Defenses to Payment of
Negotiable Instruments
Understand the real and personal defenses that obligors can raise when asked to pay on a negotiable instrument, and why holder in due course status matters.
What Is a Negotiable Instrument?
A negotiable instrument is a written, unconditional promise or order to pay a fixed amount of money. The most common examples are promissory notes and checks. These instruments can be transferred from one party to another, and the rights and defenses that attach depend on how the instrument was transferred and who holds it.
How Instruments Change Hands
Why Defenses Matter
When a holder demands payment on an instrument, the person obligated to pay (the obligor) may try to refuse. The law divides the obligor's defenses into two categories, and the type of holder determines which defenses are available:
The Core Rule: UCC Article 3
Real Defenses in Depth
Real Defenses: Fraud, Forgery, & More
Personal Defenses in Depth
Key Distinction: Factum vs. Inducement
| Fraud in the Factum | Fraud in the Inducement | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Real defense | Personal defense |
| What was the lie? | The nature of the document | The quality/value of the deal |
| Signer awareness | Did not know they signed an instrument | Knew they signed an instrument |
| Good vs. HDC? | Yes: beats HDC | No: HDC takes free |
| Example | "Sign this receipt" (really a note) | "This car is brand new" (really used) |
How to Apply the Rules
Example 1: Basic Application
Example 2: Real Defense Wins
Example 3: Material Alteration
The FTC Holder Rule
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Holder Rule is a major exception. In consumer credit transactions, the FTC requires sellers to include a notice in the contract preserving all claims and defenses the consumer could raise against the seller. This means:
Common Mistakes
Summary Table
| Defense | Type | vs. Holder | vs. HDC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Infancy | Real | ✓ | ✓ |
| Duress | Real | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fraud in Factum | Real | ✓ | ✓ |
| Forgery | Real | ✓ | ✓ |
| Discharge in Bankruptcy | Real | ✓ | ✓ |
| Breach of Contract | Personal | ✓ | ✕ |
| Fraud in Inducement | Personal | ✓ | ✕ |
| Lack of Consideration | Personal | ✓ | ✕ |
Question 1 of 5
A maker of a promissory note was induced to sign the note by the payee's fraudulent misrepresentation that the goods being purchased were of a higher quality than they actually were. The note was subsequently negotiated to a holder in due course. Which defense can the maker assert against the HDC?
Question 2 of 5
Tom, a 17-year-old, signed a promissory note payable to Seller Corp. for a laptop. Seller Corp. negotiated the note to Bank, which qualifies as an HDC. Can Tom avoid payment to Bank?
Question 3 of 5
Maria signed what she believed was a lease agreement, but it was actually a promissory note. The note was negotiated to an HDC. What type of defense does Maria have?
Question 4 of 5
A check was originally written for $200. The payee altered it to $2,000 and negotiated it to an HDC. How much can the HDC collect from the drawer?
Question 5 of 5
A consumer purchased a defective appliance with a promissory note. The seller negotiated the note to a finance company that qualifies as an HDC. The consumer claims breach of warranty. Under the FTC Holder Rule, can the consumer raise this defense?