Cell Biology • Cell-Cell and Cell-Matrix Interactions

Cell Junction Types — Distinguish tight junctions, adherens junctions, desmosomes, and gap junctions (conceptual)

How four classes of intercellular junctions seal, anchor, and communicate between cells in multicellular tissues.

A microscope examining cellular structures alongside a DNA strand.
Inside this lesson 10 sections 5 questions 5 figures

SECTION 1

Historical Context & Motivation

The realization that multicellular organisms depend on specialized physical and chemical connections between their constituent cells was one of the foundational insights of modern cell biology. Early light microscopists in the nineteenth century observed that tissues were not simply aggregations of independent cells but rather integrated communities held together by structures that resisted mechanical disruption. As microscopy advanced, so did the appreciation that these connections served purposes far more nuanced than mere adhesion—they created barriers, transmitted forces, and enabled the direct exchange of signaling molecules. The study of cell junctions thus became central to understanding epithelial physiology, cardiac contraction, neural communication, and tissue morphogenesis.

1839 • Cell Theory Formalized

Schleiden and Schwann articulate that all living organisms are composed of cells, setting the stage for investigating how cells interact within tissues.

1963 • Tight Junctions Described

Farquhar and Palade use transmission electron microscopy to identify and classify the three major junctional complexes of epithelia—tight junctions, adherens junctions, and desmosomes—establishing the morphological framework still used today.

1967 • Gap Junctions Identified

Revel and Karnovsky describe a distinct junctional structure with a characteristic 2–4 nm intercellular gap, later shown to contain channels allowing direct cytoplasmic communication between adjacent cells.

1986 • Connexin Genes Cloned

Paul and colleagues clone connexin32, ushering in the molecular era of gap junction biology and revealing a multigene family encoding the channel-forming proteins.

1998 • Claudins Discovered

Furuse, Tsukita, and colleagues identify claudins as the principal transmembrane proteins that form the selective permeability barrier in tight junction strands, revolutionizing understanding of paracellular transport.

These discoveries posed a central question that this lesson addresses: how do just four major classes of cell junctions—tight junctions, adherens junctions, desmosomes, and gap junctions—collectively enable epithelial barrier function, mechanical resilience, and intercellular signaling in virtually every tissue?

SECTION 2

Core Principles & Definitions

Cell junctions can be organized according to their primary functional role in the tissue. The four principal junction types fall into three broad functional categories: occluding junctions (tight junctions) that seal the paracellular space, anchoring junctions (adherens junctions and desmosomes) that mechanically link the cytoskeletons of neighboring cells, and communicating junctions (gap junctions) that permit the passage of ions and small molecules directly between cytoplasms. Understanding these categories clarifies the molecular logic behind each junction's protein composition and its relationship to the cytoskeleton.

1

Tight Junctions (Zonula Occludens)

Form a continuous belt near the apical surface of epithelial cells, creating a selectively permeable seal that regulates paracellular transport and maintains cell polarity. Key transmembrane proteins include claudins and occludin.
2

Adherens Junctions (Zonula Adherens)

Belt-like junctions that link the actin cytoskeletons of adjacent cells through cadherins (typically E-cadherin in epithelia), which bind homophilically in a Ca²⁺-dependent manner and connect intracellularly to catenins and actin filaments.
3

Desmosomes (Macula Adherens)

Spot-like rivets that tether intermediate filaments (e.g., keratins) of one cell to those of its neighbor. Transmembrane cadherins here are desmogleins and desmocollins, linked to the plaque proteins plakoglobin and desmoplakin.
4

Gap Junctions

Clusters of intercellular channels formed by connexin hexamers (connexons) that align between adjacent cells. Each channel permits passage of ions, metabolites, and second messengers up to ~1 kDa, enabling electrical and metabolic coupling.
✦

KEY TAKEAWAY

Think of an epithelial sheet as a brick wall: tight junctions are the mortar that seals the gaps, adherens junctions are the steel rebar tying bricks side-to-side through their actin cables, desmosomes are rivets distributing mechanical stress through intermediate filament networks like rebar anchors, and gap junctions are intercoms embedded in each brick, allowing neighbors to exchange signals directly.

SECTION 3

Visual Overview of the Junctional Complex

In a typical columnar epithelium such as the intestinal lining, the four junction types occupy characteristic positions along the lateral membrane. Moving from the apical (lumen-facing) surface toward the basal side, one encounters in order: the tight junction belt, the adherens junction belt, a ring of desmosomes, and scattered gap junction plaques. The diagram below illustrates this spatial organization between two adjacent epithelial cells, emphasizing the distinct cytoskeletal linkages and intercellular spacing of each junction type.

Epithelial Junctional Complex — Lateral ViewTwo adjacent columnar epithelial cells shown in cross-sectionAPICAL (lumen) SURFACE ↑Cell 1Cell 2Tight Junction(claudins, occludin)actinactinAdherens Jn.(E-cadherin, catenins)keratin IFkeratin IFDesmosome(desmoglein, desmocollin)Gap Junction(connexins → connexons)BASAL SURFACE ↓
Lateral view of two adjacent epithelial cells showing the characteristic apical-to-basal arrangement: tight junctions (top, sealing strands), adherens junctions (linked to actin), desmosomes (linked to intermediate filaments), and gap junctions (connexon channel arrays).

Notice the spatial hierarchy in the diagram. The tight junction sits closest to the apical surface because its primary role is to prevent paracellular leakage from the lumen into the tissue. Immediately below, the adherens junction forms a continuous adhesion belt connected to circumferential actin bundles, providing mechanical cohesion and enabling coordinated contraction of the epithelial sheet. Farther basally, desmosomes appear as discrete spot-like attachments that distribute tensile stress across the tissue via intermediate filament networks. Finally, gap junctions can form at virtually any point along the lateral membrane and permit the direct cytoplasmic exchange of ions and small signaling molecules between neighbors.

SECTION 4

Molecular Mechanisms of Each Junction Type

Tight Junctions — Occluding Function

The tight junction achieves its sealing function through a network of anastomosing strands that encircle the cell at the apical-most portion of the lateral membrane. Each strand is composed primarily of claudin proteins (a family of ~27 members in humans), which have four transmembrane domains and form homophilic or heterophilic interactions with claudins on the opposing cell. The first extracellular loop of each claudin folds into the paracellular space and determines charge selectivity—some claudins form cation-selective pores, while others are anion-selective. Occludin is another tetraspan protein enriched at tight junctions, although its precise contribution to barrier function remains debated. On the cytoplasmic face, the scaffolding proteins ZO-1, ZO-2, and ZO-3 link claudins and occludin to the underlying actin cytoskeleton and recruit signaling molecules that regulate junction assembly and permeability. Importantly, the tightness of the seal correlates with the number and complexity of the anastomosing strands—for example, the blood–brain barrier endothelium has an exceptionally high strand count compared to the leakier epithelium of the proximal tubule.

Adherens Junctions — Actin-Linked Adhesion

Adherens junctions rely on classical cadherins—single-pass transmembrane glycoproteins whose extracellular domains undergo Ca²⁺-dependent homophilic binding. In epithelia, E-cadherin predominates, whereas neural tissues express N-cadherin and vascular endothelia express VE-cadherin. The cytoplasmic tail of each cadherin binds β-catenin, which in turn binds α-catenin. α-Catenin can interact with actin filaments either directly under tension or via intermediaries such as vinculin and EPLIN. This cadherin–catenin–actin linkage is mechanosensitive: application of tensile force unfolds α-catenin, exposing a vinculin-binding site that reinforces the junction. The actin belt associated with adherens junctions enables forces generated by myosin II to be transmitted across the tissue, which is essential during morphogenetic events like apical constriction and wound closure.

Desmosomes — Intermediate Filament Anchoring

Desmosomes employ a specialized class of cadherins—desmogleins (Dsg 1–4) and desmocollins (Dsc 1–3)—that engage in heterophilic trans-interactions in a Ca²⁺-dependent manner. On the cytoplasmic side, these cadherins bind plakoglobin (γ-catenin) and plakophilins, which together form the outer dense plaque. Desmoplakin bridges the outer plaque to looping intermediate filaments (typically keratins in epithelia, or desmin in cardiomyocytes). This architecture distributes tensile forces over the entire intermediate filament network rather than concentrating them at a single point—explaining why desmosomes are especially abundant in tissues subjected to chronic mechanical stress, such as the epidermis and myocardium.

Gap Junctions — Direct Cytoplasmic Channels

Each gap junction channel is formed by the docking of two connexons (hemichannels), one contributed by each cell. A connexon is a hexameric ring of connexin subunits; when composed of a single connexin isoform it is called homomeric, and when composed of multiple isoforms, heteromeric. The resulting channel has a pore diameter of approximately 1.4 nm, large enough to pass ions (Na⁺, K⁺, Ca²⁺), metabolites (ATP, glucose, amino acids), and second messengers (cAMP, IP₃) but too small for proteins or nucleic acids. Gating is regulated by voltage, intracellular pH, and Ca²⁺ concentration; a drop in pH or a rise in cytoplasmic Ca²⁺ triggers channel closure—a protective mechanism that uncouples a damaged cell from its healthy neighbors. In vertebrates, 21 connexin genes exist, and mutations in various connexins are linked to diseases including sensorineural deafness (Cx26), cataracts (Cx50), and Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy (Cx32).

ℹ

Calcium Dependence

Ca²⁺ is a recurring theme: cadherins in adherens junctions and desmosomes require extracellular Ca²⁺ for their extracellular domain rigidity and trans-interactions, while gap junction channels close when intracellular Ca²⁺ rises abnormally. Chelation of extracellular Ca²⁺ (e.g., with EDTA) disrupts cadherin-based junctions but does not directly disassemble gap junction channels.

SECTION 5

Side-by-Side Classification of Junction Types

Comparing the four junction types along key parameters—transmembrane proteins, cytoplasmic adaptor molecules, cytoskeletal linkage, intercellular spacing, and primary function—reveals both the diversity and the unifying molecular logic of cell junction architecture. The table below condenses this information into a format suitable for rapid review and board-style exam preparation.

FeatureTight JunctionAdherens JunctionDesmosomeGap Junction
Primary FunctionOcclude paracellular space; maintain polarityCell–cell adhesion linked to actinCell–cell adhesion linked to intermediate filamentsDirect intercellular communication
Transmembrane ProteinsClaudins, occludin, JAMsClassical cadherins (E-, N-, VE-cadherin)Desmogleins, desmocollinsConnexins (→ connexons)
Cytoplasmic AdaptorsZO-1, ZO-2, ZO-3α-catenin, β-catenin, p120-cateninPlakoglobin, plakophilins, desmoplakinNone (channel subunits form pore directly)
Cytoskeletal LinkActin filamentsActin filamentsIntermediate filaments (keratins, desmin)None
Intercellular Gap~0 nm (membranes fuse at strands)~15–20 nm~25–35 nm (dense midline visible)~2–4 nm
MorphologyContinuous belt (zonula)Continuous belt (zonula)Spot-like plaque (macula)Plaque of clustered channels
Tissue EnrichmentEpithelia, endothelia (esp. BBB)Epithelia, endothelia, cardiac muscleEpidermis, cardiac muscleCardiac muscle, smooth muscle, neurons, hepatocytes

Comprehensive comparison of the four major cell junction types

Molecular Architecture — Four Junction TypesTIGHT JUNCTIONclaudin strandsZO-1 / ZO-2actin filamentsgap ≈ 0 nmADHERENS JN.E-cadherin dimerβ-cat / α-catactin filamentsgap ≈ 15–20 nmDESMOSOMEDsg / DscPG + PKP (outer plaque)desmoplakin (inner)intermediate filamentsgap ≈ 25–35 nmGAP JUNCTIONconnexon–connexon6 connexins eachpore ~1.4 nm dia.passes ions, cAMP, IP₃gap ≈ 2–4 nmFunctional Category LegendOccludingAnchoringAnchoring (IF)CommunicatingIntercellular Gap Spectrum0 nm2–4 nm15–20 nm25–35 nmTJGJAJDesmo
Detailed molecular architecture of each junction type is shown in individual panels. The bottom spectrum illustrates the relative intercellular gap distances, from the membrane fusion points at tight junctions (0 nm) to the wide desmosomal gap (~25–35 nm).

SECTION 6

Worked Example — Diagnosing Junction Dysfunction

Cell junction pathology provides a powerful lens for solidifying conceptual understanding. Consider the following clinical scenario and work through each step to identify the affected junction, predict the cellular consequence, and connect to the underlying molecular defect.

Pemphigus Vulgaris — Identifying the Affected Junction

  1. 1

    Step 1 — Identify the Clinical Presentation

    A patient presents with painful, flaccid blisters on the oral mucosa and skin. Histological examination reveals suprabasal acantholysis—separation of keratinocytes above the basal layer. Immunofluorescence detects IgG autoantibodies bound to the surface of epidermal cells.
    Key feature: loss of cell–cell adhesion between keratinocytes (acantholysis).
  2. 2

    Step 2 — Determine Which Junction Is Disrupted

    The epidermis is a tissue subjected to extreme mechanical stress, so the dominant adhesive junction there must involve the intermediate filament–linked anchoring junction—the desmosome. Unlike adherens junctions, desmosomes provide spot-weld resistance to shear forces. The suprabasal location and the fact that IgG targets epidermal cell surfaces suggest the autoantibodies are directed against desmosomal cadherins.
    Affected junction: desmosome.
  3. 3

    Step 3 — Identify the Molecular Target

    In pemphigus vulgaris, the primary autoantigens are desmoglein 3 (Dsg3) and, in more severe mucocutaneous disease, desmoglein 1 (Dsg1). Antibody binding disrupts the trans-adhesive interactions of these desmosomal cadherins, causing direct steric hindrance and triggering intracellular signaling (p38 MAPK activation) that leads to desmosome disassembly.
    Molecular target: Dsg3 (± Dsg1).
  4. 4

    Step 4 — Predict the Cellular Consequence

    Loss of desmosome function causes keratinocytes to detach from one another. Because intermediate filaments (keratins) normally loop through desmosomal plaques and distribute tensile forces, their disconnection leads to collapse of the structural network. Keratinocytes round up, fluid accumulates in the intercellular space, and clinical blistering results. This does not affect tight junction barrier function in the upper epidermis because tight junctions and desmosomes are molecularly independent.
    Consequence: suprabasal blister formation from loss of keratinocyte cohesion.
  5. 5

    Step 5 — Contrast with a Different Junction Pathology

    Compare this to arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), caused by loss-of-function mutations in desmosomal genes (often PKP2 or DSP). Here the desmin intermediate filament network in cardiomyocytes is disrupted, leading to cell death, fibrofatty replacement, and ventricular arrhythmias. Both diseases underscore the critical mechanical role of desmosomes in stress-bearing tissues.
    Same junction (desmosome), different tissue — skin blisters vs. cardiac arrhythmia.

SECTION 7

Clinical & Functional Significance

Each junction type's molecular components are targets of human disease, providing both clinical insight and experimental evidence for junction function. Autoimmune, genetic, and infectious pathologies selectively target specific junctions, confirming the non-redundant roles each plays in tissue homeostasis. The table below pairs each junction with its associated disease spectrum.

Junction TypeAssociated PathologyMolecular Basis
Tight junctionFamilial hypomagnesemia (claudin-16 mutations); Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin–mediated diarrheaLoss of ion-selective paracellular channels; toxin binds and disrupts claudins 3/4
Adherens junctionDiffuse gastric carcinoma (hereditary); E-cadherin loss in epithelial-mesenchymal transitionCDH1 germline mutations eliminate E-cadherin; metastatic cells down-regulate cadherins
DesmosomePemphigus vulgaris; ARVC; staphylococcal scalded skin syndromeAnti-Dsg3 autoantibodies; PKP2/DSP mutations; exfoliative toxin cleaves Dsg1
Gap junctionConnexin-26 deafness; Charcot-Marie-Tooth type X; oculodentodigital dysplasiaGJB2 mutations disrupt cochlear ion recycling; GJB1 mutations impair Schwann cell coupling; GJA1 mutations alter Cx43 channels

Selected diseases caused by dysfunction of each junction type

🩺

CLINICAL LOGIC

When reasoning about junction-related pathology, use the 'tissue stress test' heuristic: a tissue's most critical junction is the one whose failure most rapidly leads to dysfunction in that tissue. In skin, desmosomes are indispensable for mechanical cohesion; in intestinal epithelium, tight junctions are paramount for barrier function; in cardiac muscle, both gap junctions (electrical coupling) and desmosomes (mechanical coupling) are essential—hence the cardiac intercalated disc contains both.

SECTION 8

Connections to Advanced Topics

The four junction types discussed here represent the cell-cell junction repertoire, but a full understanding of tissue architecture requires considering cell-matrix junctions as well. Hemidesmosomes anchor the basal surface of epithelial cells to the basement membrane via integrins (α6β4) and connect to keratin intermediate filaments—much like desmosomes anchor cells to each other. Focal adhesions link the actin cytoskeleton to extracellular matrix fibronectin through integrin receptors, serving as both adhesive structures and mechanosensory signaling hubs. These cell-matrix junctions parallel the cell-cell junctions in their cytoskeletal linkages but use integrins rather than cadherins as their transmembrane adhesion receptors.

PropertyCell-Cell Junctions (This Lesson)Cell-Matrix Junctions (Advanced)
Adhesion receptorsCadherins (classical + desmosomal), connexins, claudinsIntegrins (heterodimeric αβ receptors)
Binding partnerSame protein on adjacent cell (homophilic)ECM proteins (fibronectin, laminin, collagen)
Actin-linked typeAdherens junctionFocal adhesion
IF-linked typeDesmosomeHemidesmosome
Signaling roleβ-catenin → Wnt pathway; gap junctions → metabolic/electrical couplingFAK/Src → survival, proliferation, migration

Cell-cell vs. cell-matrix junctions — parallel architecture

Beyond structural parallels, junctions are increasingly recognized as signaling platforms. β-Catenin, originally identified as an adherens junction adaptor, is also a transcriptional co-activator in the Wnt signaling pathway, linking cell adhesion to gene regulation and proliferation control. Tight junction proteins like ZO-1 interact with transcription factors and can shuttle to the nucleus in cells lacking cell contacts. These dual-function roles position junctions at the interface of structural biology, mechanotransduction, and cancer biology—areas of active research that build directly on the foundational concepts covered in this lesson.

SECTION 9

Practice Problems

Question 1: CONCEPTUAL

A researcher treats a monolayer of MDCK epithelial cells with EDTA to chelate extracellular Ca²⁺. Which two of the four major junction types would you predict to be disrupted first, and why? Would gap junctions also disassemble under these conditions?
Show answer
Adherens junctions and desmosomes depend on Ca²⁺-dependent homophilic or heterophilic interactions between their cadherin transmembrane proteins (E-cadherin and desmogleins/desmocollins, respectively). Chelating extracellular Ca²⁺ with EDTA destabilizes the rigid rod-like conformation of cadherin ectodomains, causing loss of trans-interactions and junction disassembly. Gap junctions would not be directly disrupted by EDTA because connexin–connexin interactions are not Ca²⁺-dependent in the same manner; however, a secondary rise in intracellular Ca²⁺ following cell damage could trigger gating closure. Tight junctions, while not using cadherins, are indirectly affected because adherens junctions are required for tight junction assembly and maintenance—thus they eventually dissipate as well.

Question 2: BASIC APPLICATION

Match each transmembrane protein with its correct junction type: (a) connexin-43, (b) desmoglein-3, (c) claudin-2, (d) E-cadherin. For each, state the cytoskeletal element it connects to (if any).
Show answer
(a) Connexin-43 → gap junction; no cytoskeletal linkage. (b) Desmoglein-3 → desmosome; linked to intermediate filaments (keratins in epidermis) via plakoglobin, plakophilins, and desmoplakin. (c) Claudin-2 → tight junction; linked to actin filaments via ZO scaffold proteins. (d) E-cadherin → adherens junction; linked to actin filaments via β-catenin and α-catenin. Note that both tight junctions and adherens junctions associate with actin, but through entirely different transmembrane and adaptor protein complexes.

Question 3: INTERMEDIATE

In the kidney proximal tubule, the epithelium is described as 'leaky,' allowing significant paracellular ion transport. In contrast, the blood–brain barrier endothelium is extremely 'tight.' What structural feature of tight junctions accounts for this difference, and which family of transmembrane proteins determines the charge selectivity of the paracellular pathway?
Show answer
The tightness of an epithelial or endothelial barrier correlates with the number of anastomosing tight junction strands visible by freeze-fracture electron microscopy. The proximal tubule has few strands (1–2), creating a leaky paracellular pathway that permits bulk reabsorption of filtered solutes, whereas blood–brain barrier endothelial cells have many parallel strands (≥8), creating an extremely restrictive barrier. The charge selectivity of paracellular pores is determined by the specific claudin family members expressed: claudin-2 forms cation-selective pores in the proximal tubule, while claudin-5 in the BBB is restrictive. Different claudins have distinct amino acid residues in their first extracellular loops that line the paracellular pore and determine whether cations, anions, or water preferentially pass through.

Question 4: APPLIED

Cardiac intercalated discs contain desmosomes, adherens junctions (fascia adherens), and gap junctions in close proximity. A patient with a loss-of-function mutation in the plakophilin-2 gene (PKP2) develops arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). Explain: (a) which junction is directly affected, (b) why this leads to cardiomyocyte detachment and fibrofatty replacement, and (c) how gap junction function might be secondarily impaired despite PKP2 not being a gap junction protein.
Show answer
(a) PKP2 is a desmosomal plaque protein, so desmosomes are directly affected. Loss of plakophilin-2 destabilizes the desmosomal plaque, preventing proper anchorage of desmin intermediate filaments to the cell membrane. (b) Without functional desmosomes, cardiomyocytes cannot resist the cyclic mechanical stress of contraction. Mechanical failure leads to cell death, which triggers inflammatory and fibrotic repair processes, resulting in fibrofatty replacement of myocardium—particularly in the thin-walled right ventricle. (c) Recent studies show that desmosomal and gap junction proteins are not independent; loss of PKP2 leads to redistribution of connexin-43 away from intercalated discs and its internalization into the cytoplasm. This 'gap junction remodeling' reduces electrical coupling between cardiomyocytes, creating the substrate for re-entrant arrhythmias. This cross-talk between junction types illustrates that the intercalated disc functions as an integrated signaling and structural unit.

Question 5: CRITICAL THINKING

During epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in embryonic development and cancer metastasis, cells downregulate E-cadherin, dissolve desmosomes, and lose tight junctions while upregulating N-cadherin and vimentin. Construct an argument for why the loss of each junction type contributes a distinct capability to the transitioning cell. Then explain why gap junction communication might be transiently preserved or even enhanced during certain stages of EMT, and what selective advantage this might confer.
Show answer
Loss of each junction type provides a mechanistically distinct contribution to EMT. Tight junction dissolution removes the paracellular barrier and destroys apical-basal polarity—a prerequisite for acquiring a front-rear polarity that enables directional migration. Adherens junction loss (via E-cadherin downregulation) eliminates the major cell-cell adhesive contact linked to the cortical actin cytoskeleton, freeing cells to extend lamellipodia and migrate independently. Desmosome disassembly releases the intermediate filament network from cell-cell contacts; the concurrent keratin-to-vimentin switch restructures the cytoskeleton for a more deformable, migratory cell morphology. Gap junctions present a paradox: while full EMT eventually eliminates gap junctions, early-stage EMT can show preserved or even increased connexin-43 expression. This transient preservation may allow the transitioning cell to receive survival and pro-migratory signals (such as Ca²⁺ waves or cAMP) from neighboring cells that have not yet undergone EMT, effectively 'recruiting' them into the migratory population. Additionally, connexins have been shown to have channel-independent roles in cell migration via direct interactions with cytoskeletal regulators. Thus, EMT is not simply a loss of adhesion but a precisely choreographed reprogramming of each junction's molecular components to favor invasion over cohesion.

SUMMARY

Lesson Summary

Summary

The four major cell junction types divide the labor of tissue organization into three functional categories. Tight junctions (occluding junctions) use claudins and occludin to seal the paracellular space and maintain epithelial polarity. Adherens junctions use classical cadherins coupled to catenins and actin filaments to form continuous adhesion belts, while desmosomes use desmosomal cadherins linked to intermediate filaments to provide spot-weld mechanical resistance—both serving as anchoring junctions with distinct cytoskeletal partners.

Gap junctions (communicating junctions) are composed of connexin hexamers forming connexon channels that allow direct passage of ions and small signaling molecules (up to ~1 kDa) between adjacent cytoplasms, enabling electrical and metabolic coupling. Each junction type occupies a characteristic position along the lateral membrane, employs distinct transmembrane proteins and adaptor molecules, and creates a unique intercellular gap width. Mutations or autoimmune targeting of junction components produce tissue-specific diseases—from pemphigus (desmosomes) to connexin-26 deafness (gap junctions)—confirming the non-redundant functional contributions each junction makes to tissue integrity and homeostasis.

Varsity Tutors • Cell Biology • Cell Junction Types — Distinguish tight junctions, adherens junctions, desmosomes, and gap junctions (conceptual)