Domain Restrictions, Holes, and Discontinuities - College Algebra
- Consider the rational function . After factoring both numerator and denominator completely, what can be concluded about the domain and discontinuities of this function? Answer: The domain is all real numbers except and , with a hole at and vertical asymptote at First, factor completely: . The factor appears in both numerator and denominator, creating a hole at . The factor appears only in the denominator, creating a vertical asymptote at . The domain excludes both and . Choice A incorrectly identifies both as vertical asymptotes. Choice C uses wrong values from incorrectly factoring the denominator. Choice D incorrectly excludes from the domain restriction.
- A student claims that the function has a hole at because both the numerator and denominator equal zero when . What is wrong with this reasoning? Answer: While both expressions equal zero at , the factored forms show no common factor, so there is a vertical asymptote, not a hole Factor both expressions: numerator and denominator . While both equal zero at , this alone doesn't determine the type of discontinuity. The factored forms show no common factor involving , so creates a vertical asymptote, not a hole. A hole occurs only when the same linear factor appears in both numerator and denominator and can be canceled. Choice A gives an incorrect general rule. Choice B is wrong since is undefined. Choice D correctly identifies the flaw in reasoning.
- For which value of will the function have a removable discontinuity (hole) at ? Answer: For a hole at , the factor must divide both numerator and denominator. The denominator already contains . For the numerator to also contain , we need to be a root: , so , giving and . We can verify: when , the numerator becomes . Choice B gives , no factor. Choice C gives , which doesn't factor to include . Choice D gives , also without .
- Consider the piecewise-defined function: . What type of discontinuity, if any, occurs at ? Answer: Removable discontinuity because the rational part has a hole at For , we have . So . However, . Since the limit exists but doesn't equal the function value, this is a removable discontinuity. The function could be made continuous by redefining . Choice A is wrong because . Choice B is incorrect because left and right limits are both 4. Choice D is wrong because the limit exists and is finite.
- For the rational function , what is the domain restriction and what type of discontinuity occurs at ? Answer: Domain: all real numbers except ; hole at Factor the function: . The factor appears in both numerator and denominator, creating a hole (removable discontinuity) at . The factor appears only in the denominator, creating a vertical asymptote at . The domain excludes both and . Choice A incorrectly identifies as a vertical asymptote. Choice C incorrectly excludes from domain restrictions. Choice D correctly identifies the removable discontinuity but uses less precise terminology.
- Consider the function . If this function is graphed on a coordinate plane, which statement correctly describes its discontinuities? Answer: There is a hole at and a vertical asymptote at Factor completely: . The factor appears in both numerator and denominator, creating a hole at . The factor appears only in the denominator, creating a vertical asymptote at . Choice B incorrectly places the hole at (a zero of the reduced function, not a discontinuity). Choice C ignores the common factor cancellation. Choice D reverses the locations of the hole and asymptote.