Astronomy • Stars & Stellar Evolution

Star Color & Temperature — Relate a star's color/temperature to its spectrum at a conceptual level.

Why a star's color reveals its surface temperature and how blackbody radiation connects the two.

A telescope observing an orbit and moonlit stars.
Inside this lesson 10 sections 5 questions 9 figures

SECTION 1

Historical Context & Motivation

For millennia, astronomers noted that stars exhibit different hues — some glow a deep reddish-orange while others appear brilliant blue-white — but the physical explanation for these color differences remained elusive until the development of spectroscopy and thermal radiation theory in the nineteenth century. The question of why a star shines with a particular color is intimately tied to its surface temperature, a connection that emerged only after physicists grasped the nature of blackbody radiation. Understanding this relationship was one of the great triumphs of astrophysics, linking laboratory physics to the remote furnaces of the cosmos and enabling astronomers to measure stellar temperatures across vast distances without ever touching a star.

1802 • Wollaston's Dark Lines

William Hyde Wollaston observed dark lines in the solar spectrum when he passed sunlight through a prism, noting gaps in the continuous rainbow of color. These features hinted that stellar light carries encoded information about temperature and composition, though their full significance was not yet appreciated.

1859 • Kirchhoff & Bunsen's Spectral Laws

Gustav Kirchhoff and Robert Bunsen established that every element produces a unique set of spectral lines, and formulated three laws describing continuous, emission, and absorption spectra. Their work laid the foundation for reading stellar spectra as diagnostic tools for temperature and composition.

1893 • Wien's Displacement Law

Wilhelm Wien demonstrated that the peak wavelength of radiation from a heated body shifts inversely with its temperature. This quantitative relationship finally explained why hotter stars appear bluer: their emission peaks at shorter wavelengths.

1900 • Planck's Radiation Law

Max Planck derived the full spectral energy distribution of a blackbody by introducing quantized energy packets. His law provided the complete mathematical framework connecting a body's temperature to the shape and intensity of its entire emitted spectrum.

1901–1924 • Harvard Spectral Classification

Annie Jump Cannon and the Harvard 'computers' classified over 225,000 stellar spectra into the O-B-A-F-G-K-M sequence, ordered by surface temperature. This monumental effort linked observed spectral features directly to a temperature scale, unifying color, spectrum, and thermal physics.

The central question this lesson addresses is deceptively simple: why does a star's color tell us its temperature, and how does the full electromagnetic spectrum encode that information? Answering it requires connecting thermal radiation physics, spectroscopy, and stellar classification into a coherent conceptual picture — a synthesis that stands as one of the pillars of modern astrophysics.

SECTION 2

Core Principles & Definitions

To connect a star's color to its temperature, we rely on a handful of foundational ideas that bridge thermal physics and observational astronomy. Stars radiate energy across the entire electromagnetic spectrum, but the distribution of that energy — how much is emitted at each wavelength — depends critically on the star's effective surface temperature. The following core principles form the conceptual backbone of the color–temperature relationship.

1

Blackbody Radiation

A blackbody is an idealized object that absorbs all incident radiation and re-emits it in a smooth, continuous spectrum determined solely by its temperature. Stars approximate blackbodies, so their overall spectral shape follows the Planck function. The continuous emission from the stellar photosphere forms the baseline upon which spectral absorption features are superimposed.
2

Wien's Displacement Law

The wavelength at which a blackbody emits the most energy — its peak wavelength (λmax) — shifts to shorter (bluer) wavelengths as temperature increases. This inverse proportionality is the key link between color and temperature: hot stars peak in the blue/ultraviolet, cool stars peak in the red/infrared.
3

Stefan–Boltzmann Law

The total energy radiated per unit area of a star's surface scales as the fourth power of its temperature (T⁴). This means even modest temperature increases produce enormous jumps in luminosity, reinforcing why hot blue stars are intrinsically far more luminous per unit area than cool red ones.
4

Spectral Lines & Classification

Superimposed on the continuous blackbody spectrum are dark absorption lines produced by atoms in the stellar atmosphere. The pattern and strength of these lines depend on temperature because temperature governs which electron energy levels are populated. The Harvard spectral sequence (O-B-A-F-G-K-M) arranges stars from hottest to coolest based on these line patterns.
5

Color Index

Astronomers quantify stellar color using photometric filters (e.g., B and V bands). The B − V color index measures the difference in brightness through blue and visual (green-yellow) filters; a negative B − V indicates a blue (hot) star, and a positive value indicates a red (cool) star. This provides a precise observational proxy for temperature.
✦

KEY TAKEAWAY

Think of a star as an electric stove burner. When you first turn it on, the coil glows a dull red; crank it to maximum and it shifts to bright orange, then nearly white. The coil is a rough blackbody — its color directly reports its temperature. Stars work the same way but span a far wider temperature range (roughly 2,500 K to over 40,000 K), so their 'burner colors' extend from deep red through blue-white. The complete spectrum — the full curve of intensity versus wavelength — is the detailed temperature fingerprint; the perceived color is simply the human-eye summary of that curve.

SECTION 3

Blackbody Curves & Star Color

The diagram below illustrates the core visual relationship between a star's temperature and its emitted spectrum. Each curve represents the Planck blackbody function at a different surface temperature, showing how the peak wavelength shifts and the overall intensity changes. The visible-light band is highlighted so you can see where each curve's peak falls relative to the colors your eyes can detect.

Planck Blackbody Curves at Three Stellar TemperaturesWavelength (nm)Relative IntensityVisible Band10030040055070010002000λ_max ≈ 290 nmλ_max ≈ 500 nmλ_max ≈ 970 nmT = 10,000 K (Blue)T = 5,800 K (Yellow)T = 3,000 K (Red)
Three Planck curves illustrate how increasing temperature shifts the peak emission wavelength (λmax) to shorter wavelengths and dramatically increases overall intensity. The shaded band marks the human-visible range (≈ 380–700 nm). A 10,000 K star peaks in the ultraviolet, making it appear blue-white; the Sun at 5,800 K peaks near 500 nm (green-yellow); a 3,000 K red dwarf peaks in the near-infrared, so most of its visible emission is red.

Several features of this diagram merit careful attention. First, notice that the 10,000 K curve (cyan) is enormously taller than the 3,000 K curve (red); this reflects the Stefan–Boltzmann law's T⁴ dependence, meaning a star roughly three times hotter emits about 80 times more energy per unit area. Second, the peak of the 10,000 K curve falls in the ultraviolet, outside the visible band, so the star's visible output is dominated by the short-wavelength (blue) tail of the curve — hence its blue-white appearance. Third, the 3,000 K curve peaks in the near-infrared, so within the visible range the curve is strongest at the red end, producing the familiar crimson glow of M-type stars. The Sun's curve, peaking near 500 nm, distributes energy relatively evenly across the visible band, which is why sunlight appears nearly white (with a slight yellow tint from atmospheric scattering).

SECTION 4

Mathematical Framework

The qualitative relationship between color and temperature is governed by a set of well-established radiation laws. Each equation below adds precision to the conceptual picture established in the preceding sections, allowing astronomers to extract quantitative temperature measurements from photometric and spectroscopic observations.

PLANCK'S RADIATION LAW

B(λ,T)=(2hc2/λ5)×1/(e(hc/λkBT)−1)B(λ, T) = (2hc²/λ⁵) × 1/(e^(hc/λk_BT) − 1)

B(λ, T) = spectral radiance (W m⁻² sr⁻¹ m⁻¹); h = Planck's constant (6.626 × 10⁻³⁴ J·s); c = speed of light (3.00 × 10⁸ m/s); λ = wavelength; kB = Boltzmann constant (1.381 × 10⁻²³ J/K); T = absolute temperature. This function gives the complete spectral shape of a blackbody's emission, from which all other radiation laws can be derived.

WIEN'S DISPLACEMENT LAW

λmax=b/Tλ_max = b / T

λmax = peak emission wavelength (m); b = Wien's displacement constant ≈ 2.898 × 10⁻³ m·K; T = surface temperature (K). This is obtained by differentiating the Planck function with respect to λ and setting dB/dλ = 0. It directly encodes the color–temperature relationship: doubling T halves λmax.

STEFAN–BOLTZMANN LAW

F=σT4F = σT⁴

F = total energy flux radiated per unit area (W m⁻²); σ = Stefan–Boltzmann constant ≈ 5.670 × 10⁻⁸ W m⁻² K⁻⁴; T = surface temperature (K). Integrating the Planck function over all wavelengths and all solid angles yields this expression. For a spherical star of radius R, the total luminosity is L = 4πR²σT⁴.

COLOR INDEX–TEMPERATURE RELATION

B−V≈−0.865+8540/Teff(approximateempiricalfit)B − V ≈ −0.865 + 8540 / T_eff (approximate empirical fit)

B − V = Johnson B − V color index (magnitudes); Teff = effective temperature (K). This empirical calibration converts a measurable photometric quantity into temperature. A star with B − V ≈ 0.0 has Teff ≈ 9,700 K (A0 star); B − V ≈ +0.65 corresponds to the Sun (≈ 5,780 K).

ℹ

Derivation Note

Wien's law follows from the condition ∂B/∂λ = 0. Setting x = hc/(λkBT), the maximization reduces to the transcendental equation x·ex/(ex − 1) = 5, whose solution x ≈ 4.965 yields b = hc/(4.965·kB) ≈ 2.898 × 10⁻³ m·K. This confirms the inverse proportionality between λmax and T from first principles.

SECTION 5

Spectral Classification & the Temperature Sequence

The Harvard spectral classification system arranges stars into classes based on the pattern of absorption lines in their spectra. Because the strength of a given absorption line depends on the temperature-sensitive populations of atomic energy levels (governed by the Boltzmann and Saha equations), the spectral class serves as a direct proxy for surface temperature. The traditional mnemonic — Oh Be A Fine Girl/Guy, Kiss Me — lists the classes from hottest (O) to coolest (M). Each class is subdivided into ten numerical subtypes (e.g., B0 through B9), with lower numbers indicating higher temperatures within that class.

Spectral ClassTemperature Range (K)Apparent ColorKey Spectral FeaturesExample Stars
O30,000–50,000+BlueIonized He (He II) lines; weak H lines10 Lacertae, ζ Ophiuchi
B10,000–30,000Blue-whiteNeutral He (He I) lines; moderate HRigel, Spica
A7,500–10,000WhiteStrongest H Balmer linesSirius, Vega
F6,000–7,500Yellow-whiteCa II lines strengthening; H weakeningCanopus, Procyon
G5,200–6,000YellowStrong Ca II H & K; many metal linesSun (G2V), α Centauri A
K3,700–5,200OrangeStrong metal lines; molecular bands appearingArcturus, Aldebaran
M2,400–3,700RedStrong TiO molecular bands; very weak HBetelgeuse, Proxima Centauri

Harvard Spectral Classification — Temperature Sequence

Spectral Class, Color, and Temperature SequenceO — B — A — F — G — K — M (hottest → coolest)O≥30,000 KB10–30 kKA7.5–10 kKF6–7.5 kKG5.2–6 kKK3.7–5.2 kKM2.4–3.7 kKDominant Spectral Features by ClassHe II ionized linesHe I neutral linesHydrogen Balmer series strength:StrongestCa II & Metal linesStrong →TiO Molecular bandsDominant← HotterCooler →Temperature controls which atomic/molecular energy levels are populated, determining line strengths.
The spectral classification sequence (O through M) is a temperature sequence. The upper row shows the representative color and temperature range for each class. Below, horizontal bars indicate which spectral features dominate in each class: ionized helium lines appear only in the hottest O stars, hydrogen Balmer lines peak at ≈ 9,500 K (A stars), metal lines strengthen toward cooler types, and molecular bands (notably TiO) appear only in the coolest M stars.

A critical insight from this classification is that the same element — hydrogen, for instance — can produce strong or weak absorption lines depending on temperature, even when its abundance is similar across different stars. In O-type stars, hydrogen is largely ionized and cannot absorb via Balmer transitions; in M-type stars, most hydrogen atoms sit in the ground state without enough thermal energy to populate the n = 2 level needed for Balmer absorption. The sweet spot for Balmer line strength is around 9,500 K (spectral type A), where a significant fraction of hydrogen atoms are in the n = 2 state. This temperature dependence of line strength is what makes spectral classification an indirect thermometer.

SECTION 6

Worked Example — From Observation to Temperature

Suppose you observe a star and measure its apparent brightness through two photometric filters, finding apparent magnitudes mB = 4.82 and mV = 4.36. You wish to estimate the star's effective surface temperature and predict the wavelength at which its emission peaks.

Determining Stellar Temperature from Color Index

  1. 1

    Step 1 — Calculate the B − V Color Index

    The color index is simply the difference between the B-band and V-band magnitudes: B − V = mB − mV = 4.82 − 4.36 = +0.46. A positive B − V indicates the star is brighter in the visual (green-yellow) band than in the blue band, suggesting a moderately warm star — cooler than an A star but hotter than the Sun.
    B − V = +0.46
  2. 2

    Step 2 — Apply the Empirical Color–Temperature Relation

    Using the approximate calibration B − V ≈ −0.865 + 8540/Teff, we solve for Teff: rearranging gives Teff = 8540 / (B − V + 0.865) = 8540 / (0.46 + 0.865) = 8540 / 1.325 ≈ 6,445 K.
    Teff ≈ 6,445 K
  3. 3

    Step 3 — Identify the Spectral Class

    A temperature of ≈ 6,450 K falls in the F-type range (6,000–7,500 K), likely around F5–F7. We would expect moderate hydrogen Balmer lines (weaker than in an A star), emerging Ca II H & K lines, and a yellow-white visual appearance — consistent with stars like Procyon.
    Spectral class ≈ F6
  4. 4

    Step 4 — Apply Wien's Displacement Law

    With Teff ≈ 6,445 K, we find the peak wavelength: λmax = b / T = (2.898 × 10⁻³ m·K) / 6,445 K ≈ 4.496 × 10⁻⁷ m = 450 nm. This peak falls in the blue part of the visible spectrum, but because the Planck curve is broad, significant flux extends across all visible wavelengths, resulting in the yellow-white appearance rather than a purely blue one.
    λmax ≈ 450 nm (blue)
  5. 5

    Step 5 — Interpret the Result

    Even though λmax falls in the blue, the star appears yellow-white because human color perception integrates over the entire visible spectrum, not just the peak. The broad Planck curve ensures substantial flux from violet through red, and the eye's sensitivity function (peaking near 555 nm) further shapes the perceived color. This example illustrates why Wien's law alone doesn't tell you the perceived color — the full spectral shape and the eye's response function both matter.

SECTION 7

Strengths & Limitations of Color as a Temperature Indicator

Using a star's color or color index as a thermometer is remarkably powerful, but the technique has important caveats that any practicing astronomer must keep in mind. The following table contrasts the strengths and limitations of color-based temperature estimation.

StrengthsLimitations
Photometric color indices (B − V) can be measured quickly for millions of stars from ground-based or space-based surveys, making it a highly efficient technique.Interstellar dust preferentially scatters and absorbs blue light (interstellar reddening), making stars appear redder and cooler than they actually are. Corrections for reddening (E(B − V)) are essential.
The blackbody approximation works well for main-sequence stars, whose photospheres emit nearly continuous thermal spectra.Stars are not perfect blackbodies; absorption lines, line blanketing, and atmospheric opacity effects distort the continuum and can shift the effective color.
Multiple filter systems (UBVRI, ugriz) provide redundancy and allow cross-checks, improving temperature accuracy to within ±100–200 K for well-calibrated systems.Chemical composition (metallicity) affects spectral line density, altering the broadband flux distribution and introducing systematic biases in color–temperature calibrations.
Color indices are distance-independent because they are magnitude differences; the technique works at any distance where photometry is feasible.Unresolved binary systems can produce composite colors that do not correspond to the temperature of either individual star.

Color-Based Temperature Estimation — Strengths vs. Limitations

✦

KEY TAKEAWAY

Color-based temperature estimation is analogous to using an infrared thermometer in a dusty workshop: the basic physics (thermal emission → temperature) is rock-solid, but environmental contaminants (interstellar reddening, line blanketing) can throw off the reading unless you calibrate carefully. Just as an engineer corrects for the emissivity of a surface before trusting the IR gun, an astronomer must correct for reddening (using the known E(B − V) along the line of sight) before converting a color index to a reliable temperature.

SECTION 8

Connection to the Hertzsprung–Russell Diagram & Stellar Evolution

The color–temperature relationship is not merely a curiosity of thermal physics; it is the horizontal axis of the most important diagram in stellar astronomy, the Hertzsprung–Russell (H–R) diagram. By plotting luminosity (or absolute magnitude) against spectral type (or color index / effective temperature), astronomers map the full landscape of stellar properties. Stars on the main sequence form a diagonal band where hotter stars are also more luminous, a correlation that emerges from the mass–luminosity relation. When a star exhausts its core hydrogen and evolves off the main sequence, its surface temperature changes — a red giant has expanded and cooled, shifting it rightward on the H–R diagram, while a white dwarf is hot but tiny, placing it in the lower-left corner. In every case, the star's position in color/temperature space reflects its current evolutionary state.

ConceptThis Lesson (Introductory Level)Advanced Treatment
Spectral shapePlanck blackbody curve; single temperature T characterizes the spectrum.Model atmosphere codes (e.g., ATLAS, PHOENIX) compute synthetic spectra accounting for opacity, convection, non-LTE effects, and millions of spectral lines.
Temperature measureWien's law (peak wavelength) or empirical B − V calibration.Spectroscopic fitting of line profiles; Balmer-line fitting; infrared flux method; interferometric angular diameters combined with bolometric flux.
Color interpretationHotter = bluer peak; cooler = redder peak. Simple mapping from B − V to T.Bayesian multi-band photometric fitting with dust models, metallicity priors, and stellar isochrone interpolation (e.g., SED fitting in galaxy surveys).
Evolutionary contextMain-sequence color–temperature relation; static snapshot.Time-dependent stellar evolution tracks on the H–R diagram; color changes as function of age, mass, and metallicity.

From Basic Concepts to Advanced Stellar Physics

As you progress in stellar astrophysics, you will encounter model atmospheres that replace the idealized Planck function with detailed numerical simulations of radiative transfer through a star's atmosphere. These models predict not only the continuum shape but the full array of absorption lines, enabling spectral fitting that yields temperature, surface gravity, chemical abundances, and rotational velocities simultaneously. Nonetheless, the intuitive principle established here — that a star's color fundamentally encodes its surface temperature via thermal radiation physics — remains the conceptual anchor for all of these more sophisticated treatments.

SECTION 9

Practice Problems

Question 1: CONCEPTUAL

Two stars have identical chemical compositions, but Star A appears blue-white while Star B appears orange-red. Without any calculation, explain which star has the higher surface temperature and why, referencing the physics of blackbody radiation.
Show answer
Star A has the higher surface temperature. According to Wien's displacement law, the peak emission wavelength of a blackbody is inversely proportional to its temperature. A blue-white appearance means Star A's Planck curve peaks at a shorter wavelength (toward the blue/ultraviolet end), which requires a higher temperature. Star B's orange-red color indicates its peak lies at a longer wavelength (red/infrared), corresponding to a lower temperature. Since both stars have the same composition, the color difference cannot be attributed to chemical effects and must reflect a genuine temperature difference in their photospheres.

Question 2: BASIC CALCULATION

Use Wien's displacement law to calculate the peak emission wavelength of a star with a surface temperature of 12,000 K. In what part of the electromagnetic spectrum does this peak fall, and what color would the star appear to the naked eye?
Show answer
Applying λmax = b/T = (2.898 × 10⁻³ m·K) / 12,000 K = 2.415 × 10⁻⁷ m ≈ 242 nm. This peak falls in the ultraviolet, well below the visible range (380–700 nm). However, the star still emits copious visible light — it's just that the intensity curve is declining from its UV peak through the blue and green wavelengths. Because the short-wavelength (blue) end of the visible spectrum receives more flux than the long-wavelength (red) end, the star would appear blue-white to the naked eye, consistent with a B-type spectral classification.

Question 3: INTERMEDIATE

A photometric survey measures B − V = +1.40 for a distant red giant. (a) Estimate its effective temperature using the relation Teff ≈ 8540 / (B − V + 0.865). (b) If interstellar reddening along the line of sight contributes E(B − V) = 0.30, what is the star's intrinsic (dereddened) B − V, and what corrected temperature does this imply?
Show answer
(a) Teff = 8540 / (1.40 + 0.865) = 8540 / 2.265 ≈ 3,770 K. This places the star near the K/M boundary — quite cool. (b) The intrinsic color index is (B − V)₀ = (B − V)obs − E(B − V) = 1.40 − 0.30 = +1.10. The corrected temperature is Teff = 8540 / (1.10 + 0.865) = 8540 / 1.965 ≈ 4,346 K. The reddening correction raises the inferred temperature by nearly 600 K, shifting the classification from early M to mid-K type. This problem illustrates why interstellar reddening corrections are essential: ignoring dust would systematically underestimate stellar temperatures.

Question 4: APPLIED

Two main-sequence stars have surface temperatures T₁ = 20,000 K and T₂ = 5,000 K and identical radii. (a) Using the Stefan–Boltzmann law, compute the ratio of their luminosities L₁/L₂. (b) Using Wien's law, find λmax for each star. (c) Explain qualitatively why main-sequence stars don't actually have identical radii at these two temperatures, and in which direction the true luminosity ratio would shift.
Show answer
(a) Since L = 4πR²σT⁴ and the radii are equal, L₁/L₂ = (T₁/T₂)⁴ = (20,000/5,000)⁴ = 4⁴ = 256. The hotter star radiates 256 times more energy per unit area. (b) λmax,1 = 2.898 × 10⁻³ / 20,000 = 145 nm (far-UV); λmax,2 = 2.898 × 10⁻³ / 5,000 = 580 nm (yellow-green). (c) On the main sequence, hotter stars are also more massive and physically larger. A B-type star at 20,000 K typically has a radius 4–8 times that of a G-type star at 5,000 K, so the true luminosity ratio would be much larger than 256 — typically several thousand, because L ∝ R²T⁴ and both R and T are larger for the hotter star.

Question 5: CRITICAL THINKING

The Sun's effective temperature is ≈ 5,780 K, and Wien's law gives λmax ≈ 501 nm, which is in the green part of the spectrum. Yet nobody describes the Sun as 'green.' Construct a physical argument explaining why the Sun appears yellow-white rather than green, incorporating the concepts of blackbody curve breadth, human photoreceptor response, and atmospheric scattering.
Show answer
Three factors conspire to make the Sun appear yellow-white rather than green. First, the Planck function at 5,780 K is extremely broad across the visible band; unlike a laser, which emits at a single wavelength, the Sun emits substantially at every visible wavelength from 380–700 nm, with the curve varying only gently across this range. Second, human color perception is trichromatic: our red, green, and blue cone photoreceptors integrate over wide overlapping wavelength bands, and a roughly flat spectral power distribution across all three channels is perceived as white, not as the color of the peak wavelength. A truly 'green' star would need to emit overwhelmingly at ≈ 500–560 nm with minimal red or blue flux, which no blackbody curve does — the curve is simply too broad. Third, Rayleigh scattering in Earth's atmosphere preferentially removes short-wavelength (blue/violet) light from the Sun's direct beam, slightly depleting the blue end and tipping the perceived color from white toward pale yellow. In space, astronauts report the Sun as nearly white. The key conceptual lesson is that Wien's peak identifies the mathematical maximum of the Planck function, but perceived color is a psychophysical response to the entire spectrum — a distinction that underscores why full spectral analysis, not just λmax, is needed for a complete understanding of stellar appearance.

SUMMARY

Summary — Star Color & Temperature

Summary

A star's color is a direct observable consequence of its surface temperature, governed by the physics of blackbody radiation. The Planck function describes the full spectral energy distribution, while Wien's displacement law (λmax = b/T) quantifies the inverse relationship between peak wavelength and temperature: hotter stars emit most strongly at shorter (bluer) wavelengths, cooler stars at longer (redder) wavelengths. The Stefan–Boltzmann law (F = σT⁴) further shows that total radiated flux scales steeply with temperature. Together, these laws explain why O-type stars (T ≥ 30,000 K) appear blue and are extraordinarily luminous, while M-type stars (T ≈ 2,400–3,700 K) glow a dim red.

Observationally, astronomers quantify color through the B − V color index, which maps directly to effective temperature via empirical calibrations. The Harvard spectral classification (O-B-A-F-G-K-M) organizes stars by the temperature-dependent patterns of their absorption lines, with different elements and ionization states dominating at different temperatures. Key caveats include interstellar reddening (dust makes stars appear redder/cooler than they are) and the fact that perceived color integrates the entire spectrum through the eye's response function, so Wien's peak wavelength alone does not fully determine visual appearance. This color–temperature framework is the foundation of the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram and underpins all of stellar classification and evolution theory.

Varsity Tutors • Astronomy • Star Color & Temperature