Higher-Order & Mixed Partials - Calculus 3
- Given , find at . Answer: 23 Differentiate with respect to x first: = + y/x. Then with respect to y: f_xy = y + 1/x. Differentiate that with respect to x: f_xyx = 12xy - 1/. At (1,2), this is 12(1)(2) - 1 = 23. The tempting wrong answer 24 comes from dropping the -1/ term.
- For smooth . At : , all second partials of equal 1. Find . Answer: Using the chain rule, = 2x + y . Differentiate that with respect to y: g_xy = 2x(f_uu + f_uv ) + + y(f_vu + f_vv ). At (1,0), = -1 and = 1, and all second partials are 1, so both derivative-of-f terms vanish. Only = -2 remains, giving g_xy = -2. The tempting mistake is dropping the term when differentiating y .
- For where , if for some point , what is ? Answer: When you encounter mixed partial derivatives, you're working with how a function changes when you vary one variable, then another. This tests your ability to apply the chain rule and quotient rule systematically. To find , you need to compute . First, find : Next, differentiate with respect to : Using the quotient rule: Setting this equal to : Cross-multiplying: Let . Then , so: Since this must hold and we need a specific value, testing gives us a consistent solution. Choice A (50) likely comes from squaring an intermediate result incorrectly. Choice B (10) might result from confusing the coefficient in our equation. Choice C (25) could come from squaring 5 prematurely. Strategy tip: With mixed partials involving inverse trig functions, always apply the quotient rule carefully and substitute systematically to avoid algebraic errors.
- Let . Find . Answer: Differentiate with respect to x: = y . Then differentiate with respect to y using the product rule: f_xy = + y ( y). At (1,1) this is (1 - 2) = -. A tempting mistake is , which comes from keeping only the first product-rule term and missing the chain-rule factor - y.
- If and , then necessarily... Answer: A mixed partial discontinuous If both mixed partials f_xy and f_yx were continuous at the origin, they would have to be equal by Clairaut's theorem. Since they are 5 and -5, at least one of those mixed partials must fail to be continuous there. The tempting wrong answer is that f itself must be discontinuous; in fact, f can still be continuous at the origin while its mixed partials differ.
- Let . If for some point , what is the value of ? Answer: By Clairaut's theorem, mixed partial derivatives are equal when the function has continuous second derivatives, so . Since , we have . Choice B incorrectly substitutes y for b. Choice C attempts to compute a different mixed partial. Choice D represents a computational error in finding the partial derivatives.
- For the function , which relationship holds between the mixed partial derivatives? Answer: Computing and . Then and . By Clairaut's theorem, these are equal since has continuous second partial derivatives. Choice B incorrectly suggests they're different. Choice C has the wrong expression. Choice D includes an extra term.
- At set ; elsewhere . Which is true? Answer: Compute along the axes: (0,k) = -k and (h,0) = h, while both first partials at (0,0) are 0. Therefore f_xy(0,0) = lim (-k)/k = -1 and f_yx(0,0) = lim h/h = 1. The mixed partials are negatives of each other. The tempting wrong answer is that both are 0 because f vanishes on the axes, but the partial derivatives along the axes are not 0 away from the origin.
- If and both and exist, what is ? Answer: First, and . Then and . Therefore, . This shows that is harmonic. Choices A and B give incorrect partial sums. Choice D incorrectly simplifies the arithmetic.
- Consider . What is the value of ? Answer: By Clairaut's theorem, all mixed third partial derivatives with the same variables are equal: . Computing : , , and . Therefore, . Choice A gives only one term. Choice C incorrectly multiplies by 6. Choice D represents instead of .