Research Appraisal - Eppp Skills
- Identify the best generalizability statement: RCT excludes comorbidities; what is reduced?
- Ecological validity (generalizability to real-world clinical cases). Excluding complex cases reduces the study's relevance to everyday clinical scenarios, limiting real-world applicability.
- Identify the main consequence of violating independence due to clustering.
- Standard errors are underestimated; Type I error inflates. Violating independence through clustering leads to correlated errors, biasing variance estimates and increasing false positives.
- Identify the primary threat: groups differ at baseline because participants self-select treatment.
- Selection bias (confounding by indication). Self-selection introduces confounding, as baseline differences may explain outcomes rather than the treatment itself.
- What is random assignment, and what does it primarily protect against?
- Assigning by chance; reduces selection bias and confounding. Random assignment equalizes groups on potential confounders, enhancing internal validity by preventing systematic differences.
- Which option best defines selection bias in nonrandomized studies?
- Systematic baseline differences between groups before treatment. Selection bias undermines internal validity in nonrandomized designs by creating pre-existing group differences that mimic treatment effects.
- What is construct validity for a measure or manipulation?
- Degree to which it accurately represents the intended construct. Construct validity evaluates if the operationalization faithfully captures the theoretical concept it aims to measure or manipulate.
- What is attrition bias (differential dropout) in longitudinal or RCT research?
- Unequal loss to follow-up that distorts group comparability. Attrition bias compromises group equivalence over time, potentially biasing results toward remaining participants' characteristics.
- What is a Type II error in hypothesis testing?
- Failing to reject a false (false negative). Type II error happens when a real effect is missed by not rejecting the null hypothesis.
- What is external validity in research appraisal?
- Generalizability of findings across people, settings, and time. External validity assesses how well study results apply beyond the sample to broader populations, contexts, and periods.
- What is experimenter expectancy (Rosenthal) effect?
- Researcher expectations unintentionally influence participant outcomes. Experimenter expectancy biases results through subtle cues that influence participants toward expected behaviors.
- Identify the correct interpretation of a -value in null hypothesis testing.
- Probability of data (or more extreme) given is true. The -value quantifies the likelihood of observing the data assuming the null hypothesis holds, aiding in significance decisions.
- What is statistical power, expressed in terms of Type II error rate ?
- . Statistical power represents the probability of correctly detecting a true effect, directly related to avoiding Type II errors.
- Find the correct conclusion: convenience sample from one clinic; what validity is most limited?
- External validity. Convenience sampling restricts the applicability of findings to diverse populations, thus limiting generalizability.
- What is demand characteristics as a threat to validity?
- Participants alter responses based on perceived study expectations. Demand characteristics compromise validity by cueing participants to behave in ways that confirm hypothesized outcomes.
- What is a Type I error in hypothesis testing?
- Rejecting a true (false positive). Type I error occurs when the null hypothesis is incorrectly rejected, leading to erroneous claims of an effect.
- What is statistical conclusion validity?
- Accuracy of inferences about covariation and statistical results. Statistical conclusion validity verifies the reliability of conclusions drawn from data analysis regarding relationships and significance.
- Identify the strongest design for causal inference between an IV and DV.
- Randomized controlled experiment. This design minimizes biases through randomization and control, enabling strong causal claims about variable relationships.
- Which option best describes the assumption of independence in common tests?
- Each observation is not influenced by or duplicated across others. The independence assumption ensures that data points are unrelated, which is crucial for valid statistical inference in parametric tests.
- What is the Hawthorne effect as a methodological threat?
- Behavior changes due to awareness of being observed. The Hawthorne effect introduces reactivity bias, where observation alone alters behavior, threatening internal validity.
- What is internal validity in research appraisal?
- Confidence that the IV caused the DV within the study. Internal validity ensures the study's design isolates the effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable, minimizing alternative explanations.
- What is a confound in evaluating a study's methodology?
- A third variable that covaries with IV and could cause the DV. Confounds threaten internal validity by providing alternative explanations for observed effects between variables.
- What is the primary purpose of blinding in clinical trials?
- Reduce expectancy and measurement bias in participants/raters. Blinding prevents bias by concealing group assignments, ensuring objective responses and assessments.
- Choose the correct issue: many outcomes tested with no correction; what error risk increases?
- Type I error inflation (multiple comparisons problem). Without adjustments for multiple tests, the family-wise error rate rises, increasing the chance of spurious significant findings.
- What is a placebo control intended to address methodologically?
- Nonspecific treatment effects (expectancy and attention). Placebo controls isolate active treatment effects by accounting for psychological and contextual influences on outcomes.