- The author's primary objective is to
Answer: present evidence indicating that forward guidance by central banks has both stabilizing and destabilizing effects on financial markets
When you encounter a "primary objective" question in GMAT Reading Comprehension, you need to identify the author's main purpose throughout the entire passage, not just a supporting detail or side point.
This passage follows a classic structure: it introduces a policy (forward guidance), presents opposing viewpoints about its effectiveness, then offers evidence that supports both sides. The author's main goal is to show that forward guidance has contradictory effects—it can both stabilize and destabilize markets depending on the circumstances.
The correct answer is D because the passage systematically presents evidence for forward guidance's "double-edged nature." The author mentions economists who credit it with stabilizing markets, others who worry about complacency effects, then cites research showing it "reduced short-term uncertainty but amplified market swings when guidance proved inaccurate." This balanced presentation of stabilizing and destabilizing effects is the passage's central focus.
Here's why the other choices miss the mark: Choice A is wrong because the passage never discusses abandoning traditional tools—forward guidance is presented as an additional tool used since the crisis. Choice B contradicts the passage, which actually connects bond-yield volatility to forward guidance expectations. Choice C introduces regulatory oversight, which the author never mentions or advocates for.
Strategy tip: For primary purpose questions, look for the passage's overall structure and tone. Authors who present "mixed findings" or describe something as "double-edged" are typically showing multiple sides of an issue rather than taking a strong position or making specific recommendations.
- Which statement best summarizes the passage's primary message?
Answer: Preserving heirloom crop diversity may require market incentives that make cultivation economically attractive to farmers.
This is a main idea question asking you to identify the central message of the passage. When tackling these questions, look for the thread that connects all the key points rather than focusing on any single detail.
The passage presents a clear problem-solution structure: modern agriculture threatens genetic diversity, heirloom crops offer benefits but face economic barriers, and market-based solutions could bridge this gap. The author traces how genetic diversity loss creates a need for heirloom preservation, explains why farmers resist (economic concerns), and concludes with economists' suggestion that premium marketing could make conservation profitable.
Choice C captures this complete arc perfectly—it acknowledges both the conservation goal and the economic reality that market incentives may be necessary to achieve it.
Choice A is wrong because the passage never mentions government mandates as a solution, let alone as the "only" solution. The focus is entirely on market-based approaches.
Choice B overstates the passage's claims about heirloom crops. The text says they "possess resistance to pests and climate extremes" but never claims they "uniformly outperform" modern varieties against "all known" pests.
Choice D contradicts the passage directly. Seed-saving networks are mentioned as preservation efforts, but the passage explicitly states that economic disadvantages persist—farmers still "hesitate to commit land" due to lower yields.
Strategy tip: In main idea questions, the correct answer typically acknowledges multiple key elements from the passage while avoiding absolute language ("only," "uniformly," "all") that the passage doesn't support. Look for balanced statements that reflect the passage's complexity.
- The passage mainly seeks to
Answer: present both the potential advantages and the evidentiary limitations of incorporating narrative practices into medical training
When you encounter a main purpose question on the GMAT, focus on identifying what the author is actually doing throughout the passage rather than getting caught up in specific details or taking sides in any debate presented.
This passage follows a balanced structure: it introduces narrative medicine programs and their goals, mentions some positive early findings, then immediately presents the counterpoint about measurement challenges and skepticism, before noting how proponents respond to criticism. The author maintains neutrality throughout, neither advocating for nor dismissing narrative medicine, but rather exploring both sides of the issue.
Answer choice C correctly captures this balanced approach. The passage does present potential advantages (cultivating empathy, improving communication) while honestly addressing the evidentiary limitations (difficulty measuring concrete outcomes, skeptical questions about value). This two-sided presentation is the passage's primary organizational structure and purpose.
Answer choice A is wrong because the passage discusses narrative medicine generally, not any specific university's curriculum details. Answer choice B is incorrect because the passage never claims to prove definitive health outcomes—in fact, it explicitly states that measuring such outcomes "remains challenging." Answer choice D misrepresents the tone; the passage doesn't criticize resistant physicians but rather acknowledges legitimate skeptical concerns about evidence.
On GMAT main purpose questions, watch for passages that present multiple perspectives on an issue. The correct answer will often involve words like "present," "discuss," or "examine" rather than "prove," "argue," or "criticize," especially when the author maintains an objective stance throughout.
- The author's principal purpose is to
Answer: question microfinance effectiveness by highlighting interest rate concerns and mixed evidence
When you encounter a "principal purpose" question, you need to identify the author's main goal or intent throughout the entire passage, not just focus on individual details or supporting points.
The correct answer is D because the author presents a balanced but critical examination of microfinance. The passage begins by acknowledging initial praise but immediately pivots to "mounting evidence" of problems with high interest rates creating debt cycles. The author then presents both sides of the interest rate debate and concludes with research showing "modest business growth but little improvement in household welfare," which has led to "calls for a reevaluation." This structure clearly questions microfinance effectiveness by systematically presenting concerns and mixed evidence.
Choice A is wrong because the author never praises microfinance as the "most effective" solution—in fact, the passage emphasizes problems and limitations. Choice B incorrectly focuses on default rates, which aren't mentioned anywhere in the passage. The author discusses interest rates and debt cycles, not borrower defaults. Choice C is completely off-target since the passage contains no discussion of accounting procedures or operational details—it focuses on broader policy and effectiveness issues.
Remember that principal purpose questions require you to step back and see the forest, not the trees. Look for the author's overall trajectory and tone. Here, despite acknowledging initial optimism about microfinance, the author's primary intent is to present mounting concerns and evidence that challenge its effectiveness, making this fundamentally a questioning or critical examination rather than an endorsement.
- What is the central idea conveyed by the passage?
Answer: Although a user-centric payment model could slightly redistribute streaming revenue toward niche artists, it is unlikely to resolve underlying compensation concerns.
When tackling central idea questions in GMAT verbal reasoning, you need to identify the passage's main argument while avoiding answers that focus on minor details or make unsupported claims.
This passage presents a balanced analysis of music streaming payment models. The author acknowledges that current per-stream systems may disadvantage niche artists, then introduces user-centric payments as a potential solution. However, the key insight comes in the final sentence: simulations show "only modest revenue shifts," suggesting that "structural factors" like subscription prices matter more than payment formulas. This measured conclusion—that user-centric models offer limited improvement—captures the passage's central message.
Choice D correctly synthesizes this argument: user-centric models "could slightly redistribute" revenue (matching "modest shifts") but are "unlikely to resolve underlying compensation concerns" (reflecting the emphasis on structural factors).
Choice A misrepresents the passage by claiming current models are fair, when the author clearly states they "undervalue niche genres." Choice B introduces "major record labels" and profit reduction—concepts never mentioned in the passage. Choice C fabricates a historical claim about preventing piracy that appears nowhere in the text.
For GMAT reading comprehension, watch out for answer choices that introduce new information or extreme positions not supported by the passage. The correct answer for central idea questions typically reflects the author's nuanced conclusion rather than just restating the topic or making claims beyond what's written.
- Which of the following best expresses the primary purpose of the passage?
Answer: To evaluate competing claims about whether micro-houses can genuinely alleviate urban housing unaffordability
When you encounter a "primary purpose" question on GMAT Verbal, you need to identify the passage's main function—what the author is fundamentally trying to accomplish throughout the entire text.
This passage systematically presents different perspectives on micro-houses and their role in addressing housing affordability. The author begins with advocates' claims that micro-houses make homeownership accessible, then presents skeptics who argue these don't truly solve affordability problems, followed by concerns about unintended consequences like luxury studios. The passage concludes with economists noting uncertainty about long-term impacts. This structure clearly evaluates competing viewpoints about micro-houses' effectiveness in addressing housing costs.
Choice C correctly captures this evaluative approach—the passage weighs different claims about whether micro-houses genuinely help with affordability issues.
Choice A is wrong because the passage doesn't argue for prioritizing eco-friendly methods over unit size; it merely mentions eco-friendliness as one factor that attracts municipalities. Choice B misses the mark entirely—the passage never describes architectural features or compares micro-houses to apartments structurally. Choice D is incorrect because the passage doesn't propose any subsidies or solutions; it simply examines existing perspectives on the micro-house phenomenon.
For GMAT primary purpose questions, focus on the passage's overall trajectory rather than getting caught up in specific details. Ask yourself: "Is the author arguing, describing, evaluating, or proposing?" Here, the balanced presentation of multiple viewpoints without taking sides signals an evaluative purpose.
- What is the passage mainly intended to convey?
Answer: Two-tier board systems have context-dependent effects, offering benefits in some areas but not universally enhancing corporate performance.
When you encounter a main idea question on the GMAT, look for the passage's central argument rather than supporting details or extreme positions. The author's tone and the balance of evidence presented are crucial clues.
This passage presents a balanced analysis of two-tier board systems. The author acknowledges both advocate and critic perspectives, then cites "mixed results" from comparative studies. The key phrase comes at the end: "governance outcomes depend on context rather than board architecture alone." This nuanced conclusion captures the passage's main intent.
Choice C correctly identifies this balanced, context-dependent assessment. The passage shows that two-tier boards offer some benefits (improved labor relations) but don't universally enhance performance (no clear profitability advantage), making their effectiveness situational.
Choice A is wrong because the passage never advocates for universal adoption—quite the opposite, emphasizing context-dependency. Choice B makes an absolute claim ("invariably reduces profitability") that contradicts the passage's mixed findings and ignores the labor relations benefits mentioned. Choice D misrepresents the structural information given; the passage states that two-tier systems separate management and supervisory functions, not that supervisory boards handle day-to-day operations.
For GMAT main idea questions, avoid answer choices that are too extreme, focus on minor details, or contradict the passage's tone. The correct answer typically reflects the author's overall perspective and degree of certainty. Here, the measured, evidence-based conclusion about context-dependency perfectly matches the passage's balanced approach to evaluating corporate governance systems.
- Which choice best states the author's main idea?
Answer: Despite legitimate quality concerns, aggregated citizen-science data can be as reliable as professionally collected data and thus meaningfully broaden research capacity.
When you encounter a main idea question on the GMAT, you need to identify the author's central argument—the overarching point that unifies the entire passage, not just a supporting detail or example.
The author presents a balanced view of citizen science: acknowledging critics' concerns about data quality while ultimately arguing that these concerns are "overstated." The passage follows a clear structure: it introduces citizen science, presents the criticism, then provides counter-evidence showing that aggregated volunteer data "rival those produced by professionals" and "expands the scope of research." The author concludes that while quality control is still needed, the data validity concerns may be excessive.
Choice B captures this nuanced position perfectly—it acknowledges the "legitimate quality concerns" while emphasizing that aggregated data can be reliable and broadens research capacity.
Choice A focuses only on the examples given (astronomy, ecology, history) and makes an unsupported claim about which attracts more volunteers. This misses the main argument entirely.
Choice C suggests professionals use volunteers for "trivial tasks" to focus on administrative work. The passage never mentions grant writing or administration, and it doesn't characterize the tasks as trivial.
Choice D directly contradicts the passage, which states that citizen data can rival professional datasets. The passage doesn't mention excessive post-processing or scientists regarding volunteer data as unusable.
For main idea questions, look for the answer that captures the author's overall stance and conclusion, not just supporting details or examples mentioned along the way.
- The passage primarily serves to
Answer: reinterpret Beethoven's late string quartets as precursors to modernist music, thus questioning traditional period boundaries
When you encounter a "primary purpose" question in GMAT Reading Comprehension, you need to identify the passage's main function rather than just its topic. Look for the author's central argument or goal.
This passage presents a scholarly reinterpretation of Beethoven's late string quartets. The author explains how musicologists are challenging the traditional view of these works as purely romantic, instead arguing they contain modernist elements like "abrupt key changes and fragmented motifs." The key phrase is that this "reassessment challenges a linear narrative that situates modernism firmly in the twentieth century"—the passage is fundamentally about questioning established period boundaries in music history.
Answer B correctly captures this primary purpose: the passage reinterprets Beethoven's works as modernist precursors, thereby challenging traditional chronological divisions in music history.
Answer A is wrong because the passage doesn't contrast Schoenberg with Beethoven—it actually connects them, showing how Beethoven anticipated techniques Schoenberg later used. Answer C misses the mark by focusing on a detail (fragmented motifs) rather than the main argument, and incorrectly mentions "symphonic movements" when the passage discusses string quartets. Answer D completely reverses the passage's argument—the author is challenging the view that modernism began exclusively in the twentieth century, not defending it.
For GMAT primary purpose questions, always ask: "What is the author trying to accomplish?" Focus on the argumentative structure rather than getting caught up in specific details or examples.
- Which of the following best states the author's primary purpose?
Answer: To show how satellite technology is reshaping scholarly understanding of the complexity and variability of Silk Road trade routes
Reading comprehension questions about primary purpose require you to identify the author's main goal—what they're trying to accomplish with the entire passage, not just individual details.
The author's primary purpose is to demonstrate how satellite technology is transforming our understanding of the Silk Road's complexity. The passage follows a clear structure: it starts with traditional archaeological methods, introduces satellite imagery as a game-changer that reveals previously hidden features, explains how these discoveries are reshaping our view of trade routes as "more numerous and fluid," and concludes with the integration of new and old methods to create a "more dynamic picture." This progression shows how technology is revolutionizing scholarship.
Choice A misrepresents the author's position—they advocate for "integrating remote sensing with on-site excavation," not abandoning traditional methods. Choice B is completely off-target since the passage never discusses or disputes the profitability of Silk Road commerce. Choice D contradicts the text, which explicitly states that trade routes shifted "in response to climate fluctuations," indicating climate had significant impact, not negligible impact.
Choice C correctly captures the author's central message: satellite technology is revealing new insights about the variability and complexity of ancient trade networks, fundamentally changing how scholars understand the Silk Road.
When tackling primary purpose questions, look for the passage's overall trajectory and tone. Ask yourself: "If I had to summarize what this author is trying to show or prove in one sentence, what would it be?" Avoid answers that focus on minor details or misstate the author's position.
- The author's main aim is to
Answer: outline the legal gap facing climate migrants and describe competing proposals for addressing it
When you encounter a "main aim" or "primary purpose" question on GMAT Verbal, you need to identify what the author is fundamentally trying to accomplish in the passage—not just what topics they mention, but their overarching goal.
This passage follows a classic structure: it identifies a problem (climate migrants lack legal protection because current international law doesn't cover environmental displacement) and then presents different approaches to solving it (some scholars want to expand definitions, others worry about diluting protections, and regional agreements offer potential models). The author's main aim is to map out this legal challenge and the competing solutions being proposed.
Choice B correctly captures this dual purpose—outlining the legal gap and describing the various proposals for addressing it. The passage dedicates roughly equal attention to explaining the problem and presenting different potential solutions.
Choice A is wrong because the passage never attempts to predict specific numbers of displaced people. Choice C misrepresents the author's treatment of African agreements—the Kampala Convention is mentioned as a "possible model," not criticized for undermining protections. Choice D contradicts the passage's focus; the author treats climate displacement as a current reality requiring legal solutions, not as a historical curiosity.
Strategy tip: On primary purpose questions, look for the passage's organizational structure. Often, the correct answer will reflect the major components you can identify—for example, "problem + solutions," "phenomenon + explanations," or "claim + evidence." This structural approach helps you avoid getting distracted by specific details that aren't central to the author's main goal.
- Which statement best captures the primary purpose of the passage?
Answer: To argue that social interaction is a vital component of infants' language learning, complementing previously emphasized statistical mechanisms
When you encounter a "primary purpose" question on GMAT Verbal, you need to identify the author's main goal—not just what topics are discussed, but what the author is trying to accomplish by discussing them.
This passage follows a classic structure: it acknowledges an existing emphasis in research (statistical learning in language acquisition), then introduces new evidence that adds another crucial dimension (social interaction). The author isn't dismissing statistical learning but rather arguing that social cues work alongside it to enhance language acquisition. The key phrase "amplifies, rather than merely accompanies" shows the author believes social interaction actively strengthens statistical learning processes.
Answer choice B correctly captures this purpose—the author is making a case that social interaction is vital and works with (complements) the already-recognized statistical mechanisms.
Answer choice A is wrong because the passage focuses on infants, not adults, and isn't primarily about comparing video technologies—the technology is just the experimental method. Choice C misrepresents the author's tone; there's no criticism of earlier researchers for methodological flaws, just an argument for expanding the current understanding. Choice D contradicts the passage entirely—the described caregiver behaviors (eye contact, responsiveness) actually help rather than hinder language learning.
For primary purpose questions, look for the author's argumentative stance rather than just the topic. Authors often build on existing research rather than completely rejecting it, so watch for nuanced positions that add to or refine current thinking.
- What is the primary purpose of the passage?
Answer: To temper enthusiasm for blockchain in supply chains by acknowledging both its transparency benefits and its practical limitations
When you encounter a "primary purpose" question on GMAT Verbal, you need to identify the author's main goal across the entire passage, not just focus on individual details or examples.
This passage follows a classic balanced structure: it presents blockchain proponents' claims about supply-chain transparency, acknowledges some successful pilot programs, but then introduces significant limitations (human data entry bottlenecks and errors). The author concludes by noting that analysts view blockchain as "one tool among many" rather than a cure-all. This progression shows the author is moderating overly optimistic views by presenting both benefits and realistic constraints.
Choice C correctly captures this balanced approach—tempering enthusiasm by acknowledging both transparency benefits and practical limitations. The passage neither dismisses blockchain entirely nor promotes it unreservedly; instead, it provides a measured assessment.
Choice A focuses on cryptographic algorithms, which aren't discussed anywhere in the passage. Choice B suggests the author advocates for full automation to eliminate manual data entry, but the passage only mentions this as a current limitation without proposing solutions. Choice D claims the passage shows coffee producers receive higher prices through blockchain adoption, but price benefits are never mentioned—coffee beans are only cited as an example of technical feasibility.
Watch for this pattern on GMAT primary purpose questions: passages often present a claim, provide some supporting evidence, then introduce complications or limitations. The correct answer typically reflects this nuanced structure rather than taking an extreme position in either direction.
- Which option best expresses the passage's primary purpose?
Answer: To report evidence that complicates the assumption of a uniform economic boom during the medieval climate anomaly
When you encounter a "primary purpose" question on GMAT Verbal, you need to identify what the author is fundamentally trying to accomplish in the passage. Look for the main thrust of the argument, not just supporting details or background information.
This passage follows a classic structure: it presents a traditional view (warmer medieval climate led to widespread prosperity), then introduces new evidence that challenges this view (pollen analyses showing woodland clearance actually slowed in some regions). The author's primary goal is to highlight how this new evidence complicates the simple climate-prosperity correlation.
Answer choice D correctly captures this purpose. The passage reports pollen analysis findings that challenge the assumption of uniform economic benefits during the medieval warm period. The key phrase "more localized and uneven economic effects" directly contradicts the idea of a widespread economic boom.
Answer choice A is wrong because the passage actually challenges rather than confirms the traditional climate-prosperity link. Answer choice B incorrectly suggests the passage argues that warming leads to agricultural contraction due to pests—this specific causal mechanism isn't mentioned at all. Answer choice C focuses on laboratory techniques, but the passage doesn't describe pollen analysis methods in detail; it simply references the findings from such analyses.
Remember that primary purpose questions test your ability to see the forest, not the trees. Focus on the author's overall argumentative goal rather than getting caught up in specific details or examples mentioned along the way.
- The passage is primarily concerned with
Answer: presenting new evidence in an ongoing debate about the economic consequences of corporate share buybacks
When you encounter a "primary purpose" question on GMAT Verbal, you need to identify the passage's main structural goal rather than getting caught up in specific details or content areas.
This passage follows a classic structure: it introduces a debate (whether buybacks are good or bad), presents new research evidence (the empirical study), shows how both sides interpret this evidence differently, and concludes that the debate continues. The author's primary aim is to update readers on how recent findings contribute to this ongoing economic discussion.
Choice B correctly captures this structure. The passage is fundamentally about presenting new empirical evidence (the study on R&D spending and capital expenditures) within the context of an unresolved debate about buybacks' economic consequences.
Choice A mischaracterizes the passage's focus. While the study compares R&D and capital expenditures, the passage doesn't argue that one is a better predictor of innovation than the other—it simply reports different findings for each metric.
Choice C is completely off-base. The passage discusses economic consequences of buybacks, not accounting classification methods for returned cash.
Choice D suggests the passage advocates for regulation, but the author maintains a neutral stance throughout, simply reporting the debate without taking sides or proposing policy solutions.
Strategy tip: On primary purpose questions, look for the passage's structural skeleton rather than its specific content. Ask yourself: "Is the author arguing, explaining, comparing, or reporting?" Here, the author is clearly reporting on new developments in an existing debate.
- What is the central idea of the passage?
Answer: Certain adaptable wildlife species are flourishing in cities, creating both ecological opportunities and management challenges.
Central idea questions test your ability to identify the passage's main point rather than getting caught up in supporting details or examples. You need to find the answer that captures the overall message the author is conveying.
This passage follows a clear structure: it introduces a phenomenon (wildlife thriving in cities), explains why it happens (behavioral flexibility), but then reveals a complication (this same flexibility creates conflicts). The central idea encompasses this entire arc—both the positive adaptation and the resulting management challenges.
Choice D correctly captures this complete picture. The passage describes how "some wildlife species...have begun to thrive within metropolitan limits" and explains that "the same traits that enable adaptation can increase human-wildlife conflict," requiring "more nuanced management strategies." This answer acknowledges both the ecological success story and the practical problems it creates.
Choice A focuses on a detail that isn't even mentioned—the passage never discusses traffic density declining. Choice B introduces urban planning and native vegetation, concepts completely absent from the text. Choice C directly contradicts the passage, which suggests that "simple removal or relocation" strategies are inadequate and calls for "more nuanced" approaches instead.
The wrong answers either invent information not in the passage (A and B) or misrepresent what the passage actually says (C). When tackling central idea questions, always ask yourself: "Does this answer reflect the author's complete message, or just one piece of it?" The correct answer should encompass the passage's full scope and tone.
- The primary purpose of the passage is to
Answer: challenge a prevailing view of medieval craft guilds by presenting evidence that they sometimes fostered innovation
When you encounter a "primary purpose" question, you need to identify the author's main goal in writing the passage. Look for the overall structure and the author's stance rather than getting caught up in specific details.
This passage follows a classic pattern: it presents a traditional view, then challenges that view with new evidence. The author begins by describing how medieval guilds are "traditionally" seen as obstacles to progress, but then pivots with "however" to introduce recent research showing guilds actually supported innovation through amended statutes and innovation prizes. The final sentence reinforces this revised understanding, stating that guilds "sustained rather than stifled economic dynamism."
Choice B correctly captures this structure—the author is challenging the prevailing negative view of guilds by presenting archival evidence that they sometimes fostered innovation. The word "sometimes" is key, as the author acknowledges both the traditional criticisms and the new evidence.
Choice A is wrong because the passage doesn't catalogue specific technological advances; it discusses general practices like amended statutes and prizes. Choice C is incorrect because the author never advocates for modern adoption of guild structures—this is purely historical analysis. Choice D misses the mark because the passage doesn't contrast medieval and modern price-fixing; it mentions price-fixing only briefly as an acknowledged abuse.
Remember that primary purpose questions test your ability to see the forest, not the trees. Look for signal words like "however," "although," and "emerging view" that indicate the author's argumentative structure and main message.
- What is the main idea of the passage?
Answer: Current antibiotic screening methods overlook biofilm behavior, potentially eliminating drugs that might combat resistant bacterial communities.
When tackling main idea questions on GMAT Verbal Reasoning, look for the passage's central argument or primary point the author wants to convey. Don't get distracted by supporting details or examples—focus on what the entire passage is building toward.
This passage presents a clear problem-solution structure. The author argues that current antibiotic research has a critical blind spot: it focuses on planktonic (free-floating) bacteria when most microbial life actually exists in biofilms. The key insight is that drugs appearing weak against individual cells might actually be effective against biofilm communities, but current testing methods would miss this potential. The main idea centers on this testing gap and its implications for drug discovery.
Choice D correctly captures this central argument—current screening methods overlook biofilm behavior and may be eliminating promising compounds that could fight resistant bacterial communities.
Choice A focuses on a quantitative detail about laboratory experiments that isn't the passage's main point. The passage emphasizes the testing method problem, not experimental frequency.
Choice B introduces structural complexity and visualization issues that the passage never mentions. While biofilms are described as "dense communities," microscopy isn't discussed.
Choice C suggests intentional avoidance due to cost concerns, but the passage presents this as an oversight in methodology rather than a deliberate business decision. The author calls for "revamping testing protocols," implying the issue is methodological, not financial.
For main idea questions, always ask yourself: "What is the author's primary message?" Eliminate choices that focus on minor details or introduce concepts not central to the passage's argument.
- The main point of the passage is to
Answer: explain how hiring algorithms can perpetuate existing biases and to note that proposed technical remedies may be insufficient
When tackling GMAT Reading Comprehension main point questions, you need to identify the passage's central argument while distinguishing it from supporting details or tangential information.
This passage presents a clear structure: it introduces hiring algorithms' promise of objectivity, then immediately contrasts this with evidence of bias replication. The author explains how this happens (using the women's college example), mentions proposed solutions (audits and debiasing), but then highlights a critical counterargument that these fixes may be inadequate without changing the underlying data. The passage concludes by framing this as part of a larger debate about technology and societal bias.
Choice C correctly captures this flow: it acknowledges both the bias perpetuation problem and the insufficiency of current technical solutions. This dual focus—the problem AND the limitation of proposed fixes—reflects the passage's main analytical thrust.
Choice A is wrong because the passage never discusses statistical formulas or technical implementation details. Choice B misrepresents the women's college example, which illustrates algorithmic bias rather than making any claim about educational quality. Choice D incorrectly suggests the passage compares human versus machine bias—the passage actually shows how machine algorithms inherit and amplify human biases from historical data.
For main point questions, look for the passage's central tension or argument. Avoid answers that focus on examples (like the women's college detail) or make claims the author never supports. The correct answer should capture the passage's primary analytical purpose, not just one component of the discussion.
- The author's primary purpose is to
Answer: explain how an indirect neutrino-based approach supplements existing dark-matter detection efforts
When you encounter a "primary purpose" question on GMAT Verbal, you need to identify the author's main goal for writing the passage—not just what topics are discussed, but why the author chose to present this information.
The passage follows a clear structure: it introduces traditional dark-matter detection methods (WIMP detectors), then presents a newer approach (neutrino observation), and finally explains how these methods work together. The key phrase is "it complements direct-detection experiments"—this signals that the author's purpose is to show how the newer method enhances existing efforts rather than replacing them.
Choice D correctly captures this purpose. The author explains how neutrino-based detection "supplements" traditional methods by "probing different interaction strengths," and emphasizes that "together, these methods may narrow the range of viable dark-matter theories."
Choice A misrepresents the author's tone—there's no criticism of annihilation-based theories. The passage treats them as promising, not flawed. Choice B suggests the author advocates abandoning WIMP detectors, but the passage explicitly states that both methods should work "together." Choice C focuses on a detail that isn't even mentioned—the passage discusses neutrinos from dark-matter annihilation, not solar fusion reactions.
Watch for primary purpose questions that test whether you can distinguish between describing a supplementary relationship versus advocating for replacement. Authors often present new developments as complementary rather than revolutionary, so look for language like "complements," "together," or "in addition to" when evaluating answer choices.
