Computing Limits - Business Calculus
- Evaluate the limit: Answer: To evaluate this limit at negative infinity, we divide the numerator and the denominator by the highest power of in the denominator. The term with the highest power in the denominator is , which behaves like . Since , is negative, so . We divide the numerator and denominator by . In the denominator, we use the fact that for , . As , the terms with in the denominator approach 0.
- For the function , what is ? Answer: When you encounter a limit that results in the indeterminate form , you need to algebraically manipulate the expression before evaluating. This function gives us when we substitute directly, so we must rationalize the numerator. To find this limit, multiply both numerator and denominator by the conjugate : The numerator becomes . So we have: Now we can safely substitute : Answer choice (A) is incorrect—this would occur if the numerator approached zero faster than the denominator. Choice (B) is wrong; this results from forgetting to add 3 in the denominator after rationalization. Choice (D) is incorrect because while direct substitution gives division by zero, the limit still exists after proper algebraic manipulation. Study tip: When you see square roots in rational functions that produce , immediately think "rationalize." Multiply by the conjugate to eliminate the indeterminate form, then evaluate the simplified expression.
- Consider the limit . This expression represents the derivative of at which point, and what is the value of the limit? Answer: At ; the limit equals When you encounter a limit expression in the form , you're looking at the definition of a derivative at a specific point. This is the fundamental building block for understanding how calculus measures instantaneous rates of change. Let's identify what's happening here. The expression follows the derivative definition pattern where , and we're evaluating at since suggests . Notice that , which matches the subtracted constant. To find the limit value, expand . Substituting: . As , this approaches . Therefore, this represents the derivative of at , and the limit equals . Choice A incorrectly identifies the point as (confusing the function value with the input) and gets the wrong limit. Choice B misidentifies the point as and calculates an incorrect limit of . Choice D correctly identifies but incorrectly states the limit as instead of . Strategy tip: Always match the pattern to identify both the function and the specific point. The value inside the parentheses with tells you the point of evaluation.
- Which statement best describes the meaning of the limit in this context? Answer: The cost to remove the last fraction of a percent of the pollutant is disproportionately high, approaching an infinite amount. When you encounter a limit approaching a vertical asymptote in a business context, you're typically analyzing what happens to costs, revenue, or other quantities as they approach some boundary or constraint. Let's evaluate . As approaches 100 from the left, the numerator approaches , while the denominator approaches 0 from the positive side. This creates the form , which means the limit is . The cost grows without bound as you try to remove closer to 100% of the pollutant. Option B correctly captures this: removing those final traces of pollutant becomes prohibitively expensive, with costs approaching infinity. This reflects real-world pollution cleanup, where removing the last 1% is often more expensive than removing the first 90%. Option A is wrong because the function is always increasing—costs never decrease. Option C misinterprets the calculation; while the numerator approaches 200,000, the overall limit is infinite, not capped at $200,000. Option D is incorrect because this isn't a linear relationship—each additional percent removed costs progressively more, not a constant amount. Study tip: When you see rational functions with restricted domains in business problems, immediately check what happens at the boundary values. Vertical asymptotes often represent real constraints where costs become infinite or processes become impossible.
- What is ? Answer: This limit represents the derivative of at , which you can recognize from the standard derivative definition: . When you see this indeterminate form , you need to algebraically manipulate it before taking the limit. The key technique here is rationalizing the numerator by multiplying both numerator and denominator by the conjugate : After canceling the terms: Now taking the limit as : , which is answer B. Answer A () likely comes from incorrectly thinking the derivative of at is but making an arithmetic error. Answer C () might result from confusing this with rather than . Answer D () could come from misremembering the derivative formula entirely. Study tip: When you see limits in the form , recognize these as derivative definitions. For square root functions, always try rationalizing the numerator with the conjugate to eliminate the indeterminate form.
- What is ? Answer: When you encounter a limit that produces the indeterminate form , you need to manipulate the expression algebraically before evaluating. Let's check: substituting gives us , so we need another approach. The key insight is to factor both the numerator and denominator. For the numerator: . For the denominator: using the difference of cubes formula. Now we can rewrite the limit: Since we're taking the limit as approaches 1 (not equals 1), we can cancel the common factor : Now substituting : Choice A () might tempt you if you incorrectly assume the limit equals 1 because the variable approaches 1. Choice C () could result from inverting the correct answer. Choice D () might seem right if you mistakenly think the form means the limit is 0. Study tip: When you see , always factor first. Look for common factors to cancel, especially where is the value the variable approaches.
- For a supply function where is the price, what can be concluded about ? Answer: The limit equals after canceling common factors Factor the numerator: . So for . Therefore, . Choice A gives the right answer but wrong reasoning (you can't conclude the limit is zero just because the numerator approaches zero). Choice B incorrectly assumes the limit equals the point of approach. Choice C fails to recognize that forms can have finite limits after algebraic manipulation.
- The average cost, in dollars per unit, for a manufacturing process is given by the function where is the number of units produced. What is the long-run average cost as the number of units produced becomes very large? Answer: When you encounter a question about long-run behavior in business calculus, you're looking at limits as the variable approaches infinity. This tests your understanding of how rational functions behave for very large values. To find the long-run average cost, you need to evaluate . The key insight is to factor out the highest powers from both the numerator and denominator. In the square root, factor out : . As , the term , so this becomes . The numerator approaches , and since the becomes negligible compared to , it's effectively . The denominator is effectively for large . Therefore: Choice A () would occur if the numerator's degree exceeded the denominator's degree, but they're equal. Choice B () mistakes the coefficient under the square root for the final answer. Choice C () incorrectly assumes the limit is just the coefficient of in the numerator without considering the denominator. Study tip: For rational function limits at infinity, compare the highest degree terms after simplifying any radicals by factoring out the highest powers.
- For what value of the constant is the following function continuous at ? Answer: When you encounter a piecewise function and need to find a constant that makes it continuous at a specific point, you're looking for the value that makes the function "connect" smoothly without any jumps or breaks. For continuity at , the limit as approaches 9 must equal the function value at . Since , you need to find . This limit initially gives the indeterminate form , so you need to simplify. The key insight is to rationalize by multiplying by the conjugate: For , you can cancel the terms, leaving . Therefore: So . Looking at the wrong answers: A) might come from just substituting without proper limit evaluation. B) could result from only considering and missing the addition. D) might come from incorrectly taking the reciprocal of the correct answer. Strategy tip: For piecewise continuity problems, always evaluate the limit from the "complicated" piece and set it equal to the constant. Remember to simplify indeterminate forms before substituting the point value.
- Evaluate the following limit, which represents the instantaneous rate of change of a function at a point: Answer: When you see a limit in the form , you're looking at the definition of a derivative – the instantaneous rate of change of function at point . Here, we can identify and . To evaluate this limit, we need to simplify the complex fraction. First, let's work with the numerator: To subtract these fractions, we need a common denominator of : Expanding , so: Now our limit becomes: Substituting : This confirms answer (B). (A) likely comes from incorrectly simplifying the denominator. (C) has the wrong sign – a common error when expanding . (D) ignores the denominator entirely. Study tip: When evaluating derivative limits, always factor out from the numerator before canceling. This prevents the indeterminate form .
- Evaluate the following limit: Answer: The limit results in the indeterminate form . To evaluate it, we simplify the complex fraction in the denominator: The expression becomes: We can factor a from to get : Now, by direct substitution: .
- Consider the piecewise function The value of the constant is chosen such that the limit exists. What is the value of this limit? Answer: For the limit to exist at , the left-hand limit must equal the right-hand limit. Left-hand limit: . Right-hand limit: . Set them equal to find : . The question asks for the value of the limit, not the value of . Substitute into either expression for the limit. Using the right-hand limit expression: .
- Evaluate the limit: Answer: When you encounter a limit involving the difference of two expressions that both approach infinity, you're dealing with an indeterminate form (∞ - ∞). The key strategy is to rationalize by multiplying by the conjugate. To evaluate , multiply by the conjugate : This gives us: Now divide numerator and denominator by : As , , so this becomes: Answer A) would result from incorrectly thinking both terms cancel completely. Answer B) comes from forgetting to add the term in the denominator after rationalization. Answer D) reflects the initial misconception that this limit doesn't exist because you have ∞ - ∞. Study tip: Whenever you see limits involving as , immediately think "rationalize with the conjugate." This technique converts the indeterminate form into something manageable by eliminating the troublesome square root difference.
- Find the value of the limit: Answer: When you encounter a limit that produces the indeterminate form , you need to use algebraic techniques to resolve it. Let's check: as , the numerator becomes , and the denominator becomes . This confirms we have the indeterminate form . The key technique here is rationalizing the numerator by multiplying both the numerator and denominator by the conjugate : This gives us: The terms cancel, leaving: Choice A) represents taking the reciprocal incorrectly. Choice B) might come from incorrectly concluding the limit equals the indeterminate form. Choice C) results from forgetting to add the 3 in the denominator after substitution. Remember: when you see a square root in the numerator creating an indeterminate form, try rationalizing with the conjugate. This technique frequently appears in business calculus limit problems.
- A company's profit function is where represents the number of units produced (in thousands). What is ? Answer: First, factor the numerator and denominator. The numerator . The denominator . So for . Therefore, . Choice B results from incorrectly simplifying the rational function. Choice C assumes the limit equals the input value. Choice D incorrectly concludes that undefined points prevent limits from existing.