A reversible reaction system shows the following behavior: at 25°C, 85% Product A and 15% Product B; at 100°C, 35% Product A and 65% Product B. After heating to 100°C and then cooling back to 25°C, the final composition is 40% Product A and 60% Product B. What does this indicate? Answer: Product A is kinetically favored at 25°C, but Product B is thermodynamically favored
When you encounter problems about product distributions at different temperatures, you're dealing with the fundamental distinction between kinetic control (which product forms faster) and thermodynamic control (which product is more stable at equilibrium).
The key insight comes from analyzing what happens after the heating-cooling cycle. Initially at 25°C, you have 85% A and 15% B. After heating to 100°C, the composition shifts to 35% A and 65% B. Most importantly, when cooled back to 25°C, the final composition is 40% A and 60% B—not the original 85% A and 15% B.
This tells you that the original 25°C composition wasn't at true equilibrium. If it were, you'd return to 85% A after cooling. Instead, the heating provided enough energy to overcome kinetic barriers and reach closer to the true thermodynamic equilibrium, where B is favored. At 25°C, A forms faster (kinetic control), but B is actually more thermodynamically stable.
Option A is wrong because A isn't thermodynamically favored—the equilibrium actually favors B. Option C incorrectly states B is kinetically favored; the initial high concentration of A shows A forms faster at 25°C. Option D is incorrect because the original 25°C state represents kinetic, not thermodynamic control.
The correct answer is B: Product A is kinetically favored at 25°C (forms faster initially), but Product B is thermodynamically favored (more stable at equilibrium).
Study tip: When product ratios change irreversibly after heating-cooling cycles, suspect that kinetic control was masking the true thermodynamic preference.