Passage Structure and Organization - Verbal Reasoning
- What is the structural purpose of a rebuttal following a counterargument?
- To weaken the opposing view and reinforce the author's position. Rebuttals counter opposing arguments by highlighting flaws, thereby strengthening the original thesis.
- What is the structural purpose of a topic sentence at the start of a paragraph?
- To state that paragraph's main point and guide the details. A topic sentence establishes the paragraph's focus, ensuring that supporting details align coherently with it.
- What is the main idea in a passage, in structural terms?
- The central claim the passage as a whole aims to convey. It represents the overarching thesis that unifies all elements of the passage's argument or exposition.
- What is the structural purpose of a concluding sentence that restates earlier points?
- To synthesize and reinforce the main claim or final takeaway. It integrates prior ideas to emphasize the central message, providing closure and reinforcing key insights.
- What is the primary purpose of identifying a passage's overall structure on GRE Verbal?
- To predict where key ideas appear and locate support quickly. Understanding the passage's structure allows efficient navigation to anticipate content placement and retrieve evidence for questions.
- What is the most reliable way to locate the passage's main conclusion in an argument?
- Find the claim supported by other statements and not supporting another. The main conclusion is hierarchically superior, with other elements providing justification rather than deriving from it.
- Identify the structural role of the sentence: "For example, recent surveys show..."
- Evidence or illustration supporting the preceding point. It provides concrete data or instances to substantiate the immediately prior claim in the passage's logic.
- What does a cause-effect transition ("therefore," "thus") most often signal structurally?
- A conclusion, inference, or result drawn from prior statements. Cause-effect transitions denote logical progression, linking evidence to derived outcomes or final assertions.
- What does an addition transition ("moreover," "furthermore") signal structurally?
- Another supporting point in the same direction as the prior one. Addition transitions build on existing arguments by introducing parallel evidence or ideas to reinforce the point.
- Identify the structural role of the sentence: "Some critics argue that the data are biased."
- Counterargument introducing an opposing view. This introduces an alternative perspective that contrasts with the author's, often for subsequent rebuttal.
- What does an exemplification cue ("for example," "for instance") signal structurally?
- Supporting illustration is about to follow, not a new main claim. Exemplification cues introduce specific instances that elaborate on general claims without altering the main direction.
- Identify the structural role of the sentence: "Therefore, the policy is unlikely to work."
- Conclusion inferred from earlier premises. The transition signals a deductive outcome based on accumulated evidence from previous sentences.
- What is the role of a thesis sentence in passage organization?
- It states the passage's main claim and frames what follows. The thesis provides the foundational argument that organizes and directs the subsequent development of ideas.
- What is the structural purpose of a counterargument paragraph?
- To present an opposing view that the author will address. It introduces alternative perspectives to demonstrate the author's awareness and set up a response or refutation.
- What is the structural difference between a primary claim and a subsidiary claim?
- Primary is the main point; subsidiary supports or qualifies it. Primary claims form the core thesis, whereas subsidiary ones provide auxiliary support or modifications to it.
- What does a contrast transition ("however," "yet") most often signal structurally?
- A shift to an opposing point, limitation, or correction. Contrast transitions indicate a pivot in the argument, introducing qualifications or refutations to prior ideas.
- What does a qualification cue ("in part," "to some extent") signal structurally?
- The claim is limited in scope or strength. Qualification cues moderate assertions, indicating boundaries to prevent overgeneralization in the argument.
- Which option best describes the author's attitude when a claim is followed by "but" plus criticism?
- Skeptical or critical toward the claim being qualified. The 'but' introduces a contrasting critique, revealing the author's doubt or disagreement with the initial claim.
- What is the structural role of a concession ("Although X...") in an argument?
- To grant a limited point while maintaining the main claim. Concessions acknowledge partial validity of counterpoints to build credibility while preserving the primary argument.
- What does an example typically do in a GRE passage's structure?
- It illustrates or supports a claim rather than being the claim. Examples function as evidence to substantiate or elucidate the broader assertion without constituting the core idea itself.
- Identify the structural role of the sentence: "This view, however, ignores..."
- Rebuttal of a prior view or correction of a preceding claim. The sentence uses contrast to challenge and correct a preceding viewpoint, advancing the author's position.
- Identify the structural role of the sentence: "Although the method is costly, it is reliable."
- Concession followed by the author's main emphasis. The structure admits a drawback but pivots to highlight a stronger positive aspect, maintaining argumentative balance.
- What is the structural difference between background information and evidence?
- Background sets context; evidence directly supports a specific claim. Background offers general context without direct linkage, while evidence is targeted to bolster particular assertions.
- What is the structural function of a definition in an expository passage?
- To clarify a key term so later claims can be interpreted correctly. Definitions ensure precise understanding of concepts, enabling accurate comprehension of the passage's subsequent arguments.