L'Hospital's Rule - AP Calculus AB
- A growth comparison uses . What is the value of the limit? Answer: This limit has the indeterminate form ∞/∞ as both ln(x) and √x approach infinity as x → ∞. Applying L'Hôpital's Rule gives (1/x)/(1/(2√x)) = 2√x/x = 2/√x. As x → ∞, this expression approaches 0 since the denominator grows without bound. A common mistake is to incorrectly differentiate √x as 1/√x instead of 1/(2√x), which would lead to the wrong answer. The key insight is that logarithmic functions grow much more slowly than any positive power of x, so ln(x)/ → 0 as x → ∞ for any p > 0.
- Compute . Answer: This limit is 0/0 indeterminate, so L'Hôpital's Rule applies. Differentiating gives ( - cos x)/(2x), still 0/0; a second differentiation yields ( + sin x)/2, evaluating to (1 + 0)/2 = 1/2. Taylor series confirms: ≈ 1 + x + x²/2, sin x ≈ x, so numerator ≈ x²/2, divided by x² gives 1/2. A common mistake is to differentiate incorrectly, perhaps forgetting the chain rule for . Another tempting error is assuming the limit is 0 by direct substitution without accounting for rates. A transferable strategy is to apply L'Hôpital's Rule until the form is determinate and cross-verify with series expansions for conceptual understanding.
- Find Answer: Lim as is 0/0, apply L'Hôpital twice. Derivatives lead to via scaling the standard limit by . A wrong move is forgetting the square, getting 9. The conceptual step uses . This generalizes trigonometric limits. A transferable strategy is leveraging known limits with substitutions for efficiency.
- Evaluate . Answer: The limit (ln(1+x) - x)/ as x→0 is 0/0, use L'Hôpital. Derivatives: 1/(1+x) - 1 / 2x, 0/0; second: -1/ / 2 = -1/2. One might incorrectly assume it's 0 from direct substitution. The step involves Taylor: ln(1+x) ≈ x - /2, yielding -1/2. This captures the quadratic term. A transferable strategy is applying L'Hôpital for logs and confirming with series for signs.
- A decay model requires . What is the limit? Answer: The expression ln(1 + 7x) - 7x approaches 0 as x approaches 0, creating a 0/0 indeterminate form. Applying L'Hôpital's Rule once gives (7/(1 + 7x) - 7)/(2x) = -49x/((1 + 7x)(2x)), which is still 0/0. Applying it again yields -49/(2(1 + 7x)) - 343x/(2(1 + 7x)²), which equals -49/2 when x = 0. A common error is forgetting that ln(1 + u) ≈ u - u²/2 for small u, which explains why the second-order term dominates. The strategy is to remember that when logarithms appear with their linear approximations subtracted, the limit often involves the coefficient squared divided by 2.
- Compute . Answer: Lim (ln(1+2x) - 2x)/ is 0/0, L'Hôpital twice gives -2. A mistake is positive sign assumption. Taylor: - ()/2 = -. The step captures negative quadratic. It evaluates correctly to -2. A transferable strategy is mindful of series signs in logs.
- Compute . Answer: 0/0; twice L'Hôpital gives 1/2. Taylor: -1 - sin x ≈ (sin x)²/2 / x² →1/2. Wrong: approximating e as 1+sin x only. Error: derivative mishap. Strategy: expand exponentials with inner series.
- To compare growth rates, evaluate using L'Hospital's Rule. Answer: As x approaches infinity, both and approach infinity, giving the indeterminate form . Applying L'Hôpital's Rule, we differentiate to get . As x approaches infinity, approaches 0, showing that logarithmic growth is slower than square root growth. A common mistake is to think that since both functions grow without bound, the limit doesn't exist or equals 1. The key insight is that L'Hôpital's Rule helps compare growth rates: when the limit is 0, the numerator grows more slowly than the denominator.
- Compute . Answer: As x approaches 0, it's 0/0, so L'Hôpital's Rule: derivative (2x/(1+x²))/(2x) = 1/(1+x²) → 1. Known limit ln(1+u)/u → 1 with u = x². A common mistake is direct substitution giving 0/0 without applying the rule. Another tempting error is confusing with other logs. A transferable strategy is substituting variables for composition limits.
- Compute . Answer: Evaluating lim (ln(1+3x) - 3x)/ as x→0 gives 0/0, requiring L'Hôpital's Rule. Derivatives are 3/(1+3x) - 3 over 2x, still 0/0; second derivatives yield -9/ over 2, which is -9/2 at x=0. One might wrongly plug in after the first step, thinking it's resolved. The key is recognizing the need for two applications due to the quadratic behavior. Taylor series for ln(1+3x) confirms the -9/2 limit. A transferable strategy is to use L'Hôpital's Rule for logarithmic indeterminates, applying it multiple times and cross-checking with series expansions.
- Find . Answer: An indeterminate 0/0 form arises, so apply L'Hôpital's Rule. First derivative: (cos x - - x )/ (2x), still 0/0; second: (-sin x - - - x )/2 = (-sin x - - x )/2, evaluating to (-0 - 2 - 0)/2 = -1. Taylor series: sin x ≈ x - x³/6, x ≈ x + x² + (x³)/2, so numerator ≈ -x² - (2/3)x³, divided by x² gives -1 + higher terms → -1. A common mistake is incorrect expansion of terms. Another tempting error is direct substitution leading to 0. A transferable strategy is combining L'Hôpital's Rule with series for products like x in numerators.
- Evaluate . Answer: ; twice L'Hôpital: derivative , adjust; better identity approx, u=, gives . Mistake: using . Error: insufficient applications. Strategy: use trig identities before rule.
- A log-growth index is . What is the limit? Answer: This limit has the indeterminate form ∞/∞ as both ln(x) and approach infinity as x → ∞. Applying L'Hôpital's Rule gives (1/x)/((1/3)) = /x = = = 3/. As x → ∞, this expression approaches 0 since the denominator grows without bound. A common mistake is incorrectly differentiating , forgetting to apply the power rule properly. The general principle is that ln(x) grows more slowly than any positive power of x, no matter how small that power is.
- Evaluate . Answer: The limit is , L'Hôpital twice or standard form gives . Temptingly, ignoring coefficient yields . The step scales by . This uses trig identity. Verification is . A transferable strategy is coefficient adjustment in limits.
- Find . Answer: form; L'Hôpital: . Or , , adjusted. Mistake: thinking it's . Another: substitution error. Strategy: variable substitution for inner functions.
- Evaluate . Answer: Lim ( - 1 - x)/ as x→0 is 0/0, L'Hôpital twice yields 1/2. A temptation is confusing with first-order approximation. The correct step uses Taylor: /2 term. This highlights second-order expansion. Verification matches 1/2. A transferable strategy is systematic Taylor use for exponentials.
- As , a response factor is . What is the limit? Answer: This limit presents the indeterminate form 0/0 as both - 1 - x and x² approach 0 when x → 0. Applying L'Hôpital's Rule once gives ( - 1)/(2x), which is still 0/0. Applying it again yields /2, which evaluates to 1/2 as x → 0. Students often forget to differentiate the -x term in the first application, leading to errors. This result can also be verified using the Taylor expansion = 1 + x + x²/2 + ..., which shows that - 1 - x = x²/2 + higher order terms, confirming the limit is 1/2.
- For , the efficiency model is . What is the limit? Answer: This limit presents the indeterminate form 0/0 as both - 1 - 2x and x² approach 0 when x → 0. Applying L'Hôpital's Rule once gives ( - 2)/(2x), which simplifies to ( - 1)/x, still 0/0. Applying L'Hôpital's Rule again yields /1 = , which evaluates to 2 as x → 0. Students often make the error of forgetting to differentiate the constant term -2x in the numerator, leading to incorrect results. For exponential expressions of the form - 1 - ax, the limit as x → 0 of the expression divided by x² is always a²/2.
- Find . Answer: The limit is , L'Hôpital twice gives . Wrongly adding terms positively. Taylor: . The step notes opposing series. It evaluates to . A transferable strategy is combining different function series.
- For a long-term prediction, find using L'Hospital's Rule. Answer: This limit has the indeterminate form ∞/∞ as both the numerator and denominator approach infinity. Applying L'Hôpital's Rule once gives , still ∞/∞. Applying it again yields , which approaches 0 as x approaches infinity. A third application would give = 0, confirming the result. The key insight is that exponential functions grow faster than any polynomial, so eventually dominates any polynomial in the numerator. The transferable strategy is that when comparing polynomial and exponential growth, the exponential always wins, making such limits equal to 0.