Ethical Decision Making - Eppp Knowledge
- What is the best step when cultural factors may affect how an ethical issue is understood?
- Incorporate cultural context and seek culturally informed consultation. Incorporating culture ensures culturally sensitive decisions, with consultation providing expertise to avoid ethnocentric biases in ethics.
- Which step comes immediately after defining the ethical problem in most models?
- Gather relevant facts and contextual information. Gathering facts ensures a comprehensive understanding of the situation, reducing ambiguity and informing accurate application of ethical standards.
- Which action best reflects risk management within a structured ethical decision-making model?
- Prefer the option that reduces foreseeable harm while meeting obligations. Prioritizing harm reduction while fulfilling duties integrates nonmaleficence and fidelity, central to ethical risk management strategies.
- Which resources should be consulted to identify applicable professional standards in a dilemma?
- Ethics code, laws/regulations, and institutional policies. These resources provide authoritative guidance on standards, ensuring decisions are aligned with professional, legal, and organizational expectations.
- What should you do to protect confidentiality when seeking professional consultation?
- Disclose the minimum necessary information, de-identify when possible. Minimizing disclosure upholds ethical obligations to confidentiality, allowing necessary consultation without breaching client privacy.
- What is the central task in the "generate alternatives" step of an ethical model?
- List feasible courses of action, including doing nothing. Listing all options, including inaction, promotes comprehensive consideration and adherence to systematic ethical problem-solving.
- Which analysis step explicitly compares risks and benefits for each possible action?
- Evaluate consequences of each alternative. This step systematically weighs potential impacts, ensuring the chosen action maximizes benefits and minimizes harm per ethical principles.
- What is the primary purpose of a structured ethical decision-making model in psychology?
- To make defensible, systematic decisions in ethical dilemmas. Structured models provide a systematic framework to ensure decisions are justifiable, consistent, and aligned with professional standards in complex situations.
- What is the first step in most structured ethical decision-making models?
- Identify and clearly define the ethical problem. Defining the problem establishes a clear foundation, distinguishing ethical issues from legal or practical ones to guide subsequent steps effectively.
- What is the meaning of "least restrictive alternative" in ethical decision-making?
- Choose the option that meets goals while minimizing intrusion on rights. It prioritizes options that achieve objectives with the least interference in individuals' rights, aligning with beneficence and nonmaleficence.
- What is the "publicity test" used for in ethical decision-making models?
- Assess whether you could justify the decision publicly and professionally. The publicity test evaluates defensibility by considering public scrutiny, promoting transparency and accountability in ethical choices.
- Which option is the best next step when personal values may bias your ethical judgment?
- Acknowledge the bias risk and seek consultation and objective standards. Acknowledging bias and seeking external input maintains objectivity, aligning with ethical requirements for impartial professional judgment.
- What is the final step in most ethical decision-making models after implementation?
- Evaluate outcomes and revise future practice as needed. Evaluation assesses effectiveness and informs improvements, fostering ongoing ethical competence and refinement of professional judgment.
- Which step of a structured ethical model explicitly requires choosing and carrying out a plan?
- Implement the selected course of action. Implementation translates analysis into practice, ensuring the decision is enacted effectively to resolve the ethical issue.
- What is the "justice" or "fairness" test used for in ethical decision-making models?
- Check whether the decision treats parties equitably and without bias. The justice test promotes equity by examining fairness and bias, aligning with ethical mandates for impartial treatment in decisions.
- What is the best action when two ethical principles conflict and both are relevant?
- Balance principles using facts, standards, and foreseeable consequences. Balancing requires integrating evidence and principles to resolve conflicts, ensuring decisions are principled and contextually appropriate.
- What is the "universality test" used for in ethical decision-making models?
- Ask whether the decision should be applied consistently in similar cases. The universality test ensures consistency and impartiality, verifying if the decision sets a precedent applicable across comparable situations.
- What is the key distinction between an ethical dilemma and an ethical violation?
- Dilemma: competing duties; violation: clear breach of a standard. Dilemmas involve conflicts requiring balancing, while violations are unambiguous infractions that demand corrective action per ethical codes.
- Identify the best immediate step if you have a potential multiple-relationship boundary concern.
- Assess role conflicts and risk of harm, then consider alternatives/consult. Assessing conflicts and risks first identifies issues, followed by alternatives and consultation to ensure ethical boundary management.
- What should you do first when you suspect an issue is primarily legal rather than ethical?
- Consult applicable laws and regulations before choosing actions. Legal issues take precedence to ensure compliance and avoid violations, as ethics codes often require adherence to laws before ethical considerations.
- What should be documented to make an ethical decision defensible if later reviewed?
- Facts, standards consulted, options, rationale, consultation, actions, outcomes. Comprehensive documentation demonstrates systematic reasoning and accountability, essential for defending decisions in reviews or challenges.
- What is the best next step if the facts are ambiguous and the ethical classification is unclear?
- Seek additional information and clarify assumptions. Clarifying facts and assumptions prevents misclassification and supports accurate progression through the decision-making model's subsequent steps.
- Which option best reflects the "consultation" step in ethical decision-making models?
- Obtain input from a qualified colleague or ethics/legal expert. Consultation offers objective perspectives and expertise, helping to identify blind spots and ensure decisions align with ethical standards.
- Which principle is most directly captured by selecting the least restrictive alternative?
- Respect for autonomy. Selecting least restrictive options honors individuals' self-determination, a core ethical principle in psychological practice.