Second Derivative Test - Calculus 1
- Let and be twice-differentiable functions. Suppose , , and . Also, . Let . Use the Second Derivative Test to classify the point for the function . Answer: has a local maximum at . First, determine if is a critical point for . Using the chain rule, . At , . Since , is a critical point. Next, find the second derivative of using the product rule and chain rule: . Now evaluate at : . Since , the Second Derivative Test indicates that has a local maximum at .
- In which step does the student's first error appear? Answer: Step 5 Let's check each step. Step 1 correctly applies the product rule. Step 2 correctly solves for the critical point. Step 3 correctly finds the second derivative. Step 4 correctly evaluates the second derivative at the critical point. Step 5 correctly identifies that , but draws the wrong conclusion. The condition and implies that the function is concave down at the critical point, which corresponds to a local maximum, not a local minimum. The first error is in the final conclusion drawn from the results of the test.
- Suppose for a twice-differentiable function . Which of the following conditions is sufficient to conclude that has a local minimum at ? Answer: . The Second Derivative Test states that if and , then has a local minimum at . Choice D is the precise statement of this test. Choice A is a stronger condition than necessary; we only need to know the sign of at the point itself. Choice B is incorrect because if , the test is inconclusive. Choice C describes a condition for an inflection point where the function is increasing, not a local minimum (this is related to the Higher-Order Derivative Test, but the conclusion is for an inflection point).
- Let be a function such that and . If and , what does the Second Derivative Test reveal about the function at ? Answer: has a local minimum at . First, we check if is a critical point for . Using the chain rule, . At , . So, is a critical point. Next, we find the second derivative of using the quotient rule: . Now we evaluate : . Since , , so . Because and , the Second Derivative Test shows that has a local minimum at .
- Let for some constant . If has a local maximum at , what is the value of ? Answer: For to have a local maximum at , two conditions must be met: and . First, find the derivative: . Set : . Now, we must verify this value of satisfies the second condition. The second derivative is . With , this becomes . Evaluating at : . Since , the function is concave down at the critical point, confirming a local maximum. Thus, is the correct value.
- Consider the function . When using the Second Derivative Test to analyze the critical point at , what is the conclusion? Answer: The test is inconclusive for the critical point at . The Second Derivative Test requires evaluating the second derivative at a critical point. First, find the critical points by setting the first derivative to zero. . Setting gives . Next, find the second derivative: . Now, evaluate the second derivative at the critical point: . When the second derivative is zero at a critical point, the Second Derivative Test is inconclusive. It does not provide information about whether the point is a maximum, minimum, or neither. While further analysis with the First Derivative Test would show is a local minimum, the question specifically asks for the conclusion from the Second Derivative Test itself.
- Consider the function . The function has a local maximum at which value of ? Answer: First, find the critical points using the quotient rule for . . Setting gives critical points at and . (Note is a vertical asymptote). Next, find . The numerator of is and the denominator is . Instead of a full quotient rule, it's easier to find the derivative of the simplified 's numerator for the sign of at critical points, but the formal second derivative is . Test the critical points: . This indicates a local maximum. . This indicates a local minimum. Therefore, the local maximum is at .
- Let . At which of its critical points does have a local maximum? Answer: First, find the critical points by setting the first derivative equal to zero. . The critical points are , , and . Next, find the second derivative to classify these points: . Now, evaluate at each critical point: At : . This is a local minimum. At : . This is a local maximum. At : . This is a local minimum. Therefore, the function has a local maximum only at .
- The function has a local maximum on the interval at which of the following -values? Answer: First, find the critical points by setting . The derivative is . Setting this to zero gives , or . In the interval , the solutions are and . Next, use the Second Derivative Test to classify these points. The second derivative is . Evaluate at each critical point. At , , which indicates a local maximum. At , , which indicates a local minimum. Therefore, the local maximum occurs at .
- A function is twice differentiable and has a critical point at . If the second derivative is given by , what does the Second Derivative Test imply about the point ? Answer: has a local minimum at . We are given that is a critical point, so we know . To use the Second Derivative Test, we must evaluate the sign of . Plugging into the expression for the second derivative gives: . Since and , we know that . Because is a positive number, the function is concave up at the critical point . Therefore, the Second Derivative Test implies that has a local minimum at .
- Let be a twice-differentiable function with critical points at and . The graph of its second derivative, , is a parabola opening downward with roots at and . Which of the following statements must be true? Answer: has local minima at both and . The graph of is a downward-opening parabola with roots at and . This means is positive for between 1 and 7, and negative otherwise. We need to classify the critical points and . Both of these points lie in the interval . For any in , the value of is positive. Therefore, and . According to the Second Derivative Test, if and , then has a local minimum at . Since this condition holds for both and , the function must have local minima at both points.