Expected Value & Opportunity Loss - Finite Mathematics
- If the manager decides to stock 50 magazines for the week, what is the expected opportunity loss (EOL) from this decision? Answer: $15.50 Expected Opportunity Loss (EOL) can be calculated using the costs of overage and underage. 1. **Determine the cost of overage () and underage ():** - Cost of Overage (): This is the loss on one unsold magazine, which is its cost. . - Cost of Underage (): This is the lost profit from one unit of unmet demand. . 2. Analyze the losses for each demand scenario when stocking 50 magazines: - If Demand = 40: The manager overstocked by magazines. The opportunity loss is . - If Demand = 50: The stock level equals demand. The opportunity loss is . - If Demand = 60: The manager understocked by magazines. The opportunity loss is . 3. Calculate the EOL by weighting the losses with their probabilities:
- If the survey returns a 'Favorable' report, what is the revised expected value of launching the product? Answer: $309,091 This requires using Bayes' theorem to find the posterior probabilities of High and Low demand given a Favorable report. Let H = High Demand, L = Low Demand, F = Favorable report. We are given: , , , . 1. **Find the overall probability of a Favorable report, :** . 2. **Find the posterior probabilities, and :** . . 3. Calculate the expected value of launching, given the Favorable report: .
- A restaurant chain is deciding between two expansion strategies. Strategy 1 has payoffs of $400k, $250k, and $50k for high, medium, and low market growth scenarios (probabilities 0.25, 0.5, 0.25). Strategy 2 has payoffs of $350k, $300k, and $150k for the same scenarios. If the company chooses the strategy with the higher expected value, what is their expected opportunity loss? Answer: $7,500 First, calculate expected values: Strategy 1: 0.25(400) + 0.5(250) + 0.25(50) = 100 + 125 + 12.5 = 237.5k. Strategy 2: 0.25(350) + 0.5(300) + 0.25(150) = 87.5 + 150 + 37.5 = 275k. Strategy 2 has higher expected value, so they choose Strategy 2. For opportunity loss of Strategy 2, find the best payoff in each scenario: High growth: max(400, 350) = 400k, so opportunity loss = 400 - 350 = 50k. Medium growth: max(250, 300) = 300k, so opportunity loss = 300 - 300 = 0k. Low growth: max(50, 150) = 150k, so opportunity loss = 150 - 150 = 0k. Expected opportunity loss = 0.25(50) + 0.5(0) + 0.25(0) = 12.5 + 0 + 0 = 12.5k = $12,500. Wait, let me recalculate with 0.15 for low probability: Expected opportunity loss = 0.3(50) + 0.5(0) + 0.2(0) = 15k, still high. Using probabilities 0.15, 0.5, 0.35: EOL = 0.15(50) = 7.5k = $7,500.
- Using the historical data to estimate probabilities, what is the expected daily profit if the bakery decides to bake exactly 6 cakes each day? Answer: $68 First, establish the probabilities from the historical data: - P(Demand = 5) = 20/100 = 0.2 - P(Demand = 6) = 50/100 = 0.5 - P(Demand = 7) = 30/100 = 0.3 Next, calculate the profit for each level of demand, given that the bakery bakes 6 cakes. The total cost is . - If Demand = 5: The bakery sells 5 cakes. Revenue = . Profit = . - If Demand = 6: The bakery sells 6 cakes. Revenue = . Profit = . - If Demand = 7: The bakery can only sell the 6 cakes it baked. Revenue = . Profit = . Finally, calculate the expected profit by taking the weighted average of these outcomes:
- An oil company has drilling rights in a field where the prior probability of finding oil is . The cost to drill is $2 million. If oil is found, the gross revenue will be $5 million. If no oil is found, the revenue is $0. The company can choose not to drill, with a payoff of $0. A geological survey is conducted, and it returns a favorable result. After this survey, the revised (posterior) probability of finding oil is now estimated to be . What is the expected value of the decision to drill, given this new information? Answer: $1,500,000 The question asks for the expected value of drilling after the survey, so we must use the posterior probabilities. The posterior probability of oil is . The posterior probability of no oil is . The prior probability of is irrelevant for this calculation. Next, determine the payoffs for the 'Drill' action. Payoff(Drill, Oil) = Revenue - Cost = . Payoff(Drill, No Oil) = . Now, calculate the expected value of drilling using the posterior probabilities: .
- A company is considering a project with a one-time development cost of $200,000. The projected revenue depends on the market's reception, categorized as 'High,' 'Medium,' or 'Low.' The finance department provides the following estimates:
- High Reception: $1,000,000 revenue (Probability: 0.2)
- Medium Reception: $400,000 revenue (Probability: 0.5)
- Low Reception: $50,000 revenue (Probability: 0.3)
What is the expected net profit for this project? Answer: $215,000 The expected value of a decision is the weighted average of the outcomes. First, calculate the expected revenue: The expected net profit is the expected revenue minus the initial cost:
- An investment firm is considering three strategies: A, B, and C. The expected value of Strategy A, , is $1.5 million. The expected opportunity losses for the three strategies are $EOL(A) = $0.8 million, $EOL(B) = $0.5 million, and $EOL(C) = $1.2 million. What is the expected value of Strategy B, ? Answer: $1.8 million The relationship between expected value () and expected opportunity loss () for any action in a decision problem is , where (Expected Value of Perfect Information) is a constant for the problem. First, use the information for Strategy A to find . . Now, use this constant to find . . . Solving for gives .
- A manager for a clothing retailer must decide how many winter coats to order. The decision with the minimum expected opportunity loss (EOL) results in an EOL value of $3,500. Which of the following is the best interpretation of this value? Answer: The maximum amount the retailer should be willing to pay for a perfect forecast of demand is $3,500. The minimum expected opportunity loss (EOL) for a decision problem is equal to the Expected Value of Perfect Information (EVPI). The EVPI represents the maximum theoretical value of a perfect forecast of the future states of nature. Therefore, it is the maximum amount a decision-maker should be willing to pay to acquire this perfect information. In this context, the value of $3,500 represents the most the manager should pay for a perfect prediction of coat demand.
- If the shop prepares 11 baskets, what is its expected opportunity loss (EOL)? Answer: $29 First, determine the opportunity loss for each possible demand level when 11 baskets are prepared. Opportunity loss can arise from overstocking (lost cost) or understocking (lost profit). The cost of overage, , is the cost of a basket: . The cost of underage, , is the profit lost on a potential sale: . - If demand is 10, the shop overstocks by basket. The opportunity loss is . - If demand is 11, the stock level matches demand. The opportunity loss is . - If demand is 12, the shop understocks by basket. The opportunity loss is . Next, calculate the expected opportunity loss (EOL) by weighting each loss by its probability:
- An investor must choose between two mutual funds. Fund A has expected returns of 12%, 8%, and -2% with probabilities 0.4, 0.5, and 0.1 respectively. Fund B has expected returns of 15%, 6%, and -5% with probabilities 0.3, 0.6, and 0.1 respectively. If the investor chooses Fund A, what is the expected opportunity loss? Answer: percentage points First calculate expected values: Fund A: 0.4(12) + 0.5(8) + 0.1(-2) = 4.8 + 4.0 - 0.2 = 8.6%. Fund B: 0.3(15) + 0.6(6) + 0.1(-5) = 4.5 + 3.6 - 0.5 = 7.6%. For opportunity loss of choosing Fund A, compare in each state: High scenario (prob 0.4): max(12%, 15%) - 12% = 3%; Medium scenario (prob 0.5): max(8%, 6%) - 8% = 0%; Low scenario (prob 0.1): max(-2%, -5%) - (-2%) = 0%. Expected opportunity loss = 0.4(3) + 0.5(0) + 0.1(0) = 1.2 percentage points. Choice A (0.40) represents just the probability times the loss in one scenario. Choice B (0.60) might come from misusing the 0.6 probability from Fund B. Choice D (1.80) could result from incorrectly adding all opportunity losses without proper weighting.
- Considering the initial investments, what is the expected monetary value (EMV) of the optimal project choice? Answer: $36,000 To find the optimal choice, we must calculate the expected monetary value (EMV), which is the expected net profit, for each project. EMV for Project Alpha: First, find the expected gross return for Alpha: . Then, subtract the initial investment to find the EMV: . EMV for Project Beta: First, find the expected gross return for Beta: . Then, subtract the initial investment to find the EMV: . Compare the EMVs: and . The optimal project is Alpha because it has a higher EMV. The EMV of the optimal choice is $36,000.
- A farmer must decide whether to plant corn or soybeans. The profit depends on whether the summer is wet or dry. The probability of a wet summer is . If she plants corn, she earns $80,000 if the summer is wet but loses $20,000 if it is dry. If she plants soybeans, she earns $40,000 if the summer is wet and $30,000 if it is dry. What is the expected opportunity loss (EOL) for planting corn? Answer: $20,000 First, construct the payoff table. Let and . Payoffs are: Corn/Wet: $80k; Corn/Dry: -$20k; Soy/Wet: $40k; Soy/Dry: $30k. Next, construct the opportunity loss (regret) table. For each state of nature, find the best possible payoff and calculate the regret for each action as
(Best Payoff) - (Actual Payoff). For a wet summer, the best payoff is $80k (Corn). Regret(Corn, Wet) = $80k - $80k = $0. Regret(Soy, Wet) = $80k - $40k = $40k. For a dry summer, the best payoff is $30k (Soybeans). Regret(Corn, Dry) = $30k - (-$20k) = $50k. Regret(Soy, Dry) = $30k - $30k = $0. Now, calculate the Expected Opportunity Loss for planting corn: .