Study Design Types - Eppp Knowledge

  1. Which design uses preexisting groups (for example, classrooms) and compares outcomes after an intervention?
    Quasi-experimental design. Quasi-experimental designs apply interventions to intact groups, allowing comparisons in real-world settings where randomization is impractical.
  2. What is the defining feature of a correlational design regarding variables?
    Measures association without manipulating variables. Correlational designs examine relationships between naturally occurring variables, without intervention, to assess associations.
  3. Which design is primarily hypothesis-generating and strong for rich description but weak for generalization?
    Case study design. Case studies offer detailed narratives for hypothesis development but lack broad samples, limiting applicability to wider populations.
  4. Which option best indicates a correlational conclusion rather than a causal claim?
    "X is associated with Y". Statements of association avoid implying causation, aligning with the limitations of correlational evidence on variable relationships.
  5. What is the defining feature of a case study design in psychological research?
    In-depth analysis of a single person or small unit. Case studies provide detailed, qualitative insights into unique individuals or entities, facilitating deep understanding of complex phenomena.
  6. Which study design typically has the highest external validity: experiment, quasi-experiment, or case study?
    Quasi-experimental design (often higher than lab experiments). Quasi-experiments often occur in natural settings, enhancing generalizability to real-world populations compared to controlled lab experiments.
  7. Identify the design: The researcher assigns participants randomly to CBT or waitlist and compares outcomes.
    True experimental design. Random assignment to conditions in this setup ensures group equivalence, allowing causal inferences about CBT's effects.
  8. Which option best indicates a causal conclusion that is most defensible with random assignment?
    "X causes changes in Y". Causal claims are supported by random assignment, which controls confounds and enables defensible inferences about variable effects.
  9. Which design feature most directly reduces selection bias between groups?
    Random assignment. Random assignment distributes participant characteristics evenly across groups, minimizing systematic differences that could bias results.
  10. Identify the design: Stress and sleep are measured once and their association is analyzed.
    Correlational design. Measuring and analyzing associations without manipulation typifies correlational approaches to explore variable relationships.
  11. Which design is most vulnerable to confounding by third variables: correlational or experimental?
    Correlational design. Correlational designs lack manipulation and control, making them susceptible to unmeasured variables influencing observed associations.
  12. Which design most directly tests a treatment effect while controlling history and maturation via a control group?
    True experimental design. True experiments incorporate control groups to account for external influences like history and maturation, isolating treatment effects.
  13. Which design is most useful for studying rare conditions or unusual clinical presentations?
    Case study design. Case studies allow thorough exploration of infrequent events, generating hypotheses and illustrating mechanisms not feasible in larger samples.
  14. Which design is best for estimating the direction and strength of association between two continuous variables?
    Correlational design. Correlational designs use statistical measures like Pearson's r to quantify the strength and direction of linear relationships between continuous variables.
  15. What is the primary limitation of correlational designs for interpreting results?
    Cannot establish causation. Associations in correlational designs may result from third variables or reverse causality, preventing definitive causal conclusions.
  16. What design feature is required to classify a study as a true experiment (not quasi-experimental)?
    Random assignment to conditions. Random assignment ensures groups are equivalent at baseline, minimizing confounding variables and supporting causal inferences.
  17. Which design element distinguishes a quasi-experiment from a correlational study when an intervention occurs?
    Quasi-experiment includes an intervention/manipulated treatment. The presence of researcher-manipulated interventions in quasi-experiments allows for some causal testing, unlike passive measurement in correlational studies.
  18. What is the defining feature of a quasi-experimental design compared with a true experiment?
    Lacks random assignment to conditions. Without random assignment, quasi-experimental designs use preexisting groups, which may introduce selection biases.
  19. Identify the design: A detailed report describes one patient's course after a novel intervention.
    Case study design. Detailed examination of a single case provides rich, contextual insights into the intervention's process and outcomes.
  20. Which design best addresses temporal precedence by measuring variables over time without manipulation?
    Longitudinal correlational design. Tracking variables over time in longitudinal designs establishes temporal order, aiding in assessing potential directional relationships without manipulation.
  21. Which design commonly uses nonequivalent groups and may add pretest measures to improve comparability?
    Quasi-experimental design. Pretest measures in quasi-experimental designs help assess and adjust for initial group differences in nonequivalent setups.
  22. What is the defining feature of a true experimental design regarding the independent variable?
    Researcher manipulates the independent variable. This manipulation allows for direct testing of causal effects by controlling the variable's presence or level while holding other factors constant.
  23. Which study design best supports a causal inference when well-controlled: experimental or correlational?
    Experimental design. Well-controlled experiments enable causal inferences through manipulation of variables and random assignment, unlike correlational designs.
  24. Identify the design: Two existing clinics adopt different treatments and outcomes are compared.
    Quasi-experimental design. Using preexisting clinics without random assignment introduces potential confounds but permits real-world intervention comparisons.
  25. Which design is most vulnerable to selection bias: experimental or quasi-experimental?
    Quasi-experimental design. Quasi-experimental designs rely on preexisting groups, increasing the risk of inherent differences affecting outcomes.

Study these flashcards