Practice Test 2 - AP Comparative Government and Politics

19 questions. Answer them in any order, then submit to see your score and every explanation.

Start practice test

1. Read the passage. After 1945, many states concluded that preventing conflict required institutions that combined political legitimacy with practical coordination. The United Nations (UN) embodied this logic through collective security, peacekeeping, and a network of agencies addressing refugees, health, and food insecurity—conditions that can destabilize governments and economies. In 2023–2024, debates over humanitarian access and cease-fire language in the Security Council showed how permanent-member vetoes can limit unified responses, while peace operations remain dependent on host-state consent and sufficient financing. The European Union (EU), by contrast, grew from postwar economic cooperation into a supranational system with a single market and, for many members, a shared currency; it also links some funding to governance benchmarks, but Brexit underscored sovereignty concerns and the political costs of integration. The World Trade Organization (WTO) promotes trade liberalization and resolves disputes to reduce retaliatory tariff spirals, yet the weakening of its appellate process has reduced confidence in enforcement. The African Union (AU) seeks political stability and development through norms against unconstitutional power changes and through the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), though implementation is uneven and funding constraints persist. For both members and non-members, these organizations can shape policy choices through conditional assistance, sanctions, market access, and regulatory spillover, but they are frequently criticized for democratic deficits, unequal influence, and the gap between formal rules and actual compliance. Which of the following best describes the role of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in reducing trade conflict?​
2. Which of the following best explains a primary strategy used by the government of China to sustain its legitimacy in the face of slowing economic growth?
3. Based on the text, how does Sweden's belief in Equality shape its political culture? Sweden and Germany both emphasize political values like Equality, Order, and Freedom, yet they articulate Social Welfare differently within their political culture. In Sweden, Equality and solidarity underpin a universal welfare state, reinforcing political legitimacy and a participatory political culture. Citizens commonly view taxation as a reciprocal social contract, which strengthens trust and encourages voting, party membership, and consultation through corporatist channels. In Germany, Social Welfare also remains salient, but federalism and coalition government shape policy bargaining and interest-group mediation. This institutional context encourages participation through parties and organized associations, though debates often stress fiscal sustainability and contributory benefits. Across both cases, political socialization transmits expectations about state responsibility, and political efficacy influences whether citizens engage beyond elections. These values, embedded in democratic norms, shape political behavior by directing attention toward distributive policy and accountability.
4. In Nigeria, the development of a unifying nationalistic ideology has been most significantly hindered by the
5. A core difference in executive accountability between Nigeria's presidential system and the United Kingdom's parliamentary system is that
6. The vetting of candidates by the Guardian Council in Iran has what primary effect on political participation?
7. Which of the following best explains how the United Kingdom's aging population poses a significant challenge to its political system?
8. Which of the following accurately compares the management of the oil sector in Mexico and Nigeria?
9. The devolution of power in the United Kingdom has led to which of the following adaptations in social policy?
10. Read the text and answer the question. <h3>Authoritarian Participation: Referendums and State-Managed Organizations in Russia</h3> <h4>Participatory Mechanisms</h4> In Russia, participation can include elections and referendums, but the competitive environment may be limited by barriers to opposition organization and unequal access to public communication. State-managed organizations can provide structured opportunities for engagement, often emphasizing policy implementation feedback rather than leadership alternation. <h4>Political Culture and Participation</h4> Political culture can shape participation by affecting perceived efficacy and personal risk. Where citizens doubt that opposition activity will change outcomes, they may prioritize low-risk participation or disengage, even when formal procedures exist. <h4>Formal and Informal Methods</h4> - Formal methods: voting, referendums, participation in state-linked civic bodies. - Informal methods: independent advocacy, protests, online discourse. Informal methods may face monitoring, which can reduce large-scale mobilization and shift activism toward less visible behavior. <h4>Impact on Policy-Making and Governance</h4> Participation can influence governance by transmitting grievances and implementation problems, but policy responsiveness is often mediated by elite priorities and institutional filters rather than competitive electoral accountability. Based on the passage, how do informal participation methods impact governance in Russia?
11. Which of the following describes a key similarity in how the ruling political organizations in China and Iran manage political participation?
12. A key force shaping political participation in Mexico since 2000, which is largely absent in China, is the
13. While both Iran and Nigeria have significant religious cleavages, the political impact is different. Which of the following best explains this difference?
14. A change in executive power in Russia's semi-presidential system differs from a change in Mexico's presidential system in that
15. Which of the following describes an important political consequence of China's response to global market forces?
16. Passage (Economic Cleavages—United States and Brazil): In the United States, income and educational stratification aligns strongly with partisan sorting, with higher-income and college-educated voters disproportionately supporting Democrats in many metropolitan areas, while many lower-income and non-college voters support Republicans, especially in smaller towns and rural regions; scholars describe this as a multidimensional realignment shaped by race, education, and geography (Bartels, 2016; Hacker & Pierson, 2010). In Brazil, severe income inequality and a large informal sector coincide with programmatic and clientelistic linkages; left parties such as the Workers' Party (PT) historically emphasize redistribution and social assistance, while center-right coalitions often prioritize fiscal restraint and market-oriented reforms, and party attachments are frequently weaker and more volatile (Hunter & Power, 2019; Mainwaring, 2018). Across both countries, economic cleavages affect Political Culture by shaping perceptions of fairness, trust in institutions, and expectations of state responsibility; they also affect participation through turnout disparities and unequal campaign influence. Policy-making reflects these divides: U.S. polarization constrains bipartisan compromise on taxation and social welfare, whereas Brazil's coalition presidentialism can produce expansive social policy yet also bargaining costs that complicate fiscal consolidation, with consequences for Political Stability when economic downturns intensify distributional conflict (Hacker & Pierson, 2010; Hunter & Power, 2019; Mainwaring, 2018). Question: Based on the text, how do economic cleavages influence political culture in both countries?
17. Based on the passage: Executive term limits restrict how long a leader can hold office to prevent power consolidation and encourage leadership turnover. In the United States, the 22nd Amendment (ratified 1951) limits presidents to two elected terms. In Russia, the constitution long limited presidents to two consecutive terms, but a 2020 reform reset Vladimir Putin's previous terms, allowing him to seek additional terms. In China, the presidency had a two-term limit until it was removed in 2018, aligning with a system where the top leader's authority is centered in the Communist Party. Term limits can support democratic competition by lowering the risk of indefinite rule, yet they can also create "lame duck" periods that weaken accountability near a leader's final term. The United States provides a stability-oriented model by making the rule hard to change; Russia and China show how reforms can concentrate authority by extending or removing limits. Which country mentioned in the passage provides an example of term limit reform?
18. The term "rent-seeking behavior," often associated with rentier states, describes which of the following activities?
19. Read the passage and answer the question. Political legitimacy refers to the broadly shared belief that a government's authority is rightful and should be obeyed, even when citizens disagree with specific policies. It matters because legitimacy lowers the costs of governing: compliance becomes more voluntary, coercion becomes less necessary, and institutions can make binding decisions with fewer disruptions. In comparative politics, legitimacy is not a single source of "approval" but a composite of legal procedures, performance outcomes, and culturally grounded expectations. When legitimacy erodes, states often face chronic protest, elite defection, and even regime change. Procedural Sources in Established Democracies In established democracies, legitimacy is commonly anchored in procedures that are perceived as fair, transparent, and repeatable. Competitive elections, independent courts, and predictable rules for transferring power all signal that authority is earned rather than seized. These procedural assurances do not eliminate conflict, but they channel it into institutions that can adjudicate disputes. When citizens accept that "the process worked," losing parties are more likely to wait for the next election than to reject the system. United Kingdom: Elections and Accountability In the United Kingdom, legitimacy has historically been reinforced through parliamentary elections and the expectation that governments remain accountable to the legislature. Regular contests, strong party competition, and norms of loyal opposition help sustain acceptance of outcomes. Cultural traditions—such as respect for parliamentary sovereignty and long-standing administrative continuity—also shape perceptions that governance is stable and rule-bound. When these norms hold, policy disagreements do not necessarily translate into rejection of the regime's basic authority. Germany: Constitutionalism and Public Trust Germany illustrates how legitimacy can be sustained through constitutional design and postwar historical lessons emphasizing safeguards against arbitrary power. The Basic Law, federalism, and judicial review underscore that public authority is limited and legally constrained. Coalition governance can also encourage compromise, which may bolster trust by preventing abrupt policy swings. In this system, legitimacy is reinforced when citizens view institutions as both procedurally fair and capable of delivering predictable, lawful governance. Factors Shaping Legitimacy Across Systems Even in democracies, legitimacy is influenced by performance: economic stability, effective public services, and perceived competence can deepen trust in institutions. Cultural norms—such as expectations about compromise, respect for law, and civic participation—affect how citizens interpret political outcomes. Historical context matters as well: experiences with crisis or authoritarianism can heighten sensitivity to rule-of-law protections. Thus, legitimacy emerges from an interaction of procedures, outcomes, and collective memory. Consequences of Legitimacy Deficits When legitimacy weakens, governments may face declining compliance, polarization, and increased reliance on coercive tools that further damage trust. Persistent deficits can produce institutional deadlock, recurring street mobilization, or fragmentation within ruling coalitions. Over time, these pressures may culminate in leadership turnover through elections, constitutional crises, or broader regime transformation. In short, legitimacy is both a foundation for stable governance and a buffer against political shocks. According to the text, which example illustrates a successful strategy for maintaining legitimacy?

Practice tests