SECTION 1
Historical Context & Motivation
For centuries, chemists knew that some reactions happen quickly while others proceed at a crawl, but they lacked a mathematical vocabulary to describe how fast a reactant disappears. The quest to quantify reaction speed gave birth to chemical kinetics, the branch of chemistry that studies reaction rates. Early breakthroughs came from studying simple processes—acid-catalyzed reactions and radioactive decay—where concentration measurements over time revealed elegant patterns.
1850 • Wilhelmy's Sucrose Experiment
1864 • Guldberg & Waage's Law of Mass Action
1903 • Rutherford & Soddy's Decay Law
1913 • Bodenstein & the Steady-State Concept
A differential rate law tells you how the rate depends on concentration at a single instant. That's useful, but it doesn't answer a practical question every chemist asks: "If I start with a known amount of reactant, how much is left after a certain time?" The integrated rate law answers exactly that question by relating concentration directly to elapsed time.
SECTION 2
Core Principles & Definitions
Before diving into equations, you need a solid grasp of a few foundational ideas. The reaction order describes how the rate depends on the concentration of a particular reactant. It is determined experimentally—you cannot simply look at a balanced equation and guess the order. Once the order is known, the differential rate law can be transformed via calculus (don't worry, the final result is what matters) into an integrated rate law that directly connects concentration [A] to time t.
Reaction Order
Rate Constant (k)
Initial Concentration [A]₀
Half-Life (t₁/₂)
Linear Plots
KEY TAKEAWAY
SECTION 3
Visual Explanation — Concentration vs. Time
The most immediate way to distinguish reaction orders is to look at how concentration decreases over time. Each order produces a characteristic curve shape. The diagram below plots [A] versus time for all three orders starting from the same initial concentration.
Notice how the zero-order curve hits zero concentration at a finite time—the reaction simply stops when the reactant is consumed. In contrast, the first- and second-order curves technically never reach zero; the concentration just gets infinitely close to it. This visual difference is one reason each order has a distinct half-life behavior, which we'll explore in the math section.
SECTION 4
Mathematical Framework
Each reaction order has its own integrated rate law, its own linear plot form, and its own half-life expression. Below are the three equations you need to memorize and understand. In every case, [A] is the concentration of the reactant at time t, [A]₀ is the initial concentration, and k is the rate constant.
Zero-Order Reactions
ZERO-ORDER INTEGRATED RATE LAW
Linear in [A] vs. t with slope = −k and y-intercept = [A]₀. Units of k: mol·L⁻¹·s⁻¹ (or M/s).
ZERO-ORDER HALF-LIFE
The half-life depends on initial concentration. Higher [A]₀ means a longer half-life. Each successive half-life is shorter than the previous one.
First-Order Reactions
FIRST-ORDER INTEGRATED RATE LAW
Linear in ln[A] vs. t with slope = −k and y-intercept = ln[A]₀. Units of k: s⁻¹. Can also be written as [A] = [A]₀ × e−kt.
FIRST-ORDER HALF-LIFE
The half-life is constant—it does not depend on [A]₀. This is the hallmark of first-order kinetics and is the same math behind radioactive decay.
Second-Order Reactions
SECOND-ORDER INTEGRATED RATE LAW
Linear in 1/[A] vs. t with slope = +k and y-intercept = 1/[A]₀. Units of k: L·mol⁻¹·s⁻¹ (or M⁻¹s⁻¹).
SECOND-ORDER HALF-LIFE
The half-life depends on [A]₀ and gets longer as the reaction proceeds—each successive half-life is twice as long as the one before.
SECTION 5
Determining Order from Linear Plots
In the lab, you don't usually know the reaction order in advance. The standard technique is to collect concentration-versus-time data and then make three separate plots: [A] vs. t, ln[A] vs. t, and 1/[A] vs. t. Whichever plot yields a straight line tells you the order.
| Property | Zero Order | First Order | Second Order |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rate Law | rate = k | rate = k[A] | rate = k[A]² |
| Integrated Form | [A] = [A]₀ − kt | ln[A] = ln[A]₀ − kt | 1/[A] = 1/[A]₀ + kt |
| Linear Plot | [A] vs. t | ln[A] vs. t | 1/[A] vs. t |
| Slope | −k | −k | +k |
| Units of k | M·s⁻¹ | s⁻¹ | M⁻¹·s⁻¹ |
| Half-Life | [A]₀ / (2k) | 0.693 / k | 1 / (k[A]₀) |
Summary of integrated rate law properties by reaction order
SECTION 6
Worked Example
Let's apply these equations to a concrete problem. We'll work through a first-order example step by step, then do a quick second-order calculation.
First-Order Decomposition of N₂O₅
- 1
Step 1 — Identify Given Values
Dinitrogen pentoxide (N₂O₅) decomposes in a first-order reaction. The rate constant is k = 6.82 × 10⁻³ s⁻¹ at 45 °C, and the initial concentration is [N₂O₅]₀ = 0.100 M. We want to find [N₂O₅] after 100 seconds. - 2
Step 2 — Select the Correct Integrated Rate Law
Since the reaction is first order, we use: ln[A] = ln[A]₀ − kt. We can also use the equivalent exponential form: [A] = [A]₀ × e−kt. - 3
Step 3 — Substitute Values
[N₂O₅] = 0.100 M × e−(6.82 × 10⁻³ s⁻¹)(100 s) = 0.100 M × e−0.682 - 4
Step 4 — Calculate the Exponential
e−0.682 ≈ 0.5057. Multiply: [N₂O₅] = 0.100 × 0.5057 = 0.0506 M.[N₂O₅] ≈ 0.0506 M after 100 s - 5
Step 5 — Verify with Half-Life
t₁/₂ = 0.693 / (6.82 × 10⁻³) ≈ 101.6 s. After about 102 seconds the concentration should be roughly half of the initial. Our answer of 0.0506 M at 100 s is indeed very close to half of 0.100 M, which confirms our calculation is reasonable.t₁/₂ ≈ 102 s — consistent!
Second-Order Reaction: 2 NO₂ → 2 NO + O₂
- 1
Step 1 — Given Information
The decomposition of NO₂ is second order with k = 0.543 M⁻¹s⁻¹ at 300 °C. [NO₂]₀ = 0.050 M. Find [NO₂] after 20 seconds. - 2
Step 2 — Apply Second-Order Integrated Rate Law
1/[NO₂] = 1/[NO₂]₀ + kt = 1/0.050 + (0.543)(20) = 20.0 + 10.86 = 30.86 M⁻¹ - 3
Step 3 — Solve for [NO₂]
[NO₂] = 1/30.86 ≈ 0.0324 M[NO₂] ≈ 0.032 M after 20 s
SECTION 7
Comparing the Three Orders
Understanding the differences and similarities among the three orders helps you choose the right equation and interpret results. The table below highlights the practical implications of each order.
| Feature | Zero Order | First Order | Second Order |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rate depends on [A]? | No — rate is constant | Yes — directly proportional | Yes — proportional to [A]² |
| Curve shape ([A] vs. t) | Straight line (decreasing) | Exponential decay | Concave-up decay |
| Successive half-lives | Decrease (each is shorter) | Stay constant | Increase (each is longer) |
| Common real-world example | Enzyme-catalyzed reactions at saturation | Radioactive decay, drug metabolism | NO₂ decomposition at high T |
| Strength | Simple, predictable time to full consumption | Constant half-life makes predictions easy | Accounts for bimolecular collision dependence |
| Limitation | Rare—requires a special mechanism | Doesn't apply when two molecules must collide | Half-life changes, complicating dosing predictions |
Practical comparison across reaction orders
KEY TAKEAWAY
SECTION 8
Connection to Advanced Kinetics
The integrated rate laws you've learned apply to simple, single-step (or pseudo-single-step) reactions. In more advanced chemistry, you'll encounter reactions that don't fit neatly into 0th, 1st, or 2nd order models. The table below previews how this topic extends in college-level courses.
| This Lesson (High School) | Advanced Kinetics (College) |
|---|---|
| Single-reactant rate laws (A → products) | Multi-reactant rate laws (A + B → products) with pseudo-order techniques |
| Integer orders only (0, 1, 2) | Fractional and negative orders arising from complex mechanisms |
| Rate constant k is given or measured at one temperature | k varies with temperature via the Arrhenius equation: k = |
| Irreversible reactions only | Reversible reactions and equilibrium kinetics connecting to the equilibrium constant K |
| Graphical method for order determination | Computational curve fitting and numerical integration for complex data |
How integrated rate laws expand in college-level kinetics
Even though advanced kinetics involves more complexity, the foundational integrated rate laws you're learning now remain the building blocks. For example, the Arrhenius equation tells you how the rate constant k changes with temperature, but once you know k at a specific temperature, you still plug it into the same integrated rate law equations from this lesson to predict concentrations over time.
SECTION 9
Practice Problems
Question 1: CONCEPTUAL
Show answer
Question 2: BASIC CALCULATION
Show answer
Question 3: INTERMEDIATE
Show answer
Question 4: APPLIED
Show answer
Question 5: CRITICAL THINKING
Show answer
SUMMARY
Lesson Summary
Summary
Integrated rate laws connect a reactant's concentration directly to elapsed time, allowing you to predict how much reactant remains at any point during a reaction. For a zero-order reaction, [A] = [A]₀ − kt, producing a straight line when [A] is plotted against time, with a half-life of [A]₀/(2k) that decreases over time. For a first-order reaction, ln[A] = ln[A]₀ − kt, giving a straight line on a ln[A] vs. t plot, with a constant half-life of 0.693/k. For a second-order reaction, 1/[A] = 1/[A]₀ + kt, yielding a straight line on a 1/[A] vs. t plot, with a half-life of 1/(k[A]₀) that increases as the reaction proceeds.
To determine the reaction order experimentally, plot your data in all three forms and look for the straight line. The slope of that line gives you the rate constant k (watch the sign—it is negative for zero and first order, positive for second order). Remember that the units of k change with order: M·s⁻¹ for zero, s⁻¹ for first, and M⁻¹·s⁻¹ for second. Mastering these three integrated rate laws gives you a powerful toolkit for predicting concentrations, calculating half-lives, and identifying reaction mechanisms.