effect (RI.9-10.5)

    Notice the structural choice King makes: he opens with a short, declarative sentence ("Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere") before expanding with a longer, more elaborate sentence. This structure mirrors his argument—the simple truth comes first, followed by the complex reasoning that supports it. The short opener functions almost like a thesis statement, grabbing the reader's attention before the metaphor deepens the idea.
    Structure: Short declarative claim → extended metaphorical expansion.
  4. 4

    Step 4 — Determine Point of View and Purpose (RI.9-10.6)

    King writes from the perspective of a civil rights leader imprisoned for peaceful protest. His use of "we" is strategic—it includes himself and his audience, building a sense of shared responsibility. His purpose is to persuade white moderates that the fight against injustice in Birmingham is their fight too, not a distant local issue.
    Point of view: First-person plural ("we"), creating shared responsibility. Purpose: persuasion.
  5. 5

    Step 5 — Cite Textual Evidence for Your Claims (RI.9-10.1)

    Finally, ensure that every analytical claim is grounded in specific textual evidence. For example: King's use of the metaphor "single garment of destiny" (textual evidence) supports the interpretation that he views human fate as collective rather than individual (analytical claim). When writing your analysis, you would integrate this evidence smoothly: "King's metaphor of a 'single garment of destiny' reinforces his central argument that moral responsibility transcends geographic boundaries."
    Model sentence: "King's metaphor of a 'single garment of destiny' reinforces his central argument that moral responsibility transcends geographic boundaries."

SECTION 7

Strengths and Common Pitfalls

Applying reading standards to literary nonfiction is a powerful analytical practice, but students often stumble in predictable ways. The table below contrasts effective strategies with common mistakes so you can strengthen your analysis and avoid typical errors.

Reading StandardEffective Approach ✓Common Pitfall ✗
Textual Evidence (RI.9-10.1)Quote specific phrases and explain how they support your claimMaking claims without any quotations, or dropping in quotes without analysis
Central Idea (RI.9-10.2)State the central idea as a full claim (subject + insight), then trace its developmentConfusing the topic (what the text is about) with the central idea (what the author argues or reveals)
Word Choice (RI.9-10.4)Analyze connotation, figurative meaning, and cumulative impact of language patternsSimply defining a word rather than analyzing why the author chose it over alternatives
Structure (RI.9-10.5)Explain how specific sentences, paragraphs, or sections develop, refine, or complicate the author's central claimMerely labeling the structure ('This is chronological') without explaining how it develops the argument
Point of View (RI.9-10.6)Consider how the author's perspective, background, and purpose shape the text's content and styleIgnoring the author's context entirely, or assuming all nonfiction is objective and neutral

Effective approaches vs. common pitfalls for each RI.9-10 reading standard

✦

KEY TAKEAWAY

The most common mistake in analyzing literary nonfiction is treating it like a purely informational text—reading only for facts while ignoring the author's craft. Think of it this way: if an informational text is like reading a recipe for its ingredients list, analyzing literary nonfiction is like a food critic evaluating a meal—you care about the ingredients, yes, but you also care about how they were prepared, plated, and served. The 'how' is just as important as the 'what.'

SECTION 8

Connection to Advanced Skills & Standards

The skills you develop by applying grades 9–10 RI reading standards to literary nonfiction form the foundation for more advanced analytical work in grades 11–12, in AP English Language, and in college-level courses. The table below shows how each skill evolves as expectations increase.

Skill AreaGrades 9–10 ExpectationGrades 11–12 / AP Expectation
Textual Evidence (RI.9-10.1)Cite strong and thorough evidence to support analysisCite evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn, including determining where the text leaves matters uncertain
Central Idea (RI.9-10.2)Determine central idea and analyze its development through detailsDetermine two or more central ideas and analyze their interaction and development, providing an objective summary
Rhetoric (RI.9-10.6)Identify use of ethos, pathos, logos and analyze their effectsEvaluate the effectiveness of rhetoric in context, considering audience, occasion, and the interaction of multiple appeals
Multiple TextsAnalyze how an author draws on and transforms source materialSynthesize multiple texts on the same topic, evaluating how each author uses evidence and rhetoric differently

How RI reading skills evolve from grades 9–10 to grades 11–12 and AP level

As you can see, the jump from grades 9–10 to 11–12 is not about learning entirely new skills—it's about applying the same skills with greater depth and sophistication. At the grades 9–10 level, you learn to identify and analyze a single central idea; at the 11–12 level, you track multiple central ideas and their interactions. At the 9–10 level, you identify rhetorical appeals; at the advanced level, you evaluate their effectiveness in context. Mastering the fundamentals now gives you a strong platform for more complex analytical thinking later.

ℹ

Looking Ahead

In AP English Language and Composition, you'll encounter the rhetorical analysis essay, which requires you to perform exactly the kind of close reading you're practicing here—but under timed conditions and with an emphasis on how rhetorical choices achieve specific purposes. The skills you build now are directly transferable to that high-stakes context.

SECTION 9

Practice Problems

Test your understanding of how to apply grades 9–10 RI reading standards to literary nonfiction with these five practice problems. Each problem escalates in complexity, moving from conceptual understanding to critical thinking.

Question 1: CONCEPTUAL

What is the key difference between reading literary nonfiction for information and reading it analytically using grades 9–10 RI reading standards? Explain in your own words why this distinction matters.
Show answer
Reading for information means extracting facts—what the text says. Reading analytically means examining how the text says it: the author's word choices, structural decisions, rhetorical strategies, and point of view. This distinction matters because literary nonfiction is crafted writing, not just a neutral report. Understanding the author's craft helps you evaluate whether their argument is persuasive, recognize potential biases, and appreciate the artistry of the writing—skills essential for both critical reading and strong research writing. These are precisely the skills the RI.9-10 standards target, and they directly support the W.9-10.9b requirement to draw evidence from literary nonfiction when composing research writing.

Question 2: BASIC APPLICATION

Consider the following sentence from Frederick Douglass's autobiography: "I did not, when a slave, understand the deep meaning of those rude and apparently incoherent songs." Which RI.9-10 reading standard does the phrase "rude and apparently incoherent" most directly invite you to apply, and why?
Show answer
This phrase most directly invites application of RI.9-10.4 (word choice and figurative/connotative meaning). The words "rude" and "incoherent" carry connotations of dismissal and confusion, but Douglass uses the qualifier "apparently" to signal that these songs were not actually incoherent—they contained deep, hidden meaning. By analyzing Douglass's careful word choice, you can see that he is contrasting his younger self's surface-level understanding with his later, more profound insight. The word "apparently" is the key: it shifts the entire meaning of the sentence from dismissal to revelation.

Question 3: INTERMEDIATE

An essayist writes about climate change. She opens with a vivid description of a wildfire consuming her childhood neighborhood, then shifts to presenting scientific data about rising global temperatures, and concludes with a call to political action. Identify which rhetorical appeal (ethos, pathos, or logos) dominates each section, and explain how the overall structure of the essay strengthens the author's argument.
Show answer
The opening wildfire description relies on pathos—it generates emotional urgency by making the abstract threat of climate change feel personal and immediate. The middle section, presenting scientific data, relies on logos—it provides logical, evidence-based support for the claim that climate change is real and worsening. The conclusion's call to action draws on ethos, positioning the author as someone with both personal experience and factual knowledge, making her qualified to recommend action. The structure is strategic: pathos hooks the reader's emotions, logos builds intellectual credibility, and ethos channels both into a persuasive call. This progression strengthens the argument because it meets the reader where they are emotionally, then satisfies their need for evidence, and finally channels that engagement into action. Analyzing this structure applies RI.9-10.5 (how the arrangement of sections develops and refines the argument) and RI.9-10.6 (how point of view and purpose shape the text).

Question 4: APPLIED

You are writing a research paper on how memoir authors represent trauma. You plan to use an excerpt from Elie Wiesel's "Night" as a source. Write a short analytical paragraph (4–5 sentences) that applies at least two grades 9–10 RI reading standards to a passage of your choosing from the memoir. Be sure to cite textual evidence and analyze craft, not just summarize content.
Show answer
A strong response might read: "In 'Night,' Wiesel describes his first night at Auschwitz with devastating restraint: 'Never shall I forget that night, the first night in camp, that turned my life into one long night seven times sealed.' This passage applies RI.9-10.4 through its use of repetition and figurative language—the word 'night' shifts from literal (the time of arrival) to metaphorical (a permanent state of darkness), and 'seven times sealed' evokes biblical language suggesting irreversible finality. Applying RI.9-10.5, the repeated structure of 'Never shall I forget…' across the surrounding sentences develops and intensifies Wiesel's central claim—that this night has become an inescapable, defining part of his identity—refining a personal memory into something resembling a solemn vow. This structural choice elevates the memoir beyond simple narration, deepening the reader's sense of memory as a moral obligation rather than a passing personal burden." This response demonstrates citing specific textual evidence (RI.9-10.1), analyzing word choice for connotative and figurative meaning (RI.9-10.4), and examining how structural choices develop and refine the author's central claim (RI.9-10.5). Applying these RI standards also satisfies W.9-10.9b, which requires drawing evidence from literary nonfiction to support research and analysis.

Question 5: CRITICAL THINKING

Some critics argue that applying analytical reading standards to nonfiction is problematic because it treats factual texts as aesthetic objects, potentially distracting from the truth of what the author is reporting. Others argue that literary analysis is essential because all nonfiction is shaped by the author's subjective choices. Which position do you find more persuasive, and why? Use your understanding of the RI.9-10 reading standards to support your argument with at least two specific examples.
Show answer
A strong response would acknowledge both sides and take a reasoned position. For example: "While the concern about aestheticizing facts is valid—readers should never lose sight of the real events behind a memoir or reportage—literary analysis is ultimately essential to responsible reading of nonfiction. Consider Martin Luther King Jr.'s 'Letter from Birmingham Jail': reading it only for its factual claims about segregation would miss the rhetorical brilliance that made it persuasive to millions. Analyzing his metaphors, sentence structures, and rhetorical appeals (RI.9-10.4, RI.9-10.5, RI.9-10.6) doesn't diminish the truth of his arguments—it reveals how truth was communicated effectively. Similarly, if we read Joan Didion's journalism without attending to her point of view (RI.9-10.6), we might mistake her subjective framing for objective reporting. Literary analysis is not about treating nonfiction as fiction; it is about recognizing that every author makes choices, and those choices deserve scrutiny." The strongest responses will synthesize multiple RI standards, acknowledge complexity, and provide concrete textual examples.

SUMMARY

Lesson Summary

Summary

Applying grades 9–10 RI reading standards to literary nonfiction means analyzing essays, memoirs, speeches, biographies, and journalism with the same rigor you bring to fiction and poetry. Because literary nonfiction is informational text under the CCSS, the correct standard strand is RI (Reading Informational Text), not RL. You identify the central idea and trace how it develops through details (RI.9-10.2). You analyze craft and structure—examining diction, figurative language, sentence patterns, and organizational choices for their effects on meaning and tone (RI.9-10.4, RI.9-10.5). You consider the author's point of view and purpose, recognizing how personal, cultural, and historical context shapes the text (RI.9-10.6).

You evaluate the quality and relevance of evidence and reasoning, and you identify the author's use of rhetorical appeals—ethos, pathos, and logos—to understand how they persuade or engage readers (RI.9-10.6). Throughout, you ground every analytical claim in strong textual evidence (RI.9-10.1), quoting or paraphrasing specific passages and explaining how they support your interpretation. These RI skills connect directly to the CCSS Writing standards W.9-10.7–W.9-10.9, which require you to conduct research, evaluate sources, and draw evidence from literary nonfiction to support your own arguments—making these reading and writing competencies inseparable in practice.

Varsity Tutors • High School Writing: Grades 9-10 • Apply Grades 9–10 Reading Standards to Literary Nonfiction