- Q2 production budget shows: direct materials $71,100, direct labor $187,200, manufacturing overhead $135,200, and 5,200 units produced. What is the budgeted manufacturing cost per unit?
Answer: $75.67
Total manufacturing cost = $71,100 + $187,200 + $135,200 = $393,500. Cost per unit = $393,500 / 5,200 = $75.67. Option A omits manufacturing overhead from the total. Option B uses an incorrect total. Option C adds all costs but divides by 4,950 units.
- In preparing the master budget, which budget is typically prepared first because it drives all subsequent operating budgets?
Answer: The sales budget
The sales budget is the starting point because projected sales volume determines how many units must be produced, which in turn determines materials, labor, and overhead requirements. The entire operating budget cascade flows from the sales forecast. Option A (production) depends on the sales budget. Option C (cash) is a financial budget prepared after the operating budgets. Option D (budgeted income statement) is the culminating financial statement, not the starting point.
- A cash collections budget for Q2: Q2 credit sales $400,000 (60% collected in quarter of sale, 35% next quarter, 5% uncollectible). Q1 credit sales were $360,000 (35% collected in Q2). What are total Q2 cash collections?
Answer: $366,000
Collections from Q2 sales = $400,000 x 60% = $240,000. Collections from Q1 sales = $360,000 x 35% = $126,000. Total Q2 collections = $240,000 + $126,000 = $366,000. Option A collects 100% of Q1 sales. Option C collects 100% of Q2 sales without the Q1 carryover. Option D collects only Q1 carryover.
- A participative budgeting process finds that most departments submit budgets 10-20% above prior-year actuals without detailed justification. Which concern does this raise?
Answer: Managers may be building budget slack to create a performance cushion; without robust challenge and justification requirements, the budget may be systematically overstated
Budget slack occurs when managers deliberately inflate their budget requests beyond what they realistically expect to need, creating a buffer to ensure they meet their targets. This is a well-documented behavioral problem in participative budgeting. The solution is a rigorous challenge process where managers must justify each expenditure with specific plans rather than applying a blanket percentage increase. Option A treats operational knowledge as a guarantee of budget accuracy without acknowledging incentive problems. Option B overcorrects by eliminating a useful process. Option D makes an unsupported universal claim.
- The primary purpose of a cash budget is:
Answer: To forecast the timing and magnitude of cash inflows and outflows so management can maintain adequate liquidity and identify periods requiring external financing or investment of surplus cash
The cash budget translates the operating and financial budgets into projected cash flows, revealing the timing of cash surpluses and deficits. This allows management to arrange financing before shortfalls occur and invest surplus cash productively. Option B describes external cash flow reporting, which follows different standards and purposes than internal cash budgeting. Option C overstates the cash budget's role; planning ahead helps manage credit needs but does not eliminate the need for credit facilities. Option D describes cash accounting or treasury reconciliation, not budgeting.
- A company uses incremental budgeting where department managers submit requests 8-12% above prior-year actuals without detailed justification. Which concern does this budgeting process raise?
Answer: Incremental budgeting perpetuates inefficiencies by assuming all current spending is justified and building on it rather than requiring managers to justify expenditures from zero
Incremental budgeting's key weakness is that it treats the prior year's spending as an unquestioned baseline, allowing inefficiencies, redundant programs, and unjustified expenses to compound year after year. Zero-based budgeting (ZBB) was developed specifically to address this problem by requiring every expenditure to be justified independently of prior spending. Option B makes an unsupported universal claim about appropriate increases. Option C confuses reliability of the base data with accuracy of the resulting budget. Option D overstates the efficacy of approval processes as a substitute for sound budget methodology.
- A capital expenditure budget of $4,200,000 is planned for the year. Projected operating cash flow before capex is $1,800,000. The company has no external financing plans. Which concern does this budget reveal?
Answer: The company cannot fund $4,200,000 of capex from $1,800,000 of operating cash flow alone; a $2,400,000 funding gap must be addressed through debt, equity, asset sales, or reduced investment
Free cash flow = Operating cash flow - Capex = $1,800,000 - $4,200,000 = -$2,400,000. Without external financing, the company cannot execute this capital plan solely from operations. The $2,400,000 gap requires identification of funding sources before the capital budget can be finalized. Option A compares capex to depreciation, which is not the relevant cash flow metric. Option C mischaracterizes depreciation; it is already included in the operating cash flow calculation and cannot be added again. Option D is incorrect; capital investment must be funded, and the funding must come from somewhere.
- Q2 cash disbursements: materials purchased $71,100 (50% paid in Q2), direct labor $187,200 (paid in Q2), manufacturing overhead $135,200 (includes $20,000 depreciation), SGA $110,000 (includes $5,000 depreciation), capital expenditures $60,000. What are total Q2 cash disbursements?
Answer: $502,950
Materials cash = $71,100 x 50% = $35,550. DL = $187,200. OH cash = $135,200 - $20,000 depreciation = $115,200. SGA cash = $110,000 - $5,000 depreciation = $105,000. Capex = $60,000. Total = $35,550 + $187,200 + $115,200 + $105,000 + $60,000 = $502,950. Option A pays 100% of materials. Option B omits capex. Option D uses incorrect depreciation exclusions.
- A monthly cash budget for March shows: beginning cash $35,000, cash receipts $420,000, cash disbursements $490,000. The minimum required cash balance is $25,000 and a $100,000 revolving credit line is available. What is the March ending cash balance after borrowing the minimum required amount?
Answer: $25,000 (minimum balance after borrowing $60,000)
Cash before financing = $35,000 + $420,000 - $490,000 = -$35,000. Borrowing needed = $25,000 - (-$35,000) = $60,000. Ending cash = -$35,000 + $60,000 = $25,000. Option A shows the pre-financing position. Option B incorrectly uses the beginning balance. Option C borrows the full $100,000 credit line instead of the minimum needed.
- A company allocates a capital budget of $1,500,000. Project submissions total $2,200,000. Projects ranked by priority: Project 1 $600,000 (essential equipment), Project 2 $500,000 (efficiency upgrade), Project 3 $400,000 (expansion), Project 4 $700,000 (new market entry). Which combination maximizes strategic investment within the $1,500,000 budget?
Answer: Projects 1, 2, and 3: $1,500,000 total
Projects 1+2+3 = $600,000 + $500,000 + $400,000 = $1,500,000, exactly within budget. Option A ($1,800,000) and Option D ($1,600,000) exceed the budget. Option B ($1,300,000) is within budget but leaves $200,000 undeployed that could fund Project 3 while staying within the limit.
- A manufacturing overhead budget for Q2: variable overhead rate $8 per direct labor hour, budgeted DL hours 10,400, fixed manufacturing overhead $52,000 per quarter. What is total budgeted Q2 manufacturing overhead?
Answer: $135,200
Variable overhead = 10,400 x $8 = $83,200. Fixed overhead = $52,000. Total = $83,200 + $52,000 = $135,200. Option A is only the variable overhead component. Option B is only the fixed overhead component. Option D applies a higher variable rate.
- The master budget is best described as which of the following?
Answer: A comprehensive set of interrelated budgets covering all aspects of planned operations for a period, culminating in a budgeted income statement, balance sheet, and cash flow statement
The master budget is the complete, integrated financial plan for the organization, built from operating budgets (sales, production, materials, labor, overhead) and financial budgets (cash, capital expenditures) that together produce pro forma financial statements. Option B describes a top-down directive, not the master budget itself. Option C describes a rolling budget or continuous reforecast. Option D is only one component of the master budget.
- The production budget requires 5,200 units in Q2, but the facility has a practical capacity of only 4,800 units per quarter. Which concern does this raise for budget preparation?
Answer: The production budget is infeasible; either the sales forecast must be revised, prior inventory drawn down, or capacity expanded before the budget can be accepted
A production budget that exceeds practical capacity is not executable as stated. The budget preparation process must resolve this constraint before finalization. Options include revising the sales plan, scheduling additional production in adjacent quarters to build inventory, or investing in capacity expansion. Each option has cost and timing implications that must be incorporated into the master budget. Option A ignores a binding physical constraint. Option C overstates the flexibility of short-term capacity; 400 additional units (8.3% above stated capacity) may not be achievable through overtime alone. Option D incorrectly isolates the production department from the integrated budget process.
- A company's budget projects improvement in operating margin from 9% to 11%, driven by headcount reduction and supplier renegotiations. By October, operating margin is 8.5% despite completed headcount reductions. Supplier renegotiations have not been completed. Which interpretation is most analytically complete?
Answer: The incomplete supplier renegotiations are the primary cause of the margin shortfall; the headcount savings are being more than offset by the absence of supplier savings, and a reforecast should model realistic timing for the remaining initiatives
The diagnostic is clear: the headcount component of the plan was executed (a positive result) but the supplier component was not. Because the budget improvement required both initiatives, the absence of supplier savings has left actual margins below even the prior year level. Management needs a reforecast that: quantifies the savings still achievable from supplier renegotiations, establishes a realistic timeline, and assesses whether alternative actions can partially recover the shortfall. Option A treats the shortfall as justification to abandon rather than adjust. Option B celebrates partial execution without acknowledging the net result. Option D dismisses the below-prior-year margin as acceptable.
- The cash budget shows a Q2 ending balance before financing of -$91,950. The minimum required cash balance is $30,000. What is the minimum amount the company must borrow?
Answer: $121,950
Required borrowing = Minimum balance - Current balance = $30,000 - (-$91,950) = $121,950. The company must borrow enough to both cover the deficit and bring the balance up to the required minimum. Option B covers the deficit but leaves the balance at zero, below the $30,000 minimum. Option C results in a $30,000 deficit after borrowing. Option D is the minimum balance itself, not the borrowing amount.
- A cash budget shows significant deficits in Q2 and Q3 with recovery in Q4. Management plans to draw on its revolving credit facility to cover the deficits. Which concern should be raised when reviewing this budget?
Answer: The adequacy of the credit facility to cover the full deficit, the interest cost of borrowings, and the risk that the facility may not cover the peak deficit should be explicitly modeled and reviewed
While using a revolving credit facility for seasonal or timing-driven cash needs is legitimate, the budget review should explicitly model: the maximum draw required, whether the facility limit is sufficient, the interest cost impact on the income statement, and the repayment schedule. If the peak deficit approaches the facility limit, the company has no buffer for unexpected shortfalls. Option A overstates the prohibition on using credit lines. Option B is unrealistic - seasonal businesses routinely budget cash deficits. Option D dismisses a genuine planning requirement.
- A company's 4-month budget cycle produces a plan completed in November. By February of the budget year, three major assumptions have been invalidated. The annual budget remains the primary performance benchmark. Which concern is most significant?
Answer: Using a budget built on invalidated assumptions as the primary benchmark creates misleading variance analysis; an updated forecast should serve as the working decision-making tool while the original budget is retained for accountability tracking
When material assumptions underlying a budget are invalidated early in the year, continuing to use that budget as the primary performance benchmark produces variance analyses that conflate the impact of changed external circumstances with actual management performance. Best practice separates the original budget (which establishes the accountability baseline agreed upon at the start of the year) from a current-period forecast (which reflects the best current estimate of what will actually happen). This allows performance evaluation against the original commitment while providing accurate information for current decisions. Options A, B, and C dismiss or delay the analytical response to known material changes.
- A selling and administrative (SGA) budget for Q2: variable SGA $6 per unit sold, budgeted Q2 unit sales 5,000, fixed SGA $80,000 per quarter. What is total budgeted Q2 SGA?
Answer: $110,000
Variable SGA = 5,000 x $6 = $30,000. Fixed SGA = $80,000. Total = $110,000. Note that SGA uses sales units (5,000), not production units (5,200). Option B uses production units (5,200) for the variable component. Option C is only fixed SGA. Option D uses a $4 variable rate instead of $6.
- A budgeted income statement projects a 15% gross margin improvement. The budget includes $1,200,000 of cost reduction initiatives that have not yet been approved or implemented. Which concern is most significant?
Answer: Embedding unapproved cost reduction initiatives into the base budget creates an unrealistic target; the budget should present the baseline scenario separately from planned but unconfirmed savings
A budget that includes $1,200,000 of savings from initiatives not yet approved or underway is building in an assumption that may not materialize. Best practice is to present the baseline budget (without the savings) and the upside scenario (with the savings) separately, clearly labeling which elements depend on successful initiative execution. If the budget is adopted including unconfirmed savings and those savings are not achieved, the budget will be missed through no controllable failure. Option A makes an absolute claim without knowing the specific circumstances. Option B is an unsupported assertion. Option C is not relevant to the concern about unapproved initiatives.
- A sales budget shows quarterly unit sales: Q1 4,000, Q2 5,000, Q3 6,000, Q4 4,500. The selling price is $80 per unit. What is the total budgeted annual revenue?
Answer: $1,560,000
Total units = 4,000 + 5,000 + 6,000 + 4,500 = 19,500 units. Total revenue = 19,500 x $80 = $1,560,000. Option A uses 18,000 units. Option C uses 20,500 units. Option D uses 24,500 units.