AP English Language and Composition Quiz
20 questions · no time limit
0:00
RHETORICAL SITUATION: WRITING
Question 1 of 20
No time limit
Current
Answered
Flagged
Not seen
Read the following student-written argumentative passage and answer the question. My school is considering switching from traditional letter grades to standards-based grading (SBG), where students are assessed on specific skills and can reassess after additional learning. Some students think reassessments mean "infinite chances," but the point is not to avoid accountability; it is to align grades with what students actually know at the end of instruction. Letter grades often mix behavior with learning. A student who understands algebra may still earn a C because of late homework, while a student who completes every worksheet may earn an A without deep mastery. That system makes grades a measure of compliance. Standards-based grading separates academic skill from habits like timeliness, which can be reported differently without distorting mastery. SBG can also reduce the pressure to "play the points." When students focus on earning points, they may avoid challenging tasks that risk lowering their average. With skill-based targets, students can take academic risks and learn from mistakes. Reassessment is not a loophole; it is practice with feedback, which is how learning works in music, sports, and jobs. Of course, SBG requires clear rubrics and teacher training. Without consistency, students could feel confused. But confusion is not a reason to keep a flawed system; it is a reason to implement change carefully. In conclusion, standards-based grading is better than letter grades, and teachers should just explain it more so students aren't confused. Which revision to the bolded conclusion would best reinforce the author's purpose?
YOUR PROGRESS
20
QUESTIONS
Ready when you are
Answer in any order. Your progress shows here as you go.
QUESTIONS
KEYBOARD
Pick an answer ABCD
Next question ↵→
Previous ←
Flag for review F