Triangle Congruence
from Rigid Motions
Discover why ASA, SAS, and SSS guarantee congruence: because a rigid motion can always map one triangle exactly onto the other.
What Does Congruence Really Mean?
Two figures are congruent if and only if one can be mapped onto the other by a sequence of rigid motions: translations, rotations, and reflections. These transformations preserve distances and angles exactly.
The Three Rigid Motions
Why Do We Need Shortcut Criteria?
A triangle has six measurements: three sides and three angles. Checking all six is tedious. The congruence criteria (SSS, SAS, ASA) tell us that matching only three specific measurements is enough to guarantee a rigid motion exists.
SSS: Side-Side-Side
If three sides of one triangle are equal to three sides of another triangle, then the triangles are congruent.
SAS: Side-Angle-Side
If two sides and the included angle of one triangle are equal to the corresponding parts of another, the triangles are congruent.
ASA: Angle-Side-Angle
If two angles and the included side of one triangle equal the corresponding parts of another, the triangles are congruent.
Included vs. Non-Included Parts
The Rigid Motion Proof Pattern
Example 1: SSS in Action
Example 2: SAS in Action
Example 3: ASA in Action
Why SSA Does Not Work
Common Mistakes
Comparison of Criteria
| SSS | SAS | ASA | SSA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Given Parts | 3 sides | 2 sides + included angle | 2 angles + included side | 2 sides + non-included angle |
| Valid? | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✕ No |
| Rigid Motion Step | Circle intersection pins 3rd vertex | Angle fixes ray direction | Two rays intersect at one point | Ambiguous: two intersections |
| Reflection Needed? | Sometimes | Sometimes | Sometimes | N/A |
Question 1 of 5
Two figures are defined as congruent when:
Question 2 of 5
In the SAS criterion, the word "included" means the angle must be:
Question 3 of 5
Why does SSA fail to prove triangle congruence?
Question 4 of 5
In the rigid motion proof of ASA, after translating vertex \(E\) to \(B\) and rotating to align \(\overline{EF}\) with \(\overline{BC}\), what guarantees that the third vertex \(D\) maps to \(A\)?
Question 5 of 5
If \(\triangle ABC\) has \(AB = 5\), \(BC = 7\), and \(AC = 5\), and \(\triangle DEF\) has \(DE = 5\), \(EF = 7\), and \(DF = 5\), which criterion proves \(\triangle ABC \cong \triangle DEF\)?