Recognize wound infection and skin breakdown - Certified Patient Care Technician Assistant Cpcta

SECTION 1

Historical Context & Motivation

The recognition and management of wound infections has been a cornerstone of medical practice for millennia, though the understanding of why wounds become infected evolved dramatically over time. In ancient Egypt, physicians applied honey and grease-soaked linen to wounds, inadvertently exploiting the antimicrobial properties of honey without understanding the underlying mechanisms. For centuries, the prevailing belief held that laudable pus—thick, creamy wound drainage—was a sign of healing rather than infection, a misconception that contributed to countless preventable deaths. The trajectory of wound care shifted profoundly with the advent of germ theory in the nineteenth century, and subsequent breakthroughs in antisepsis, aseptic technique, and pressure injury staging have given modern healthcare workers the tools to recognize and intervene in wound complications before they escalate.

1867 • Lister's Antiseptic Technique

Joseph Lister introduced carbolic acid spray during surgery, dramatically reducing post-operative wound infections and establishing that microbial contamination—not "bad air"—was the root cause of surgical sepsis.

1962 • Moist Wound Healing Paradigm

George Winter published landmark research demonstrating that wounds covered with moisture-retentive dressings epithelialized up to twice as fast as those left to air dry, fundamentally changing wound management protocols.

1975 • First Pressure Ulcer Staging System

Shea published the first widely adopted classification system for pressure ulcers, providing clinicians with a standardized language to describe skin breakdown severity—a system later refined by the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP).

1992 • CDC Surgical Site Infection Criteria

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention formalized diagnostic criteria for surgical site infections (SSIs), standardizing how healthcare workers identify and report wound infections across all clinical settings.

2016 • NPIAP Terminology Update

The term "pressure ulcer" was officially replaced with "pressure injury" to reflect the fact that skin breakdown can occur without an open wound, emphasizing the importance of recognizing early-stage tissue damage including intact but compromised skin.

Today, patient care technicians function as critical frontline observers in the healthcare team. Because CPCTs spend more time at the bedside than most other providers, they are frequently the first to notice the earliest signs of wound infection or progressive skin breakdown. The central question this lesson addresses is: How does a patient care technician systematically recognize the cardinal signs of wound infection and the progressive stages of skin breakdown in order to escalate care promptly and prevent complications?

SECTION 2

Core Principles & Definitions

Effective wound and skin assessment rests on a foundation of interconnected principles drawn from pathophysiology, microbiology, and clinical observation. Understanding why tissue breaks down and why infections develop allows the CPCT to move beyond simple checklist-based assessment toward genuinely informed clinical observation. The following foundational concepts underpin every wound and skin integrity evaluation performed at the bedside.

Skin Integrity

Skin integrity refers to the skin's ability to function as an intact, unbroken barrier against pathogens, fluid loss, and mechanical injury. Any disruption—whether from pressure, moisture, shear, or surgical incision—creates a portal of entry for microorganisms and initiates the wound healing cascade.

Cardinal Signs of Infection

The classic signs of localized wound infection include rubor (redness), calor (warmth), tumor (swelling), dolor (pain), and functio laesa (loss of function). These manifestations result from the inflammatory response triggered by microbial colonization progressing to true tissue invasion.

Wound Colonization vs. Infection

All open wounds harbor microorganisms (colonization), but infection occurs only when the microbial burden exceeds the host's immune defenses—typically at concentrations greater than 10⁵ organisms per gram of tissue. Recognizing this distinction prevents both under-reporting and unnecessary alarm.

Pressure Injury Staging

The NPIAP staging system classifies pressure injuries from Stage 1 (non-blanchable erythema of intact skin) through Stage 4 (full-thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle). Unstageable and deep tissue injuries represent additional categories that CPCTs must recognize.

Wound Healing Phases

Normal wound healing progresses through hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. Infection disrupts this orderly cascade—typically stalling the wound in the inflammatory phase—making knowledge of normal healing essential for recognizing when the process has gone awry.

✦

KEY TAKEAWAY

Think of intact skin as a fortress wall: colonization is like enemy scouts camped outside the gate—present but not yet a threat. Infection is the moment those forces breach the wall and begin overwhelming the garrison. Your role as a CPCT is to serve as the sentry who detects the breach early—before the fortress falls. Every assessment you perform is a patrol of that wall, looking for the telltale signs that the defenses have been compromised.

SECTION 3

Visual Explanation: Cardinal Signs of Wound Infection

The five cardinal signs of wound infection radiate from the wound site. Rubor (redness) and calor (warmth) reflect increased blood flow from vasodilation; tumor (swelling) results from fluid leaking into interstitial spaces; dolor (pain) arises from chemical mediators irritating nerve endings; and functio laesa (loss of function) reflects the cumulative impact of these responses on tissue use.

As depicted in the diagram above, the five cardinal signs of infection are interrelated manifestations of the body's inflammatory response to microbial invasion. When bacteria overwhelm local defenses, the immune system releases chemical mediators—including histamine, prostaglandins, and cytokines—that trigger vasodilation (causing redness and warmth), increase capillary permeability (causing swelling), and sensitize peripheral nociceptors (causing pain). Recognizing these signs in the context of a wound requires the CPCT to perform systematic, head-to-toe skin assessments and compare findings to baseline. A wound that was pink and healing yesterday but today appears erythematous with spreading redness, increased warmth, and new purulent drainage represents a significant change warranting immediate escalation to the licensed nurse. In addition to these classic signs, modern wound assessment also looks for purulent or foul-smelling drainage, wound dehiscence (separation of wound edges), delayed healing beyond expected timelines, and systemic signs such as fever or elevated white blood cell count.

SECTION 4

Mechanism: The Wound Infection Continuum & Skin Breakdown Pathophysiology

The Wound Infection Continuum

Wound infection does not occur as a sudden, binary event; rather, it progresses along a continuum that the CPCT must understand in order to identify the point at which intervention becomes critical. The continuum begins with contamination, a state in which microorganisms are present on the wound surface but are not replicating. The next stage, colonization, involves microbial replication without triggering a host immune response or delaying healing. As the organism burden increases and begins to impair healing without overt signs of infection, the wound enters a state of critical colonization (also called local infection), characterized by subtle signs such as friable granulation tissue, wound bed discoloration, and increased exudate without the classic inflammatory signs. Finally, infection occurs when organisms invade viable tissue, eliciting a robust host immune response and the cardinal signs discussed previously. If unchecked, localized infection can progress to systemic infection (sepsis), a potentially life-threatening condition.

The upper portion illustrates the wound infection continuum from contamination through sepsis. The lower section shows the pathophysiological pathway of pressure-induced skin breakdown: sustained pressure causes ischemia, which leads to tissue hypoxia and ultimately necrosis (cell death). Key risk factors including immobility, malnutrition, moisture exposure, and decreased sensation are shown at the bottom.

Pathophysiology of Skin Breakdown

Skin breakdown—most commonly manifesting as pressure injuries—results from the interplay of external mechanical forces and intrinsic patient vulnerabilities. When sustained pressure exceeds capillary closing pressure (approximately 32 mmHg), blood flow to the underlying tissue is occluded, depriving cells of oxygen and nutrients. This ischemia triggers an anaerobic metabolic cascade that produces toxic metabolic byproducts, ultimately leading to cellular death (necrosis). The process is accelerated by shear forces (which stretch and angulate blood vessels feeding the tissue) and friction (which strips the epidermis). Intrinsic risk factors such as advanced age, malnutrition (particularly protein and vitamin C deficiency), incontinence-related moisture exposure, decreased sensory perception, and impaired circulation compound the mechanical insult. The Braden Scale is the most widely used clinical tool for quantifying pressure injury risk, scoring patients across six subscales: sensory perception, moisture, activity, mobility, nutrition, and friction/shear.

SECTION 5

Pressure Injury Staging & Wound Classification

The NPIAP pressure injury staging system provides a universal framework for describing the severity of skin breakdown. As a CPCT, you will not independently stage wounds—that responsibility belongs to the licensed nurse—but you must recognize the visual and tactile characteristics of each stage so that you can accurately describe what you observe and escalate concerns appropriately. The following table summarizes the defining features, clinical appearance, and CPCT actions for each stage.

Stage	Tissue Involvement	Clinical Appearance	CPCT Action
Stage 1	Intact skin with non-blanchable erythema	Area appears red (darker-skinned patients may show purple or ashen hues); feels warmer or cooler than surrounding tissue; may be painful, firm, or boggy	Report to nurse immediately; reposition patient; document location, size, and color
Stage 2	Partial-thickness skin loss involving epidermis and/or dermis	Shallow open wound with red-pink wound bed; may present as an intact or ruptured serum-filled blister; no slough or bruising	Report to nurse; keep wound clean per orders; protect from friction; monitor for progression
Stage 3	Full-thickness skin loss extending into subcutaneous tissue	Deep crater; subcutaneous fat may be visible; slough may be present; bone, tendon, and muscle are NOT exposed; undermining/tunneling possible	Notify nurse urgently; assist with wound care as delegated; strict repositioning schedule
Stage 4	Full-thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle	Deep wound extending into muscle, bone, or supporting structures; slough or eschar often present; high risk for osteomyelitis	Immediate nurse notification; assist with advanced wound care; monitor for systemic infection signs
Unstageable	Full-thickness loss obscured by slough or eschar	Wound base covered by yellow, tan, gray, green, or brown slough, or black/brown eschar; true depth cannot be determined until removed	Report to nurse; do NOT attempt debridement; document appearance of covering tissue
Deep Tissue Injury (DTI)	Intact or non-intact skin with localized damage to underlying soft tissue	Purple or maroon localized area of intact skin, or blood-filled blister; may be preceded by tissue that is painful, firm, mushy, boggy, warmer, or cooler compared to adjacent tissue	Report immediately; this may evolve rapidly to reveal a Stage 3 or 4 injury; monitor closely

NPIAP Pressure Injury Staging System with CPCT-Specific Actions

⚠

Clinical Pearl: Dark Skin Tones

In patients with darker skin pigmentation, Stage 1 pressure injuries may not present as visible redness. Instead, the CPCT should assess for changes in skin temperature, tissue consistency (firmness or bogginess), pain at the site, and color changes toward purple or ashen hues. Comparing the suspected area to adjacent intact skin using the back of the hand (for temperature) and gentle palpation (for texture) is essential for equitable, accurate assessment.

SECTION 6

Worked Example: Assessing a Patient for Wound Infection and Skin Breakdown

The following scenario illustrates how a CPCT would systematically assess, identify, and report wound infection and skin breakdown in a clinical setting. Work through each step as though you are at the patient's bedside.

Scenario: Mrs. Johnson, 78-year-old Post-Surgical Patient

1
Step 1 — Review Patient Context

Mrs. Johnson is 3 days post-op from a right hip replacement. She has a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus (impairs wound healing and immune response), is on a low-protein diet due to renal concerns, and has been largely bed-bound since surgery. You are performing routine morning care and a skin assessment. Key risk factors identified: advanced age, diabetes, nutritional compromise, and immobility.

High-risk patient profile for both wound infection and pressure injury development.
2
Step 2 — Assess the Surgical Wound

You inspect the right hip surgical incision with gloves in place, following standard precautions. Using the mnemonic COCA (Color, Odor, Consistency, Amount), you evaluate wound drainage. The wound edges are approximated with staples, but you note a 3 cm area of erythema extending beyond the incision margins that was not present yesterday. The skin surrounding this area feels noticeably warmer than the opposite hip. There is a small amount of thick, yellow-green drainage on the dressing with a faint foul odor.

Findings concerning for wound infection: spreading erythema, increased warmth, purulent drainage, foul odor.
3
Step 3 — Perform Head-to-Toe Skin Assessment

While turning Mrs. Johnson for back care, you inspect the sacrum and coccyx—the highest-risk pressure points for a supine patient. You observe a 4 cm × 3 cm area of reddened skin over the sacrum. You perform a blanch test by pressing a gloved finger firmly over the reddened area for 3 seconds and releasing. The area does NOT blanch (turn white and refill)—it remains persistently red. Mrs. Johnson reports the area is tender when pressed. The heels appear intact with no discoloration.

Non-blanchable erythema over the sacrum consistent with Stage 1 pressure injury.
4
Step 4 — Document and Report Findings

You document your findings using objective, descriptive language: "Right hip surgical site with 3 cm erythematous area extending beyond incision margins; area warm to touch; small amount of thick, yellow-green drainage with foul odor noted on dressing. Sacral area with 4 cm × 3 cm non-blanchable erythema; tender to palpation; skin intact." You immediately report these findings to the assigned RN, specifying the change from previous assessment (the erythema and drainage are new since yesterday). You use SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) format for verbal communication.

Timely escalation ensures the nurse can initiate wound culture, adjust the care plan, and implement pressure injury prevention interventions.
5
Step 5 — Implement Preventive Interventions Within Scope

Following the nurse's orders, you implement the following within your scope of practice: reposition Mrs. Johnson off her sacrum using a 30-degree lateral turn with pillows for support, place heel suspension devices (heel offloading boots), ensure the bed surface is a pressure-redistribution mattress, and establish a repositioning schedule of every 2 hours. You note all interventions in the medical record and set a reminder for the next scheduled turn.

Appropriate CPCT response: assess → document → report → implement delegated interventions → reassess.

SECTION 7

Differentiating Wound Types and Drainage Characteristics

Not all wound drainage indicates infection, and not all skin changes indicate pressure injuries. One of the most important clinical skills for a CPCT is the ability to differentiate between normal healing processes and pathological findings. The following table compares wound drainage types, and the subsequent discussion addresses common assessment pitfalls.

Drainage Type	Appearance	Clinical Significance
Serous	Clear, thin, watery; straw-colored or pale yellow	Normal in early wound healing; plasma-derived; expected after surgical drain placement
Sanguineous	Bright red, bloody	Expected immediately post-operatively or after debridement; may indicate active bleeding if excessive
Serosanguineous	Pink-tinged, thin; mix of serous and blood	Common during normal wound healing (days 2–5 post-op); generally reassuring
Purulent	Thick, opaque; yellow, green, tan, or brown; often foul-smelling	Indicates infection; contains dead white blood cells, bacteria, and tissue debris; requires immediate reporting
Hemopurulent	Reddish, thick, cloudy; mix of blood and purulent material	Strongly suggests infected wound with active tissue destruction; urgent escalation required

Wound Drainage Classification for CPCT Assessment

✦

KEY TAKEAWAY

Think of wound drainage assessment like reading a traffic light: serous and serosanguineous drainage are green lights—healing is proceeding normally. Increased amount of any drainage type, or a change from one type to another, is a yellow caution light requiring closer monitoring and reporting. Purulent or foul-smelling drainage is a red light—stop and report immediately. As a CPCT, your documentation of drainage color, consistency, odor, and amount creates the dataset that nurses and physicians use to make treatment decisions.

SECTION 8

Connection to Advanced Practice: Wound Assessment Frameworks

While the CPCT role focuses on recognition and reporting, understanding how licensed clinicians use advanced wound assessment frameworks provides valuable context that sharpens your observational skills. Several standardized tools exist that translate bedside observations into quantifiable data used for treatment planning, research, and quality improvement.

Assessment Tool	CPCT Level (Recognition)	Advanced Practice Level (Evaluation)
Braden Scale	Recognize risk factors (immobility, moisture, poor nutrition, decreased sensation) and report them; assist with repositioning and skin care	Score each of six subscales (6–23 range); develop individualized prevention care plans; select specialty surfaces; order dietary consults
PUSH Tool (Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing)	Observe and describe wound size changes, exudate amount, and tissue type at wound base; report trends	Calculate composite healing score (0–17); track progress over time; adjust dressing regimen and offloading strategies
TIME Framework	Identify tissue appearance (red, yellow, black), signs of infection/inflammation, moisture level, and wound edge characteristics	Systematically address Tissue management, Infection/Inflammation control, Moisture balance, and Edge advancement; guide debridement and antimicrobial decisions
Wound Culture Techniques	Recognize when a wound may need culturing (purulent drainage, non-healing, systemic signs); assist with specimen collection as delegated	Perform Levine technique or tissue biopsy; interpret culture and sensitivity results; prescribe targeted antimicrobial therapy

Wound Assessment Tools: CPCT vs. Advanced Practice Scope

As you advance in your healthcare career, many of these tools will become part of your daily practice. For now, the key insight is that every observation you make as a CPCT—the color of the wound bed, the character of drainage, the temperature of periw wound skin, the patient's reported pain level—feeds directly into these advanced frameworks. Your accurate, timely observations are the raw data upon which clinical decisions depend. A missed Stage 1 pressure injury today can become an unstageable wound next week; a dismissed change in drainage character can delay antibiotic therapy by critical hours.

SECTION 9

Practice Problems

Question 1: CONCEPTUAL

A patient's wound has been colonized with bacteria for several days, but the wound is healing normally and the patient shows no signs of discomfort. Explain the difference between wound colonization and wound infection, and identify the key clinical threshold that distinguishes one from the other.

Show answer

Wound colonization refers to the presence of replicating microorganisms on the wound surface that do not elicit a host immune response or impair healing. Wound infection, by contrast, occurs when microbial burden exceeds the host's immune defenses—generally when organism concentration surpasses approximately 10⁵ colony-forming units per gram of tissue—and invades viable tissue. The key clinical threshold is the point at which bacterial presence begins to produce the cardinal signs of infection (rubor, calor, tumor, dolor, functio laesa), delays healing, or causes tissue destruction. In the colonized state described, the wound healing trajectory remains normal and no inflammatory response is evident, so no intervention beyond standard wound hygiene is required. The CPCT should continue to monitor for any changes that might indicate progression along the infection continuum.

Question 2: BASIC CALCULATION

A patient is assessed using the Braden Scale. The scores for each subscale are as follows: Sensory Perception = 2, Moisture = 2, Activity = 1, Mobility = 2, Nutrition = 2, Friction/Shear = 1. Calculate the total Braden score and determine the patient's risk category, given that scores ≤ 12 indicate high risk, 13–14 moderate risk, 15–18 mild risk, and 19–23 no risk.

Show answer

The total Braden score is calculated by summing all six subscale scores: 2 + 2 + 1 + 2 + 2 + 1 = 10. A score of 10 falls within the ≤ 12 category, classifying this patient as high risk for pressure injury development. This score indicates significant deficits across virtually every risk domain—the patient has limited sensory perception, is frequently moist, is bedfast, has very limited mobility, has probably inadequate nutritional intake, and presents a friction/shear problem. As a CPCT, you would report this score to the nurse, implement a strict every-2-hour repositioning schedule, ensure pressure redistribution surfaces are in place, and perform frequent skin assessments with particular attention to bony prominences (sacrum, heels, occiput, ischial tuberosities).

Question 3: INTERMEDIATE

During morning care, you notice that a patient's abdominal surgical incision, which appeared clean and dry yesterday, now has a 2 cm band of redness extending bilaterally from the incision line. The dressing shows a moderate amount of thick, greenish-yellow drainage with a pungent odor. The patient reports increased pain at the site rated 7/10 (up from 3/10 yesterday). The patient's temperature is 38.6°C. Identify all the signs that suggest wound infection, distinguish between local and systemic findings, and describe your immediate actions as a CPCT.

Show answer

The local signs of wound infection present in this scenario include: spreading erythema (rubor) extending 2 cm beyond the incision margins, thick greenish-yellow purulent drainage (indicating bacterial presence and white blood cell infiltration), foul odor (suggesting anaerobic bacterial activity or significant tissue breakdown), and escalating pain (dolor) from 3/10 to 7/10. The systemic sign is the elevated temperature of 38.6°C (fever), which suggests the infection may be extending beyond the local wound environment and triggering a systemic inflammatory response. As a CPCT, your immediate actions would include: notifying the assigned RN immediately using SBAR format, documenting all findings with objective descriptions (measurements, colors, odor characteristics, pain scale), noting the change from baseline (comparison to yesterday's assessment), refraining from manipulating the wound beyond observation, and monitoring for additional systemic signs such as tachycardia, hypotension, or altered mental status that could suggest progression toward sepsis.

Question 4: APPLIED

You are caring for Mr. Patel, a 65-year-old diabetic patient who is wheelchair-bound following a stroke. He has decreased sensation in his lower extremities and is incontinent of urine. During a skin assessment, you discover a 5 cm × 4 cm area over his left ischial tuberosity that appears as a deep, crater-like wound with visible subcutaneous fat at the base. There is yellow slough covering approximately 40% of the wound bed, and the remaining 60% shows beefy-red granulation tissue. The surrounding skin is macerated from moisture exposure. Based on your knowledge of pressure injury staging and contributing factors, identify the stage of this pressure injury, explain why this patient is at particularly high risk, and outline a comprehensive prevention plan for his other at-risk sites.

Show answer

This pressure injury is classified as Stage 3: full-thickness skin loss extending into subcutaneous tissue. The key findings supporting this classification are the crater-like appearance, visible subcutaneous fat, and the presence of slough—but without exposed bone, tendon, or muscle (which would indicate Stage 4). Mr. Patel is at exceptionally high risk due to a convergence of multiple risk factors: diabetes mellitus impairs wound healing through microvascular disease and immune dysfunction; decreased lower extremity sensation eliminates the protective pain response that would normally prompt repositioning; wheelchair-bound status creates sustained pressure on the ischial tuberosities; urinary incontinence causes chronic moisture exposure that macerates the skin and increases friction coefficients; and stroke-related immobility limits his ability to independently shift his weight. A comprehensive prevention plan for his other at-risk sites should include: pressure-relieving wheelchair cushion (gel or air); weight shifts every 15–30 minutes (assisted if he cannot perform independently); structured incontinence care program with barrier cream application; moisture-wicking undergarments; nutritional optimization including adequate protein, vitamin C, and zinc; daily skin assessments of all bony prominences with particular attention to the contralateral ischial tuberosity, sacrum, coccyx, heels, and trochanters; and patient/family education on the importance of pressure relief and skin monitoring.

Question 5: CRITICAL THINKING

A fellow CPCT tells you, "I checked Mr. Garcia's sacrum and it's a little red, but it blanched when I pressed on it, so it's fine—I'm not going to document it or tell the nurse." Critically evaluate this decision. Consider the wound infection continuum, pressure injury staging criteria, the CPCT's scope of practice, and principles of patient safety. What would you do differently, and why?

Show answer

While the colleague is correct that blanchable erythema does not meet the criteria for a Stage 1 pressure injury (which requires non-blanchable erythema), the decision not to document or report this finding represents a significant gap in patient safety practice. Blanchable erythema over a bony prominence is a warning sign—it indicates that reactive hyperemia is occurring in response to pressure, meaning the tissue has experienced sufficient ischemia to trigger compensatory vasodilation. This is a pre-Stage 1 finding that signals the patient is at active risk for pressure injury development if preventive measures are not implemented or intensified. The failure to document means there is no baseline record against which future assessments can be compared; if the area progresses to non-blanchable erythema overnight, the next assessor has no way to know when the change began. Furthermore, the decision not to report removes the nurse's ability to modify the care plan proactively—for example, adjusting repositioning frequency, adding pressure redistribution devices, or addressing underlying risk factors such as nutrition or moisture. The CPCT scope of practice requires reporting all observations and changes in patient status to the licensed nurse; making independent clinical judgments about what constitutes a reportable finding exceeds that scope. The correct course of action would be to document the finding objectively (location, size, that it blanched on testing), report it to the nurse, implement standard pressure prevention measures, and reassess at the next scheduled skin check to evaluate for progression.

SUMMARY

Lesson Summary

Summary

This lesson established that recognizing wound infection and skin breakdown is a foundational competency for the CPCT, rooted in centuries of evolving understanding from Lister's antiseptic revolution to the modern NPIAP staging system. The five cardinal signs of infection (rubor, calor, tumor, dolor, and functio laesa) provide a systematic framework for identifying when bacterial colonization has crossed the threshold into true tissue invasion. The wound infection continuum—from contamination through colonization, critical colonization, infection, and sepsis—highlights that infection is a progressive process with identifiable warning signs at each stage. Wound drainage assessment using the COCA mnemonic (Color, Odor, Consistency, Amount) and classification of drainage types (serous, sanguineous, serosanguineous, purulent, hemopurulent) enables the CPCT to distinguish normal healing from pathological findings.

For skin breakdown, the NPIAP pressure injury staging system (Stages 1–4, Unstageable, and Deep Tissue Injury) provides the universal classification language. The Braden Scale quantifies risk across six domains (sensory perception, moisture, activity, mobility, nutrition, friction/shear), with lower scores indicating higher risk. The CPCT's role is clear: perform systematic skin assessments, document findings objectively, report all changes and concerns to the licensed nurse using structured communication (SBAR), and implement delegated preventive interventions including repositioning, pressure redistribution, moisture management, and nutritional support. Remember that accurate, timely observation at the bedside is the critical first link in the chain of wound care—every intervention depends on the quality of your assessment.